logo
Plans to close two Co Tipperary courthouses labelled ‘short-sighted'

Plans to close two Co Tipperary courthouses labelled ‘short-sighted'

District Judge Brian O'Shea, assigned to District 21 covering east Cork, south Tipperary and west Waterford, wrote to the head of Circuit and District Court operations in March indicating that he is transferring District Court sittings from Youghal to Dungarvan and from Cashel and Carrick-on-Suir to Clonmel.
The directions for the transfer were issued pursuant to Section 27 (3) of the Courts of Justice Act and Order 2, Rule 1 (2) of the District Court Rules with effect from November 1 next.
Additionally, with effect from June 1 there will be an extra sitting in District 21 on the second Friday of each month where cases from Youghal will be heard in Dungarvan.
It is planned that this additional sitting will be for Child and Family Agency matters. Details of these changes among others, which are set out in Statutory Instrument Number 77 of 2025, can be found on the Courts Service website.
'The Courts Service has now commenced engaging with the various stakeholders such as legal practitioners, gardaí, state solicitors, the Probation Service, the Irish Prison Service, local family law user representative groups, unions representing court staff and others, to explore any possible impacts and unintended consequences of the proposed transfers,' said a courts spokesperson.
'Upon completion of this work the Courts Service will report on its findings to the relevant District Judge and make operational plans accordingly. The Courts Service has no record of having received communications about this matter from Cork County Council, but of course will engage with them, as with others with an interest in this matter.'
Cathaoirleach of Tipperary County Council Declan Burgess said he is 'deeply shocked' and 'disappointed' by recent reports indicating the planned closure of Cashel Courthouse this autumn.
'I am firmly opposed to the removal of services from this facility and their relocation to Clonmel,' he said. "This decision is a serious mistake. It represents a short-sighted move to centralise services without considering the negative impact on Cashel and its surrounding communities.
"I have urgently contacted the Court Services and have also made formal representations to the Minister for Justice, Jim O'Callaghan. Rather than closing the courthouse, a small investment – such as upgrading the public toilet facilities – would be far more constructive and cost-effective.
'I totally oppose this approach and will do my best to ensure we keep our historic courthouse open and operational for the people it serves,' added Cllr Burgess.
ADVERTISEMENT
Learn more
It's understood Judge O'Shea has taken the decision after four years of consideration of the condition of the court buildings. In his submission he said that Carrick-on-Suir courthouse lacks a public toilet, is cold and damp, attracting mould and vermin, while a stairway is rotting due to a leak.
Cashel Courthouse's toilets were described 'disgustingly unhygienic' in Judge O'Shea's submission, while the building is small and cramped, meaning people have to wait outside on family law days. Youghal Courthouse is also cold and not fit for purpose, resulting in solicitors having to wear jackets and coats indoors.
Judge O'Shea has said he believes that any inconvenience is compensated for by the benefits of attending a court in warm conditions with proper facilities, with improved security.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeal Court overturns requirement for councils to get members' consent before defending legal actions
Appeal Court overturns requirement for councils to get members' consent before defending legal actions

Irish Times

time5 days ago

  • Irish Times

Appeal Court overturns requirement for councils to get members' consent before defending legal actions

Local authorities do not have to seek the approval of councillors before deciding to enter a defence to a court challenge to council decisions, the Court of Appeal has held. The three-judge court's decision overturns a High Court ruling from June last year that found councils must take the 'positive step' of securing express authorisation from elected members before defending a case. The question of whether authorisation from councillors is required has been raised in several High Court challenges related to decisions of elected members, such as votes on local development plans. Every local authority must have a development plan, a document with maps that guides how certain areas should be zoned and developed. READ MORE It is used to guide planning decisions in those areas, but is sometimes the subject of litigation by interested parties who could be affected by any changes. In this case, developer Oceanscape Unlimited Company brought a legal challenge over the Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council development plan and the decision to rezone its lands at Stillorgan Business Park for educational facilities. Oceanscape contended the rezoning amounted to a 'sterilisation' of its site and would cause the company 'serious and irreparable' harm as well as costing it millions of euro. The council filed legal documents opposing the developer's claim, but Oceanscape argued the local authority had no power to do this as it had not sought prior authorisation from elected members, which it argued was required under the Local Government Act, 2001. It asked the court to strike out the council's opposition statement on these grounds. Section 153(2) of the Act states that where a legal action relates to the performance of functions reserved to the elected members, the chief executive 'shall' act with the 'express authorisation of the elected council'. It provides that such authorisation 'shall be deemed to have been given unless or until the contrary is shown'. The council asked the court to interpret the section which, it said, relies on an assumption that the chief executive has a 'deemed authorisation' that is lost only where elected members actively direct him not to do something in a case. It said no formal resolution was passed by elected members, but they were aware of the proceedings and were formally briefed on them in March 2023. The High Court had ruled in Oceanscape's favour, finding the required authorisation was not secured in this case. Soon afterwards, the High Court introduced new practice rules requiring local authorities to inform the court early on whether councillors had given express authorisation to defend a challenge to their decision. However, the Court of Appeal has now overturned the High Court decision and has ruled in favour of the council in a recently published judgment. Explaining the appeal judges' rationale, Ms Justice Nuala Butler said entering into litigation was an 'executive function' and could be taken by the chief executive without requiring a vote of elected councillors. 'In these circumstances, the appeal taken by the local authority will be allowed and the order striking out its statement of opposition will be set aside,' she said.

