The winds of change are blowing in favour of Palestine
Abbey Makoe
The tide is turning – and at a blistering pace – for the recognition of the Palestinian statehood by a growing majority of the nations of the world.
As of this year, 147 out of the 193 UN member-states officially recognize the State of Palestine.
At the end of a widely publicized conference on the Middle East held in New York this week, 15 predominantly Western nations undertook to recognize the Palestinian statehood.
Represented by their ministers of foreign affairs, the following countries nailed their colours to the mast, once and for all. They are: Canada, France, Australia, Ireland, Finland, Iceland, New Zealand, Portugal, Norway, Spain, Slovenia, Malta, San Marino, Andorra, and Luxembourg.
Why does this matter? It matters the most because, for far too long, the plight of the Palestinian people has been ignored by the bulk of the nations of the world. Let me paraphrase: The suffering of the Palestinian people has been aided and abetted by the vast majority of the world's most influential countries.
The unfolding drastic changes in global relations once more prove a pertinent point: Evil can never triumph over good, no matter how long it takes.
There have been times, times too many to count, when the temptation to give up the pursuit of Palestinian freedom appeared too appealing, and appeasing.
The father of Palestinian freedom, Yasser Arafat, and hundreds of thousands of other Palestinians had lived and died for a free Palestine. As is the case with the blood of freedom fighters, their blood is never shed in vain. It nourishes the course for which men, women, and children give their lives. It expedites the attainment of the goal of liberty and freedom.
The spirit of the more than 60,000 Palestinians who have been mowed down by the machine guns of the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) and their drones lives forever. Their blood nourishes the Palestinian tree of liberty. So, too, is the blood of the unaccounted-for thousands of Palestinians whose bodies continue to rot under mountainous heaps of rubble that is a testament to the relentlessly merciless bombardment of the Gaza Strip. The world is finally reawakening from slumber, regaining consciousness, and the sense of righteousness.
Countries such as South Africa deserve a loud mention in defense of the Palestinian course for self-determination. So, too, are countries such as Russia, which, from as far back as the days of the Soviet Union, has recognized the Palestinian statehood and the UN declaration of the two-state solution as the safest pathway to a permanent basis for a peaceful coexistence of the peoples of Israel and Palestine.
The 15 nations wrote in a joint statement that has captured the attention of the international community: 'We ...have already recognized, have expressed or express the willingness or the positive consideration of our countries to recognize the State of Palestine, as an essential step towards the two-state solution.'
They explicitly called on the other member-states of the UN to join them in the push for the global recognition of the State of Palestine and the establishment and institution of the two-state solution, where apartheid Israel would cease to keep the Palestinians under the yoke of oppression.
This shift in momentum towards ending the suppression of the rights of millions of Palestinians needs to be maintained.
The fear of US hegemony has been overcome, and it appears to have finally been broken by its one-time enforcers. The public announcement by the French President Emmanuel Macron that Paris will officially recognize the State of Palestine when the UN General Assembly convenes in September shook the diplomatic cover and insulation that Tel Aviv has thus far enjoyed, with the apparent absence of conditions for several decades.
Macron's pronouncement triggered different reactions from different quarters. First, and predictably, the US President Donald Trump poured scorn on France's move. But elsewhere – in Britain, to be specific – Prime Minister Keir Starmer faced heightened pressure to emulate his French counterpart. Traditionally, Starmer's Labour Party has been regarded as leftist and pro-poor, although in modernity, the party's actions have proved a far cry.
Under immense pressure, the UK Prime Minister followed closely in the footsteps of his French counterpart when he announced that Britain, too, would recognize the State of Palestine when the UN General Assembly convenes in September. His condition not to follow through on his threat would be dependent upon Israel ending the 'appalling situation in Gaza', he said.
Additionally, Starmer demanded that Tel Aviv must stop the expansion of the illegal settlements in the Palestinian territories and allow the UN to resume the distribution of aid in Gaza. Knowing Israel as we know it, the conditions are highly unlikely to be met.
Therefore, we can expect the UK to join the growing chorus of UN member-states recognizing the State of Palestine. This development would inevitably create an unprecedented challenge for both Israel and the country's Big Brother in the form of the US. The worst-case scenario is that Washington would be as isolated as Israel amidst the rapidly changing geopolitical architecture.
