logo
Ontario tourism association's Andrew Siegwart on U.S.-Canada travel

Ontario tourism association's Andrew Siegwart on U.S.-Canada travel

Travel Weekly23-06-2025
Tensions between the U.S. and Canada have been high due to President Trump's talk of making Canada the 51st state and his threats of levying heavy tariffs. Tours and river cruises editor Brinley Hineman spoke with Andrew Siegwart, CEO of the Tourism Industry Association of Ontario, about the impact on travel between the two countries and how Ontario is sending a message of welcome to the U.S.
Andrew Siegwart
Q: Has there been a decline in Americans visiting Ontario?
A: A recent pulse survey of our members across Ontario at the beginning of May found that 24% of operators experienced reduced U.S. visitation year to date compared to 2024, and 32% noted less U.S. bookings for summer 2025 compared to summer 2024. The primary markets are Northeast drive and fly markets within the U.S. It's too early to share comparisons year over year, but our data points suggest less activity. It's important to note that last year, U.S. spending in Ontario grew by almost 15% compared to 2023; U.S. spending equals about 20% of overall tourism spending in Ontario.
Q: How is Ontario promoting itself to Americans?
A: There are more than a dozen campaigns in the market right now from Ontario to the U.S. The focus is: You are welcome, we are "arms open," border access is seamless into Ontario. The campaigns also focus on calling upon friends and family in the U.S. to visit, the exchange rate and the experiences that make Ontario special: nature, diversity, iconic experiences, proximity, etc. If you think of northwestern Ontario as an example, all of that great natural outdoor adventure, it's such a draw for U.S. visitors.
Related story: Brand USA's 'America the Beautiful' campaign aims to rekindle inbound travel
Q: Do travelers have concerns about potential issues crossing the U.S.-Canada border?
A: Our survey noted that U.S. customers are asking operators if it's OK to visit. They note concerns about being welcomed, and they also noted some concerns about delays or challenges returning home across the border.
Q: What about Canadians and their travel plans?
A: The recent Destination Ontario results show that Canadians and Ontarians have a real interest in traveling closer to home, but they're still looking at international markets and still considering U.S. visits. My interpretation of that is consumers are just waiting to make those bookings and to finalize those plans. I think we'll be waiting to see how things transpire between Canada and the U.S. and the upcoming negotiations.
Q: Are you seeing a desire for Canadians to travel domestically and support their own country's tourism?
A: Absolutely, yeah. When you go to a grocery store right now and just take a look at people shopping, you can see the degree to which people are looking at labels and assessing where products are from. So if they're doing it on the lettuce they buy, they're certainly going to do it on the trip that they plan. Over 80% of Ontarians are looking to travel closer to home.
Q: What are some ripple effects of the drop in tourism between the U.S. and Canada?
A: There's another aspect of tourism, which is business travel and conventions. Some of our larger players in that space in Ontario have definitely observed that U.S. conference business is slowing down a bit based on that concern about coming back across the border. But on the flip side, European and other international conventions are now looking to Canada as a safer place than the U.S. to hold the convention and where North America can still be on the map. Part of what we're doing is making sure that we're marketing those capabilities as well. As one thing shifts, another opportunity emerges.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump eyes U.S. government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds: Reuters
Trump eyes U.S. government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds: Reuters

CNBC

time8 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump eyes U.S. government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds: Reuters

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that receive CHIPS Act funding to build factories in the country, two sources said. Expanding on a plan to receive an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants, a White House official and a person familiar with the situation said Lutnick is exploring how the U.S. can receive equity stakes in exchange for CHIPS Act funding for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung. Much of the funding has not yet been dispersed. Aside from Intel, memory chipmaker Micron is the biggest U.S. recipient of CHIPS Act cash. TSMC declined comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10% government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters. While Lutnick said earlier on CNBC that the U.S. does not want to tell Intel how to run its operations, any investment would be unprecedented and ramps up a new era of U.S. influence on the big companies. In the past, the U.S. has taken stakes in companies to provide cash and build confidence in times of economic upheaval and uncertainty. In a similar move earlier this year, Trump approved Nippon Steel's purchase of U.S. Steel after being promised a "golden share" that would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying promised investments, transferring production or jobs outside the U.S., or closing or idling plants before certain time frames, without the president's consent. The two sources said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act. The act provides funding for research and grants for building chip plants in the U.S. Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea. The U.S. Commerce Department late last year finalized subsidies of $4.75 billion for Samsung, $6.2 billion for Micron and $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the U.S. In June, Lutnick said the department was re-negotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, calling them "overly generous". He noted at the time that Micron offered to increase its spending on chip plants in the U.S.

