logo
Porn site traffic plummets as UK age verification rules enforced

Porn site traffic plummets as UK age verification rules enforced

BBC News3 days ago
The amount of people in the UK visiting the most popular pornography sites has decreased after new age verification rules came into place, new figures indicate.Data analytics firm Similarweb said leading adult site Pornhub lost more than one million visitors in just two weeks.Pornhub and other major adult websites introduced advanced age checks on 25 July after the Online Safety Act said sites must make it harder for under-18s to see explicit material.Data experts at Similarweb compared the daily average user figures of popular pornography sites from 1 to 9 August with the daily average figures for July.
Pornhub is the UK's most visited website for adult content and it experienced a 47% decrease in traffic between 24 July, one day before the new rules came into place, and 8 August, according to Similarweb's data.Over the same time period, traffic to XVideos, another leading adult site, was also down 47% and OnlyFans saw traffic drop by over 10%.The number of average daily visits to Pornhub fell from 3.2 million in July to 2 million in the first nine days of August.However, the data also showed that some smaller and less well regulated pornography sites saw visits increase.This comes after Virtual private network (VPN) apps became the most downloaded on Apple's App Store in the UK in the days after the age verification rules were enforced.VPNs can disguise your location online - allowing you to use the internet as though you are in another country.The apps would also make it harder to collect data on how many people are visiting sites from specific locations.Media regulator Ofcom estimates 14 million people watch online pornography.It has set out a number of ways websites can verify the age of users including through credit card checks, photo ID matching and estimating age using a selfie.Critics have suggested an unintended consequence of the changes could be to drive people to more extreme content in darker corners of the internet, such as the dark web.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Could Labour ban VPNs after users dodge online protection laws?
Could Labour ban VPNs after users dodge online protection laws?

Wales Online

time21 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Could Labour ban VPNs after users dodge online protection laws?

Could Labour ban VPNs after users dodge online protection laws? Some internet users have raised concerns that stricter online safety laws could include VPNs in the future Some internet ueers are concerned their VPNs are under threat (Image: Getty Images) Since Labour introduced new age verifcation methods as part of the Online Safety Act, VPNs have seen an uptick in popularity. ‌ Virtual Private Networks help to obscure someone's IP address and can trick a website into thinking someone is connecting from another country. In practice, this allows users to dodge age verification checks from websites that require them under the new laws. ‌ However, with the government pushing the controversial rules on sites and emphasising its necessity in protecting children from harm online, many are concerned that this relatively easy way of skirting the checks could be banned. One concerned user on Reddit raised this question and asked whether the government could actually ban VPNs. ‌ Difficulties faced in banning VPNs User GenericUser104 wrote in the r/homelab subreddit:"I've recently started using a VPN again. I used one a while back to sail the seas, and now I'm using Proton to get around the Online Safety Act in the UK. Now there's talk of them banning VPNs too. Surely this isn't something they can do—and if it is, how would I put things in place so it won't affect me?" In response, another user highlighted how it would be technically very difficult for the government to implement a ban on VPNs due to their extensive use in business settings as well as person. User hk135 said: "VPN's are used extensively in the Corporate world for remote working, this is where they originated as a means to securely connect to the network at Work or interconnect various offices and sites. "Blanket banning VPN's is a non-starter for corporate reasons. Not just this but also depending on how you define a VPN, if it is encapsulating traffic in an encrypted tunnel, then SSL in general would be covered. Article continues below "What about encrypted connections to Proxy servers, that would redirect traffic as well. The logistics of banning VPNs or even anything that hides (intentional or not) the source IP address is unworkable, it would make any kind of security on the internet illegal." Overseas restrictions on VPNs However, some other users pointed out that other countries have already placed bans and restriction on using VPNs at home. For example, citizens in China are only allowed to use certain VPNs that have been approved by the government. Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates also has strict laws against using VPNs to access restricted content. Certain forms of restricted content can include calling services like WhatsApp. ‌ Similarly, user theantnest claimed: "As somebody who lived and worked in Dubai for a number of years, I can tell you that banning VPNs is totally possible. In the UAE every VPN website is blocked, it just won't load. And then they use deep packet inspection to detect VPN use and then throttle the traffic. "This even works on private VPNs like shoving a raspberry Pi running OpenVPN onto the network at your grandmothers house. The one caveat is that the UAE only has 2 ISPs that are both government owned. For it to work in the UK they would need to legislate that all ISPs must block VPN traffic by law." Does the government plan on banning VPNs? While concerns are being raised over a potential ban on VPNs, there is currently no indication from the government or other official bodies of this being put in place. In fact, the Science Secretary Peter Kyle told Sky News last month that he acknowledged VPN use was on the rise but stressed "the vast majority of adults" in the UK were following the rules. ‌ At the time, he said no plans were in place to ban VPNs, but added that he was looking "very closely" at how they are being used. He noted that "very few children" were actively looking for harmful content online and that the issue surrounding the law was that "harmful content comes and finds them". Melanie Dawes, the head of Ofcom, told MPs in May that people would use VPNs to get around the restrictions. 'A very concerted 17-year-old who really wants to use a VPN to access a site they shouldn't may well be able to,' she said. 'Individual users can use VPNs. Nothing in the Act blocks it. Furthermore, a spokesperson for the Age Verification Providers Association said that good quality VPNs provide a more secure way to connect to the internet. They added that AVPF does not support a ban on VPNs. Article continues below On its own website AVPF highlighted that digital services that want to remain compliant with the rules could detect VPN use, asses risk through behavioural cues, and flag users the option to verify their age or prove their location. A Government spokesperson said: "The Online Safety Act places no curbs whatsoever on what adults can say, see or access on the internet, unless it is something that would already be illegal, offline. "However, we make no apology for holding platforms to account, to ensure they take steps to prevent children from bypassing safety protections. This includes not encouraging content that promotes VPNs or other workarounds, when they are aimed specifically aimed at young users. More broadly, there are a range of legitimate reasons why users might use VPNs which do not cut across children's safety online."

