Democrats Are Pouring Into This Red-State Senate Race
Turek, who represents Council Bluffs in far western Iowa in the state House, is a former Paralympian who won two gold medals in wheelchair basketball as part of Team USA. He announced his run with a two-minute video in which he casts himself as an underdog who's managed to win in Trump territory.
Turek joins four already-announced candidates: State Sen. Zach Wahls; Jackie Norris, the chair of the Des Moines School Board and a former chief of staff to then-first lady Michelle Obama; former professional baseball player and State Sen. J.D. Scholten and Nathan Sage, an Iraq War veteran who chairs the Chamber of Commerce in the tiny town of Knoxville.
The size of the field reflects Democrats' optimism that the backlash to President Donald Trump's second term could be large enough to give them a fighting chance in a state he won by 13 percentage points in 2024. It also highlights the party's ongoing uncertainty about the best pathways to compete in red territory.
The five candidates are taking distinct approaches: Norris is emphasizing her background as a teacher and education issues; Sage and Scholten are both running as populists; Wahls, age 34, is promising to be part of a 'new generation' of Democrats; and Turek is emphasizing his past electoral successes.
There are clear through lines: All five candidates are attacking Ernst for her support of the GOP budget that combined slashes to Medicaid with tax cuts tilted toward the wealthy. Multiple candidates mentioned Ernst's 'we are all going to die' response at a town hall in their launch videos.
Ernst has hired a campaign manager, but some Republicans in Washington, D.C., still believe she could choose not to run for a third term after briefly clashing with Trump over the nomination of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. It's not clear who the GOP could run if Ernst decides to bow out.
Republicans have a 53-47 advantage in the Senate. While the political environment in the midterms is expected to favor Democrats, their pickup opportunities beyond North Carolina and Maine are unclear. Iowa is one of several states in the next tier of opportunities, along with similarly red Texas and Ohio.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom praised for new online posting style: All Caps and mimicking Trump
California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom is earning plaudits for his recent trolling of President Donald Trump by mimicking his social media habits, including all-caps posts. Newsom, a frequent foil for the president's social media outbursts, took to X Tuesday night to blast 'DONALD 'TACO' Trump,' -- a reference to 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' coined by a financial columnist over the president's back-and-forth tariff policies. Trump has been pushing several red states to gerrymander their congressional maps to give Republicans an upper hand, amid growing fears that the GOP could lose the House in next year's midterms. The maps are typically redrawn every ten years following the census, and not in the middle of the decade. Newsom sent Trump a letter Monday calling on him to end the 'unprecedented, mid-decade, hyper-partisan gerrymander to rig the upcoming midterm elections.' 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' he wrote. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' Newsom subsequently posted on X that Trump had 24 hours to respond to the letter. On Tuesday, as the deadline passed, he wrote: 'DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, 'MISSED' THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS,' THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!).' 'BIG PRESS CONFERENCE THIS WEEK WITH POWERFUL DEMS AND GAVIN NEWSOM — YOUR FAVORITE GOVERNOR — THAT WILL BE DEVASTATING FOR 'MAGA,'' he added. 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!' Sports reporter Emily Bicks wrote on Threads: 'Gavin Christopher Newsom keepin the no f***s energy comin.' Liberal social media commentator, Harry Sisson, wrote: 'I absolutely love how Gavin Newsom is treating Donald Trump with the disdain and disrespect that he absolutely deserves.' Journalist Karly Kingsley added: 'I don't think we're giving Gavin Newsom enough credit for what he's doing to defend democracy and to stop a wannabe dictator from consolidating power.' Attorney and Never Trump-er George Conway joined the presidential mockery, writing in response to Newsom: 'Many people, big strong men with tears in their eyes, will soon be saying, 'Sir, you have the most Amazing State, with the Most Beautiful Maps. No one has ever seen anything like this. Your Excellency, Sir, we are in awe of your Incomparable Gubernatorialicityness'.' But not all were on board with Newsom's style change. The Chief Strategy and Public Affairs Officer at Future Caucus, an organization for young lawmakers, Reed Howard, wrote: 'Race-to-the-bottom politics is a darn shame. America deserves better than this. I want real leadership.' Reporter Alex Gault added: 'If this becomes a lasting approach to political communications, I will be committing myself to whatever mental hospital still does lobotomies.' Last month, Trump asked Texas to redraw its maps to hand Republicans another five House seats in the state. Texas Democrats left the state to deny Republicans the ability to move forward with their proposal. Democrats then said they would look to redraw maps in blue states such as Illinois, California, and New York, prompting Republicans to consider taking action in Ohio and Indiana. California has an independent commission that draws political maps, and if Newsom moves ahead with his threat, he would need passage of a special ballot in November.
