Pictures of lifeboat and crew in Dunkirk rescue colourised for 85th anniversary
The RNLI has had two of its images from the time painstakingly cleaned and colourised using digital technology to mark the bravery of the crews that took part in Operation Dynamo 85 years ago, which began on May 26.
Coxswain Parker, who was 53 when he led his crew to the French coast, was awarded a Distinguished Service Medal for his services at Dunkirk.
He previously said of the operation: 'Margate lifeboat crew were standing by in their favourite pub, playing a quiet game of darts when I was called down to the boathouse.
'I asked them if they would help take the boat to Dunkirk to help rescue our boys. That was a shock to them, but they all volunteered without a murmur.
'They rushed home to tell their wives to get some food and then we were off.
'Margate was a pretty dead town then, more than half the residents had evacuated.
'But when we got to Dunkirk it was a bit different. With shells bursting and fires raging, it was like hell.'
One of the images of Margate Lifeboat Station shows Coxswain Parker with his crew in front of the Lord Southborough lifeboat which made the journey to Dunkirk.
The original black and white photo has been brought to life with colour, revealing the crew in brown kapok lifejackets and brodie helmets.
Kapok lifejackets were worn by RNLI crews during the Second World War.
Kapok is a fine, cotton-like material which is more commonly used to stuff cushions and toys and is highly buoyant, the RNLI said.
For crews taking part in wartime action, brodie helmets replaced the traditional yellow sou'wester.
The second photo shows the Lord Southborough in full colour, revealing a blue lifeboat with the RNLI logo.
It also shows the crew in their signature bright yellow waterproof oilskin coats.
The RNLI sent 19 boats across in total as part of the maritime rescue, with two crewed by its volunteers and 17 crewed by the Royal Navy.
When Coxswain Parker and his crew got to the shore, the sound of shell fire and the smell of burning was everywhere.
In the darkness, the crew had to feel their way towards the shore.
Once there, they got to work, moving people from the shore to the larger ships anchored in deeper water.
The crew from Ramsgate Lifeboat Station also went to Dunkirk for Operation Dynamo.
Both RNLI boats helped to save 3,400 people in the evacuation, the charity said.
Hayley Whiting, RNLI heritage archive and research manager, said: 'As we mark the 85th anniversary of Dunkirk, it feels fitting to bring these images of Margate Lifeboat Station to life with colour and remember the bravery of the crews that went across to Dunkirk and the lives they saved.
'I'm delighted to see Coxswain Parker and his crew in colour, it gives us an opportunity to share this remarkable story of courage and take a moment to reflect on the bravery of those that set sail for Dunkirk all those years ago and the difficult journey they faced. We're so proud of their courage and lifesaving efforts.
'Both of these images have been worked on by our in-house creative team to bring the original colours to life, with hours spent on the detail and research, to ensure they are a true representation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Pilot says he's found the location of Amelia Earhart's aircraft using Google Earth
Captain Justin Myers, who has almost 25 years of experience as a pilot, is "99 per cent certain" he has found the exact location where Amelia Earhart and her navigator crashed A British pilot is convinced he has tracked down the wreckage of a missing plane - 88 years after it vanished. Captain Justin Myers says he is "99 per cent certain" he has found the exact location where legendary female aviator Amelia Earhart's plane crashed. She had set off with navigator Fred Noonan in July 1937 for from Lae, Papua New Guinea, never to be seen again. No trace has ever been found of the pilot or her plane despite the most expensive sea and air search in American history up to that point being implemented. However now, Captain Myers is sure he has made a breakthrough - and he wants an expedition to the location to confirm his theories. It mirrors a story we previously shared about a tech expert from the UK who had claimed he spotted the doomed MH370 plane on Google Maps. When Captain Myers recently used zoomed-in images sourced from Google Earth, he spotted a group of shapes he believes to be fragments of the crashed plane. The expert, has almost 25 years of experience as a pilot, who claims these submerged objects match the exact dimensions of Earhart's Lockheed Electra 10E. According to Captain Myers, Earhart and Noonan crashed on the east coast of Nikumaroro Island, a remote coral atoll in the Pacific Ocean. He is not the first to suggest Earhart and Noonan may have crashed near to Nikumaroro Island as previous investigations low fuel and bad weather may have pushed the aircraft in this direction. Earhart was supposed to have landed at Howland Island to refuel, some 400 miles (640km) to the north of the atoll. The difficult conditions led to an attempt at an emergency landing on Nikumaroro, it is thought. Improvised tools, bits of clothing, and a piece of plexiglas which matches that of an Electra window have been found during previous probes. Captain Myers considered these investigations when he stumbled on what he believes are images of fragments of the crashed plane. In a blog post, Captain Myers says he became interested in Nikumaroro Island after watching a documentary about Earhart's final flight. He wrote: "Poor sleep, upper wind predictions not being accurate, probably fatigue and some anxiety would likely have played a part in the disappearance. "As a pilot, I thought to myself, if I was in Amelia's position trying to find a needle in a hay stack low on fuel and to be honest if we were in her position no doubt using some choice language, where would I force land my Lockheed Electra 10E?" Although Captain Myers, who lives in Lancashire, says he can't be completely sure this is Earhart and Noonan's Electra, he is certain that it is a vintage plane of the same size. He told Popular Science: "The bottom line is, from my interests from a child in vintage aircraft and air crash investigation, I can say that is what was once a 12-metre, two-engine vintage aircraft. What I can't say is that is definitely Amelia's Electra. If this is not Amelia's Electra 10 E, then it's the answer to another mystery that has never been answered."
