logo
New CDC advisers will skip some expected topics and explore a target of antivaccine activists

New CDC advisers will skip some expected topics and explore a target of antivaccine activists

Associated Press5 hours ago

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new vaccine advisers meet next week, but their agenda suggests they'll skip some expected topics — including a vote on COVID-19 shots — while taking up a longtime target of anti-vaccine groups.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices makes recommendations on how to use the nation's vaccines, setting a schedule for children's vaccines as well as advice for adult shots. Last week, Kennedy abruptly dismissed the existing 17-member expert panel and handpicked eight replacements, including several anti-vaccine voices.
The agenda for the new committee's first meeting, posted Wednesday, shows it will be shorter than expected. Discussion of COVID-19 shots will open the session, but the agenda lists no vote on that. Instead, the committee will vote on fall flu vaccinations, on RSV vaccinations for pregnant women and children and on the use of a preservative named thimerosal that's in a subset of flu shots.
It's not clear who wrote the agenda. No committee chairperson has been named and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not comment.
Committee won't take up HPV or meningococcal vaccines
Missing from the agenda are some heavily researched vaccine policy proposals the advisers were supposed to consider this month, including shots against HPV and meningococcal bacteria, said Dr. Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Instead, the committee is talking about subjects 'which are settled science,' she said.
'Every American should be asking themselves how and why did we get here, where leaders are promoting their own agenda instead of protecting our people and our communities,' she said. She worried it's 'part of a purposeful agenda to insert dangerous and harmful and unnecessary fear regarding vaccines into the process.'
The committee makes recommendations on how vaccines that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration should be used. The recommendations traditionally go to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director. Historically, nearly all are accepted and then used by insurance companies in deciding what vaccines to cover.
But the CDC has no director and the committee's recommendations have been going to Kennedy.
Thimerosal is a longtime target of antivaccine activists
Thimerosal was added to certain vaccines in the early 20th century to make them safer and more accessible by preventing bacterial contamination in multi-dose vials. It's a tiny amount, but because it's a form of mercury, it began raising questions in the 1990s.
Kennedy — a leading voice in an antivaccine movement before he became President Donald Trump's health secretary — has long held there was a tie between thimerosal and autism, and also accused the government of hiding the danger.
Study after study has found no evidence that thimerosal causes autism. But since 2001, all vaccines manufactured for the U.S. market and routinely recommended for children 6 years or younger have contained no thimerosal or only trace amounts, with the exception of inactivated influenza vaccine.
Thimerosal now only appears in multidose flu shot vials, not the single-shot packaging of most of today's flu shots.
Targeting thimerosal would likely force manufacturers to switch to single-dose vials, which would make the shots 'more expensive, less available and more feared,' said Paul Offit, a vaccine expert at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Doctors' groups have opposed Kennedy's vaccine moves
Last week, 30 organizations called on insurers to continue paying for COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women after Kennedy said the shots would no longer be routinely recommended for that group.
Doctors' groups also opposed Kennedy's changes to the vaccine committee. The new members he picked include a scientist who researched mRNA vaccine technology and became a conservative darling for his criticisms of COVID-19 vaccines, a top critic of pandemic-era lockdowns and a leader of a group that has been widely considered to be a source of vaccine misinformation.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has long put out its own immunization recommendations. In recent decades it has matched what the government recommended. But asked if they might soon diverge, depending on potential changes in the government's vaccination recommendations, Kressly said; 'Nothing's off the table.'
'We will do whatever is necessary to make sure that every child in every community gets the vaccines that they deserve to stay healthy and safe,' she said.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump installs pair of 88-foot-tall new flag poles at the White House
Trump installs pair of 88-foot-tall new flag poles at the White House

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump installs pair of 88-foot-tall new flag poles at the White House

