
The common money mistake that is lazy and losing you £100s a year – I know how to fix it
WE all work hard for our cash, and most of us could probably do with a bit more of it in our pockets.
But there's one way that infuriates me as many of us are accidentally throwing it away through sheer laziness - and it's SO easy to avoid.
One of the biggest crisis facing finances for my generation (those in their 20s) is undoubtedly sticking with what we know when it comes to our finances.
It's easy, isn't it?
Your bank offers you insurance, a mortgage, or a savings account.
You've been with them for years. They seem trustworthy. So, you just say "yes". Job done.
But here's the truth: loyalty rarely pays when it comes to money. In fact, it often costs you - and it could end up making you £100s poorer each year.
When did you last shop around for your car insurance? Your home insurance? Your mortgage? Your savings or investment platforms?
If the answer is "years ago," or even worse, "never," you're almost certainly paying too much.
As Chief Consumer Reporter for The Sun my email inbox is regularly pumped full of press releases from financial firms and government departments telling me that people are missing out on cash.
To make matters worse, banks and other financial institutions rely on our laziness.
They know that most of us can't be bothered to switch.
It feels like a hassle.
There's paperwork, phone calls, comparisons...
But honestly, in today's world, it's easier than ever.
Switch bank accounts for free perks
Is comfort costing you
The costs can quickly add up. I'm moving home this week - so, checking my bills is top of my agenda.
For example, I bank with HSBC, and I asked them for a quote on insuring a typical three-bedroom semi-detached house, it would cost £489 per year.
But just five minutes spent adding my details into Money Supermarket I'm given a policy with the same cover for just £236 a year.
And remember the golden rule when it comes to paying for insurance - always pay annually upfront if you can.
It's almost always cheaper than opting for monthly payments, as you'll avoid the added interest charges that come with instalment plans.
The same goes with other financial products, such a mortgages.
For example, if you bank with NatWest and wanted to borrow £250,000 with a 10% deposit on the open market, you'd be offered a 4.7% two-year fixed rate.
In comparison, opting for Lloyds Bank's deal for the same loan would provide you with a more competitive rate of 4.32%.
And it all adds up - that's a saving of £1,143 in the first two years of your mortgage.
However, to get the most competitive mortgage rates, speak to a broker who has access to whole of market deals.
Some rates are available from as low as 3.72%.
Some will charge an extra fee but there are plenty who give advice for free and get paid only on commission from the lender.
You can find local brokers through your estate agent, word of mouth or online.
Make sure the broker is a qualified mortgage adviser – the most common qualification is called CeMAP.
4
That monthly pay cheque hitting your account? A great feeling, isn't it?
But if you're not actively managing the money you don't spend, your inaction could be diminishing its potential for growth.
Experts at AJ Bell recently revealed a staggering statistic - £280billion is languishing in current accounts, earning absolutely no interest.
And even if you do have a linked savings account with your high street bank, you're unlikely to see much of a return.
According to TotallyMoney, the average easy-access account (allowing unlimited withdrawals) on the high street pays a paltry 1.2%.
That's a full 2.3% below the latest inflation rate (3.5%), meaning your savings are effectively shrinking in real terms.
On a £5,000 deposit, this would add up to just £60 in interest annually, whereas the top rate currently available elsewhere could yield an impressive £239 a year.
If you're saving for a house or a holiday that could make a REAL difference.
The truth is, you don't need to keep your savings with your current account provider.
Most recommended savings accounts listed by comparison websites only include those covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
This means that if the company were to go bust, your savings, up to a value of £85,000, would be protected.
So, with potential savings rates of up to 4.77% available elsewhere, why stick with your high street bank?
To find the best savings rates, use comparison websites like moneyfactscompare.co.uk and moneysupermarket.com instead of checking individual bank sites.
Look for accounts paying more interest than the current inflation rate of 3.5%.
Keep some money in an easy-access savings account for emergencies, but for long-term goals, consider fixed-rate bonds or a Stocks and Shares ISA for potentially higher returns.
I've been lazy too - my biggest mistake
I learnt this hard way. Like many others, I made the classic mistake of sticking with my high street bank when I opened my first Stocks and Shares ISA years ago.
I wrongly assumed it was the best option, but my bank was quietly taking a hefty 0.25% of my entire investment's value in fees every single quarter.
For example, if I had £10,000 saved, they'd take £25 in the first quarter alone, followed by further chunks, including a cut of any interest I earned in the following three.
And that doesn't even include the fees to buy, sell, and trade funds and shares.
However, like me, you can get rid of these fees completely.
Specialist investment platforms like Trading 212 and InvestEngine don't charge any annual fees or trading charges.
If you'd prefer to trade on a more established platform, Interactive Investor charges just £4.99 a month, and Vanguard charges £4 a month on balances below £50,000.
