
Michigan led on safe water after Flint, but mobile home parks are stubborn rough spot
But the state has a blind spot when it comes to the hundreds of thousands of people who live in its mobile home parks.
Regulators say they have little power to enforce the rules in the state's estimated 100 or more unlicensed parks when owners fail to provide safe water. The problem is compounded by private equity firms that have been buying up parks over the past two decades and now control about 1 in every 6 parks in Michigan — among the highest rates in the country, according to the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, a group that advocates against such purchases.
Officials say it can be a struggle to even contact those park owners, let alone get them to comply with regulations.
'With private equity moving into this space, the goal these companies seem to have is to return the absolute highest return they can to investors even if that means providing inadequate service or engaging in exploitative practices, or unsafe practices for the residents,' said state Sen. John Cherry, a Democrat who sponsored legislation to strengthen enforcement in the communities.
But the state doesn't attempt to track unlicensed parks. And an industry spokesperson said Michigan officials — particularly law enforcement — have the power to do more if they choose.
At North Morris Estates where Theo Gantos lives outside Flint, conditions got so bad that the state refused to renew the park's license to operate.
Water often flowed weakly from the tap because the wells that service the park didn't produce enough, Gantos said. Sometimes the water was discolored. It could stain laundry and destroy appliances. He installed a multistage filter system just to be able to use it.
Eventually, local law enforcement investigated. In March, the owner pleaded guilty to a criminal charge for operating without a license, agreeing to pay a fine and sell the park.
That might not have happened if Gantos had not been so pugnacious. He spent years battling Homes of America, an affiliate of private equity group Alden Global Capital that local prosecutors said owns North Morris. That included filing a public records request for emails on officials' handling of problems at his park, pushing regulators to enforce rules and speaking out to media over what he calls blight conditions.
'These guys, they don't care,' Gantos said about complying with the rules.
Representatives of North Morris and Homes of America, including an attorney who appeared for the park in legal proceedings, did not respond to messages seeking comment.
The Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, called LARA, has the authority to inspect and investigate complaints at licensed mobile home parks. But it's typically fallen to law enforcement to pursue criminal charges against unlicensed parks.
The North Morris conviction for operating without a license is likely the first such under the state's mobile home law that has been on the books since 1987, the county prosecutor said.
John Lindley, president and CEO of the industry group Michigan Manufactured Housing Association, said the rarity of such cases is evidence that state and local law enforcement are choosing not to enforce the rules.
'This whole notion that, 'There's nothing we can do about this.' Clearly there is, or that prosecution wouldn't have taken place,' Lindley said. 'Not having the authority to go after communities that don't have a license is completely different from choosing not to go after those. And what we've seen so far with both the state and local units of government is they've elected not to.'
Shutting down a park is a bad option
Mobile home parks without a license are 'essentially operating unregulated,' Cherry said. One of the state's few options is to shut down a park, a rarely used last resort that can mean throwing people out of their homes.
Mobile home parks have long been an important affordable housing option. But that affordability is fading.
A study by Lending Tree, a lending marketplace, found new mobile home sale prices rose more than 50% nationally from 2018 to 2023 — new single-family home price averages, by contrast, rose 38% over that period.
Last year, LARA supported legislation that would have given the department more power to penalize unlicensed parks, force parks to provide owner contact information and limit rent increases. That failed.
This year, Democratic Sen. Jeff Irwin has proposed a narrower law that would give state drinking water officials more power to make sure water in all mobile home parks is drinkable. Right now, they only have direct authority over parks that provide their own water. But it's common for parks to take city water from a pipe connecting to the nearby town.
That water is usually safe when it reaches the park, but if the park's water pipes crack or fail, water protections won't apply on the private property. That keeps officials from stepping in and forcing change except in limited situations when there's a public health threat. It can leave residents unsure where to turn when the owner refuses to fix problems.
'We take those issues very seriously,' said Eric Oswald, director of the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy's drinking water and environmental health division. He said they try to work with licensing officials to ensure water is safe, though 'the problem is, I'm not resourced for that.'
The Michigan Manufactured Housing Association opposed last year's legislation, arguing it would make mobile homes less affordable. The group says it supports extending water protections to within parks, as called for in this year's legislation. It passed the state Senate in late June and is now in the GOP-controlled House.
