The Irish Times view on personal injuries claims: going to court is rarely worth it
The message about the
Injuries Resolution Board (IRB)
is clearly not getting through to the public in general and insurance customers in particular. Established in 2004 to provide a lower cost route for settling personal injury insurance claims, nearly all cases must now be submitted to the board. Overall, it resolves one in two claims.
The other fifty per cent of claims – where either side rejects the IRB settlement proposal – are resolved by litigation, which usually takes the form of an out of court settlement. The enduring popularity of the legal route for resolving motor insurance injury claims is hard to fathom, given that court awards and IRB awards are based on the same guidelines and the average value of awards made across both channels is the same. However, the litigation route takes three years longer and legal costs are on average 24 times higher.
It is hard to see how the continued use of the litigation channel benefits the injured party. Why wait three years for the same result? The higher fees that are incurred – for little apparent benefit to the client in most cases – may be paid by the insurance company, but the wider pool of insurance customers ultimately foot the bill in the form of higher premiums.
The presumption is that the bulk of IRB settlements are rejected by a claimant on the advice that they may do better by going down the litigation route.
READ MORE
The Solicitor's Guide to Professional Conduct places no specific requirement on solicitors to talk through the pros and cons of rejecting an IRB settlement and going down the litigation route with their clients. There are general guidelines about client relationships which if adhered to in the spirit intended should suffice.
It perhaps asks too much of any profession to expect its members to turn down work. The time may have come when a different approach is needed to ensure that claimants are fully aware that, in the round, the benefits of rejecting an IRB settlement and taking your insurer to court are at best marginal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
Insurers and businesses call for injury guidelines reform
Insurers, business lobby groups and the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB) have called for an overhaul of how personal injury awards guidelines are set, amid concern that a planned 16.7 per cent hike to payouts will widen the gap with other European jurisdictions when it comes to whiplashes and other minor injuries. Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan's officials are working on draft legislation that would bring about the increase, which has been put forward by the Judicial Council under an awards guidelines regime that came into being four years ago. Joe Brennan has the details. Smokers pay tens of thousands of euro more for life insurance and mortgage protection than non-smokers, according to new research from price comparison and switching website For mortgage protection – a legal requirement for anyone taking out a mortgage in Ireland – a 38-year-old couple can pay as little as €35.60 a month for €300,000 in cover over 30 years as long as they're both non-smokers. Conor Pope reports READ MORE Dutch private equity group Waterland is to invest a further €150 million here over the next year and a half as it looks to add to its growing portfolio of Irish companies. At a time when the wider industry is reportedly pulling back on new investments and fundraises, the group's Irish arm signalled on Friday that it plans to 'dramatically' ramp up its expansion plans in the Republic, writes Ian Curran. Ford Chief Lisa Brankin on accelerating the switch to EVs Listen | 41:35 More than two-thirds of job applications are rejected by employers because they lack the relevant skills for the role, new research has found , with others binned because applications are badly formatted or due to unexplained gaps in employment. The survey, which was carried out for hiring platform IrishJobs, found that 78 per cent of employers are dissatisfied with the quality of job applications received, making it slower and more resource-intensive for employers. Ciara O'Brien reports. Average Irish mortgage approval values rose to a record of more than €319,000 in April, new figures from the banking industry reveal, as house prices continued to climb, requiring property owners to take on higher levels of debt, reports Ian Curran. At 7.55am most weekday mornings, about 60 staff at the Seating Matters' manufacturing facility in Limavady, Co Derry meet for 45 minutes with the family owners and management. The factory makes therapeutic seating for people with disabilities. It's part training session to sharpen skills and knowledge, and partly a platform for both sides to air any issues from the previous day and is practice imported from Japanese business culture, Martin Tierney, managing director of Seating Matters tells Ciarán Hancock . He is one of 140 Irish business leaders in Japan this week as part of a CEO retreat organised by the EY Entrepreneur of the Year (EOY) programme. For the last two months European businesses have been facing 10 per cent tariffs, which are import taxes, when selling goods into the US. Cars and steel products sold from the EU to the US have been subject to 25 per cent levies. The threat of across-the-board tariffs of 20 per cent, or even 50 per cent, if negotiations failed, has caused growing alarm across European industries. Jack Power brings us inside a crucial week in the trade talks between the European Union and the US A key lesson from the miserable economic performance of the 1980s is that it is vital to act quickly when in a fiscal crisis. Spreading the adjustment out over the course of a decade made things worse rather than easier, argues John FitzGerald in his weekly column . In the financial crisis that began in 2008-09, this lesson was learned. The really painful adjustment was completed between 2010 and 2013, resulting in a rapid and sustained recovery from 2014. While many at the time argued for a slower adjustment, it is likely that would only have prolonged the agony, as in the 1980s. The Linwoods brand was for most of its history best known as a bread and milk producer and wholesaler but, amid changing economic fortunes and increased competition from multinationals, the family-owned company began to struggle. 'My father always says 'evolve or die',' managing director Patrick Woods told Hugh Dooley in our interview slot . Linwoods has since evolved into one of the largest health food companies in Ireland, with distribution links with big retailers across the UK. If you'd like to read more about the issues that affect your finances try signing up to On the Money , the weekly newsletter from our personal finance team, which will be issued every Friday to Irish Times subscribers.