What happened when we let Times readers bet $10,000 on stocks
What happened when we let Times readers bet $10,000 on stocks

Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Times

What happened when we let Times readers bet $10,000 on stocks

If you could go back in time to the day of the 2024 US election — armed with $10,000 and everything you know now — how much money could you make in the stock market? That is the challenge we set Times readers last week. Buy and sell any stock in the S&P 500 or the FTSE 100 and jump forward in time, watching how the actions of the Trump administration have affected global markets. You can play it here. So, how did readers get on as stock market traders? The average player managed to turn their $10,000 investment into about $14,000 over the eight simulated months, meaning that they generated $4,000 profit — a return of 40 per cent. This is a pretty good return, even if readers knew exactly what would happen: $10,000 invested in the S&P 500 would have returned $10,787, and the same in the FTSE 100 would have resulted in $11,095 — although $10,000 in bitcoin, turning into $16,931, would have beaten the lot. Trump's tariffs resulted in a frenzy of trading, helping Barclays to a 23 per cent jump in pre-tax profits in the first half of the year. There are, of course, some objectively 'better' stocks to pick. The US AI firm Palantir, co-founded by the Trump ally Peter Thiel, has more than tripled its value since the election. Other US AI firms and computer chip manufacturers (such as Super Micro Computer Inc and Jabil Inc) have also experienced strong growth, as well as companies in AI adjacent sectors, particularly energy stocks such as the General Electrics power spin-off GE Vernova Inc, which has benefited from increased demand from AI data centres. • The cheap and easy way to invest (without the risk) A significant number of readers wisely put all their money into Palantir, yielding returns of 200 per cent. But the highest profits were for those who traded repeatedly at optimum times. Only two players turned their $10,000 into more than $100,000; at the time of writing, the top score was an eye-watering $441,681. The highest possible score, buying the best performing stock day after day, was well over a trillion dollars. Compounding returns, to paraphrase Albert Einstein, really are the eighth wonder of the world. For data privacy reasons, we don't know which stocks the top performer picked. However, on average, those who played did not opt for high-risk, high-reward US tech stocks. In fact, most readers put their money into recognisable UK companies that had a track record of doing well. Readers rightly focused on UK defence stocks such as Rolls-Royce, BAE and also Babcock, the best performing FTSE 100 company during the period. All those stocks boomed after Trump's realignment of global defence. • Bull or bear? Find out what kind of investor you are Other top performers picked out by readers included Airtel Africa, International Airlines Group (which owns British Airways) and the mining firm Fresnillo. For the FTSE at least, readers had a good sense of where the gains have been, with most of the ten best-performing stocks over the period being in the most-bought list. The above looks at which stocks had the most money invested. But the list of stocks that were bought and sold the most — that is, with the highest number of trades — shows a preference towards US growth firms. Top of this list is Coinbase, the cryptocurrency exchange, and Elon Musk's Tesla, both of which have share prices inherently tied to unpredictable and volatile entities. Readers also explored options with oil and steel stocks. Due to tariff changes, these companies were particularly volatile. Many readers bought BP, others looked at Chevron or the US steel manufacturer Steel Dynamics. There were good profits to be had with all these, but you'd need to buy and sell at specific times to really make a good profit. • I want to invest in Europe's comeback. Where do I start? These lists also feature unexpected appearances from 3M, 3i Group, AES Corporation and APA Corporation. Theses companies didn't perform particularly well over the period and their inclusion is likely to be due to their names appearing at the top alphabetically, rather than being selected as part of a broader investment strategy.