___

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Paxton seeks Beto O'Rourke's arrest over financial support of Texas Democrats
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) is seeking former Rep. Beto O'Rourke's (D-Texas) arrest, alleging in a motion filed on Tuesday that the Texas Democrat was violating a temporary restraining order over offering financial support for lawmakers who fled the state. The filing alleges that O'Rourke and his Powered By People group continued to fundraise money to cover the expenses of Texas Democrats who fled the state even after a judge temporarily blocked the group from soliciting money. The filing called for a $500 fine 'for each act of contempt' and for O'Rourke to be jailed 'until he demonstrates a willingness to abide by the Court's orders pending the outcome of this lawsuit.' 'Beto is about to find out that running your mouth and ignoring the rule of law has consequences in Texas. It's time to lock him up,' Paxton wrote in a post on the social media platform X. The Hill has reached out to O'Rourke's spokesperson for comment. Texas Republicans are trying to put maximum pressure on Democrats to return to the state as the GOP looks to pass an even friendlier House map ahead of 2026. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has said he'll call a second special session if Democrats fail to show up on Friday. Democrats incur a daily $500 fee for everyday they remain out of state during the special session, while Republicans have issued warrants for their arrest. Democrats like O'Rourke have sought to financially help Texas lawmakers shoulder the financial costs of fleeing the state, though Paxton's move underscores how Republicans are placing maximum pressure on the lawmakers to return to the state. Texas Republicans have also said the FBI is involved in trying to find the Democrats who fled the state, though the bureau has declined to comment on the matter. It's also not clear what jurisdiction the FBI could have in the matter. Texas GOP leaders have also moved to vacate the seats of a group of lawmakers. It's unclear how long Democrats will remain out of the state.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Adam Schiff authorized classified intel leaks to smear Trump during Russiagate, whistleblower claims
A seasoned intelligence officer who aided Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee repeatedly alleged to the FBI that then-Rep. Adam Schiff approved leaking classified information to tarnish President Trump's image during the Russiagate probe, shocking newly released documents reveal. Now-Sen. Schiff (D-Calif.), then the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, openly discussed plans to reveal sensitive information about the Trump-Russia collusion probe starting soon after the 45th president's inauguration in 2017, the unidentified male whistleblower alleged. During an FBI interview in June 2023, the source recalled being part of an all-staff meeting called by Schiff, at which the Democrat 'stated the group would leak classified information which was derogatory to President of the United States Donald J. TRUMP. SCHIFF stated the information would be used to Indict President TRUMP.' Advertisement The whistleblower said he objected to Schiff's idea, a summary of the interview reveals, only to be told by other participants that 'they would not be caught leaking classified information.' Sometime later, the whistleblower said he was approached again about leaking against Trump and responded that they 'believed this activity to be unethical and treasonous.' The whistleblower later reached out to the FBI and was even invited to attend a mock grand jury hearing, only to later be told that the Justice Department would not investigate further. Advertisement Investigators believed Schiff, now 65, was protected by the Constitution's Speech or Debate Clause, which bars the apprehension of legislators for their professional activities except in the event of 'Felony, Treason and Breach of the Peace.' The whistleblower claimed during his June 2023 interview that he 'did not believe' Schiff's actions were covered by the Speech or Debate Clause. The whistleblower's claims were first reported by Just the News, with FBI Director Kash Patel confirming on X Monday night: 'We found it. We declassified it. Now Congress can see how classified info was leaked to shape political narratives – and decide if our institutions were weaponized against the American people.' Patel previously worked as a top aide to former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and authored a memo accusing FBI officials of abusing their power during the Trump-Russia investigation, which proceeded under the code name Crossfire Hurricane. Advertisement The whistleblower, who worked for Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee for 12 years after more than two decades in the intelligence community, was described as 'friends with both Schiff and Nunes' and someone who 'worked with senior political leaders from both major political parties.' However, an October 2017 FBI memo claimed that word was spreading among committee staff that the whistleblower had been fired for a 'perceived lack of party loyalty.' When a Republican staffer went to offer condolences, the memo relates, the whistleblower told them they had lost their job because 'there was an expectation of leaking and he refused to participate.' Over drinks that evening, the whistleblower claimed that Democrats on the intelligence committee had established a 'system' for leaking in which sensitive information would be given to Schiff, 'after which a decision was made as to who would leak the information.' One prominent oversharer, according to the whistleblower, was Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) another intel committee member. Advertisement In a December 2017 FBI interview, the whistleblower recounted how a 'particularly sensitive document' was seen by a small group of lawmakers and staff, including Schiff and Swalwell, but leaked out 'almost verbatim' within a day. The whistleblower allegedly claimed to have 'been warned to be careful because he [Swalwell] had a reputation for leaking classified information.' 