Irish Times
5 days ago
- Irish Times
Insurers and businesses call for injury guidelines reform as 17% rise planned
Insurers, business lobby groups and the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB) have called for an overhaul of how personal injury awards guidelines are set, amid concern that a planned 16.7 per cent hike to payouts will widen the gap with other European jurisdictions when it comes to whiplashes and other minor injuries. Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan 's officials are working on draft legislation that would bring about the increase, which has been put forward by the Judicial Council under an awards guidelines regime that came into being four years ago. A Supreme Court ruling last year confirmed that the council had the power to set guidelines, as long as they, and any changes, are rubber stamped by both Houses of the Oireachtas. A number of insurers and business representative groups have used a Department of Finance public consultation on future insurance reforms to register concerns about the planned blanket increase to personal injury awards, the frequency with which they are reviewed and the extent of powers the judiciary has. READ MORE Aviva Insurance Ireland said that while the 2021 guidelines brought down overall injury awards, the going rate for minor neck injuries where recovery is made within six months is up to €3,000, 5½ times higher than that in the UK. 'The large disparity is before the 16.7 per cent increase proposed by the Judicial Council, which, if introduced, will make the gap even larger,' Aviva said. 'Comparing Aviva's claims in the UK and Ireland, attritional claims like whiplash represent 30 per cent of the cost of motor insurance premium in Ireland compared to 10 per cent of premium in the UK in 2024 and lower still in Europe.' 'We estimate that the cost of implementing the 16.7 per cent increase is €74 million, which ultimately will be paid for by customers.' Aviva , Allianz Ireland and Insurance Ireland each called for the guidelines to be benchmarked against European countries. 'Legal expenses and award levels for lower-value claims remain disproportionately high and are not aligned with those observed in the UK and other European jurisdictions,' said Allianz. 'Before any inflationary adjustments are made to the personal injuries guidelines, it is essential to conduct a comprehensive benchmarking exercise with our European counterparts to ensure a proportionate and evidence-based approach.' Alliance for Insurance Reform, a lobby group for business and civic organisations, said the periodic review of awards should be extended from three to seven years. 'The guidelines ought not to be both reviewed and subsequently applied by the judiciary,' the alliance said in its submission to the Department of Finance. 'Rather the former responsibility should be delegated to an independent commission comprising a variety of members, reflective of the many stakeholders and policy considerations involved.' Small business lobby group ISME also called for judges to be removed entirely from the setting of awards guidelines. It claimed, in addition, that 'there is too much judicial discretion improperly exercised in favour of losing plaintiffs' in the injury cases that end up in court. The IRB said the current three-year review cycle does not allow guidelines to be embedded. It suggested it should be extended to five years. It also called for clarity on what happens if the Houses of the Oireachtas does not approve amendments. 'Under the current guidelines model, there could be several versions of the guidelines in use dependent on whether a claim has already been assessed or if legal proceedings have been initiated,' it said. 'A situation cannot exist whereby the same injury, the same claim, that has been rejected within the Injuries Resolution Board goes into the court system and a different set of guidelines is used to value compensation.'
Irish Times
27-05-2025
- Irish Times
The debate: Is going to court worth it for personal injuries claimants?
