‘MindsEye' is more than the worst game of the year
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
an hour ago
- The Verge
Could the Oscars come to YouTube?
Posted Aug 18, 2025 at 2:51 PM UTC Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Emma Roth Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Emma Roth Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Entertainment Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Streaming Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All YouTube
Digital Trends
2 hours ago
- Digital Trends
Every Nintendo console release in chronological order: it goes back way before the NES
For many gamers, Nintendo was our introduction to the world of video games. Whether it was booting up Super Mario Bros. on the NES or Donkey Kong Bananza on the Switch 2, Nintendo consoles have been the default system for kids for decades. However, Nintendo's history dates back even further than the most passionate Nintendo fan might realize. The Mario maker wouldn't become a household name until the NES arrived in the mid-'80s, but Nintendo has been spreading joy through gaming for well over half a century now. While some hardware didn't hit the mark, hit franchises like Zelda, Pokémon, and Mario always delivered enthralling experiences that helped define multiple generations of gamers. With such a rich history, I want to walk down memory lane with you to recall every major Nintendo console released from its origins up to today. Recommended Videos Note: I will be leaving out all the various versions and redesigns of consoles, such as the various Game Boy, DS, and Switch models. Color TV-Game – 1977 Even the most hardcore Nintendo fan who is always at the ready to hit you with the fact that Nintendo began in the 1800s selling Hanafuda cards is unlikely to know that the first true Nintendo console was the Color TV-Game from 1977. Nintendo partnered with Mitsubishi to create a line of five different models over the course of six years. These consoles had a set of built-in games, most of them versions of Pong, with newer versions having slight upgrades in hardware. While quaint by today's standards, Nintendo clearly knew what it was doing right from the start since it was the best selling system of the first generation. Game & Watch – 1980 The good old Game & Watch is where most Nintendo historians will mark the start of Nintendo's video game history. The story goes that designer Gunpei Yokoi was inspired to create a small, handheld game when seeing a businessman on a train entertaining himself by messing around with a pocket calculator. Thus, he designed a game that could be carried around in someone's pocket to help pass the time on the train. Game & Watch consoles only played one very basic game each, but introduced a ton of important features for video games. Handheld games were the obvious, but this was the first time a D-pad was used to control a character. Nintendo Entertainment System – 1985 As successful as the Color TV-Game and Game & Watch were overseas, it was the Nintendo Entertainment System that gained worldwide notoriety. Called the Famicom in Japan, the NES took all the learnings from other home consoles, such as swappable cartridges, and melded them with amazing franchises that are still going strong today. This was the birth of the modern 2D platformer in Super Mario Bros., the introduction to the Legend of Zelda, and the hidden mysteries of Metroid. The NES single-handedly revitalized the home console market thanks to its revolutionary controller and software lineup. Game Boy – 1989 As great as the NES was doing in the home market space, Nintendo knew there was a massive market for gaming on the go that no one else was properly servicing. There were other handhelds out there before the Game Boy, but none as powerful and compelling as this. It wasn't quite an NES in your pocket, but it was darn close. Plus, the Game Boy might have had the best launch game of all time with Tetris. Even if it only played that, I suspect the Game Boy would've sold a ton. The fact that Nintendo kept this system going for over a decade with only minor upgrades is a testament to its understanding that fun trumps power. Super Nintendo Entertainment System – 1991 Nintendo kept the naming convention simple and clean for its second major home console release. The SNES was, in every way, just a better version of the NES. We went from 8 to 16-bit graphics, got four face buttons and two bumpers, plus one of the strongest libraries of games yet. Other developers were starting to understand game design a lot more by this point, but Nintendo itself continued to make everything else look basic by comparison. Super Mario World, A Link to the Past, and Super Metroid are all still regarded as some of the best in their series and totally playable over 30 years later. Virtual Boy – 1995 It was only a matter of time before Nintendo stumbled, but thankfully the Virtual Boy was more of a side project than a core system. Nintendo had always been pushing the limits with new ways to play, such as motion controls and lightguns as far back as the NES, but virtual reality was a nut no one had cracked. Nintendo gave it a shot, but even the gaming titan couldn't manage to pull it off. The black and red screen was a killer for most, but the awkward design of the hardware itself made it almost impossible to play comfortably. It also wasn't even real virtual reality, but more of a simulated 3D effect. Nintendo 64 – 1996 Speaking of 3D, the N64 is a strange case. On one hand, the Nintendo first-party games felt a full generation ahead of the others who struggled to grapple with 3D design. On the other