The Irish Times view on personal injuries claims: going to court is rarely worth it
Injuries Resolution Board (IRB)
is clearly not getting through to the public in general and insurance customers in particular. Established in 2004 to provide a lower cost route for settling personal injury insurance claims, nearly all cases must now be submitted to the board. Overall, it resolves one in two claims.
The other fifty per cent of claims – where either side rejects the IRB settlement proposal – are resolved by litigation, which usually takes the form of an out of court settlement. The enduring popularity of the legal route for resolving motor insurance injury claims is hard to fathom, given that court awards and IRB awards are based on the same guidelines and the average value of awards made across both channels is the same. However, the litigation route takes three years longer and legal costs are on average 24 times higher.
It is hard to see how the continued use of the litigation channel benefits the injured party. Why wait three years for the same result? The higher fees that are incurred – for little apparent benefit to the client in most cases – may be paid by the insurance company, but the wider pool of insurance customers ultimately foot the bill in the form of higher premiums.
The presumption is that the bulk of IRB settlements are rejected by a claimant on the advice that they may do better by going down the litigation route.
READ MORE
The Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct places no specific requirement on solicitors to talk through the pros and cons of rejecting an IRB settlement and going down the litigation route with their clients. There are general guidelines about client relationships which if adhered to in the spirit intended should suffice.
It perhaps asks too much of any profession to expect its members to turn down work. The time may have come when a different approach is needed to ensure that claimants are fully aware that, in the round, the benefits of rejecting an IRB settlement and taking your insurer to court are at best marginal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
6 days ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the Small Claims Court: relevance must be protected
The Small Claims Court would appear to be a victim of its own success. Established in 1996 as an arm of the District Court, it has helped many consumers to resolve small disputes without going to the expense of hiring a solicitor. It costs €25 to bring a claim but only actions involving goods, services, damage to property or non-return of key money are admissible. However, the use of the court is declining according to the Courts Service with only 2,081 cases lodged with it last year, a fall of 55 per cent on the previous year. Amongst the possible explanations for the decline advanced by the Courts Service is the intriguing notion that a greater awareness among goods and service providers of the small claims process – and the likelihood that they will lose if they end up in the court – has brought about a more conciliatory attitude when it comes to dealing with consumer complaints. There is no doubt that the court does seem to look kindly on plaintiffs. Last year 70 per cent of the 478 small claims cases which went ahead with a hearing were successful, according to the Courts Service. Many others were settled, usually following mediation led by court officials. The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) has put forward another somewhat more prosaic explanation for the decline in use of the court. The €2,000 limit on cases that can be brought before the court 'is out of step with many of the most basic and unavoidable expenses faced by consumers today,' according to the watchdog. READ MORE The CCPC – which refers a significant number of complaints to the court each year – points out that many of them are about issues such as car purchases or home improvements. These fall within its remit and are well suited to its procedures but are generally excluded from its jurisdiction by virtue of the €2,000 limit. The limit was last raised – from €1,000 – in 2006. Cumulative inflation since then has been close to 30 per cent, meaning a review of the limit is warranted. The court's success in settling disputes suggests that the adjustment should be even greater than this.
Irish Times
6 days ago
- Irish Times
An Irish fish in Australian waters: ‘I read the room for clues as to what I need to do next'
The tiniest flutter of familiar anxiety ripples over me as I realise I'm unsure what kind of place this is. This has happened pretty regularly since my arrival in Australia . It's like the small anxiety you feel when you meet a person from a different culture and don't catch their name first time round, so you have to ask them to repeat it. It feels impolite, as though you weren't listening, when you might just need to hear it twice to get it right or to consciously add this new word to your mental bank of names. My poor friend Sadhbh, who lives in the UK , gets this a lot. People are trying. The name is a new sound to them. She accepts it as a minor cost of living outside your own majority cultural context. In this moment, I too am a well intended fish out of water. I'm in this Australian restaurant , and I'm just trying to get it right. I read the room for clues as to what I need to do next. It's a nice restaurant, but not especially notions or high end. You'd call it more of a cafe, since like many Australian eateries, it specialises in breakfast and brunch. I want to pay for the (pretty excellent) scrambled eggs on toast I just finished. They're served ribboned into a sort of eggy rosette atop a big crusty piece of toasted sourdough, and served with tender, herby mushrooms on the side. Delicious. READ MORE While things are generally more straightforward in Ireland, where a place with table service means you ask for the bill and then you pay at your table, while a coffee counter right inside the door might mean 'pay here first then take a seat', it doesn't consistently work that way in Australia. In some places, you order and pay at the counter. In others, you go up and pay once you've finished eating, without asking for your bill first. I've been to expensive steak places that work this way and find it baffling. In others, you ask for the bill like you usually would in a similarly positioned Dublin or London restaurant. I still don't know how to tell which sort of place I'm in through vibe alone, the way Aussies seem to be able to. It's a very minor cultural difference, but it's enough to result in any immigrant repeatedly misreading the correct way to behave. If you don't know the norm, you don't have the experience to intuit what you need to do. Living outside your country of birth is full of these sorts of