UAE gold prices: 22K gold hits Dh370+ today, last chance to lock in or wait for dip
Gold prices in Dubai have surged once again, crossing the Dh370-per-gram mark for 22K gold, a threshold that could prompt shoppers to rethink their buying plans. After weeks of relatively stable pricing that encouraged steady demand, this sharp increase is shifting market sentiment just as consumer confidence had begun to return.
Gold Prices Climb Sharply: Current Rates and Recent Trends
As of Tuesday afternoon, the retail gold price in Dubai for 22K gold has jumped more than Dh7 in just a matter of days. The rates now stand at:
24K gold: Dh403.75 per gram (≈ $110)
22K gold: Dh374.00 per gram (≈ $101.85)
21K gold: Dh358.25 per gram (≈ $97.60)
18K gold: Dh307.25 per gram (≈ $83.70)
This upward move comes shortly after many UAE residents took advantage of prices around Dh365.75 ($99.60), locking in their purchases during what now appears to have been a brief window of stability.
In recent weeks, jewellery retailers and the Gold Souk had seen increased footfall, with shoppers resuming purchases amid relatively calm pricing.
But with gold now climbing sharply again, many potential buyers are likely to hold off in anticipation of a possible correction.
Global Drivers Behind the Price Spike
The price surge is not limited to the UAE. International spot gold prices climbed for a second consecutive day, reaching around $3,322 an ounce, up 0.6% on Tuesday in Asia, after rising 0.9% on Monday.
Speaking to
Gulf News
, Vijay Valecha, Chief Investment Officer at Century Financial, attributed the rebound to multiple global pressures.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Sharp Design, Smoother Drives.
Toyota Glanza
Learn More
Undo
'Despite recent losses from risk-off sentiment unwinding, gold has rebounded strongly after testing and bouncing off the long-term bullish trendline,' said Valecha.
He further explained that market fears are being stoked by ongoing global uncertainties, including tensions in international trade and monetary policy decisions:
'Adding to gold's safe-haven appeal is the uncertainty surrounding trade deals with major countries, including President Trump's fresh tariff threats on Japan.
With the Federal Reserve expected to cut interest rates later this year, gold is set to attract even more attention in the coming weeks,' Valecha added.
Market watchers have noted that the recent strength in gold is also linked to macroeconomic cue, particularly speculation surrounding interest rate decisions by the U.S. Federal Reserve. Expectations of a rate cut have historically led to increased investor interest in non-yielding assets like gold.
Market Sentiment: What Analysts and Traders Are Saying
According to Vivek Dhar, an analyst at the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, gold remains one of the strongest-performing assets in the current global market environment.
'Despite recent losses, gold has the most short-term potential to gain if the US dollar continues to weaken,' Dhar wrote in a client note.
Investors are also watching key upcoming indicators, including the U.S. jobs report and a July 9 tariff deadline, which could influence the short-term direction of gold.
Many traders believe unless prices fall significantly below $3,200 an ounce, a major correction is unlikely.
Market insiders have pointed out that gold prices have already gained more than 25% so far this year, and the commodity now sits less than $200 away from its all-time high set in April 2025.
Some analysts saw last week's brief decline as a routine pause in an otherwise upward trend, supported by ongoing geopolitical tensions and inflationary concerns that continue to drive demand for safe-haven assets.
What It Means for UAE Gold Buyers
With gold nearing a new local peak, shoppers in the UAE face a familiar dilemma, buy now before prices climb further, or wait for a potential pullback?
The recent spike may cause hesitation, especially for casual buyers or tourists. However, those who locked in purchases last week at Dh365.75 ($99.60) may have acted at the perfect time.
Looking ahead, most analysts agree that while volatility is likely to continue, the bias remains toward further upside, particularly if U.S. rate cuts materialize or new geopolitical risks emerge.
