Emma Gilthorpe resigns as Royal Mail chief executive after just a year
Emma Gilthorpe, who joined from Heathrow airport in May 2024, left the company on Thursday, and will be replaced on an interim basis by the chief operating officer, Alistair Cochrane, with immediate effect, the Guardian has learned.
Daniel Křetínský completed a deal to buy International Distribution Services (IDS), the owner of the 509-year-old Royal Mail, in April.
A group of existing IDS non-executive directors, including the chair, Keith Williams, resigned earlier this month. However, the company had made no mention of Gilthorpe's future after the deal.
She had been the chief operating officer at Heathrow airport since 2020, and joined Royal Mail in a newly created role under Martin Seidenberg, who is chief executive of IDS. Gilthorpe had also held positions in the telecoms industry, with BT and Cable & Wireless.
She said: 'I will always be incredibly proud to have led Royal Mail … I look forward to seeing Royal Mail continue to transform in the years ahead, ensuring a stronger and more sustainable future for this great British company.'
Cochrane joined Royal Mail in 2023 from the delivery company Whistl, where he was chief executive. He has also held senior roles at TNT Express and Parcelforce Worldwide.
He becomes Royal Mail's fourth boss in three years. Seidenberg, who had responsibility for the division before Gilthorpe was installed, replaced Simon Thompson, who stepped down in 2023 after only two years following an acrimonious tussle with unions.
Thompson had become the latest in a line of executives to clash with unions as they attempted to overhaul the company after its privatisation in 2013.
Seidenberg said: 'Emma has worked tirelessly to drive forward Royal Mail's transformation, and I would like to extend my personal thanks to her for the significant contribution she has made to the company.'
He added: 'Alistair Cochrane is an exceptional leader and brings significant experience to his new role from across the logistics industry, and from his time with us at both Royal Mail and Parcelforce.'
In May, the industry regulator, Ofcom, launched an investigation into Royal Mail's quality of service after almost a quarter of first-class post last year arrived late. The target is for 93% of first-class items to arrive within one working day.
Consumers and businesses have lamented the standard of service, complaining about delivery delays and higher stamp prices. In April, the price of a first-class stamp rose by 5p, or 3%, to £1.70 – the sixth increase in little more than three years.
Ofcom has been examining whether to relax rules on Royal Mail's service, and has proposed allowing it to only deliver second-class letters on alternate weekdays and not on Saturdays, with first-class post remaining six days a week.
Křetínský's EP Group clinched the IDS deal after a long-running UK government review of the national security considerations approved the deal.
The Conservative former trade policy minister Greg Hands was this month appointed as a strategic adviser to EP Group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Fabrizio Romano says Premier League star WILL join Liverpool
Fabrizio Romano has essentially confirmed that one Premier League star will join Liverpool. It seems this one is going to happen. Liverpool have been busier than anyone in this transfer window as they've overhauled their squad. Perhaps nothing shows that off more than the fact they've spent the most money while also raking in the most. In fact, despite breaking their transfer record, signing the two most expensive full-backs in their history, and paying the most they ever have on a centre-forward, Liverpool aren't even in the top five for net spend in the Premier League. It's been remarkable. Shop the LFC Store LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! Ridiculously, they're not even done. Liverpool just signed Giovanni Leoni from Parma and have several sales in mind. Ben Doak, to name one, should depart for Bournemouth before long. We'll see what happens with Harvey Elliott, too. Alexander Isak is the big name wanted before the window closes and Liverpool are hoping to convince Newcastle United to sell. But even that's not all of - there's another Premier League star on the agenda. Liverpool want Marc Guehi Liverpool are pushing to sign Marc Guehi before the window closes. There's potential for a cut-price deal there as the centre-back is now in the final year of his contract at Crystal Palace. Chairman Steve Parish has publicly admitted they'll try to sell, too. It's all about finding the right price. But Fabrizio Romano claims that even if Liverpool don't find that price, Guehi will ultimately land at Anfield. It might just need to wait a year. "On Liverpool, I insist they are still working for Marc Guehi," Romano said on YouTube. "There's still a conversation ongoing with Crystal Palace, still a conversation ongoing with the player side because the agreement with the player is okay, from what I'm hearing. "Still waiting to see what happens club to club. But Marc Guehi wants to go to Liverpool. If it's not now, it's going to be in the future." It seems we're either seeing Guehi arrive at Liverpool in the next two weeks or we're seeing it next summer, then. Romano certainly believes so. We imagine a lot of it might hinge on what Real Madrid plan to do with Ibrahima Konate. He's also out of contract in a year and Los Blancos want to sign him. Maybe they'll wait, but maybe they'll try a late push. Guehi would certainly be an ideal replacement.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Denver man called United Airlines real customer service — then got transferred to someone who took $17K. How?