Letters to the Editor, August 8th: On questions on Gaza, prescribing opioids,  and big cars
Letters to the Editor, August 8th: On questions on Gaza, prescribing opioids,  and big cars

Irish Times

time08-08-2025

  • Irish Times

Letters to the Editor, August 8th: On questions on Gaza, prescribing opioids, and big cars

Sir, – The world will eventually get into Gaza, and establish that the 61,000 reported killed so far by Gaza's health ministry is only a fraction of the dead. Many more lie under the rubble, or were not able to be brought to hospital to be counted. The following questions will then demand answers. Why did the United Nations (UN) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) allow a full famine to develop after four months of Israel blocking food, medicine and fuel to Gaza, when they could have forced the aid through under Article 7 of the UN charter? Why did the world not stop Israel's war crimes when the first hospital was shelled, instead allowing all 36 hospitals to be repeatedly bombed? Why did the world's media accept a ban on their journalists reporting inside Gaza, and why did RTÉ continually refer to the Hamas-controlled health ministry, long after CNN and Channel 4 dropped this nomenclature? READ MORE Why did Western governments, including Ireland, drag their feet on sanctioning Israel, despite consistent mass protests throughout the world? Why were many decent people silenced in the face of clear Israeli barbarity against children and families in Gaza, by the fear that criticising Israel might make them appear anti-Semitic? (A charge refuted by the many Jewish critics of Israel). Why were US warplanes refuelled at Shannon airport despite vocal criticism by Ireland of the 'war' they were enabling and supporting? Why did the Irish Central Bank take on the facilitation of Israeli war bonds in the EU, thus providing at least ¤418 million funding of Israel's war economy? Why did the world stand by for 21 months, wringing its hands and looking pained, while the war crimes of bombing civilians, starving civilians, and forced population transfers took place before our eyes? A genocide in plain sight. – Yours, etc, BETTY PURCELL, Former commissioner, Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, Dublin 6W. Sir, – I object , as a taxpayer, that the staff of the Central Bank, whose salaries are paid for by the Irish exchequer, are being indirectly deployed to finance the Israeli government's genocidal war against the Palestinian people through the sale of Israeli war bonds (' Lobby other EU countries to allow Irish Central Bank to drop Israeli war bonds, TDs recommend ,' August 6th). According to Central Bank governor Gabriel Makhlouf, Ireland has no power to unilaterally remove itself from this role and that any decision to change this situation would be made by Israel. Who is in charge in the Central Bank, Mr Makhlouf representing the Irish taxpayer, or Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu? – Yours, etc, BRENDAN BUTLER, Drumcondra, Dublin 9. Prescribing opioids Sir, –Your article on increased opioid prescribing in Ireland highlights a genuine concern (' Doctors increasingly prescribing highly addictive opioids, ' August 7th). However, the study it references adjusted only for age and sex; it did not control for clinical indication, comorbidities, or access to non-drug treatments such as physiotherapy or timely surgery. The findings are based solely on the General Medical Services population, which is older and more socioeconomically disadvantaged. An increase in prescriptions within this group may reflect unmet need rather than inappropriate use. We must be cautious not to conflate prescribing volume with prescribing harm. Simplistic interpretations risk stigmatising both patients with complex pain and the doctors doing their best in a constrained system. The real challenge is improving access to safe, evidence-based alternatives – not simply tightening prescribing. – Yours, etc, Dr JOSEPH BROWNE, Consultant Physician, and Geriatrician, Castleknock, Dublin 15. Benefits of breastfeeding Sir, – I refer to ' Parents of children with Down syndrome: it teaches you to be a better person ' (August 5th). Congratulations and fair play to the mother referred to in the report who persisted in her efforts to breastfeed her baby who has Down syndrome despite being told 'that Down syndrome babies probably don't breastfeed'. It is very disappointing that this outdated attitude still persists, especially if it is coming from the medical profession. Of course babies with Down syndrome breastfeed. I can verify this from my own and many other mothers' experiences. What makes the difference for many is the right support and information at the right time. The health and other benefits of breastfeeding for any baby – but particularly for a baby with additional needs – cannot be emphasised enough. Therefore, all mothers who wish to breastfeed their babies who have Down syndrome should be given all the encouragement and support to do