UK Labour government toughens immigration plans as far right gains support
'Every area of the immigration system, including work, family and study, will be tightened up so we have more control,' he told reporters at a Downing Street news conference on Monday.
Starmer announced he was ending an 'experiment in open borders' that saw net migration rise to nearly one million people under the previous Conservative government, which lost last year's general election.
Labour has been traditionally more sympathetic to immigration than the Conservative Party. Starmer, a former human rights lawyer who voted for the UK to remain part of the European Union, is under renewed pressure to tackle the issue after the anti-immigration Reform UK party's gains in recent local elections.
However, Starmer's shift to the right on immigration risks alienating Labour's large base of left-of-centre supporters and losing their votes to the Liberal Democrats and the Greens.
The government's Immigration White Paper policy document includes plans to cut overseas care workers and increase from five to 10 years the length of time people will have to live in the UK before qualifying for settlement and citizenship.
English-language rules would also be strengthened with all adult dependants required to demonstrate a basic understanding while the length of time students may stay in the UK after completing their studies would be reduced.
The white paper also proposes new powers to deport foreigners who commit offences in the country. Currently, the government is only informed of foreign nationals who receive prison sentences while under the new arrangements all foreign nationals convicted of offences would be flagged for the government.
The document also proposes new visa controls requiring foreign skilled workers to have a university degree to secure a job in the UK.
The prime minister acknowledged that migrants 'make a massive contribution' to Britain but alleged the country risks becoming an 'island of strangers' without more controls. He added that he wants net migration to fall 'significantly' by the next election, likely in 2029, but refused to say by how much.
Labour promised in its general election manifesto last year to significantly reduce net migration, which stood at 728,000 in the 12 months to June. It had peaked at 906,000 in 2023 after averaging 200,000 a year for most of the 2010s.
Arch-eurosceptic Nigel Farage's Reform party won more than 670 local council seats this month as well as its first two mayoral posts. It is also riding high in national polls while Labour is struggling after its 2024 landslide general election victory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Lone Star Lockup' joins growing list of huge US migrant detention centres
'Lone Star Lockup' joins growing list of huge US migrant detention centres NewsFeed The 'Lone Star Lockup' is the latest migrant detention centre in the United States as the Trump administration continues its efforts to deport millions of undocumented migrants. Video Duration 03 minutes 05 seconds 03:05 Video Duration 02 minutes 59 seconds 02:59 Video Duration 03 minutes 16 seconds 03:16 Video Duration 02 minutes 05 seconds 02:05 Video Duration 01 minutes 15 seconds 01:15 Video Duration 00 minutes 55 seconds 00:55 Video Duration 01 minutes 02 seconds 01:02
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UK agrees to drop mandate for Apple ‘back door', US spy chief says
Apple will no longer be forced to provide the United Kingdom's government with access to American citizens' encrypted data, Washington's spy chief has said, signalling the end of a months-long transatlantic privacy row. Tulsi Gabbard, the United States' director of national intelligence, said on Monday that London agreed to drop its requirement for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have allowed access to the protected data of US users and 'encroached on our civil liberties'. Gabbard said the reversal was the result of months of engagement with the UK to 'ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected'. The UK government said it would not comment on operational matters, but that London and Washington have longstanding joint security and intelligence arrangements that include safeguards to protect privacy. 'We will continue to build on those arrangements, and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK,' a government spokesperson said. 'We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The UK's climbdown on encryption comes after Apple in February announced it could no longer offer advanced data protection, its highest-level security feature, in the country. While Apple did not provide a reason for the change at the time, the announcement came after The Washington Post reported that UK security officials had secretly ordered the California-based tech giant to provide blanket access to cloud data belonging to users around the world. Under the UK's Investigatory Powers Act, authorities may compel companies to remove encryption under what is known as a 'technical capability notice'. Firms that receive a notice are legally bound to secrecy about the order unless otherwise granted permission by the government. It was not immediately clear if Apple would start offering advanced data protection again in the UK. Like other tech giants, Apple has marketed its use of end-to-end encryption as proof of its steadfast commitment to the privacy of its users. End-to-end encryption scrambles data so it cannot be read by third parties, including law enforcement and tech companies themselves. Governments around the world have made numerous attempts to undermine or bypass encryption, saying that it shields serious criminals from scrutiny. Privacy experts and civil liberties advocates have condemned efforts to weaken the technology, arguing that they treat innocent people as potential criminals and put the privacy and security of all users at risk. John Pane, chair of the advocacy group Electronic Frontiers Australia, welcomed the UK's reported reversal as a win for digital rights and safety. 'Were Apple to create a backdoor to its encrypted user data it would create a significant risk which could be exploited by cybercriminals and authoritarian governments,' Pane told Al Jazeera. 'EFA believes access to encryption technologies is vital for individuals and groups to be able to safeguard the security and privacy of their information and it is also fundamental to the existence of the digital economy. The right to use encrypted communications must be enshrined in law.'
Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UK drops mandate for Apple ‘back door', US spy chief says
Apple will no longer be forced to provide the United Kingdom's government with access to American citizens' encrypted data, Washington's spy chief has said, signalling the end of a months-long transatlantic privacy row. Tulsi Gabbard, the United States' director of national intelligence, said on Monday that London agreed to drop its requirement for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have allowed access to the protected data of US users and 'encroached on our civil liberties'. Gabbard said the reversal was the result of months of engagement with the UK to 'ensure Americans' private data remains private and our constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected'. The UK government said it does not comment on operational matters, but that London and Washington have longstanding joint security and intelligence arrangements that include safeguards to protect privacy. 'We will continue to build on those arrangements, and we will also continue to maintain a strong security framework to ensure that we can continue to pursue terrorists and serious criminals operating in the UK,' a government spokesperson said. 'We will always take all actions necessary at the domestic level to keep UK citizens safe.' Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The UK's climbdown on encryption comes after Apple in February announced it could no longer offer advanced data protection, its highest-level security feature, in the country. While Apple did not provide a reason for the change at the time, the announcement came after The Washington Post reported that UK security officials had secretly ordered the California-based tech giant to provide blanket access to cloud data belonging to users around the world. Under the UK's Investigatory Powers Act, authorities may compel companies to remove encryption under what is known as a 'technical capability notice'. Firms that receive a notice are legally bound to secrecy about the order unless otherwise granted permission by the government. Like other tech giants, Apple has marketed its use of end-to-end encryption as proof of its steadfast commitment to the privacy of its users. End-to-end encryption scrambles data so it cannot be read by third parties, including law enforcement and tech companies themselves. Governments around the world have made numerous attempts to undermine or bypass encryption, arguing that it shields serious criminals from scrutiny. Privacy experts and civil liberties advocates have condemned efforts to weaken the technology, arguing that they treat innocent people as potential criminals and put the privacy and security of all users at risk.