4 Sen. Adam Schiff had drawn suspicions of leaking during the first Trump administration. AP 4 President Trump has seethed at Rep. Adam Schiff, who had been one of his top House Democratic adversaries during his first term. AP 4 Russiagate loomed large over the first Trump administration. REUTERS Schiff, who spearheaded the first impeachment of President Trump in 2019, had long been suspected by Republicans of leaking classified information during the Russiagate saga. He also infamously read key portions of the since-debunked Steele Dossier into the congressional record in 2017. In 2023, House Republicans voted to censure Schiff for his role in Russiagate, only for him to be elected to the Senate the following year. In the December 2017 interview, the whistleblower claimed that Schiff had been furious at Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton, believing he would have been tapped as CIA director had the Democrat won. Last week, The Post reported that a grand jury has been convened in Maryland to investigate whether Schiff 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms.' Advertisement 4 FBI Director Kash Patel turned over the bureau's findings on the whistleblower's accusations to Congress. REUTERS The California senator is accused of mortgage fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud and false statements to financial institutions for certifying a Maryland property as his primary residence while also claiming a California condominium as his main home for tax and mortgage purposes. The FBI earlier this month initiated an investigation into former CIA Director John Brennan and ex-FBI Director James Comey for any potential criminal actions taken as part of the Trump-Russia probe. Advertisement The Justice Department also launched a 'strike force' last month after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released a long-anticipated, 44-page report from the House Intelligence Committee that found 'egregious' errors committed by Brennan in the compiling of an assessment that claimed Moscow preferred Trump to defeat Clinton. Representatives for Schiff and Swalwell did not immediately respond to requests for comment.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
National Guard troops arrive in D.C. to execute Trump's order to address crime
WASHINGTON — National Guard troops began arriving at the D.C. Armory on Tuesday morning to report for duty to carry out President Donald Trump's directive to address crime in the nation's capital. The guardsmen, who entered the D.C. National Guard's headquarters east of the U.S. Capitol dressed in their military uniforms, are part of a mobilization of about 800 soldiers that the Army activated Monday to assist with law enforcement. While Trump's memorandum said the mobilization would end once he determines that the "conditions of law and order have been restored in the District of Columbia," the troops were notified they would be deployed until Sept. 25. 'Currently, the National Guard is being deployed to protect federal assets, provide a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests, and deter violent crime with a visible law enforcement presence," a White House official said Monday. Standing alongside Trump as he announced his executive order, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that people should expect to see the guardsmen "flowing into the streets of Washington in the coming week" and that they were prepared to bring in other specialized units. Trump's memorandum also directed Hegseth to coordinate with governors across the country and "authorize the orders of any additional members of the National Guard to active service, as he deems necessary and appropriate, to augment this mission." In an interview with NBC News, Greggory Pemberton, chairman of the D.C. Police Union, expressed support for the president's moves, which included federalizing the Metropolitan Police Department. Pemberton said crime is still "ubiquitous" in the city, adding that while the president's order could be potentially helpful in fighting crime, it would likely have only a temporary impact without making more far-reaching changes. Pemberton said one of the main reasons local law enforcement "can't get a handle on the crime" is because of a staffing shortage of more than 800 officer vacancies and because of laws the city council enacted "that really prevent us from being able to do our job and being able to hold criminals accountable." "As a short-term, stop-gap measure, if they want to give us 1,000 National Guardsmen and 500 federal agents to help us do our job, we'll take it," he said. "We'll take anything we can to try to keep these criminals from victimizing citizens." Pemberton said he is concerned that if longer-term changes aren't made, once federal agents and National Guard troops leave D.C., the Metropolitan Police Department "will be left holding the bag, which will only allow crime to again, you know, regain its foothold and start growing it again." The reactions from Washingtonians to Trump's moves to take over the city were mixed. Denise Rucker-Krept, a Democrat and longtime resident of the D.C. neighborhood near where guardsmen are mobilizing, told NBC News Tuesday that she agrees with Trump that the city has a crime problem, but she also doubted a short-term surge in law enforcement and the military presence would provide a sufficient fix. 'I say that because you can tell people not to commit crimes, you can arrest them, but if you do not prosecute them, then nothing happens,' Rucker-Krept said. She added that the city council and the U.S. Attorney's Office need to do more to prosecute those who commit crimes and hand down swift punishments that will serve as a deterrent — including holding young people, who she said are a major part of the problem, accountable. Violent crime in the district has decreased by 26% over the last year, according to Metropolitan Police Department statistics, though crime overall has gone down by only 7% during that same period. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said Monday that the city was able to reverse a crime spike in 2023. "This year, crime isn't just down from 2023, it's also down from 2019 before the pandemic, and we're at a 30-year violent crime low," she said. But she added, "We're not satisfied. We haven't taken our foot off the gas, and we continue to look for ways to make our city safer." Bowser met Tuesday with Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is overseeing the effort, and several other top Justice Department officials. Also present at the meeting was DEA Administrator Terry Cole, whom Trump tapped to lead the police department. Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Bowser said Trump's takeover of the police department will not change the force's organizational chart or 'how we do business.' She emphasized that the city wanted to ensure it was using the new resources, saying she was focused on 'the federal surge and how to make the most of the additional officer support that we have.' 'How we got here, or what we think about the circumstances right now, we have more police, and we want to make sure we're using them,' she said. Jim Lardner, who was in D.C. on Tuesday protesting Trump's actions, said he thinks Trump is trying to distract the public from other issues his administration is facing. 'The whole idea that there is some kind of a crisis of disorder in D.C. is a made-up phony story to distract attention from [a] deteriorating economy, from the ICE raids — which horrify even people who wanted action on immigration — and of course, from the Epstein files, it's all a game of diversion,' said Lardner, who was holding a 'Resist' sign a few blocks north of the White House, where homeless people sometimes set up encampments. 'I think this administration would like to take over, not only D.C., but any state or jurisdiction that doesn't completely bend the knee,' he added.