moments. They become less constant with time, as you recognise patterns and learn the norms of a new place. Still, they do happen a lot when you don't have the built-in understanding that comes with growing up inside a culture and internalising how it works. In any Australian gym I've visited, anyone who doesn't clean machines after using them will be openly policed by other gym-goers. As a result, most people don't need to be shamed into compliance. Whenever I've witnessed anyone openly being told (usually in a tone of some disgust) that they need to go back and clean a machine, the rule-breaker is usually not Australian. They might be British, or Irish, or from some other culture where cleaning the equipment is theoretically a rule, but not one that's universally followed. Australian culture looks cosmetically so similar to our own that it's easy for an Irish person to presume assimilating will be straightforward, but this isn't always the case. When you move between cultures that are similar but have material differences, and where you visually 'pass' or blend in and are therefore presumed to just 'know' how things work, you realise how much of your life in Ireland is invisibly configured for you if you remain at home. You understand the rules and norms. You're unlikely to frequently breach them out of ignorance. You know how to read the space between people's words and their behaviour. You can predict the likely outcomes of certain actions or interactions and you know what constitutes subversive or rude behaviour in most situations. In Ireland, for example, it's understood that when you meet an old acquaintance on the street and one of you suggests that you two should absolutely go for a pint some night, that person is lying. It's a noise we make with our faces to be polite. Anyone who interpreted this as a sincere invitation and sent messages trying to make pints actually happen would be considered guilty of harassment. When someone you don't know really well asks how you're doing, like your accountant or the person at the checkout in Tesco, you're not actually meant to tell them. The question is a performance of good manners. If you reply that you're not great because your turtle just died and you're questioning your sexuality and you're worried you might have scurvy, they simply will not know what to do. You've gone off script by giving a true (if concerningly full) answer to a question which is merely a formality of decent etiquette. You've breached a norm and now – look – things are all weird. Standard operating procedures cannot run as normal. This woman is just trying to sell you lettuce or amend your tax return. These sorts of transgressions won't necessarily be pointed out to you overtly. Instead, you'll just get social feedback ranging from distance to overt rejection, to let you know you've done something wrong. Not being able to deduce the payment system of a brunch restaurant isn't quite the same as telling someone in Tesco you're worried about your gum health, but it's not so different either. When you live outside your own culture, it's very easy to feel at a loss, to offend or irritate people through very subtle social transgressions without realising you're doing it, and to misinterpret the environment around you. Sometimes it's funny or just very embarrassing. Sometimes you don't even know you've done it, or you do, because everyone is staring. We'll just call it character-building, I suppose. Sign up to The Irish Times Abroad newsletter for Irish-connected people around the world. Here you'll find readers' stories of their lives overseas, plus news, business, sports, opinion, culture and lifestyle journalism relevant to Irish people around the world If you live overseas and would like to share your experience with Irish Times Abroad, you can use the form below, or email abroad@ with a little information about you and what you do. Thank you
Irish Times
05-08-2025
- Irish Times
Mincon returns to growth, driven by pivot towards construction sector
Irish engineering group Mincon said it returned to growth in the first half of 2025 as the company's revenues increased and its margins rebounded. In the six months to June 2025, the company's revenue rose 9 per cent to €74 million, despite the impact of currency exchange providing a 1 per cent headwind. The company said growth was driven by activity in the construction sector, which rose 47 per cent year-on-year in revenue as the company recorded major project wins in Australia and Africa. However, mining revenue was down 13 per cent on a year earlier, while geothermal revenues were 9 per cent lower. READ MORE Gross profit was €22 million, up 27 per cent and in line with analyst forecasts, while operating profit for the period was €5.4 million, rising from €200,000 a year earlier. 'This improved performance has been driven by increases in our construction revenues. This strong construction performance is due to a combination of our superior engineered product offering as well as onsite service support,' said chief executive Joe Purcell. 'In conjunction with our improved sales, we have continued our focus on driving operational efficiencies across the group, which is enhancing our margins and competitiveness.' Geographically, Mincon saw revenue in the Americas rise on stronger construction sales, while mining revenues grew in North America. This was offset by reductions in South America. In Europe and the Middle East, revenue was 6 per cent higher. 'Our water well/geothermal market was slow in the first half of 2025 reflecting a depressed Scandinavian housing market, however we see this picking up as the year progresses,' Mr Purcell said. Income in Africa shrank, with construction revenue increasing in the region, while mining revenue declined. 'On top of this, there has also been a rowing back on certain climate commitments which is concerning in the global push to reduce emissions. In the context of these challenges, it is important to take a step back and note the flexibility that our global spread gives us to try and mitigate tariffs,' Mr Purcell said. 'Also, the requirement of reducing emissions is directly related to increasing the efficiency of drilling which also impacts drilling costs. In that context, our engineering focus on efficiency remains a cornerstone in our push to win profitable market share.' The company said the macroeconomic uncertainty due to the emerging global tariff situation has 'given pause for thought'. In a note to investors, Davy analysts said Mincon's operating profit level was 9 per cent ahead of its expectations. 'The business is well placed for the rest of the year despite currency and trade headwinds,' Davy said. 'We expect to leave our underlying operating profit forecast for the year (€9.8 million) unchanged following today's results."