Dan Smoker's dream family trip to Europe turned into a nightmare—not because of a cancellation, but due to a call he made to United Airlines. After his initial flight was canceled due to mechanical issues, Smoker spent over three painstaking hours on the phone with United trying to rebook. He connected with an agent named 'David,' who promised to charge for the new ticket, upgraded Smoker to premium economy and said the original cost would be refunded. A confirmation email followed — addressing refund timelines, oddly, from a non-United email. Months later, no refund had arrived. Upon investigating his credit card bill, he found the legitimate charges from United Airlines for Smoker's rebooked flight, along with another charge for $17,000 listed under the alias "AIRLINEFARE." Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Scammed — but how? After consumer investigator Steve Staeger examined the confirmation email, he immediately noticed several red flags indicating a possible scam. "I figured Dan had been taken advantage of, thought maybe he'd Googled a number for United," Staeger says in a WGRZ video, "but he didn't." Both Smoker and Staeger confirmed using call logs that Smoker had called United Airlines' official customer service number, and the call log showed confirmed three hours he had spent on the phone were with United. 'The more I looked into it, the more clear it became that it was a scam via United's system somehow," Smoker said. "Now how that happened? I have no idea.' On United's end, however, a representative told him the three-hour call connected with David was only in their internal call log for 12 minutes. United confirms they logged several calls from Smoker's number and have launched an internal review. However, the airline couldn't explain how the call was transferred to the alleged scammer or why their own logs recorded a much shorter call duration. Smoker has filed a fraud report with his credit card provider while awaiting resolution. 'They have a system that people are supposed to trust,' Smoker said. 'I trusted that system. There was no reason that I shouldn't have trusted that system, and I was scammed as a part of it.' 'We've been in direct contact with the customer to understand what happened in this case,' a United spokeswoman said in a statement. 'We are reviewing this matter thoroughly. We're committed to finding a fair resolution for him.' She did not answer any questions on how Smoker's call could have been redirected. A broader rise of airline scams While Dan Smoker's case stands out as he was somehow intercepted or rerouted through United's offical line, it's part of a broader trend of scammers cashing in on airline cancellations. The urgency and panic that comes with rebooking a cancelled flight makes airline customers a prime target for phishing in scammers books. Recent investigations by consumer watchdogs like the Better Business Bureau (BBB) and AARP show how widespread the threat has become. The BBB issues frequent alerts about fake airline customer service numbers leading to billing scams, and reports via their Scam Tracker database note how even trusted sources like Google can populate fraudulent numbers that impersonate airline support. Scammers often purchase top ad placement or manipulate Google search results to insert fake numbers at the top of your query—meaning customers often think they're getting help, not pitching money. AARP has documented similar cases, where frustrated travelers searching online for help ended up paying twice — once to the airline and again to a fraudster disguised as a booking agent. Scammers also exploit social media by replying to posts complaining about cancelled flights with phony offers of assistance. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. How consumers can protect themselves Airline scams are evolving so quickly that even travelers who do everything 'by the book' can get caught in the trap. The best protection starts with knowing what red flags to look for. Experts warn that you should only ever contact an airline through its official channels, either the number listed on its verified website or inside the company's app. Refund emails should always come from a legitimate domain like @ never a generic address. And while it might be second nature to type 'United customer service' into Google, that's one of the biggest dangers: scammers buy ads or spoof listings to make fake call center numbers appear at the top of search results. Even if you're on the phone with someone who seems helpful, remember that real agents won't demand you pay upfront for a refund or push you to make unusual financial transactions. If something about the interaction feels off — say, the call log shows a different length than what you remember, or you can't get a case number — it's worth hanging up and calling back through a different