hand, the library was woefully small and the system itself didn't sell all that well. Again, this wasn't the first time an analog stick was used to control games, but Nintendo was the first major company to include it in its controller by default, which would soon become standard. This was also the last major console to stick to cartridges while the competition, specifically PlayStation, opted for CDs. Game Boy Advance – 2001 If the Game Boy was an NES in your pocket, the GBA was the SNES in your pocket. This long-overdue handheld upgrade was superior in every way. Beyond the graphics, the design itself was much more comfortable and pleasing, especially the horizontal screen. What was most appealing about the GBA, and would become a highly requested feature to this day, was backwards compatibility. All original Game Boy games fit right into the GBA as well as the new titles. Nintendo even toyed with merging the handheld with the home console with an adapter that allowed players to connect to a GameCube in certain titles. GameCube – 2001 That brings us to the good old GameCube. This block of a home console was a bit hit and miss in retrospect. It was the weakest-selling compared to the Xbox and PS2, but had some of the more contentious first party games at the time. While they are more appreciated today, Super Mario Sunshine and The Wind Waker were both seen as a letdown compared to previous entries. Nintendo DS – 2004 Rather than wait another decade to give us a handheld upgrade, Nintendo struck rather quick with the DS. That would normally be a recipe for disaster, but Nintendo sidestepped the controversy by once again allowing full backwards compatibility with the GBA. The dual screen design of the DS was another big risk, but one that paid off big time. A ton of unique games suddenly became possible using the two screen system and stylus, as well as built-in Wi-Fi support for online functionality. It skyrocketed to become one of the most successful systems ever made. Nintendo Wii – 2006 Console sales had been declining after the SNES, which perhaps was the impetus for Nintendo to go weird with the next home console rather than fight head-to-head as it had before. Rather than embracing HD graphics like the others, the Wii remained in SD but revolved around motion controls. That idea didn't come to fruition on the NES, but in 2006 the technology was good enough to make it work. And boy did it work. The Wii broke into markets no other game console had, suddenly appearing in nursing homes as well as young kids' living rooms because anyone could hold the remote and know how to play. Nintendo 3DS – 2011 This is technically part of the DS line, but I think the 3DS deserves a special mention because it did have exclusive games that set it apart. As you can guess by the name, this system is essentially the DS again but with more powerful guts and the ability to use stereoscopy technology to create the illusion of 3D without needing glasses. While not something that completely changed the way games were played, it was still a marvel to see and kept the handheld system relevant for another six years. Nintendo Wii U – 2012 The only bigger stumble Nintendo took than the Virtual Boy is the Wii U. The combination of a confusing name and marketing strategy, plus a weird Game Pad controller that ended up being more of a hindrance than a cool control method buried this system. I still maintain that the Wii U had a lot of potential if properly handled, but it sadly never managed to overcome its troubles. The only saving grace is that every amazing game released on the system eventually got a port to the next console. Nintendo Switch – 2017 What's there to say about the Switch? Nintendo had a lot to prove this time and made sure not to make any of the same mistakes it had with the Wii U. We knew right from the start what this system was and why it was special, but it also had the software to back it up. Launching with a Zelda game was massive, and combining all Nintendo's development focus onto the hybrid system rather than splitting between home and handheld devices ensured a steady stream of amazing games. Even though its successor has hit the market, there's a very good chance the Switch sales could creep their way up to become the best selling console of all time. Nintendo Switch 2 – 2025 And that brings us to today, with the Switch 2. We're still early on in its life, but it has already broken records as the fastest selling console in history during its first month. I don't see that pace slowing down soon, either, with an incredible lineup of titles on the way to draw in fans from all over. This is just a more powerful Switch in almost every way, plus some minor tweaks like mouse controls, but Nintendo clearly didn't want to fix what wasn't broken. We'll have to see how that plays out in the long term with its upcoming video games, like whatever new Zelda game is coming and the next Pokémon entries.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
What Two Seemingly Dissimilar GOTY Contenders Have In Common