There would be sanctions against the political leadership of Israel and a highly likely trade embargo. The hegemony of the US is gradually crumbling as things stand in the world. The reconfiguration of the international world order has seen the emergence of new poles of power, such as BRICS, and the enhancement of the South-South solidarity.
The Trump administration's tariff wars have also undermined the status of the US as a dependable leader of the so-called Free World. In addition, the emergence of China as a global leader of note has caused unprecedented schism in the collective Western domination of world affairs. As international relations scholars note, the rapid reconfiguration of global affairs bears implications of monumental significance.
In my view, the sudden changes in diplomatic posture and narrative against the hitherto untouchable Israel are a game-changer. To borrow from McMillan, 'the winds of change are blowing'.
The 55 countries that are yet to join the 147 that recognize the State of Palestine would not stick to their positions for too long. Liberty, equality, and freedom are some of the fundamental basis on which a just world order is built.
The denial of the rights of the Palestinians by Israel cannot be permanent. Ask us in South Africa who were born and bred under apartheid. No matter how long oppression lasts, it too has a beginning and an ending. As for the Palestinians, the end of their long Israeli-induced misery is nigh.
The excuse to annihilate the Gazans until the hostages are returned is too myopic an argument. The fundamental causes of apartheid in Israel ought to be tackled. As they say, violence suits all those who have nothing to lose. Life, all of it, is precious. Palestinian lives would soon be put on par with those of the Israelites under international law.
When that happens, the impunity with which Israel has maimed and oppressed their fellow human beings in the land of Palestine will end forever. After all, it is what humanity expects. Strength and power to all nations that insist on a two-state solution where Israel would be held accountable for its excesses wherever they rear their ugly head, as is currently the case in Gaza and everywhere across the besieged Palestinian territories.
*Abbey Makoe is Founder and Editor-in-Chief: Global South Media Network (gsmn.co.za). The views expressed are personal.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
24 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Syria coastal massacres show signs of war crimes, UN says
More than 1 700 people were killed in March violence along Syria's Mediterranean coast. A UN commission investigating sectarian bloodshed in Syria's Alawite heartland documented systematic violence at the hands of government forces and allied groups, warning Thursday that some of the acts could constitute war crimes. The violence in March unfolded along Syria's predominantly Alawite Mediterranean coast, where security personnel and their allies were accused of carrying out summary executions, mostly targeting civilians from the religious minority, with a war monitor saying more than 1 700 people were killed. The Syrian foreign ministry said it was committed to 'incorporating the (commission's) recommendations into the ongoing process of institution-building' and of consolidating the rule of law. War crime-like acts The UN commission said in its report on Thursday that the violence committed by 'members of the interim government forces and private individuals operating alongside or in proximity to them… followed a systematic pattern across multiple, widespread locations'. 'The violations included acts that likely amount to war crimes,' it said. The commission documented cases of 'murder, torture and inhumane acts related to the treatment of the dead, widespread looting and burning of homes all of which displaced tens of thousands of civilians'. Syria's new authorities have accused gunmen loyal to ousted ruler Bashar al-Assad of instigating the violence by launching deadly attacks that killed dozens of security personnel. The UN commission also found that pro-Assad forces were implicated in the violence. 'Deeply disturbing' Human rights groups and international organisations have said entire families were killed, including women, children and the elderly. ALSO READ: Syrians protest Sweida killings in London, Paris Gunmen stormed homes and asked residents whether they were Alawite or Sunni before killing or sparing them, they said. The UN commission documented similar cases involving the killing of Alawite men. During his rule, Assad — himself an Alawite — cultivated an image as a defender of minorities, even as his authoritarian tendencies plunged the country into civil war. Since his December ouster at the hands of Islamist-led rebels, the violence on the coast and in south Syria's Druze heartland have raised questions about the new authorities' ability to provide security and manage sectarian tensions. The UN commission — which said it had been granted 'unfettered access' to the area by the post-Assad government — based its findings on more than 200 interviews with victims and witnesses. It said there were 'reasonable grounds to believe' that members of the security forces and other private individuals engaged in 'serious violations of international human rights law'. 