verified line. Finally, timing matters. If you do see an unexpected charge, don't wait it out. Contact your bank immediately, dispute the charge, and let the airline know what happened. Quick action often makes the difference between recovering your money and losing it for good. Bottom line This case is alarming as Smoker's wasn't duped by a fake Google listing or social media post — he dialed the official United line. Somehow, his call still went sideways. You shouldn't have to second-guess an airline's own customer service line — yet scams are increasingly blurring the lines between real systems and fake ones. When trust in the system breaks down, vigilance becomes the traveler's best defense. By sticking to official channels, questioning odd requests, and acting fast when something doesn't add up, you can keep your dream trip from turning into a financial nightmare. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Are Browsers Key To An Agentic AI Future? Opera, Perplexity Think So
AI-powered conversational search engine Perplexity is in the news for offering to buy Google's Chrome browser for $34.5 billion. But in December of 2024, Perplexity considered buying The Browser Co. And just months ago, Perplexity reportedly offered to buy Brave, the privacy-focused browser, for about $1 billion. Why does Perplexity want a web browser so badly? Possibly because a browser just might be key to our agentic AI future. I recently interviewed Opera senior product leader Henrik Lexow on my TechFirst podcast. Opera, the 30-year-old browser company that pioneered tabbed browsing, pop-up blocking, and ad blockers, has about 300 million active users globally. This year, Opera was the first to bring AI agents right into our browsers in a project called Opera Neon. 'The agentic browser … is that sort of the new operating system?' Lexow asked during the podcast. 'It's a big question.' Regardless of where the browser goes, Opera's pretty sure about the future of the internet itself. That's a huge shift, by the way. An agentic internet would be a massive and fundamental change from a user-driven internet to an agent-driven version. In a user-driven internet, you search, you see results, you make selections, you click links, you fill out forms, you book flights, and you buy products. In a sense, you are the agent. In an agentic internet, you tell something – maybe your agentic browser – to do those things for you. Except you don't say search, look, select, and buy; you say buy me more of the underwear I got six months ago. The agent then consults its memory, forms a plan, takes multiple steps, and handles it all: from which underwear you bought, and where you bought them, to finding the same ones online (and maybe checking around for better prices), to adding them to cart, to checking out … and reporting back to you with the results. The agent – in this case potentially an agentic browser – is therefore essentially a personal assistant, a force multiplier. But will an agentic browser be the main way we engage with agents? Perplexity seems to think it's pretty important, given the company's persistent and repeated but so far unfruitful attempt to buy a browser. Opera certainly thinks so, if only because Opera has a browser, and a very innovative one at that. Opera launched AI in a browser back in 2023 in a project called ARIA. ARIA enabled contextual interactions within web pages in a GPT-based chat interface. Over time, that's evolved to a tripartite strategy under the Opera Neon brand: The reality is that for many of us, most of our work happens in a browser. I'm writing this story in a browser. I recorded the interview in a browser. I've researched Opera and Perplexity in a browser. I made episode art for the podcast in a browser (thanks, Canva). Opera's thesis is that having agents embedded where you work makes them vastly more useful: they have access to your history, to your work, to your sites and apps. Important note: the Neon agentic browser's AI lives locally on your hardware, making it your agent, not Opera's, and not your employer's. This should boost your privacy, which is critical if you're going to give an agent access to very personal information including, likely, your credit card. Of course, this is just one vision of the future. Apple with Siri, as justly maligned as it is, would have another vision. Google, with Gemini and its own vast fleet of Android-enabled phones, would have another. Microsoft's Copilot is another. And OpenAI, which has ChatGPT apps for mobile devices as well as full computers, might have yet another vision of how we'll integrate AI into our lives and work. So whether the browser will be the locus of our agentic AI future or not is yet to be determined. Remember the old proverb: every problem looks like a nail to the person who only has a hammer. But it seems like a fairly good bet to me.