For now, the market is sending a clear signal: gold remains a safe-haven asset in turbulent times, and those who wait too long might end up paying more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
'If Trump were president in 2022, there would be no war': Putin after Alaska meeting; US President says no deal with Russia over Ukraine conflict
President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin Friday, Aug. 15, 2025, at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. AP/PTI(AP08_16_2025_000011A) Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday claimed that he would not have invaded Ukraine if Joe Biden had not been in office, a remark seen as courting Donald Trump, even as US tariff threats persist. 'I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American colleague the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities,' Putin said after his nearly three-hour summit with Trump in Alaska. 'And I said it quite directly back then. 'That's a big mistake today, when President Trump is saying that if he was the president back then, there will be no war — and I'm quite sure that it would indeed be, so I can confirm that.' 'I think that, overall, me and President Trump have built a very good business-like [relationship],' he added. Trump has frequently expressed the belief that Putin would not have initiated the invasion had he been president in 2022, but he did not appear to engage with the dictator's provocation on Friday. Ahead of the meeting in Alaska, Trump, while in his flight, told Fox News that this Ukraine war is Biden's war and he was the one who screwed up. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "I'm not doing it based on history, based on anything else — I'm doing it based on a deal. If we make a deal, great. If I see that there's no hope of making a deal, I'm out of there... This isn't my war. This is Biden's war. Biden screwed this up..." Putin said. Trump subtly reminded Putin that he would not engage in any business dealings with Russia until the Kremlin ceased its three-year war on Ukraine, highlighting the US' leverage. 'We … have some tremendous Russian business representatives here, and I think everybody wants to deal with us. We've become the hottest country anywhere in the world in a very short period of time,' he said. 'We look forward to dealing — we're going to try and get this over with. '… We'll have a good chance when this is over.' Trump said that he and Putin did not reach an agreement to resolve Moscow's war in Ukraine, though he characterized the meeting as 'very productive.' 'There were many, many points that we agreed on,' Trump said at a joint press conference with Putin. 'I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway. So there's no deal until there's a deal.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Only 52% industrial allotments functional: CAG
Noida: A CAG performance audit has exposed how Greater Noida Authority mismanaged industrial and Sports City land allotments over decades, creating massive unpaid dues and leaving ambitious projects incomplete. The audit found that unpaid dues from industrial plot allottees reached over Rs 630 crore, while another Rs 2,330 crore was stuck in the Sports City and Recreational Entertainment Park (REP) schemes. Together, they represent a staggering setback for the Authority, with projects often diverted from their intended public purpose. Between Jan 1991 and March 2021, GNIDA allotted 2,580 industrial plots covering 1,130 hectares, about one-fifth of its allotted land. Yet by April 2021, only 1,341 plots (52%) were functional, many after delays as long as 19 years. Just 147 plots (11%) met the original development timelines. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida | Gold Rates Today in Noida | Silver Rates Today in Noida Out of these, 972 allottees defaulted on payments, resulting in Rs 630 crore in unpaid land premiums, lease rent, and interest. Over Rs 374 crore of these dues arose from allotments made between 2005–06 and 2020–21. Instead of cancelling allotments or recovering dues, GNIDA allowed defaulters to retain plots, in some cases, even enabling them to profit by transferring them to others. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo In Sector Ecotech-XI, 193 plots were allotted before the sector's development was complete. Lease deeds for 139 plots could not be signed due to litigation over land acquisition, which stalled roads and electricity. Instead of cancelling allotments, GNIDA waived penalties and extended deadlines, losing Rs 142 crore as deeds were later signed at outdated rates. The CAG found delays of up to 1,804 days in issuing lease deed checklists, resulting in a Rs 4 crore loss in lease rent, and failure to recover Rs 15 crore in charges for changes in shareholding. Weak eligibility norms until 2018 encouraged speculative trading, with allottees selling stakes before starting any industrial work. Launched between 2011 and 2014, the Sports City and REP schemes promised integrated sports infrastructure, golf courses, cricket academies, and facilities to host international events. None of the projects were complete as of March 2022. Four large land parcels were allotted under the schemes. Among them were Sports City-1 (Sector Techzone IV), where over 5 lakh sqm was allotted to MMR Construction for Rs 354 crore, and later split into 13 subdivisions. For Sports City-2 in Sector 27, 7 lakh sqm was given to Supertech Ltd for Rs 903 crore, and later divided into four sub-plots. For REP-1 in Sector 27, 4 lakh sqm was allotted to RBA Buildtech for Rs 327 crore and for REP-2 in Sector 27, 3 lakh sqm was given to Ultra Home Construction for Rs 382 crore—plot was later split into three sub-plots. Scheme rules mandated that 70–75% of the land be dedicated to sports/recreation. But by April 2021, 19 of 20 sub-allottees had defaulted, leaving Rs 2,330 crore unpaid. The brochures favoured real estate developers, requiring