Chicago Tribune
26 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Harvard and the Trump administration are nearing a settlement including a $500 million payment
WASHINGTON — Harvard University and the Trump administration are getting close to an agreement that would require the Ivy League university to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and to end investigations, according to a person familiar with the matter. The framework is still being sorted out with significant gaps to close, but both sides have agreed on the financial figure and a settlement could be finalized in coming weeks, according to the person who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Harvard declined to comment. The agreement would end a monthslong battle that has tested the boundaries of the government's authority over America's universities. What began as an investigation into campus antisemitism escalated into an all-out feud as the Trump administration slashed more than $2.6 billion in research funding, ended federal contracts and attempted to block Harvard from hosting international students. The university responded with a pair of lawsuits alleging illegal retaliation by the administration after Harvard rejected a set of demands that campus leaders viewed as a threat to academic freedom. Details of the proposed framework were first reported by The New York Times. A $500 million payment would be the largest sum yet as the administration pushes for financial penalties in its settlements with elite universities. Columbia University agreed to pay the government $200 million as part of an agreement restoring access to federal funding, while Brown University separately agreed to pay $50 million to Rhode Island workforce development organizations. Details have not been finalized on where Harvard's potential payment would go, the person said. The Republican president has been pushing to reform prestigious universities that he decries as bastions of liberal ideology. His administration has cut funding to several Ivy League schools while pressing demands in line with his political campaign. None has been targeted as frequently or as heavily as Harvard, the richest U.S. university with an endowment valued at $53 billion. More than a dozen Democrats in Congress who attended Harvard cautioned against a settlement on Aug. 1, warning the university it may warrant 'rigorous Congressional oversight and inquiry.' Capitulating to political demands, they said, would set a dangerous precedent across all of higher education.
Chicago Tribune
26 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Column: Illinois, Texas both need remap reform
Nearly a thousand miles and opposite sides of the political spectrum separate Illinois and Texas. Yet there's one thing Democrats in the Land of Lincoln and Republicans in the Lone Star State can agree on: Gerrymandering works. For political operatives, the crafting of partisan redistricting maps is the miracle elixir that cures party ills and keeps politicians entrenched for generations. Like in Illinois and Texas. Which is why dozens of Texas Democrats have fled Austin, the state capitol, and are glamping in Chicagoland. They do not want to be part of a legislative quorum, which would allow the state's Republicans to redistrict upward of five new bright-red congressional districts. On its face, it seems supremely unfair attempting to wipe out constitutional guarantees of 'one man, one vote,' which is core to our democratic institutions. Instead of redistricting, both Illinois and Texas need remap reform. Under the Texas two-step of Gov. Greg Abbott, he who bused Illinois thousands of asylum seekers in recent years, we are told will give the administration of President Donald Trump additional seats in the U.S. House — Texas currently has 35 — in order to push through any wacky proposals he can come up with. So far, there have been plenty that have squeaked through the House and Senate with the help of Trump-friendly lawmakers. Texas Democrats setting up their rump headquarters in Illinois, at least through Aug. 19, is the latest foray in this battle of political wills. After all, we are a sanctuary state, and all are welcome. Notice these Dems didn't abscond to Oklahoma or Arkansas to boycott their legislative session. They made a beeline here and have been garnering much media play with Illinois Democrats by their side, denouncing Trump and this vote grab. Indeed, lame-duck Sen. Dick Durbin said the other day the opposition to the remap is not alone to Texas: 'This is an American issue, where we have to stand together for the families of this country.' But he would be so eloquent for families in Illinois who have seen their votes diluted over the years through the gerrymandering of congressional and state legislative districts. It's not that this isn't well-known. Gov. JB Pritzker, who signed the 2021 redistricting bill into law which has locked in Democrats' super-majorities in the Legislature, has warned if Texas goes through with this questionable mid-term redistricting, Illinois could do the same. Unsure where those additional blue seats would come from. Of our 17 congressional districts, 14 are ruled by Democrats. That's an 82% majority. Gerrymandering has been around since the nascent days of the republic. The term combines the name of Elbridge Gerry with salamander and is considered anathema to those who seek to keep that elusive 'one man, one vote' in play. Gerry, an early patriot during the American Revolution who eventually became a vice president, was governor of Massachusetts in 1812 when he signed a bill that created a partisan House district in the Boston area that opponents compared to the shape of a salamander. Sort of like the looks of the 5th Congressional District represented by Chicago Democrat Mike Quigley. Quigley's district snakes from deep inside Wrigleyville on Chicago's North Side through Skokie, Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, and eventually finding its way into a sliver of Lake County, with 5.62% of its electorate. Lake County towns include Lake Zurich, Buffalo Grove, Long Grove, Barrington, Kildeer, and Deer Park. Besides being potential voters, what those Lake County communities have in common with Chicagoans only Springfield's Democrat political mapmakers know for certain. Perhaps many once lived in the big city and bolted for the suburbs. State Democrats have voiced concerns that the Republican remap of Texas' congressional districts would be unconstitutional for violating federal voting protections in minority-majority districts. They do this while ignoring what has been done in Illinois, where the redistricting maps were drawn after the 2020 census, not in the middle of the decade. To end this political theater in the future and to install fairness back in the process, there needs to be an independent, nationwide mapmaking system to consider congressional and legislative districts every decade. Talk of remap retaliation by elected leaders in Illinois, California, New York and others sounds like we're living in a banana republic instead of a constitutional one.