At face value, two potential Game of the Year (GOTY) nominees, Dogubomb's Blue Prince and Kojima Productions' Death Stranding 2: On the Beach, seem like very different games, but both aim to reinvent our genre expectations. One of the things I like about the Game of the Year Awards—and gaming in general—is how titles from vastly different genres are appreciated and discussed alongside one another. Last year, for instance, Balatro, a poker roguelike by solo developer LocalThunk, competed against Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, an action RPG from industry giant Square Enix. These games couldn't be more different in genre, story, and mechanics—and they also diverge radically in production budgets, marketing power, fan base size, and development team scale. As someone coming from the book world, I find the fact that such different games can compete against each other striking. Literary prizes are often far narrower, not only in genre but also in the types of publishers and authors considered. The prestigious Man Booker Prize, for example—which is supposed to be open to all genres—heavily favors literary fiction from a specific kind of author backed by a certain caliber of publishing house. That's not to say the Game of the Year Awards offer a perfectly level playing field. The awards, which are 90% determined by jurors from the media and 10% determined by fan vote, have a tendency to favor AAA and AA games. Arguably, indies don't get the attention they deserve. Still, it's significant that a game like Balatro can share the stage with Final Fantasy VII Rebirth. This year, we may see a similar face-off: an indie breakout hit (Blue Prince) against an industry heavyweight (Death Stranding 2). Blue Prince is a complex puzzle game with a lot of layers. Story-wise, you play as a young man trying to reach the hidden 46th room of your late uncle's mansion to claim your inheritance. To do so you have to fit the mansion's shifting rooms together in the right way. You accomplish this by drawing and selecting different rooms from a randomized pool. The rooms reset every day. Rooms have different orientations, properties, and abilities that can help you, or hinder you, as you attempt to get to the 46th room. Fitting them together in a way that lets you progress is deceptively difficult. Blue Prince involves spatial puzzle solving (trying to arrange the rooms on a 2D grid) with first-person environmental storytelling (you then have to walk through the rooms to solve puzzles within the rooms). Shuttling between these two different forms of puzzle creates an experience unlike any other game I've played. The result is a sort of weird mashup of something like Tetris and Gone Home. Developed over eight years by first-time developer Tonda Ross, Blue Prince launched to widespread critical acclaim. Ross largely worked on the project alone, at least at first. At present, Blue Prince looks like a strong contender for a GOTY nomination. On the flip side, Death Stranding 2: On the Beach is an action-adventure game set in a post-apocalyptic future. You play as the currier Sam, delivering packages across treacherous terrain while facing enemies that range from ghostlike BTs to samurai mechs to run-of-the-mill brigands. The Death Stranding series builds its gameplay loop around delivery and traversal, even though its world often resembles a third-person shooter. While Death Stranding 2 leans more into shooter elements than its predecessor, it still devotes a lot of attention to walking and inventory management: e.g., deciding whether to deploy a ladder or a zipline, balancing cargo loads, and plotting safe routes. In a setting more reminiscent of Fallout or Horizon Zero Dawn, the mechanics sometimes feel closer to a cozy game. Death Stranding's creator, Hideo Kojima, is one of the most recognized names in gaming. While exact numbers are not known, his production company likely had around 150 people working on the game, plus a slew of actors (including Norman Reedus and Elle Fanning) and creatives hired specifically for the project. Thematically, stylistically, and mechanically Blue Prince and Death Stranding are incredibly different. But both creatively arrive at gameplay loops that feel quirky and unexpected. Both games are hard to describe. The uniqueness of how you play these games is a major strength, but also a source of frustration. Both games, for me, took a good while to settle into, in part because I didn't know what to expect. The blending of genres can be disorienting. Ultimately though, it made my attachment to both games stronger, and the experience of playing them more memorable. Neither Blue Prince nor Death Stranding are completely 'new.' Like all games, they borrow from well-established predecessors. But they do so in a way that is genre bending. While both games have received positive reviews, blending genres isn't without risk. Some players report Blue Prince is too challenging. The focus on walking and routing in Death Stranding left many players feeling bored. Not all acclaimed, successful, or great games go the route of Blue Prince and Death Stranding. Games like the Witcher 3 and Red Dead 2 are innovative in their own right. They are beautiful and tell compelling stories. They are incredibly fun to play. But they are built on improving, rather than subverting, what players expect from a genre. One of the pluses though, of genre bending experimentation, is that it can bring new players into gaming, or at least bring players to new types of games. Because of Blue Prince's board game like qualities and spatial reasoning, I've introduced it to friends and family who don't game. Despite being a little hesitant at first, they've enjoyed it. Similarly, I don't think I would have found Death Stranding 2 to be such an intensely emotional experience if it didn't jarringly combine the soothing mechanics of logistic management with a deeply disturbing world. While I doubt either Blue Prince or Death Stranding 2 will win GOTY (Clair Obscur: Expedition 33, which looks excellent, is currently the frontrunner), it's encouraging to see risk taking, genre bending titles receive attention and success. It's also encouraging to see such radically different games celebrated alongside one another.