WASHINGTON ― Massive new flag poles hoisting United States flags have been installed on the White House grounds after President Donald Trump said they were desperately needed and that he would pay for them himself. The placement of the two 88-foot-tall flagpoles — one on the north lawn and one on the south lawn — began early in the morning of June 18. A U.S. flag was later raised on the south lawn around 1 p.m. at a ceremony that included Trump's daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner. The couple was at the White House to watch the swearing in of Charles Kushner, Jared's father, as U.S. ambassador to France. 'How do you like it, everybody?' Trump said to reporters after the flag reached the top of the pole. Soon afterward, the second flag pole of identical height was installed on the north lawn. A few hours later, after thunderstorms rolled through Washington D.C., a second flag with the same dimensions was raised. Presidents have long put their own mark on how the White House is decorated, and Trump, who built his personal brand flipping commercial properties, is no exception. "It is a GIFT from me of something which was always missing from this magnificent place," Trump said in a social media post. "Hopefully, they will proudly stand at both sides of the White House for many years to come!" Trump said he paid out of his own pocket to install the poles, which cost about $50,000 each. This week, the White House traded a bust sitting in the Oval Office of the civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr. for one of former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Trump said earlier this year he'd like to see a new ballroom built in the White House. When asked what gave him the idea to install the flag poles, Trump said he first considered the flags during his first term but blamed distractions caused by the media for getting in the way. 'I was the hunted. And now I'm the hunter,' Trump told reporters on June 18. "It's a big difference." Contributing: Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump installs pair of 88-foot-tall new flag poles at the White House

What Parents—and Industry—Need To Know About Education's Future
What Parents—and Industry—Need To Know About Education's Future

Forbes

time25 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What Parents—and Industry—Need To Know About Education's Future

As the school year ends, many parents are breathing a sigh of relief—but they also have some critical homework of their own. America's education system is in crisis—one that transcends test scores and headlines. It's a slow-burning, systemic failure that has robbed millions of students of opportunity and taxpayers of trust. With all the money we spend, why aren't our kids learning? Consider this: Governments at all levels spend over $850 billion annually on K–12 education—averaging more than $16,000 per student, and exceeding $29,000 in places like New York and Washington, D.C, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Yet the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reveals that 69% of eighth graders are not proficient in reading, and 73% are not proficient in math. These poor results are not new. They have persisted through pre-pandemic years, despite record-high spending. If this were any other public service, there would be outrage. Instead, families are met with shrugs and excuses. The excuses range from COVID-era learning loss to a lack of funding. But these rationalizations collapse under scrutiny. Student performance has been flat or declining since 2013, and pandemic relief funds—totaling more than $190 billion—barely moved the needle. That money is now gone, and districts are facing a fiscal cliff after investing in one-time fixes instead of systemic improvements. It was irresponsible spending with no accountability—and families know it. Fortunately, parents are no longer waiting for top-down solutions. They are driving a movement for education freedom—a shift toward a future where learning is personalized, innovative, and accountable to the people it serves. That's what the Center for Education Reform's 2025 Parent Power! Index reveals. It's not a measure of school choice alone; it's a roadmap of how well states empower parents through access to options, meaningful funding portability, and a culture of transparency and innovation. In states like Texas, Iowa, Indiana, and Arkansas, recent legislation has transformed the landscape. Texas jumped 15 spots in this year's Index after launching the largest day-one Education Savings Account (ESA) program in the country. Iowa made ESAs universal and expanded its charter school sector. Indiana enacted new policies to ensure charter schools receive equitable funding, helping it rank third nationally. Arkansas expanded its ESA program to provide universal eligibility, moving it into the top 10. These states didn't just talk about parent power—they backed it with laws that let funding follow the student and gave families the freedom to choose. This momentum matters not just for families—but for economic growth. States that empower parents are also outperforming economically. When education policy aligns with workforce needs, innovation flourishes and businesses thrive. It's no coincidence that states leading in education freedom—like Texas, Indiana, and Iowa—are also magnets for economic development. Governors who deliver results in education are winning in other sectors too, because great education fuels a great economy. Several other states also saw dramatic improvements. Wyoming surged 30 spots after enacting a new education scholarship program. North Dakota climbed 18 positions with strong charter legislation. Louisiana, Idaho, and Tennessee all rose substantially by expanding or creating new programs that prioritize parent-directed learning. These ranking shifts underscore a broader trend: bold governors and state leaders who enact strong laws and align workforce needs with educational delivery are leading the charge in responding to parent demands. Meanwhile, too many states remain stuck in bureaucratic inertia. Nebraska slid 18 spots after voters repealed its newly passed choice law. South Carolina and the District of Columbia lost ground due to missteps in managing challenges to ESA and charter programs, respectively. These declines reflect the consequences of weak follow-through, lack of vision, or resistance to innovation. State leadership is the key variable. In a polarized era, it is often governors—regardless of party—who are earning popularity and political capital by championing education freedom. When state executives embrace policies that fund students rather than systems, they don't just improve education; they build public trust. Parents want more than vague promises. They want a guarantee that their children are worth the same amount in public funding regardless of which school they choose. They want transparency in curriculum and outcomes. They want innovation that breaks free from one-size-fits-all models. And most of all, they want urgency. Education freedom isn't a theory. It's happening now in microschools, hybrid academies, online platforms, and career-based programs across the country. When parents are in charge, education becomes dynamic and adaptive. Students thrive. Educators innovate. Communities grow stronger. This isn't just a policy imperative. It's a moral one. Every year we wait, another generation of students slips through the cracks. We need leaders who are willing to challenge the status quo, put families first, and fund education that works—wherever it happens. The Parent Power! Index doesn't just highlight where states stand; it offers a vision of what's possible when we stop funding systems and start funding families. That's how we reclaim excellence, restore trust, and fulfill the promise of American education.