Students can get ‘first-class' Samsung phone and Chromebook from Tesco Mobile for £20p/m – here's how
Students can get ‘first-class' Samsung phone and Chromebook from Tesco Mobile for £20p/m – here's how

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Students can get ‘first-class' Samsung phone and Chromebook from Tesco Mobile for £20p/m – here's how

Summer's nearly done, and let's be honest, a lot of students will be thinking about getting back to uni or college. Tesco Mobile is offering a brilliant bundle deal that combines a Chromebook and Samsung's budget-friendly A16 handset - with the lowest monthly price starting at just £19.99 with a Clubcard. Samsung Galaxy A16 with Chromebook Go, from £23.99p/m (£19.99p/m with Clubcard) This is an absolute gem of a deal for students looking for some low-cost tech for their studies ahead of their return to colleges and universities. Tesco Mobile has rolled out a deal that covers all the bases, without a fuss. You get a Samsung Galaxy A16 smartphone and a Chromebook Go laptop, all on one simple, low-cost contract. Better yet, there are big savings for shoppers with a Tesco Clubcard. If you're signed up to the supermarket's loyalty scheme, the 3GB data plan drops to £19.99 per month (it's typically £23.99 per month). The 12GB plan, meanwhile, is a just £22.99 a month (usually £28.99 per month). The Samsung Galaxy A16 is one of the brand's most affordable handsets. Let's be clear: it doesn't have all the AI-powered bells and whistles of a flagship like the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra. But despite being a budget device, it's still got the pedigree of the UK's top-selling Android brand, and has an impressive-looking range of features. It comes with a big, crisp 6.7-inch Super AMOLED screen. That's the sort of size you generally expect from 'max' smartphones - and to be fair, the aforementioned Galaxy S25 Ultra is only slightly larger at 6.9 inches. The camera on the back of the A16 is eye-catching for an entry-level device, with a 50MP main sensor that should snap some decent photos. Up front, there's a solid 13MP camera for all your video calls with the family or for getting that perfect selfie. And let's talk about the battery, because this thing is an absolute beast - it's a huge 5,000mAh unit that will keep you going all day long. (That's an interesting aspect of cheap phones, by the way: they tend to have great stamina.) A when you do need to charge it up, the fast charging gets you back in the game in no time. Interestingly, the SIM-free Galaxy A16 is currently sold out on Amazon, where it has an average rating of 4.3 out of 5 and largely positive reviews. One shopper says: 'Amazing phone, highly recommended... Love, love, love!' Another customer talks about its 'first-class service.' The Chromebook Go is a top bit of kit for a student on the move. It weighs next to nothing at 1.45kg, so you can just chuck it in your bag without even noticing it's there. It runs on Chrome OS and fires up in seconds, perfect for knocking out essays or doing research without any faffing about. The screen even folds right back, which is handy for showing your mates something you're working on. With a battery that goes the distance for up to 12 hours, you'll be able to work all day without worrying about power. As Tesco points out on its website, if you need wi-fi on the Chromebook, you can use the Samsung A16 to create a hotspot, making them excellent partners. So basically, you've got a single, simple way to get a phone and a laptop on one bill. The bundle comes with a standard 24-month manufacturer's warranty from Samsung in the UK. Honestly, for anyone heading off to studies in the near future, this deal's a no-brainer. Earlier this week, tech writer Tom Tyers spotted a .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store