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
The British public will never forgive Labour's latest cruel pension raid
We're not going to the dogs: 12 reasons why Britain remains the greatest place to live
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
The best portable neck and handheld fans, tested: six expert picks to keep you cool
Most people were hoping we wouldn't see a repeat of June and July's heatwaves this year, according to a recent YouGov survey of 5,148 British adults. Well, another one is already upon us. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. Thanks to the climate crisis, we know that things are hotting up year on year, and while we can hide in air-conditioned shops and offices, our homes can get uncomfortably – sometimes dangerously – hot. And we also have to go outside – or worse, voluntarily pack ourselves like sweaty sardines on dangerously hot public transport. On those occasions, a portable fan can make all the difference between manageable discomfort and indulging in an inadvisable quantity of ice-cream. Which one should you buy? I've spent the past few weeks testing handheld and neck fans from the likes of John Lewis, Dunelm and Bush, assessing them for power, noise, battery life and portability. Here's what I've found. Best handheld fan overall: John Lewis handheld and foldable fan Best budget handheld fan:Fine Elements folding rechargeable mini travel fan Best for power:Diveblues Jetforce Best neck fan: Jialexin three-speed neck fan I've been testing consumer technology for more than a decade now, including electric toothbrushes and water flossers for the Filter. Yet, without wanting to shatter the illusion that this makes me uniquely qualified for the task, portable fans are among the easiest things to test. There's little subjectivity involved, as you can measure power, noise, weight and battery life. All you really need is a working hypothalamus and fingers that can manoeuvre buttons – which I have. You also need hot weather, of course, but the Great British Summer has been, if anything, a little too accommodating in that regard. It also helps that my PC can turn my tiny office into an overheated sauna in 20 minutes. Each of the 13 fans I tested was assessed for measures that can be objectively tested. Power was not only measured by active use, but via a dedicated digital anemometer to measure wind speed at the highest and lowest supported speeds. More power equals more volume, so I used a sound measurement app held 15cm from the source to assess the decibel level at high, medium and low speeds. I timed how long it took each fan to empty its battery at the lowest and highest speeds (a test my three cats hated even more than I did, due to the constant noise for hours at a time), and popped each one on the scale to get an idea of portability. I also assessed them for more subjective things. Is the fan nice to hold? Can it be folded for increased portability or hands-free use? Does it look visually appealing? Finally, there's the biggie: price. With portable fans costing between £3 and £100, there's a huge range of options. It's simplistic to suggest that a higher cost automatically equals a better experience, though there is naturally a correlation. Nonetheless, I'm more forgiving of odd quirks in cheap fans than I would be in more expensive ones. There's also the sticky issue of repairability, and the growing waste problem of fast tech. Tough-to-replace lithium-ion batteries were present in all but two of the fans tested, which is far from ideal. With that in mind, I kept an eye on build quality too, hoping to endorse fans that will have a long and productive life before they need to be disposed of (electrical recycling, please – you can find a local spot here). After testing, the fans were either returned to the manufacturer or donated to charity. Here are the six best portable fans from my tests. It may not look that special, but John Lewis's offering is a well-made product at a reasonable price that doesn't put a blade wrong. The handle is a good size for a comfortable grip, and the sage colour my review unit came in is rather stylish. You can also get it in white, light blue or an eye-searing orange if you prefer. Why we love itLooks and build quality aside, the fan provides what you need without fuss. It has three power settings, putting out between 2.5 and 3.7 metres a second (m/s) of wind speed, and the 10cm head covers your whole face at a sensible distance without needing constant adjustment. I measured a peak volume of 62.4dB, which isn't the lowest, but is still quieter than some of the chunkier fans at their lowest levels. The battery lasted more than four hours on its highest setting, which should be sufficient for most journeys, and it can be charged up via a USB-C cable when it's empty. Pleasingly, the handle can also be folded down to make it a handy desktop fan with or without a cable attached. It works well, as long as you have space to keep it close enough to be refreshing. It's a shame that … at 25cm, it's a little on the tall side. