Declassified emails show James Clapper's dismissive response to intel community concerns over Russia election interference report
Clapper described the Obama administration's effort to revamp an intelligence community (IC) assessment on 'Russia Election Meddling' as a 'team sport,' and one that may require the IC to 'compromise' its standards, Director of National intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revealed Wednesday.
Former National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers warned that his team had concerns about the rush to get the report out and their lack of access to the 'underlying intelligence' being used to produce the 'joint product related to Russian attribution and intent for the DNC/DCCC hacks,' according to a declassified Dec. 22, 2016, email from the intelligence official to Clapper, ex-CIA Director John Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey.
3 Clapper was among several top Obama administration officials tasked by the president in December 2016 to redo a intelligence assessment that initially determined Russia did not hack the 216 presidential election.
AP
'I know that this activity is on a fast-track and that folks have been working very hard to put together a product that can be provided to the President,' Rogers wrote in the email. 'However, I wanted to reach out to you directly to let you know of some concerns I have with what I am hearing from my folks.'
'Specifically, I asked my team if they'd had sufficient access to the underlying intelligence and sufficient time to review that intelligence. On both points my team raised concerns,' the former NSA director stated.
'I'm concerned that, given the expedited nature of this activity, my folks aren't fully comfortable saying that they have had enough time to review all of the intelligence to be absolutely confident in their assessments,' Rogers continued, noting that he wasn't expressing a substantive disagreement with the report's conclusion.
'I do want to make sure that, when we are asked in the future whether we can absolutely stand behind the paper, that we don't have any reason to hesitate because of the process,' he added. 'I know that you agree that this is something we need to be 100% comfortable with before we present it to the President – we have one chance to get this right, and it is critical that we do so.'
'I'm concerned we are not there yet.'
Rogers said he would 'stand down on these concerns' if the report didn't have to be co-authored by the NSA, but for his agency to sign-off, he would need to see 'even the most sensitive evidence related to the conclusion.'
3 Rogers expressed concern with how quickly the report was being produced and his team's lack of access to the sensitive information it was being based on.
AP
Clapper urged the NSA to fall in line in his short response to Rogers.
'Understand your concern. It is essential that we (CIA/NSA/FBI/ODNI) be on the same page. and are all supportive of the report — in the highest tradition of 'that's OUR story, and we're stickin' to it,'' Clapper wrote back.
The ex-DNI went on to shut down any talk of 'more time' being needed.
'We will facilitate as much mutual transparency as possible as we complete the report … but, more time is not negotiable,' Clapper insisted.
'We may have to compromise on our 'normal' modalities, since we must do this on such a compressed schedule,' he added.
'This is one project that has to be a team sport,' Clapper demanded.
3 Gabbard declassified the top secret emails between Rogers and Clapper on Wednesday.
MediaPunch / BACKGRID
The exchange came days after a Dec. 9, 2016, meeting between former President Barack Obama, Clapper, Brennan and other top administration officials, during which the president demanded a report detailing the 'tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.'
The previous intelligence community assessment, rejected by Obama, determined that 'Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.'
The NSA would go on to sign-off of the new report, along with the CIA and FBI.
Gabbard, who has been on warpath against the actors behind the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, said Clapper's email 'reinforces what we already exposed.'
'[T]he decision to compromise standards and violate protocols in the creation of the 2017 manufactured intelligence assessment was deliberate and came from the very top,' Gabbard said in a statement.
'Clapper's own words confirm that complying with the order to manufacture intelligence was a 'team sport,'' she added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Native Ukrainian left speechless after ‘no deal' summit
Native Ukrainians disappointed after no deal was reached Trump and Putin's high stakes summit Ukrainian-American Volodymyr Valchuk said he already had low expectations for the high-stakes summit between President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. But after listening to the world leaders meet in person for the first time in six years to end Russia's war in Ukraine, Valchuk admitted this was a head-shaker. "I'm speechless. I have nothing to say. I really didn't expect much, but this is even worse than I thought," Valchuk, 46, told USA TODAY. "That's what I'm feeling right now." Valchuk, a respiratory therapist who lives in San Rafael, California, said he's "very disappointed" when Trump said "no deal" was reached to end the three-year Ukraine war. 'At least they could've given us a little idea what Putin said the agreement was,' Valchuk said about the summit held in Anchorage, Alaska. 'Trump said he will talk to NATO and (Ukrainian President Volodymyr) Zelenskyy, but I really don't know what that means? 'Yeah, I'm disappointed,' said Valchuk, who came from Ukraine to the US to attend college in 1996. 'Very disappointed.' Valchuk, who gained his American citizenship in 2004, said he doesn't know what will happen next for his homeland. 'I just hope it's not going to cost Ukraine some of its land and more lives,' Valchuk said. 