Apple will imbue iPhones with a nifty holographic effect, offering the biggest clue yet as to where the company is headed
This fall, you'll likely find lots of family and friends experimenting with Spatial Scenes, especially since you can do it with almost any photo, on any recent iPhone (12 or later), and apply these 3D effects to your lock screen. But if you dig a bit beneath the surface of this update, you'll see how this is a perfect example of how Apple envisions the iPhone as a gateway to a future where nearly every digital interaction is spatial and AR-friendly. AR, or augmented reality, is the underlying magic behind the company's equally impressive and expensive Vision Pro headset, which lets you see and interact with digital elements in the real world.
The groundwork for augmented reality, including this new feature in iOS 26, was laid years ago when Apple introduced Portrait Mode in the iPhone 7 Plus. By blending information from two lenses, the camera system began capturing rudimentary depth maps, blurring backgrounds to mimic the look of a professional DSLR camera. Since then, the iPhone's cameras have greatly advanced: adding LiDAR sensors in Pro models, refining the Neural Engine that processes the images you capture, and quietly collecting the data needed to make 3D reconstructions possible at scale.
Now, with Vision Pro on shelves and AR an official focus for Apple's future pipeline, thanks to years of CEO Tim Cook evangelizing the bleeding-edge tech, Apple is putting these spatial capabilities front and center in the iPhone. Rather than limiting depth effects to photos taken in Portrait Mode, the new iOS 26 update can apply them retroactively to nearly any image in your library, so long as there's a clear background and foreground to work with. Apple tells Fortune all you have to do is find a image in your library, click a new spatial icon in the top right corner, and your photo will come to life.
Here's what it looks like in action:
Everyday AR, not just for headsets
Apple's Vision Pro headset, released in February 2024, was Apple's attempt to finally make 'spatial computing' happen—but it clearly has a long way to go in terms of adoption. At an eye-watering starting price of $3,499, Vision Pro remains a niche device targeting early adopters, although Apple has made clear of its ambitions to make the tech mainstream. The ubiquitous iPhone is a key stepping stone to get there: by infusing everyday features like wallpapers with AR flourishes, Apple is easing users into a world where spatial content feels normal, even expected.
By embedding spatial computing into users' photos, arguably a person's most personal digital real estate, Apple is training people to expect depth and dimension everywhere. And by making it available as a lock-screen feature, it's even clearer that this is Apple's attempt to gently introduce people to the direction it's heading as a company.
To be clear, 3D photos might seem like a novelty, but it has actual utility as well. By getting people excited about 3D effects on their multimedia, this is also Apple's way of subtly encouraging developers to build AR-friendly applications, from gaming to social media to shopping. Hundreds of these applications exist on the Vision Pro headset, but the true opportunity lies with the iPhone, of which there are north of 1.3 billion owners. And, since this feature will sync across devices, you can expect spatial features like the 3D-photo feature in iOS 26 making its way across the entire Apple ecosystem.
While Apple fans and consumers are most likely focused on the other bells in whistles of iOS 26—the new app icons, phone features like call screening, and further personalization options for Messages—we may look back on this update as the first time Apple really started to lean into its AR future.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
3 minutes ago
Trump thinks owning a piece of Intel would be a good deal for the US
SAN FRANCISCO -- President Donald Trump wants the U.S. government to own a piece of Intel, less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping chipmaker. If the goal is realized, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more U.S. companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas suppliers. The Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10% stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the U.S. government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest economy. In his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogram the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15% commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export licenses. Trump's interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the U.S., which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the world. By lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the U.S. will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial intelligence. That's what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired him. The demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the U.S. in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an 'amazing story.' The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the U.S. government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of weakness. After enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 debut. Intel has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly $19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting spree. By the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last year. Although rare, it's not unprecedented for the U.S. government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in GM. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the company. But some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favor with the president to increase their orders for the company's chips. Intel was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the program. The company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives program — money that Lutnick derided as a 'giveaway' that would better serve U.S. taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. 'We think America should get the benefit of the bargain,' Lutnick told CNBC. 'It's obvious that it's the right move to make.'
Hypebeast
20 minutes ago
- Hypebeast
A First for Apple: U.S.-Bound iPhones to Be Produced in India
Summary In a historic shift in its global supply chain,Appleisreportedlyexpanding its iPhone production to India to fulfill the majority of demand for its latest models in the United States. This marks the first time in history that all new variations of the upcomingiPhone 17, including the premium Pro models, will be manufactured in India from the start for a major Western market. The move is a strategic pivot for Apple, driven by a desire to reduce its reliance on China and to mitigate the potential impact of tariffs and geopolitical tensions. According to sources familiar with the matter, Apple has significantly ramped up its production in five Indian factories, including new plants operated by the Tata Group and Foxconn Technology Group. This expansion has already led to a surge in iPhone exports from India, with the U.S. becoming the country's primary export destination. This change is not just about avoiding potential tariffs; it is a long-term strategy to diversify Apple's manufacturing footprint. The shift has delivered substantial results, with India's iPhone exports surging to $7.5 billion USD in just the four months beginning April, nearly half of the previous fiscal year's total. This move solidifies India's role as a major hub in Apple's global production ecosystem, signaling a new era for both the company and the country's manufacturing sector.
Business Insider
20 minutes ago
- Business Insider
NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, AMZN: Why Fund Managers Are Trimming Holdings in Mega-Cap Tech Stocks
Mega-cap tech stocks, including Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Meta (META), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Nvidia (NVDA), are the most under-owned by institutional investors in more than 16 years, according to a new report from Morgan Stanley (MS). Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. These companies account for a large share of the S&P 500 (SPX) index, yet active fund managers hold fewer of them than their benchmark weightings. The under-ownership of mega-cap tech stocks grew to roughly 140 basis points in the second quarter, compared with 115 in the first quarter. Notably, mega-cap companies are those with a market capitalization of $200 billion or more. Most of these companies boast well-established business models, strong brand power, and global operations. Nvidia Leads the Gap Nvidia, now the world's most valuable company, saw the gap between its institutional ownership and S&P 500 weighting widen by 92 basis points in the quarter, reaching -2.41%, the largest underweight among big tech stocks. This comes even as Nvidia's stock has skyrocketed nearly 1,346% over the past five years, powered by surging demand for its AI GPUs. In 2025 alone, shares have jumped 30.8%, far outpacing the S&P 500's 9.65% gain. Nvidia leads the gap, but others are not far behind. Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon are also underweight in institutional portfolios by 2.39%, 1.66%, and 1.40%, respectively. Still, these stocks have all delivered strong long-term gains, with Microsoft up 137%, Apple up 95%, and Amazon up 38% over the past five years. Why Funds Are Holding Back Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring said that mega-cap tech stocks now make up such a large share of the S&P 500 that active managers are cutting exposure to avoid concentration risks. Some managers are also cautious for company-specific reasons. For instance, Apple has been hit by slower iPhone sales and ongoing regulatory challenges. Still, Woodring believes that this under-ownership could be a bullish signal. If fund managers raise their holdings to match index levels, it could trigger another wave of buying, pushing mega-cap tech stocks to fresh record highs. Which Mega-Cap Stock Looks Most Attractive? Using TipRanks' Stock Comparison Tool, we compared NVDA, AMZN, AAPL, and MSFT to see which stocks analysts favor most. Nvidia, Amazon, and Microsoft all carry Strong Buy ratings, with analysts projecting more than 10% upside for each. Apple, on the other hand, holds a Moderate Buy rating, with a more limited upside of about 3.7% from current levels.
