China reportedly discouraged purchase of NVIDIA AI chips due to 'insulting' Lutnick statements
The US, if you'll recall, blocked NVIDIA from selling its H20 chips to China back in April out of concern that the Chinese military would use them to develop AI technology. When the US government reversed its decision in July and allowed the company to start shipping its chips to China, Lutnick told CNBC: "We don't sell them our best stuff, not our second best stuff, not even our third best. The fourth one down, we want to keep China using it... The idea is the Chinese are more than capable of building their own. You want to keep one step ahead of what they can build, so they keep buying our chips. You want to sell the Chinese enough that their developers get addicted to the American technology stack. That's the thinking." To note, a previous Times report stated that the government allowed NVIDIA to ship its products to China again after agreeing to hand over 15 percent of its profits.
As a response to Lutnick's remarks, the Times says Chinese authorities sought ways to prevent local companies from buying H20 chips. CAC issued an informal notice instructing China's biggest tech firms, such as ByteDance and Alibaba, to stop new orders for H20 chips until the government is done conducting a national security review. The companies are compelled to comply, because they could face substantial fines from the CAC if they don't. Meanwhile, NDRC also issued an informal notice, asking local tech companies not to purchase any NVIDIA chip.
Reuters recently reported that NVIDIA is developing a new chip for the Chinese market that's more powerful than the H20, perhaps driven in part by China's move to discourage its purchase. It will be based on the company's Blackwell architecture, but will only be capable of half the computing power of NVIDIA's Blackwell Ultra GPUs. Their regulatory and export approval aren't guaranteed, but the president previously implied that he was aware of the project and said he expects NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang to talk to him about it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia orders halt to H20 chip production after China directive, The Information says
(Reuters) -Nvidia has told some of its component suppliers to suspend production work related to H20, its AI chip tailor-made for the Chinese market, The Information reported on Thursday, citing two people with direct knowledge of the communications. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration not eyeing equity in companies that are increasing US investment, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -The Trump administration is considering taking equity stakes in companies receiving funds from the 2022 CHIPS Act but has no plans to seek shares in bigger semiconductor firms that are increasing their U.S. investments, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing a government official. The development follows comments made by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who on Tuesday said the government is continuing to work on the possibility of taking a 10% stake in troubled chipmaker Intel. However, the administration does not intend to take equity stakes in companies like TSMC, which are ramping up investment, the official told the Journal. Businesses not increasing their commitments may need to offer equity to the government in exchange for subsidies. "The Commerce Department is not looking to take equity from TSMC and Micron," the official told WSJ. TSMC executives have already had discussions about giving back their subsidies if the administration asks to become a shareholder, according to the report. The White House and TSMC did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. TSMC, which counts Nvidia and Apple as key clients, announced plans for a $100 billion investment in the United States during an event with President Donald Trump at the White House in March. This investment is in addition to $65 billion committed for three manufacturing facilities in the state of Arizona. The U.S. Commerce Department, which oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act, late last year finalized subsidies of $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the United States. Besides Intel, Micron, TSMC and Samsung were among the biggest recipients of CHIPS Act funding. In the past, the U.S. government has taken stakes in companies during periods of economic uncertainty to provide financial support and restore confidence. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI CEO joins chorus of industry experts warning about "AI bubble"
Tech giants have made clear that they'll spare no expense in their efforts to win out in the AI rat race. So much so, that tech giants like Meta () , Microsoft () , Amazon () , and Google () planned to spend up to $320 billion on AI tech in 2025. So when Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who augured the great LLM-ification of AI and became a major investor in ChatGPT creator OpenAI in 2019, warned about "overbuild" of data centers after being part of the cohort signaling their spending ambitions, some analysts and industry experts seemed to perk up. Even more so when Alibaba co-founder Joe Tsai echoed Nadella's concerns, calling the buildout in AI datacenters a "bubble." Microsoft, meanwhile, went on to deny additional capacity from hyperscaler CoreWeave () , which was in the process of IPOing (that capacity was bought by OpenAI instead.) Only, nobody really cared. On Wall Street, valuations in AI-fueled trades were taking off. The only real segway was April's tariff tiff. Then, it was back to all-time highs for U.S. equities. The attitude was: "don't fight the tape." In some techno-optimist circles, the advent of superintelligent AI was seen just around the corner. Their attitude: "Why sell now?" Investors might be more wary now, thanks to a recent MIT study warning that businesses are not seeing returns from AI investments. And making matters worse, more industry experts are warning that investors got ahead of themselves. MIT drops AI spending bombshell MIT researchers studied 300 businesses and how they were using AI and found that, despite claims that the businesses had invested $30 to $40 billion into generative AI, only 5% of companies had seen any return thus far. Where industry anecdotes fell on deaf ears, the MIT study cut through the noise. Immediately after the report dropped, so too did tech stocks. And dogpiling on, even more industry leaders are joining the chorus, explicitly calling out what they see as an AI bubble. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warns of bubble Among them are OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who said in plain terms that, "investors as a whole are overexcited about AI." While emphasizing its long-term important, Altman cautioned that investors could get "burnt" by the 'dot com-like' dynamic in the market. Unfortunately, it won't just be the people betting on high-flying names like Palantir () . Many Americans' 401(K)s, IRAs, and brokerage accounts are tied up in indexes which are heavily exposed to the AI trade. In fact, these tech giants represent over a third of the S&P 500's weight. Altman remains an optimist over the long run, casting issues with his firm's latest frontier AI model as a "misfire" and promising an even more fantastic sequel in GPT-6. But that's what many AI optimists were hoping for GPT-5. And waiting even longer for "the future" to arrive might mean expending their optimism. That's not to say that AI models (including at competitors) are not progressing, but what investors' willingness to allow firms to become capital intensive businesses might not last much longer if they don't see light at the end of the tunnel. While they've learned to love the stratospheric growth coming from AI chipmaker Nvidia () and the double-digit strides in cloud services from Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, wariness about payoff might prompt a pullback. Mark's spend-a-thon comes to a close There's some evidence that it's already come — or maybe, somehow, AI is already replacing jobs — at Meta. CEO Mark Zuckerberg spent big to acquire AI talent and build out data centers. He's now almost fresh out of cash and looking to private credit to shore up his ambitions. Still, if you're confident there's a payoff, why pullback? Per WSJ, Meta is in the process of reorganizing its AI segment into different businesses prioritizing business endpoints. With it, exec departures, layoffs, and a hiring freeze. Is this a sign that Zuckerberg and management have looked around and collectively discovered that they're buying the top? Is this an unfortunate repeat of the company's failed metaverse ambitions? Or is this a wake-up call from within after squandering billions on comp packages for researchers and data centers? Too early to say, but after blowing through $31.8 billion in the last six months, you'd have to wonder if maybe, the industry gurus called it how it was. Now that Wall Street finally seems to be paying attention, what does that bode for the market? This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 21, 2025, where it first appeared in the Investing News, Analysis, and Tips section. Add TheStreet as a Preferred Source by clicking here.