no prior sports infrastructure experience or detailed project reports. Sports bodies like BCCI or Sports Authority of India were never consulted. Consortium structures allowed inexperienced firms to qualify using partners' credentials, then exit after allotment. In Sports City-1, MMR Construction relied on NKG Infrastructure's credentials; NKG exited before lease signing, and MMR later abandoned one sub-project mid-way, violating rules. GNIDA removed the "lock-in" rule for Sports City-2 and REP-1, which had required lead members to retain a 30% stake until completion of a phase, making it easier for non-serious players to flip land. By permitting higher Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and more ground coverage for residential development, GNIDA gave allottees undue benefits worth Rs 470 crore. Another Rs 690 crore was lost by underpricing land and ignoring key cost factors. The focus shifted from sports to housing, with facilities reduced to token features — a small pool, a tennis court, or a putting green — meant only for residents, not public use. By March 2023, of 20 sub-allottees in Sports City and REP projects, five allotments were cancelled, and five opened escrow accounts. Ten had not opened escrow accounts despite notices. Rules in the brochures were inconsistently applied. GNIDA accepted incomplete Memorandums of Agreement between consortium members, failed to collect Rs 37.40 crore in "Change in Constitution" charges, and gave mortgage permissions despite large unpaid dues — a flawed practice followed since 2006. Even approved layouts did not safeguard large sports areas like planned golf courses. In the absence of clear technical standards, promised sports facilities never materialised, leaving the land primarily used for residential construction. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
After decade-long ordeal, Bengaluru flat buyers without sale deed win interest payout
Bengaluru: In a major relief to homebuyers, Karnataka Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (KREAT) has ordered a city-based builder to pay interest on the Rs 34.4 lakh refunded to a family that waited nine years for possession of a flat that never came with a registered sale deed. Though Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Rera) ordered a refund in 2023, it denied interest. Overruling this, the tribunal on July 25, 2025, upheld the complainants' right to interest under Rera. The story began in Sept 2013, when Begur-Hulimavu Road residents K Kiran Sarat and Subhagya S Kumar booked a flat in Suadela's 'Queens Gate' project. Over the next four years, the mother-son duo paid Rs 34.4 lakh in instalments toward the total sale consideration of Rs 80.1 lakh. The builder promised to deliver possession within four years of booking. However, no registered sale agreement was executed, nor was the apartment handed over. Despite repeated follow-ups, the builder failed to register the agreement or deliver possession. In March 2022, BBMP issued a partial occupancy certificate for the project — almost nine years after the first payment. By then, the family had decided to exit the project because of the prolonged delay. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru | Gold Rates Today in Bengaluru | Silver Rates Today in Bengaluru The duo filed a complaint on July 20, 2022, before K-Rera, seeking a refund along with interest. Rera, in its order dated Dec 2, 2023, directed the promoter to refund Rs 34.4 lakh but rejected the complainants' demand for interest. Rera reasoned that there was no registered agreement in place and the buyers chose to withdraw from the project voluntarily. The family appealed that decision before KREAT. The buyers alleged that the builder had violated Section 13 of the Rera Act, which prohibits accepting more than 10% of the flat cost without executing a registered agreement. They highlighted a 2016 email from the builder stating that the basement slab was constructed only after 3.5 years, clearly indicating delays. They also submitted that the standard construction agreement used with other buyers specified a 30-month delivery period with a six-month grace time, and said that possession was clearly understood to be due within three years of the first payment. The buyers further stated that the builder contacted them only in Aug 2018 — five years after booking — to execute an agreement. By then, frustrated by the inordinate delay, they wanted to withdraw from the project. The final cancellation was done in Feb 2019. In 2024, the builder refunded the entire amount via two demand drafts of Rs 17.2 lakh each. The builder's counsel, on the other hand, argued that the buyers had defaulted on pending instalments and not responded to repeated notices, including a final pre-cancellation notice issued in Oct 2018. They maintained that once the buyers accepted the refund, their right to claim interest was forfeit. The promoter also stated that the project was registered with Rera until Aug 2022, implying there was no delay on its part. The tribunal, after hearing both sides, observed that the developer had violated mandatory legal provisions and failed to execute a sale agreement despite collecting a substantial portion of the flat cost. It also found "untenable" the argument that the absence of a registered agreement barred the buyers from claiming interest. The tribunal noted that the builder took nearly a decade to obtain even partial occupancy, with registration under Rera coming only in Oct 2017 — four years after the buyers' first payment. It added that the builder reached out about executing the agreement only after five years of booking. Such delays, the tribunal held, amounted to gross deficiency of service. The tribunal has now ordered the builder to pay interest at 9% per annum on the principal amount up to April 30, 2017. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Krishna Janmashtami Wishes ,, messages , and quotes !
