The unlivable city
For yet another year, Karachi has been branded one of the world's least livable cities, ranking 170 out of 173 in the Economist Intelligence Unit's 2025 Global Liveability Index. With a dismal score of 42.7 on a 100-point scale, Karachi barely edged out Dhaka, Tripoli and Damascus to stay out of last place. It should be noted however that Dhaka has been at the centre of a political revolution that led to the overthrow of the Bangladeshi government and several protests, some of which turned violent.
Tripoli has been ravaged by a civil war and repeated flare-ups since the Arab Spring began in 2011, while Damascus has just emerged from the brutality of the Syrian civil war. Karachi, on the other hand, has no civil war or uprising to blame. It just is that much of a mess.
The city's woes are multifaceted, rooted in decades of neglect and misguided priorities. Karachi scored worst in "stability" and "infrastructure" — even worse than war zones where roads, highways and hospitals are being bombed — and it remains plagued by crime, terrorism and inadequate public services. In fact, a Forbes Adviser list last year placed Karachi as the second riskiest city for international tourists.
An Asian Development Bank report also offered more context for Karachi's problems, drawing a direct link between grotesque income inequality and the city's major problems. While it is quite difficult to make things worse,
Mayor Murtaza Wahab's defence was simultaneously lamentable as he criticised the survey for overlooking Karachi's "vibrancy" and "resilience." Other cities generally described as vibrant include Vienna and Damascus, which are polar opposites in almost every other measure.
Beyond security, many of the problems holding Karachi back are unique to Pakistan, including the commercial emphasis on property speculation, which is more lucrative for businesses and politicians, rather than affordable housing developments, which are direly needed and still profitable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Future-proofing textile exports
Global fashion brands are reshuffling supply chains after years of China-focused sourcing. This once-in-a-decade opportunity to capture massive new market share could slip away if Pakistan fails to act decisively against competitors. Photo: file The trade landscape in August 2025 resembles a high-stakes poker game, where nations are forced to recalibrate strategies amid escalating US tariffs. Islamabad's newly signed trade deal with Washington alone has shifted trade balances in South Asia significantly. The US imposed a 19% tariff on Pakistani goods, a 20% tariff on Bangladeshi ones, and a devastating 25% (potentially 50%) on Indian products. This creates two entirely different competitive dynamics: a golden opportunity against India and cut-throat competition against Bangladesh. This affects our textile exports directly. In January 2025, Pakistan had a 5% advantage over Bangladesh in its textile exports to the US, but now that comfortable lead has evaporated overnight. It now clings to a razor-thin one-percentage-point edge (19% vs 20%), while Bangladesh's massive manufacturing machine enjoys at least 60% lower power and gas tariffs compared to Pakistan. Meanwhile, the Indian tariffs open new doors of opportunities for Pakistan. With a six-point tariff advantage already, Pakistani exporters can undercut Indian suppliers across textiles, processed foods, leather goods, and IT services. In fact, India's textile exports to the US fell for the fourth consecutive month in July, and India's $10 billion annual textile exports to America now sit vulnerable, ripe for capture. Major US buyers like Target and Walmart are already reassessing supplier relationships, with Pakistani manufacturers reporting unprecedented inquiry volumes. In contrast, Bangladesh's resurgence threatens to crush Pakistan's textile dominance before it can capitalise on the Indian opportunity. Bangladesh's garment sector employs 4.1 million workers – nearly triple Pakistan's textile workforce. Bangladesh exported $47 billion in garments alone globally last year compared to Pakistan's $16 billion total exports across all sectors. Even with a 1% tariff disadvantage, Bangladesh's scale advantages in logistics, financing, and established buyer relationships with major US fashion brands could overwhelm Pakistan's narrow price edge. Moreover, Bangladesh's textile lobbies are pressuring Dhaka to negotiate even lower US tariff rates, while Pakistani manufacturers demand government subsidies to offset the narrowed competitive gap. Indian suppliers, desperate to maintain US market access despite punitive tariffs, are slashing prices and accepting razor-thin margins. American importers are watching this South Asian battle with keen interest. The fragmented competitive landscape gives US buyers unprecedented leverage to demand lower prices, faster delivery, and higher quality from all three countries desperate to maintain market shares. Global fashion brands are reshuffling supply chains after years of China-focused sourcing. This once-in-a-decade opportunity to capture massive new market share could slip away if Pakistan fails to