'I hope.' Live updates: Trump, Putin meet in Alaska summit How the war looks for two Ukrainian teens currently in the US For two Ukrainian-born teenagers, Taisiia Grygorova and Sofiia Kopytko, who are spending this summer performing across the East Coast in a play titled "Voices from Ukraine: Stories of War and Hope," they told USA TODAY that no matter what outcome comes from the summit in Anchorage, Alaska, the war can't end soon enough. Grygorova, 19, who lives in Kharkiv, a city near the Ukrainian-Russian border, said despite the constant rocket attacks, drones, air raids, and explosions, her thoughts are always with the people suffering through the continuous combat. Grygorova, who's studying journalism at Warsaw International University, said she regularly returns to Kharkiv to visit her parents and four younger siblings, despite the dangers. "And every time I go there I prepare myself, 'Taia, you're going for two weeks, and it's a 100% chance that you will get under a rocket attack at least four times during this time, but you'll be fine, your younger brothers and sisters live in this nightmare every day, you can handle two weeks,'" Grygorova said. Grygorova said her youngest brother, a six-year-old, is supposed to start school this year, but she wonders how with the threat of bombings. "You will ask, 'What risk?' Well, there is always a possibility that one of those bombs, which are flying over the city, will hit a school where kids are studying," Grygorova said. "My brother is going to study underground, with no sunlight, with no possibility to play outside, to run freely over a football pitch or hear the birds singing." Grygorova said her mother keeps all of the family documents near the front door, just in case they need to leave their house forever. "That's how the war looks for me and my family," Grygorova said. Sofiia Kopytko, 18, from Chernihiv, Ukraine, said the war has not only been about territory, the lack of resources and weapons, but also the doctors who work in critical conditions, and families like Grygorova's who live in occupied territories and face death daily as a result of random air strikes. "Human lives are not statistics, but the most valuable thing that each of us has, and we must protect it," Kopytko said. "After all, you never know what tomorrow holds and whether it will come at all." Grygorova said she desperately wants the war to end so that people can live their lives in peace. "I hope that when the war is over, I'll be able to visit my family without fear," Grygorova said. "I hope that my city will be renovated. I hope I'll be able to help in the rebuilding of my country, where I want my future kids to grow up." Kopytko said her wishes are quite simple. "That there will be no more news of death and destruction, just simple happiness," Kopytko said. "Of course, I can talk about building a career and a family, but for me, these are the components of the happiness I strive for. First and foremost, free people in a free country. In a free Ukraine."
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
All eyes on the Trump-Putin Alaska summit
The two world leaders met for about three hours alongside senior Russian and U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, and two Russian aides – shifting from a previously planned one-on-one summit between Trump and Putin. Afterward, they took to podiums in front of a blue backdrop that read 'Pursuing Peace,' speaking to reporters in a highly anticipated joint appearance. Putin began speaking first, in Russian, telling the audience that negotiations were held in a ' respectful, constructive and mutually respectful atmosphere,' and that he agrees that the security of Ukraine should be ensured. ' I agree with Trump that the security of Ukraine must be secured, and of course, we are ready to work on that,' he said, adding that he hopes that the agreement reached between Washington and Moscow 'will help us bring closer that goal and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine.' Putin also proposed Moscow as the next location for any future meeting with Trump. 'That's an interesting one, I'll get a little heat on that one,' Trump replied. 'But I could see it possibly happening.' When it was his turn to speak, Trump spent a portion of his time lamenting that he has 'always had a fantastic relationship' with Putin, but that it was impeded by investigations during his first term into Russia's interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. 'We had many, many tough meetings, good meetings. We were interfered with by the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. I've made it a little bit tougher to deal with, but he understood it,' Trump said. He also offered little as to whether anything was agreed to or not in the talks, noting that ' there's no deal until there's a deal.' 'I will say that I believe we had a very productive meeting. There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say, a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there. We've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal,' the president said. Ahead of the meeting, Trump said that he has a 'good idea' of what Ukraine would like to see from the summit. ' It's not for me to negotiate for Ukraine, but I think I have a pretty good idea what they'd like to see, and what's good and what's not good,' the president said during his interview with Fox News' 'Special Report' with host Bret Baier. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was excluded from the talks, said Russia has no intention to end the war soon. 'The war continues, and it is precisely because there is neither an order nor even a signal that Moscow is preparing to end this war. On the day of negotiations, they are killing as well. That speaks volumes,' he said in a video posted to X.
Axios
13 minutes ago
- Axios
"Next time in Moscow": Putin extends Trump invitation as summit ends
At the conclusion of Friday's "productive" but inconclusive summit on Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin quipped to President Trump: "Next time in Moscow." The intrigue: Putin made the remark in English, a language he rarely speaks in public. The suggestion drew a surprised chuckle from Trump, who didn't rule it out but said he'd "get a little heat for that one." The big picture: If Trump were to travel to Russia, it would be the first time in over a decade that an American president set foot on Russian soil. Putin is angling for a more friendly relationship with the U.S. after being isolated on the world stage, and would likely consider such a visit a major coup. But there's no sign as of now that it's likely to happen. What they're saying: Putin's "next time in Moscow" quip came just at the end of Trump's televised remarks. "Oh, that's an interesting one," Trump replied. "I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening." The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on the president's willingness to travel to the Russian capital. Catch up quick: In a joint press briefing, President Trump called the highly-anticipated peace talks "productive" but said that the two leaders "didn't get there" on a ceasefire or on ending the war in Ukraine. Trump said the two agreed on many issues but could not come to an agreement on "the biggest one." Putin said that it was very important for the two countries "to go back to cooperation," and that it was time for the superpowers to shift from "confrontation to dialogue." Neither Putin nor Trump offered any details of a potential agreement. Flashback: Barack Obama was the last U.S. president to visit Russia over a decade ago, according to the State Department.