so, particularly while they are in hospital. – Yours, etc, MARGARET CARROLL. Portobello, Dublin 8. Too much information Sir, – To the letter writer (Letters, August 6th) whose Tesco spinach was recalled due to possible Listeria, and is now 'overthinking every bowel movement', I'm sorry but one expects a certain decorum on the Letters page and that is simply, to use the modern parlance, TMI. –Yours, etc, BRIAN AHERN, Clonsilla, Dublin 15. Women and men Sir, – Pamela McDonald (Letters, August 6th) says that she is 'struck by the absence of a male outcry against abhorrent male violence'. I am proud to be part of a male swimming group, The Gollymocky Whalers, who, in February 2024, raised €48,500 for Women's Aid in our annual Freezbrury swim challenge. We chose Women's Aid as our charity precisely because we are males. An outcry can come in many forms. – Yours, etc, JONATHAN WHITE, Killiney, Co Dublin. Sir, – Pamela McDonald (Letters, August 6th) is struck by the lack of a male outcry against abhorrent male violence. In her next breath, she quotes Germaine Greer saying that 'women have very little idea of how much men hate them'. She then finishes by challenging men to prove her wrong. To be honest, having given this some thought, all I can think is that this is offensive nonsense. –Yours, etc, BRIAN CULLEN, Rathfarnham, Dublin. Taxing rental income Sir, – In his letter (August 6th), Emmet McCrann expresses surprise at Lorcan Sirr's surprise that small landlords earn so much from their rental. He goes on to say: 'As an actuary who has worked with statistics for decades, it always surprises me to see experts quote statistics and then imply tangential conclusions.' Indeed. His own conclusion is: 'With income tax of 40 per cent, USC of 8 per cent and PRSI of 4 per cent all applying, the small landlord is left with 48per cent of the rent . . . etc'. He then itemises further deductions, such as management fees and repairs, that reduce income even more. Could these be 'tangential conclusions?' He may be further surprised to learn that taxes are not levied on the gross rental income, but on net income after such legitimate costs are deducted. – Yours, etc, JIM HOLOHAN, Stranorlar, Co Donegal. Population and the environment Sir, – In the course of a meandering Opinion piece on world population and future demographics, it is unclear what point former Green Party leader Eamon Ryan is making (' It's about to get much harder to blame population growth for the climate crisis ,' August 6th). Surely it is obvious that the current world population of over eight billion is putting massive strain on the natural world and an increase to a peak of 10 billion will hardly help matters? The Industrial Revolution and rapid population growth from 1900 onwards has contributed to climate change and a tipping point into the age of mass extinction in the natural world, all at the hands of mankind. At this point I do not see technology and a falling birthrate pulling us back from the brink in an increasingly authoritarian multi-polar world. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL FLYNN, Dublin 13. Build the MetroLink Sir, – I would like to express my frustration over a series of myopic and parochial articles regarding the proposed MetroLink rail service. It's as if nobody in Ireland has ever been outside the country. It makes Irish people look stupid and maybe they are too infantile to understand the value of good public infrastructure. Anyone who has used the Elizabeth Line to Heathrow, gone from central Tokyo to Narita, or has been to Hong Kong will tell you that you simply can't beat the rail service to the airport. Self-driving cars will get stuck in self-driving traffic jams trains regardless of weather. Please stop this insane and ridiculous hand-wringing and moaning about building a piece of infrastructure that would barely get any notice in most countries. The Chinese would have built this in 18 months and ditto for any major European or Asian country. Just tender the contract to any large European or Asian infrastructure provider, CPO the necessary property and set up a special purpose vehicle to facilitate all legal eventualities and start the work. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL COFFEY, New Jersey, US. Sir, – Instead of encouraging cars or private transport of any kind, or discouraging future MetroLink plans, we should be trying to increase frequency, improve and extend public transport. The Dart and Luas are both very successful, Dart's daily ridership has grown to around 90,000 passengers, Luas, approximately 140,000. And that's probably not counting free travellers! We now need to extend both and proceed to build the metro in both Dublin and Cork. A fixed charge could be paid to use public transport up to a given number of journeys, the charge pro-rated upwards, depending on the number of journeys made. This would simplify the collection of fares and reduce the cost. In the interests of the economy, the environment, our health, and the future