JD Vance account suspended, then quickly restored, on liberal X competitor
JD Vance account suspended, then quickly restored, on liberal X competitor

Fox News

time25 minutes ago

  • Fox News

JD Vance account suspended, then quickly restored, on liberal X competitor

Vice President JD Vance was briefly suspended Wednesday evening by liberal X competitor Bluesky within the first hour of the country's No. 2 leader joining the platform. The account has since been reinstated. "We welcome the Vice President to the conversation on Bluesky," the company told Fox News Digital in an email response, noting, "There have been many past attempts to impersonate Vice President JD Vance on Bluesky as he is a public figure, and the account was flagged as part of that pattern by our automated systems, and temporarily suspended." "The account was quickly reinstated within 20 minutes of the suspension, and we've also added a verified badge to help users confirm the authenticity of the profile," the statement added. Bluesky, a social media platform with a similar layout to X, has become a haven for many liberals fleeing X after Elon Musk bought the platform and began making changes. Despite its reputation as a liberal stronghold, Vance set up a profile on Bluesky Wednesday, making his first post at 4:50 p.m. In the vice president's first post he said: "Hello Bluesky, I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis. So I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you." Within the post, he embedded a screenshot of Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas' concurring opinion issued today in United States v. Skrmetti, which upheld a Tennessee law banning sex change surgeries on minors. Thomas' concurrence listed off several problems he found with those challenging Tennessee's law, which included "there is no medical consensus on how best to treat gender dysphoria in children" and "leading voices in this area have relied on questionable evidence, and have allowed ideology to influence their medical guidance." In his second and third posts, Vance said: "To that end, I found Justice Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth," and "I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids. What do you think?" In response, Bluesky quickly suspended Vance's account. However, it was shortly reinstated after a brief period. This prompted a firestorm of mockery from conservatives on X, who said the suspension evidenced the need for a free speech platform. "Bluesky banned VP JD Vance 20 minutes after he joined the platform … The libs at Bluesky are so triggered," commented popular conservative account Libs of TikTok. "OMG they banned him already," chimed in political commentator Eric Daugherty. The suspension even garnered condemnation from Vance critics. Liberal reporter Billy Binion commented, "I can't stand JD Vance. But suspending the sitting vice president is exactly why Bluesky is unserious & doomed to fail." "If you claim to care about real debate, you can't wall yourself off from everyone outside the progressive bubble—esp[icially] someone who might be president one day," wrote Binion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store