White House joins TikTok after delaying enforcement of sale-or-ban law
White House joins TikTok after delaying enforcement of sale-or-ban law

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

White House joins TikTok after delaying enforcement of sale-or-ban law

The White House launched a TikTok account on Tuesday amid uncertainty about the app's future, as another deadline approaches for its parent company, Bytedance, to sell to a US buyer or be banned in the United States. President Donald Trump has repeatedly extended the deadline of a sale-or-ban law passed under former President Joe Biden's administration, with the new deadline less than a month away on September 17. The latest delay in June kept the app accessible for its 170 million American users, despite the legislation that passed last year with bipartisan support over concerns that TikTok's Chinese ownership poses a US national security risk. And it came as both the United States and China sought leverage in tense trade talks. TikTok's ultimate fate in the US remains unclear, but the official White House account is a signal the app could be here to stay. The first post on the official White House TikTok account features video of Trump as he says, 'Every day, I wake up determined to deliver a better life for the people all across this nation. I am your voice.' The post's caption reads, 'America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?' As of 8 p.m. on Tuesday, shortly after launching, the account had garnered more than 20,000 followers. This is the administration's first official TikTok account. Both Trump and Biden launched accounts during the 2024 presidential campaign, drawing scrutiny as the leaders had previously raised national security concerns with the app. TikTok doesn't operate in China, but the Chinese government enjoys significant leverage over businesses under its jurisdiction. The US government has said it's worried China could use its national security laws to access the significant amount of personal information that TikTok, like most social media applications, collects from its US users. The TikTok sale-or-ban law went into effect on January 19 after Biden signed it last year. TikTok briefly took itself offline, sparking outcry from creators, but quickly came back after Trump signed an order delaying the ban's enforcement by 75 days in one of the first acts of his second term. The president's June delay marked his third extension of the ban.

SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel
SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel

Intel (INTC) rose roughly 7% on Tuesday, a day after SoftBank Group announced it would take a $2 billion stake in the struggling chipmaker. News of SoftBank's investment follows a Bloomberg report last week that said the Trump administration is considering taking up to a 10% position in the company. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed in a CNBC interview Tuesday that the investment would involve the US government converting Intel's grants from the Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act — worth $10.9 billion — into an equity stake aimed at stabilizing the company's US manufacturing business. Bessent did not confirm the size of the stake the government would take. Intel has fallen behind in an industry it once dominated. Its manufacturing division is bleeding cash, just as its legacy computer chip segment forfeits market share to rivals Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Qualcomm (QCOM) in the PC space. Intel is also woefully behind AMD and Nvidia (NVDA) in the AI race. The company's market capitalization of $111 billion is less than half of its value in 2021. And CEO Lip-Bu Tan has been forced to lay off 15% of the company's workforce and shelve plans to build plants in Europe. But the troubled chipmaker is the only large-scale US-based leading-edge chip manufacturer, giving it geopolitical significance as the nation looks to reshore semiconductor production. Intel's problems, however, may be too big for either SoftBank or the Trump administration to solve on their own. Intel in need of direction Deutsche Bank analyst Ross Seymore said news of the US potentially taking a stake in Intel, combined with the SoftBank investment, shows that "[Tan] is taking bold actions to solidify Intel's financial and strategic positioning during its ongoing difficult transformation process." Tan became CEO in March after Intel's board ousted former CEO Pat Gelsinger late last year. But others on Wall Street expressed skepticism that those investments would be enough to save Intel from its decline, which resulted from years of missteps. Loop Capital analyst Gary Mobley wrote in a recent note to clients that the support from SoftBank and, potentially, the US government may be "akin to a lifeline with no secure anchor at the other end," because while Intel may be "finding new buyers of its primary equity capital," that may not guarantee it can find customers for its manufacturing business. Gelsinger established Intel's third-party chip manufacturing business, otherwise known as its Foundry, in 2021 as a means of competing with rival TSMC, which produces chips for companies including Nvidia, Apple (AAPL), AMD, and others. But so far, its Foundry business has been a disappointment, struggling to secure customers. While Intel has said it reached agreements to build chips for Amazon (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT), the company is still its own largest manufacturing client. Intel's plan includes building chips based on newer technologies, including its 18A and upcoming 14A node design processes, part of Gelsinger's plan for five process nodes in four years. But 18A, which was initially supposed to roll out in the first half of 2025, is now slated to debut in 2026. Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon was similarly critical of Intel's cash infusion in his own investor note, writing, "We do not believe that Intel's capability gap has anything to do with money." Rasgon also questioned whether the US taking a stake in Intel would be enough to complete the company's domestic manufacturing expansions. "Intel was originally supposed to get these CHIPS Act funds for free; giving up 10% of the company for them seems worse," he wrote in a note to clients. "And if the goal is to help Intel build substantial US capacity, $10.9B really isn't enough." Moor Insights and Strategy founder and chief analyst Patrick Moorhead told Yahoo Finance that while SoftBank's $2 billion investment and the prospect of a potential US stake are good things, the company would require as much as $40 billion to build out its next-generation 14A technology. Still, getting the US government involved, at least in the short term, could prove to be a boon for the company. "My short-term answer is that the US government is a kingmaker, and they just made Intel the king, and they are going to wrap policy around that to make Intel foundry successful," Moorhead said. If the government sticks with Intel for the long haul, though, Moorhead said it could further complicate the company's development problems, leading to a lack of innovation, inefficiencies, and growing costs. "My hope is that Intel gets back on its feet, it turns itself into a reputable, leading-edge foundry, and the government sells the stake," he said. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store