Moyagh Murdock: No. Compensation awarded by the IRB is similar to that awarded by the courts The answer is no. Not for claimants, not for policyholders, not for the economy or society. The personal injuries system is at a crossroads. On one side lies a time-consuming litigation process. On the other, a faster, fairer and more cost-effective alternative: the Injuries Resolution Board (IRB). Let's be clear: the IRB works. It delivers broadly similar compensation outcomes as litigation, but at a fraction of the cost and in a fraction of the time. The IRB was designed to streamline claims, reduce legal overheads and deliver justice swiftly. It is an efficient and effective service for claimants. It empowers individuals to resolve their cases quickly. Using the IRB delivers results in a fraction of the time. Claimants can get their lives back on track much quicker and with much more certainty by going through the IRB route. Claims take on average two years to settle through the IRB, compared with an average of six years through costly and unnecessary litigation. The Central Bank of Ireland's national claims information database (NCID), established in 2019, provides policymakers with a definitive independent data source on the personal injury claims environment. In its most recent report on liability claims , published in March of this year for 2023 claims data, the NCID illustrated the significant impact of litigation, with more than 70 per cent of claims settled by litigation, representing 89 per cent of injury settlement costs. These legal costs are ultimately borne by policyholders, businesses and consumers. They affect insurance premiums and put significant strain on small businesses and unnecessary pressure on the court services with cases that could – and should – be resolved more efficiently. READ MORE Critics may argue that litigation offers more 'control' or 'fairness'. But the data tells a different story. The compensation awarded by the IRB is broadly similar to that awarded by the courts. Successive NCID reports have highlighted the effectiveness and efficiency of the IRB's claim settlement process. Compensation levels – whether in a litigated process or settled by the IRB – are based on the same personal injuries guidelines. The guidelines were introduced by the Judicial Council in 2021. The NCID has reported previously that legal costs are well over 20 times higher in the litigation channel than in the IRB. It is concerning, therefore, that the Judicial Council has proposed a 16.7 per cent increase in the personal injuries guidelines. This could erode the progress made by the Government's insurance reform agenda. If implemented, the recommended increase would directly impact claims costs, which are ultimately borne by consumers. As a result of the IRB and the introduction of the personal injuries guidelines, it is easier than ever for parties to resolve a case at an early stage without litigation and unnecessary legal costs. This means less delay, less waste of resources, fewer medical and other expert reports, leading to a more efficient claims process and speedier payment of compensation to accident victims. The current claims environment and the Government's action plan for insurance reform have created ample opportunity for claimants, insurers and their advisers to settle cases quickly and cost effectively without going to court. For personal liability claims, it is the best route to take to have claims resolved quickly and efficiently. The IRB has been immensely positive in its 20-year history, and it continues to evolve. With a broader mediation mandate, it is more capable than ever of delivering timely, fair and proportionate outcomes. The courts should be reserved for complex or contested cases – not routine claims that can be resolved quickly and fairly using the IRB. Moyagh Murdock is chief executive of Insurance Ireland Seán Guerin: Yes. Court proceedings produce the best results for victims Insurance is a numbers game and the insurance industry is very good with numbers. It can be hard for the ordinary reader to keep up. Fortunately, the Central Bank is here to help. To understand what has been happening in the Irish insurance market, only one number matters: what the Central Bank calls 'gross insurance-related result'. This number shows how much money insurance companies make on the policies they issue, after the cost of claims (including compensation and legal costs), as a percentage of premium income. That number tells a very simple story. In recent years, the insurance industry in Ireland has been making out like bandits. For motor insurance, between 2009 and 2012, the gross insurance-related result was -1 per cent. Between 2017 and 2023, it was 15 per cent. For other insurance types (employers' liability, public liability and commercial property), between 2009 and 2014 it was 0.8 per cent. In 2022, it was 31 per cent and in 2023 it was 34 per cent. These mind-boggling increases in the profitability of insurance underwriting in Ireland have been achieved by hoodwinking the public, the media and successive governments into believing that compensation awards or legal costs, or both, were too high. Compensation is simply a means of providing redress to a victim of a civil, as opposed to a criminal, wrong. Because the process of obtaining redress is legally and factually complex, victims are entitled to the advice and representation of expert lawyers. Forcing down compensation awards, while at the same time reducing the ability of victims to recover the real cost of essential legal advice and representation, is a double blow to victims. But for the insurance industry, the beating of victims will continue while profits improve. An editorial published in this newspaper last week made three fundamental errors in reaching the conclusion that 'the benefits of ... taking your case to court are at best marginal'. The first error is to ignore the Central Bank findings of boomtime insurance underwriting profit, while high premiums for consumers and businesses remain. The public policy goal of reducing insurance costs to consumers and businesses has not been achieved. The second error is to ignore the effect on victims, who are now expected to navigate the legal and procedural difficulties of their situation without legal advice and representation, unless they pay for it out of their own pockets or their award of compensation. This is unfair. The third error is to assume that a single bureaucratic assessment of redress is an adequate substitute for the judicial process. The IRB applies the same guidelines as in court. True, but the application of the guidelines to individual cases still requires sensitivity and understanding. It is too early to tell whether the IRB does this job as well as the courts. What is clear is that the legitimacy of any system of redress depends heavily on the opportunity for a victim to have their voice properly heard. Last year saw the 100th anniversary of the Courts of Justice Act 1924 celebrated. A century after their establishment, the Irish people trust their courts, and independent judges, to see justice done. They also trust their lawyers, both solicitors and barristers, to advise them and speak up for them. And the Central Bank has shown them to be right. The March 2025 Central Bank report shows that issuing proceedings in court and settling with the benefit of expert legal advice produces the best results for victims. Compared with awards by the IRB, litigating and settling produces a 60 per cent increase in compensation for pain and suffering and a 500 per cent increase in compensation for financial loss. If you've been injured unlawfully, call your local solicitor and let them find you an expert barrister if necessary. Don't let the insurance industry – or your newspaper – tell you otherwise. Seán Guerin SC is chair the Council of the Bar of Ireland
