Paxton seeks Beto O'Rourke's arrest over financial support of Texas Democrats
The filing alleges that O'Rourke and his Powered By People group continued to fundraise money to cover the expenses of Texas Democrats who fled the state even after a judge temporarily blocked the group from soliciting money.
The filing called for a $500 fine 'for each act of contempt' and for O'Rourke to be jailed 'until he demonstrates a willingness to abide by the Court's orders pending the outcome of this lawsuit.'
'Beto is about to find out that running your mouth and ignoring the rule of law has consequences in Texas. It's time to lock him up,' Paxton wrote in a post on the social media platform X.
The Hill has reached out to O'Rourke's spokesperson for comment.
Texas Republicans are trying to put maximum pressure on Democrats to return to the state as the GOP looks to pass an even friendlier House map ahead of 2026. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has said he'll call a second special session if Democrats fail to show up on Friday.
Democrats incur a daily $500 fee for everyday they remain out of state during the special session, while Republicans have issued warrants for their arrest. Democrats like O'Rourke have sought to financially help Texas lawmakers shoulder the financial costs of fleeing the state, though Paxton's move underscores how Republicans are placing maximum pressure on the lawmakers to return to the state.
Texas Republicans have also said the FBI is involved in trying to find the Democrats who fled the state, though the bureau has declined to comment on the matter. It's also not clear what jurisdiction the FBI could have in the matter.
Texas GOP leaders have also moved to vacate the seats of a group of lawmakers. It's unclear how long Democrats will remain out of the state.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Declassified emails show James Clapper's dismissive response to intel community concerns over Russia election interference report
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was adamant about 'stickin' to' the narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump, despite concerns raised by a top intelligence official, top secret emails show. Clapper described the Obama administration's effort to revamp an intelligence community (IC) assessment on 'Russia Election Meddling' as a 'team sport,' and one that may require the IC to 'compromise' its standards, Director of National intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed Wednesday. Former National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers warned that his team had concerns about the rush to get the report out and their lack of access to the 'underlying intelligence' being used to produce the 'joint product related to Russian attribution and intent for the DNC/DCCC hacks,' according to a declassified Dec. 22, 2016, email from the intelligence official to Clapper, ex-CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey. 3 Clapper was among several top Obama administration officials tasked by the president in December 2016 to redo a intelligence assessment that initially determined Russia did not hack the 216 presidential election. AP 'I know that this activity is on a fast-track and that folks have been working very hard to put together a product that can be provided to the President,' Rogers wrote in the email. 'However, I wanted to reach out to you directly to let you know of some concerns I have with what I am hearing from my folks.' 'Specifically, I asked my team if they'd had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence and sufficient time to review that intelligence. On both points my team raised concerns,' the former NSA director stated. 'I'm concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren't fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments,' Rogers continued, noting that he wasn't expressing a substantive disagreement with the report's conclusion. 'I do want to make sure that, when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper, that we don't have any reason to hesitate because of the process,' he added. 'I know that you agree that this is something we need to be 100% comfortable with before we present it to the President – we have one chance to get this right, and it is critical that we do so.' 'I'm concerned we are not there yet.' Rogers said he would 'stand down on these concerns' if the report didn't have to be co-authored by the NSA, but for his agency to sign-off, he would need to see 'even the most sensitive evidence related to the conclusion.' 3 Rogers expressed concern with how quickly the report was being produced and his team's lack of access to the sensitive information it was being based on. AP Clapper urged the NSA to fall in line in his short response to Rogers. 'Understand your concern. It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page. and are all supportive of the report — in the highest tradition of 'that's OUR story, and we're stickin' to it,'' Clapper wrote back. The ex-DNI went on to shut down any talk of 'more time' being needed. 'We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report … but, more time is not negotiable,' Clapper insisted. 'We may have to compromise on our 'normal' modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule,' he added. 'This is one project that has to be a team sport,' Clapper demanded. 3 Gabbard declassified the top secret emails between Rogers and Clapper on Wednesday. MediaPunch / BACKGRID The exchange came days after a Dec. 9, 2016, meeting between former President Barack Obama, Clapper, Brennan and other top administration officials, during which the president demanded a report detailing the 'tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.' The previous intelligence community assessment, rejected by Obama, determined that 'Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.' The NSA would go on to sign-off of the new report, along with the CIA and FBI. Gabbard, who has been on warpath against the actors behind the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, said Clapper's email 'reinforces what we already exposed.' '[T]he decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,' Gabbard said in a statement. 'Clapper's own words confirm that complying with the order to manufacture intelligence was a 'team sport,'' she added.
