'Justice Needs Human Touch': Kerala HC Grants Escort Parole To Death Row Convict To Visit Ailing Mother
In a judgment underscoring the role of humanity in justice delivery, the Kerala High Court has granted escort parole to a death row convict to visit his bedridden 93-year-old mother, despite clear legal provisions barring such relief for those sentenced to death.
The single-judge bench of Justice PV Kunhikrishnan, while passing the judgment, remarked that although the convict is accused of a brutal murder committed in front of the victim's wife, child, and mother, the court cannot adopt an equally inhuman stance.
'Justice, without the soft hand touch of humanity, compassion, and empathy, is not justice. But humanity, compassion and empathy are matters of judicial discretion which is to be used based on the facts and circumstances of each case," the Court observed, adding that India does not follow the doctrine of 'an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."
'Our country known for its humanity, compassion, and empathy while delivering justice. It is the duty of the constitutional court to see that the fundamental needs and basic rights of a prisoner is protected till the sentence is finally executed," the Single Bench said.
Facts of the Case
The convict had appealed his conviction by the Sessions Court, which had awarded him the death sentence.
His wife had approached the High Court after prison authorities denied her request for escort parole, citing Section 42 of the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Act and Rule 339(2) of the Rules framed under it, which bar such concessions to death convicts.
Despite this statutory bar, the Court held that constitutional principles and fundamental rights demand a humane approach, especially when the prisoner seeks to see his dying mother.
'If anybody said that the prisoner's request is like the words of 'a wolf in sheep's clothing,' they cannot be blamed. But a court of law cannot take an inhuman stand like the prisoner who orphaned the kith and kin of the victim," the Court said.
The High Court emphasised that until a sentence is finally executed, a convict remains entitled to basic rights and dignity.
Accordingly, the Court directed prison authorities to grant escort parole to the convict and allow him to spend at least six hours with his mother under strict police supervision.
'Necessary arrangement shall be made by the District Police Chief (Thiruvananthapuram City) for granting escort parole to the petitioner's husband forthwith," the Court added.
First Published:
June 26, 2025, 15:48 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Uttarakhand to toughen anti-conversion law; life imprisonment, ₹10 lakh fine proposed — check details
The Uttarakhand government's move to bring another legislation to amend the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act is expected to make the law even more stringent. The amendment, approved by the state cabinet, aims to prevent religious conversions through coercion, fraud, or undue influence. The amendment legislation, approved by the state cabinet on Wednesday, proposes a maximum punishment of life imprisonment and a fine of up to ₹ 10 lakh for forced conversion. Currently, the maximum prison term for the offence in the state is 10 years and the highest fine is ₹ 50,000. This is the second legislation to amend the Act, which has been in force in the state since 2018. The first amendment was made in 2022. The Pushkar Singh Dhami-led government is preparing to introduce the legislation during the monsoon session of the state assembly, which is scheduled to begin on August 19, reported news agency PTI, citing sources. According to the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion (amendment) legislation, 2025, fraudulent or forced conversion would be a cognizable and non-bailable offence. In such cases, police will be allowed to arrest an offender without a warrant and bail will be granted only if the trial court (sessions court) is convinced that the accused is not guilty and would not repeat the offence. "Yet another amendment legislation to make the law even more strict has been occasioned by recent cases of conversions in the state aimed at demographic change," PTI quoted Ajendra Ajay, BJP leader and former chairman of Badrinath-Kedarnath Temple committee, as saying. Terming the cabinet's decision as historic, Ajay said: "An amended act with stricter provisions will work as a strong deterrent for potential offenders and help preserve the original identity of a border state like Uttarakhand, which is also known as Devbhoomi." The Bill also expands the definition of inducement to include any gift, gratification, easy money, or material benefit in cash or kind, employment, free education, promise of marriage, hurting religious faith, or glorifying another religion, categorising all of them as crimes. It also makes punishable acts such as promoting or inciting conversion through social media, messaging apps, or any online medium.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Kerala HC terms right to motorable roads as a Constitutional right, seeks safety and quality audit report within a month
Asserting that the right to motorable roads is a Constitutional right, the Kerala High Court has directed the government to file a road safety and quality audit report within a month. A Bench of Justice Devan Ramachandran added orally that the right to travel is within the compass of the fundamental right while dealing with a case regarding the spate of accidents due to potholes, the poor upkeep of roads in Kerala and the rampant violation of traffic rules. The court cited incidents like one in Thrissur where a two wheeler rider who swerved to avoid a pothole being fatally hit by another vehicle, right in front of his mother, to shed light on the deteriorating conditions of the roads. These are not mere accidents, and ought to have been eye openers. Yet, the court still does not see concrete actions, it added. The amicus curiae for the case Vinod Bhat said that only peripheral work was done, despite multiple orders by the court. Designated engineer Stating that every road had a designated engineer who was prima facie responsible to ensure its upkeep and to prevent accidents due to potholes, the court expressed the hope that stakeholders, including at the highest level, would proactively find feasible and lasting solutions. It specifically mentioned the expected increase in traffic during the impending Onam season. Although the court had earlier sought a comprehensive audit report on road safety and quality from the Public Works department and the Kochi Corporation, the government's counsel sought additional time to submit the report. The matter has been posted for hearing the coming week.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
As Top Court Reserves Decision On Delhi's Stray Dogs, Key Points From Earlier Order
The Supreme Court has reserved its order on petitions challenging its August 11 directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR streets and confine them permanently in shelters. A B ench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and NV Anjaria reserved its verdict on the pleas. No immediate relief was granted to petitioners demanding a stay on the August 11 ruling, which triggered protests from animal activists and dog lovers. This means the drive to remove stray dogs from streets and move them to shelter homes will continue. The court also criticised the authorities for failing to implement existing guidelines for animal control. 10 Takeaways: The August 11 ruling was issued in response to rising dog-bite incidents and rabies cases in the Delhi-NCR region. The court directed authorities to create shelters for at least 5,000 stray dogs within six to eight weeks. Authorities were told to immediately begin rounding up all stray dogs and placing them in shelters. The court ruled that captured dogs must not be released back into public spaces. The court mandated authorities to simultaneously build shelters and capture stray dogs. A special enforcement force is to be formed for the relocation exercise. CCTV cameras are to be installed in shelters to ensure no animals are released or removed unlawfully. The court prohibited mistreatment, cruelty, overcrowding, or starvation of the animals. An adoption scheme for the sheltered dogs is to be initiated, but adopted animals cannot return to the streets. A helpline to report dog bites was to be set up within one week. Authorities were ordered to capture any dog involved in a bite incident within four hours of a complaint. The Delhi government was directed to publish rabies vaccine stock, availability, and monthly treatment data. Any obstruction to the order's implementation would be treated as contempt of court. One recent ruling by Supreme Court Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan ordered removal of all strays to shelters, disregarding the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules. Justice Pardiwala said, "Pick up dogs from all localities and shift them to shelters. For the time being, forget the rules." The ABC Rules, 2023, require stray dogs to be sterilised and returned to the same locality after treatment. Chief Justice BR Gavai said he will "look into" the matter to resolve the legal contradiction. The August 11 order has been welcomed by several Resident Welfare Associations, citing public safety concerns. The order has been criticised by animal rights activists, celebrities and some political leaders as inhumane and impractical due to funding and infrastructure challenges.