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 2.5-3.7m/sMeasured volume: 51.1-62.4dBTested battery life: maximum, 4hrs 11mins; minimum, 9hrs 37minsMeasured weight: 181g Cheap and cheerful, this folding fan may feel a little rough around the edges, but it gets the job done. It's not the cheapest fan I tested, but it proved superior to Dunelm's £3 offering (which dropped to a barely noticeable 0.5m/s power as the AA batteries drained) and beat Superdrug's £5 fan on battery life (a disappointing 45 minutes at maximum and two hours on minimum). Why we love itIt's flimsy, but the fan delivers the basics pretty well. It has three speeds, giving between 2.6 and 3.7m/s of wind speed, while the battery lasted six hours at the lowest setting, and just short of three at its highest. It's a touch noisier than the John Lewis model, maxing out at 64.8dB, but it's more travel-friendly, folding in half for portability and weighing 48g lighter. That folding hinge means you can also use it as a desk fan, if you like, and there's even a small flashlight on the bottom for looking around in the dark (though it's easy to leave this on by mistake). It's a shame that … the build quality isn't all that, with some rough plastic moulding. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 2.6-3.7m/sMeasured volume: 54.3-64.8dBTested battery life: maximum, 2hrs 50mins; minimum, 6hrsMeasured weight: 133g If you want power for a reasonable price, then the Jetforce is the answer. Even at its lowest of five speeds, it narrowly betters the speeds of the two fans above by hitting a breezy 3.8m/s. Why we love itA refreshing breeze even at the lowest settings, but when you're really struggling with the heat, crank it up all the way to level five, and it hits a massive 6.6m/s. In truth, you likely won't need to max it out, and that's just as well because the noise levels really pick up on the higher settings. Starting at an already noisy 66dB, put it all the way up to level five, and it reaches 74.3dB, about the level of a vacuum cleaner – a vacuum cleaner uncomfortably close to your ears. It'll also hit the battery hard: at level 1, you can eke out nearly 11-and-a-half hours, but that drops to 2hrs 37mins on max. Still, if you can cope with the noise or routinely wear headphones, it's a nice option to have in really hot weather. Plus, the flexible head means you can use it as a desk fan, and it has an attachable lanyard so it can be worn around the neck, blasting air upwards. It's a shame that … it gets noisy fast. Power levels: 5Measured air speed: 3.8-6.6m/sMeasured volume: 66-74.3dBTested battery life: maximum, 2hrs 37mins; minimum, 11hrs 25minsMeasured weight: 184g Sign up to The Filter Get the best shopping advice from the Filter team straight to your inbox. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. after newsletter promotion Want something hands-free to keep you cool? A fan worn around the neck does that, while targeting the body's thermoregulation centre, which can, in theory, make you feel cooler. The Jialexin three-speed neck fan certainly delivered that, if you can cope with fans running so close to your ears. Why we love itIt really does make you feel cooler, even if the fans don't appear to be more powerful when compared with regular handheld fans. My anemometer test revealed seemingly low speeds of 1.7 to 2.2m/s, but there are more air sources and, as a result, the cooling effect felt more consistent and less disruptive than a jet of constant air to the face. The downside of this, however, is the noise. While the measured volume of 52 to 64.1dB doesn't sound too bad – around the sound of a busy office – having it this close to your ears for an extended period is tiring, and you do feel a sense of calm when it's switched off again. That said, if you're wearing headphones, it becomes a non-issue. This neck fan is extremely comfortable to wear, and it's more flexible than solid plastic ones, so you can shape it around your neck for more comfortable cooling. That, for me, makes it stand out from its competitors. It's a shame that … by design, neck fans have to be quite close to your ears. Power levels: 3Measured air speed: 