'The scale and brutality of the violence documented in our report is deeply disturbing,' said commission chair Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, urging accountability and expanded efforts to arrest perpetrators. ALSO READ: New Syria PM says all religious groups' rights 'guaranteed' 'Serious note' The commission said it 'continues to receive information about ongoing violations in many of the affected areas, including abductions of women, arbitrary arrests and enforced disappearances'. It said it had 'found no evidence of a governmental policy or plan' to carry out the attacks, though their systematic nature 'in certain locations may be indicative of an organisational policy within certain factions or groups'. In a letter to the commission, Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani said the government took 'serious note of the alleged violations', saying they 'appear to be consistent with the findings' of the Syrian inquiry. US envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack called the report 'a serious step towards definable and traceable metrics to the Syrian government's responsibility, transparency and accountability'. Investigations into recent violence The commission said it was also investigating recent violence in Syria's Druze-majority Sweida province that it said highlighted the urgency of implementing the report's recommendations. In its own inquiry, the committee formed by the Syrian authorities documented 'serious violations against civilians' in March. The committee confirmed 'the names of 1 426 dead, including 90 women', and identified '298 individuals by name' who were suspected of involvement in the violations. NOW READ: 'Tread carefully': What fall of Assad regime in Syria means for SA
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
AU urges adoption of world map showing continent's true size
The AU has backed a campaign to end the use by governments and international organisations of the 16th-century Mercator map of the world in favour of one that more accurately displays Africa's size. Created by cartographer Gerardus Mercator for navigation, the projection distorts continent sizes, enlarging areas near the poles such as North America and Greenland while shrinking Africa and South America. 'It might seem to be just a map, but in reality, it is not,' AU Commission deputy chair Selma Malika Haddadi told Reuters, saying the Mercator fostered a false impression that Africa was 'marginal', despite being the world's second-largest continent by area, with 54 nations and more than a billion people. Such stereotypes influence media, education and policy, she said. Criticism of the Mercator map is not new, but the 'Correct The Map' campaign led by advocacy groups Africa No Filter and Speak Up Africa has revived the debate, urging organisations to adopt the 2018 Equal Earth projection, which tries to reflect countries' true sizes. 'The current size of the map of Africa is wrong,' Moky Makura, executive director of Africa No Filter, said. 'It's the world's longest misinformation and disinformation campaign, and it just simply has to stop.' Fara Ndiaye, co-founder of Speak Up Africa, said the Mercator affected Africans' identity and pride, especially children who might encounter it early in school. 'We're working on promoting a curriculum where the Equal Earth projection will be the main standard across all (African) classrooms,' Ndiaye said, adding she hoped it would also be the one used by global institutions, including African-based ones. Haddadi said the AU endorsed the campaign, adding it aligned with its goal of 'reclaiming Africa's rightful place on the global stage' amid growing calls for reparations for colonialism and slavery. The AU will advocate for wider map adoption and discuss collective actions with member states, Haddadi added. The Mercator projection is still widely used, including by schools and tech companies. Google Maps switched from Mercator on desktop to a 3D globe view in 2018, though users can still switch back to the Mercator if they prefer. On the mobile app, however, the Mercator projection remains the default. 'Correct The Map' wants organisations like the World Bank and the UN to adopt the Equal Earth map. A World Bank spokesperson said they already use the Winkel-Tripel, or Equal Earth, for static maps and are phasing out Mercator on web maps. The campaign said it has sent a request to the UN geospatial body, UN-GGIM. A UN spokesperson said that once received it must be reviewed and approved by a committee of experts. Other regions are backing the AU's efforts. Dorbrene O'Marde, vice-chair of the Caribbean Community Reparations Commission, endorsed Equal Earth as a rejection of Mercator map's 'ideology of power and dominance'.
Eyewitness News
3 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Activists, journalists believe journalists in Gaza deliberately targeted by IDF
CAPE TOWN - Activists and journalists who gathered at St George's Cathedral on Wednesday said they believed that journalists in Gaza had been deliberately targeted by the Israeli Defence Force (IDF). The crowd held a vigil in support of journalists working in the occupied territories. ALSO READ: - Palestine Solidarity Campaign: More must be done to protect journos in conflict zones - Activists gather outside St George's Cathedral to honour journalists killed in Gaza Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif and four other journalists were killed in an Israeli airstrike on Sunday. According to the International Federation of Journalists, more than 270 journalists and media workers have been killed since Israel declared war on Hamas in Gaza. Activist and writer, Iman Zanele Omar, said the killing of journalists silenced the voice for the voiceless. "This is one of the first live-streamed genocides that we've seen in our lifetime. I think that the fact that journalists were able to utilise social media and we have so much access, it has opened people's eyes on a global sense."