CBS News
29 minutes ago
- CBS News
Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett considering running for different congressional district amid redistricting battle
The newly drawn and hotly contested congressional maps in Texas may prompt Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas, to run in a neighboring district, instead of the one she currently represents. This comes as Texas House Democrats have made national news by breaking quorum for a second week to prevent the chamber from passing the new maps that are designed to give the GOP five new majority seats. In an interview for Eye On Politics on Wednesday, Crockett accused Republicans of intentionally drawing her home out of her district, District 30, under the newly proposed maps. Due to that, she said she is considering running in the newly drawn 33rd Congressional District, where her home will be if the new maps are approved by Texas Republicans. "I'm debating about where I will run where they put me, which is where I live, in 33," said Crockett. Crockett has served in the 30th Congressional seat since January 2023, and her district is mostly in Dallas County, but also has some constituents in Tarrant County. While the boundaries of her district would change, it's still considered a Democratic majority seat and will have a majority of Black Americans. The current 33rd Congressional District is served by Representative Marc Veasey, D-Fort Worth, and is in both Tarrant and Dallas counties. Under the proposed new map, the 33rd District would only be in Dallas County and include Congresswoman Crockett's home. Congressman Veasey lives in Tarrant County, and he would not live in this district if it were approved. This will become a Hispanic-majority district and will remain a majority seat for Democrats. The 32nd Congressional District, also in North Texas, would undergo major changes. Congresswoman Julie Johnson, D-Farmers Branch, represents the district. Under the newly drawn map, she will not live in the district. If approved, it will also become a Republican majority district because it will stretch out to East Texas. Crockett told CBS News Texas that she does not want to move from her home. Members of Congress are not required to live in their districts — they only have to be residents in the state in which they serve. Crockett said she wants to have a conversation with her current constituents and her Democratic colleagues in Congress about the situation they face. "Does Marc Veasey fit better into 30 now because it does have some Tarrant, or not. And does Julie just kind of fit better running in 33 than me? Is my district going to be OK with me running and being on this fixed government income, and therefore not buying a home in the newly constructed 30?" Crockett said. "Obviously, I don't have to live there under federal rules, but some people want someone who lives in the district. Obviously, I want to talk to my colleagues and see what kind of makes sense so that at least hopefully two of us have the best shot at going back." Crockett said she believes she still has a strong rapport with her current constituents, most of whom will remain in the 30th District. Last week, Congressman Veasey and Congresswoman Johnson told CBS News Texas that they are focused on fighting back against the Republican-drawn maps first and will then decide what to do about their races. Candidates can begin filing their paperwork with the Secretary of State's office on Nov. 8 and have until Dec. 8 to do so. Crockett said Republicans at the Texas Capitol will eventually approve the new maps once the House can establish quorum, which may happen later this week. Watch Eye On Politics at 7:30 Sunday morning on CBS News Texas on air and streaming Follow Jack on X: @cbs11jack
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Earle-Sears accepts CNN invitation to Virginia governor's debate
Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, the Republican nominee for governor, formally accepted CNN's invitation on Wednesday to participate in a fall debate. Her Democratic opponent, former US Rep. Abigail Spanberger, has not yet responded to CNN's invitation. The election is one of two governor's races across the nation in the year immediately after the presidential election and could serve as a bellwether ahead of next year's midterms. Earle-Sears is seen by many in her party as an underdog against Spanberger, who won the endorsement Wednesday of the Virginia Police Benevolent Association even as the law enforcement group backed Republicans for lieutenant governor and attorney general. CNN's forum will take place live in late September or early October with questions posed directly by voters and moderated by network anchors. 'Winsome Earle-Sears is not afraid to answer tough questions and face Virginians head-on. This debate is an opportunity for voters to see the difference between a leader with a clear plan and a career politician who would rather talk around the issues,' Earle-Sears campaign spokeswoman Peyton Vogel said. Spanberger's team declined to comment on the nationally televised CNN debate or her future plans, but pointed to a regional debate that the campaign accepted and Earle-Sears declined. 'Abigail formally accepted the statewide 'People's Debate' more than a month ago with AARP Virginia, Virginia State University, WTVR-Richmond, WJLA-Northern Virginia, and WTKR-Norfolk confirming her participation for September 16 at Virginia State University. Unfortunately, her opponent just declined to participate in this statewide debate,' said Samson Signori, Spanberger's campaign manager. Earle-Sears' team cited a scheduling conflict with her official schedule on Sept. 16 but say they are eager to debate Spanberger and hopes she accepts CNN's invitation. Since 2015, CNN has moderated or co-moderated more than 190 town halls, 13 presidential primary debates and two general election debates. 'CNN has extended an invitation to Lieutenant Governor Earle-Sears and Representative Spanberger to participate in a live CNN Gubernational Town Hall Debate this fall,' a CNN spokesperson said in a statement. 'Lieutenant Governor Earle-Sears has accepted our invitation, and we look forward to hearing from Representative Spanberger.'