1.7-2.2m/sMeasured volume range: 52-64.1dBTested battery life: maximum, 3hrs 19mins; minimum, 8hrsMeasured weight: 291g Best for: a multi-function fan If you've got money to burn, then the JisuLife handheld fan Ultra2 is both ridiculously powerful and extremely versatile. Starting with the power, it has 100 different speeds, ranging from 2.8m/s all the way up to 9.8m/s at full blast, with 98 increments in between. The battery is impressive too, lasting well over a day at the lowest speed – though this did drop to 1hr 34mins when running at full blast. I was secretly quite pleased about that, as the 88.8dB volume (similar to a hairdryer) wasn't a particularly fun time for my ears, even from a decent distance away. In truth, that kind of power is uncomfortably like staring down a wind tunnel anyway, and the lower settings are considerably easier on the ears: 59.5dB at level 1, rising to 79.1dB at 50. The high price of entry is made a little easier to swallow, though, since the Ultra 2 brings a few extra features for the money. There are a couple of adapters in the box to turn the fan into an air cushion inflater pump or to help kickstart campfires by pushing in more air. A powerful torch on the back can flick between different lighting modes, including a flashing one to attract attention in an emergency. For those of us allergic to camping, there are more sedate indoor uses. One of the adapters is a dust cleaner, which has removed an unspeakable amount of gunk from my keyboard, and the USB-C charging port is two way, meaning you can steal some of the 9,000mAh battery for your other devices too. It didn't make the final cut because … you could buy 15 Fine Elements fans for the Jisulife's RRP of £95. Power levels: 100; measured air speed: 2.8-9.8m/s; measured volume: 59.5-88.8dB; tested battery life: maximum, 1hr 34mins; minimum, 26hrs 49mins; measured weight: 294g Best for: peace and quiet Take it from someone who's listened to the incessant hum of fans for weeks now: the noise can become grating. If keeping sound to a minimum is your priority, then this VonHaus 3-in-1 fan might be the one for you. At its lowest setting, it registered just 41dB – less than the sound of a fridge humming. At that volume, you're looking at a limited power of 2.7m/s, of course, but you can increase that to 4.3m/s over five incrementally louder settings if you need something more. It's worth noting that by the time you hit maximum, the volume reaches 61.9dB – more comparable with the other fans on test. Overall, it's a well-designed fan: comfortable in the hand, with a stand to put it upright on your desk, including a phone holder at the base if you want to watch something over the fan's whisper. You can even use it as a makeshift neck fan with the detachable lanyard, and the head pointed upwards. This isn't a direct substitute for a neck fan, as it's still aimed at the face, but it's a nice added use case all the same. It didn't make the final cut because … the smaller head doesn't cover quite as much of the face as other models. Power levels: 5; measured air speed: 2.7-4.3m/s; measured volume: 41-61.9dB; tested battery life: maximum, 3hrs 45mins; minimum, 13hrs 20mins; measured weight: 129g Look out for fans with different uses. While the traditional way to use a handheld fan is, of course, in the hand, some models can double as desktop fans, either by folding in half or with a bundled stand. Some even come with a lanyard attachment so they can be worn hands-free around the neck. While power might seem like the key feature, remember this is always a trade-off. Higher fan speeds will make you feel nominally cooler, but will come at the expense of battery life and more subtle noise levels. Neck fans have two advantages over regular handheld fans. The first is that they're entirely hands-free, meaning you can wear them without temporarily losing the use of a hand in the process. The second advantage is that as they target the neck, there's evidence to suggest they may make you feel cooler overall. This is because the thermoregulation centre is at the base of the brain, so a neck fan may make you feel cooler than a regular handheld one, even if your actual body temperature isn't dropping all that much. The downside to this is that the positioning directly below your ears can be a little tiring, given the constant volume (although this is a problem that's easily sidestepped with a pair of headphones). Alan Martin is a writer who has been putting products – including phones, gaming devices and wearables – through their paces for more than a decade. He is constantly tripping over product boxes