Of course, the exact amount you'll be charged depends on how much you've invested, so grab a pen and paper and compare the fees before you get started.
Before you start investing, you need to make sure you have at least two months' worth of salary saved into an easy access account in case of emergencies.
Most experts advise having a cash buffer to fall back on.
If you do invest - you have to be willing to lose the cash, as it's a gamble.
But the biggest gamble of all if letting your bank or current provider scam you into taking out a product with them.
It's rarely going to save or make you more money - but it can be avoided. It's time to stop being lazy!
4
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Shepperton firms fear Terminal House eviction for housing plans
Tenants at a commercial property in Surrey say they fear their new landlord will convert the building to studio at Terminal House in Shepperton, some of which have been in place for 30 years, found out in March that the building had a new owner, who applied for permission to change the use of the were issued in May as, under existing planning rules, changing the use of many commercial buildings to housing does not require planning new owner's planning agent did not respond to a request for comment. People who work at Terminal House said they had received limited contact from the new landlord, leaving them unclear about if they would be allowed to remain at the Brown, a recruitment consultant, said the new owner was "a bit vague" about plans for the site, adding he believed turning the property into flats was the landlord's "end goal".Another person who works at Terminal House, who wanted to remain anonymous, said they had seen "people doing surveys" on the building and furnishings being business owner Nicola Males said she had decided to pre-emptively end her lease, adding she "couldn't bear the uncertainty".She said she could not risk being given three months' notice to leave Terminal House as she had to be "set up ready to go" ahead of the Christmas rush, adding it was "very difficult" to find similar commercial properties in Shepperton. Mr Brown said the new landlord had also "cancelled a bunch of subscriptions" - such as for bin collections and drinking water fountains - since taking Males added that the lack of bin collections had led to "rubbish strewn all over the road" for a time, but that collections had worker at Terminal House said that the communication had been "shocking" regarding the move and they only learned the building had been sold after the transaction was said the property was now managed by P4i, a London-based company that advertised its involvement in commercial site conversions across England.P4i did not respond to a request for comment from the addition to the successful bid to change the use of the building, the landlord has also submitted applications for planning consent to extend both blocks of Terminal House, which are located either side of a railway Borough Council is yet to determine the outcomes of these applications.


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Residents urged by Rother District Council to have say on housing
Residents in an area of East Sussex are being urged to air their views on the future of housing and homelessness services following an increase in Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Strategy Consultation will help shape how Rother District Council delivers housing and homelessness services between 2025 and consultation closes at midnight on leader Doug Oliver said demand for services relating to housing, homelessness and temporary accommodation have "a significant impact on the council's budget". The strategy's key themes are reducing homelessness, increasing housing accessibility, and improving both temporary accommodation and Oliver added: "I would encourage all residents and businesses to respond to the consultation, but particularly those at risk of homelessness, or from the building industry and organisations involved in the housing sector."


BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sneinton: 'We could have to pay £1m to fix a collapsed wall'
Residents in a Nottingham suburb say they are facing a bill of hundreds of thousands of pounds to repair a retaining Drayton, who lives on Windmill Lane in Sneinton, said the 70ft (21.34m) structure collapsed on 3 February 30-year-old said residents have been unable to get costs for repairs covered by insurers, and called on Nottingham City Council - who rebuilt the wall in 2003 - to "take responsibility".The council said it will not comment "as the wall is privately owned and therefore the council is not responsible for its upkeep or repair". Mr Drayton, who has lived in his house since 2016, said the wall was rebuilt by the council in 2003, but said two structural engineers hired by neighbours found the structure "was never fit for purpose in the first place".After the "massive panic" caused by the collapse, he said residents were left with a £60,000 bill to clear up 200 tonnes of debris, and described the current difficulties in finding a permanent fix as a "tricky situation"."The design flaw was in the wall that had been signed off by Nottingham City Council, and paid by Nottingham City Council, which was subsequently then charged back to us," he said."It's been a four-year process where people have really been struggling, emotionally and financially." Without the wall, Mr Drayton said the site is "totally unsafe", with residents unable to use their gardens without risking more said they are struggling to find a way to pay for the necessary work."We've been in contact with lots of builders, structural engineers and whatnot, trying to understand what the cost of the rebuild would be, and that cost is somewhere between £600,000 and £1m, and that's between six houses," he said."To put that in perspective, I bought the house - my first home - for less than the value of what it would cost to rebuild that wall, so it puts us in a really difficult situation."How we see it is that it's the council that has put us in that situation, because they didn't rebuild the wall properly in the first place, and we've got proof of that."With one neighbour putting up their house for auction and others having had therapy to deal with the stress, Mr Drayton said they face an uncertain future."Financially we can't really do a lot about it," he said."None of us can move from it until it's done."