of the planet, public transport must be encouraged by all. –Yours, etc, SHEILA DEEGAN, Dublin 3. A suggestion on big cars Sir, – I refer to Ultan Ó Broin's letter (August 7th) regarding the seemingly insatiable lust of Irish drivers for tank-like cars which occupy far too much space on roads and in car parks never designed for these monstrous vehicles. I would propose an educational approach accompanied, as in Paris, by extra charges for these jumbos to compensate for their unnecessary weight and size and environmental impact. These vehicles are not safer, certainly not if they hit a human. Posters showing a child standing in front of one of these behemoths should be displayed everywhere, it is genuinely blood chilling to see. – Yours, etc. JOANNA MULVEY, Greystones, Co Wicklow. The Lions share Sir, – I have enjoyed reading Barry Sheehan's articles and this last one today, his final take on Sydney and the team's 'effort, commitment and bravery', really struck a chord with me, as a parent of young men, how important trust and camaraderie among a group of friends can make all the difference in one's life. We always want the best for our children, no matter what road they are on. Well done to Barry, and to the Lions squad. You have done us all proud. – Yours, etc, VICTORIA MADIGAN, Terenure, Dublin 6. Figuring out Trump Sir, – The current president of the United States has sacked the head of that country's bureau of employment statistics, Erika McEntarfer. Cause? It was alleged she was massaging those very statistics to make the president's record in this area look bad. Wait a minute. Six or so months ago did not the same president employ a close associate to head up a new government efficiency department? That head of Doge(Elon Musk), now unemployed from government himself, did 'real good' according to the template. Hundreds of thousands of civil servants lost their jobs. So, was the statistics head not merely reporting great success in the job filleting endeavour? Am I missing something? – Yours, etc, MARY FINN, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14. Illegal dumping Sir, – Is it any wonder illegal dumping is so prevalent in this country? If caught the individual faces a €150 fine. This is cheaper than using a refuse company or a legal dump (if used throughout the year). Illegal dumpers will not be put off by a few CCTV cameras, they will just dump their rubbish somewhere else. The fine is too small and enforcement rates too low and this is why illegal dumping is an option many will continue to take. – Yours, etc, SIOBHÁN McDERMOTT, Killester, Dublin 5. Seeing red Sir, – As one who, as a child, remembers notices outside Garda stations offering the public £5 for a dead fox and also hearing despairing tales of overnight slaughter in back yard chicken coops, I too think that foxes are beautiful creatures (Letters, August 7th). At dusk on recent nights I have watched three delightful red cubs frolic and play together at dusk at the fence behind my house, as they gobble up the dog food I leave out for them. Who needs television with such alternative entertainment? – Yours, etc, MARION WALSH, Donnybrook, Dublin 4.

Refurbishment works at Wicklow courthouse subject to national funding
Refurbishment works at Wicklow courthouse subject to national funding

Irish Independent

time07-08-2025

  • Irish Independent

Refurbishment works at Wicklow courthouse subject to national funding

The former courthouse has been closed due to health and safety concerns since September 2010. Since then, Bray has served as the main court venue for County Wicklow. The Office of Public Works (OPW) has provided the Courts Service with costings and options for the full restoration of Wicklow Courthouse, ranging in price from around €13 million to €17 million. The Courts Service has also advised Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan that Wicklow Courthouse was included in its submission for the NDP. This means that further progress in relation to the building and timeline for its complete refurbishment will depend on funding allocated under the revised plan. Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers completed a review of the plan in July 2025, however there was little detail on what specific projects will receive funding. In the meantime, the OPW has recently undertaken some works to preserve the roof of the building to address the dry rot which has spread to the adjoining buildings. The Courts Service has further advised that, while open to making the courthouse available for community usage, it is not currently able to do so for health and safety reasons. Despite that, officials from the Court Service have liaised with Wicklow County Council and made the adjoining former Library building available to the council, which has been used as a Ukrainian hub since 2022. In addition, the Courts Service are open to engaging with all interested parties on how the building can be used in the future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store