act decisively against both competitors simultaneously. Way forward: the three-front war strategy Pakistan must fight simultaneously on three fronts to survive this transformed landscape. Against Bangladesh, Pakistan cannot win on price or scale. Instead, it must pursue "premium differentiation" — positioning itself as the quality alternative to Bangladesh's mass-market approach. This means investing in sustainable manufacturing, technical textiles, fashion design partnerships, and Industry 4.0 technologies that Bangladesh's fragmented sector cannot match. Slashing margins to maintain competitiveness won't work with Bangladesh's volume-focused approach. Against India, Pakistan should launch immediate and aggressive campaigns targeting US importers currently sourcing from Indian suppliers, emphasising the 6% (and potentially 31%) cost advantage while it lasts. Pakistani exporters should offer locked-in pricing and guaranteed capacity to steal Indian contracts before competitors respond. The third front is diversification. Pakistan's over-dependence on textiles becomes a vulnerability when Bangladesh has developed textiles as its core competency. Pakistani exporters must rapidly expand into pharmaceuticals, IT services, processed foods, and light manufacturing sectors where the country's skilled workforce and growing industrial base should compete with India. The window for action is closing fast. Bangladesh won't remain satisfied with a 1% tariff disadvantage, while India's powerful lobbying machine will fight to level the playing field. Pakistan's moment of tariff advantage could vanish within months if it doesn't use the opportunity to increase its competitiveness in the long run. THE WRITER IS A CAMBRIDGE GRADUATE AND IS WORKING AS A STRATEGY CONSULTANT
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Playing trump card in mineral exploration
Despite its huge potential, the mineral sector currently contributes around 3.2% to the gross domestic product (GDP), with exports accounting for a meagre 0.1% of the world's total. photo: file Pakistan is playing its trump card in a potential minerals deal with the United States. The administration of US President Donald Trump has shown keen interest in two critical areas – digital currency and minerals – and this is where Pakistan is working with them. On the other hand, China – the world's second-largest economy and a major rival of the US in both economic and political spheres – has been developing since long the Saindak copper and gold mining project. However, it is not known how much success has been achieved. A few months ago, Pakistan hosted a minerals conference, drawing participation from several countries and inviting investment in potential projects. Beijing and Washington both are keen to exploit the untapped mineral resources of Pakistan but so far, the US has been more active in a bid to clinch lucrative deals. Pakistan's government believes that the country has minerals potential worth $8 trillion. Earlier, the US signed a deal with Ukraine for a share in rare earths and other minerals, where it demanded a $500 billion slice of minerals in exchange for aid. Later, it revised the agreement, saying that future American military assistance to Ukraine would be linked to US investment in a joint reconstruction fund that would pour money into Kyiv's natural resources. Experts believe that in the case of Pakistan too, the US will ask for a big share in copper and gold mining projects. Critics, however, argue that mineral-rich nations have not benefitted much; rather the companies extracting minerals have reaped massive dividends. The government is looking for partners in the Reko Diq copper and gold project in Chagai, Balochistan, where, according to officials, the US administration seems least interested but Saudi Arabia is eager to join hands. The government has awarded another mining area on the Reko Diq belt to the Chinese company that was already working in Saindak. In this backdrop, the government should be weighing proposals from both Washington and Beijing. Experts are of the view that Pakistan would have to deal side by side with these countries for extracting its vast mineral deposits that could spark an economic turnaround. It has recently received a $5 billion offer for the multibillion-dollar Reko Diq project. Funding commitments have been received from foreign donors and the amount is more than the investment required for Reko Diq, which is estimated at $3 billion. The donors include the Asian Development Bank, Islamic Development Bank, International Finance Corporation and US Exim Bank. Development agencies from Germany and Denmark have also come up with financing proposals. While financing offers are trickling in, the government should execute other projects as well, in addition to Reko Diq, to tap the full potential of copper and gold reserves in the country. Pakistan is blessed with abundant mineral resources that hold immense potential to fuel economic growth and industrial development. The vast reserves of coal, copper, gold, iron ore, chromite and precious stones provide a solid foundation for the mining sector to thrive and contribute to rapid economic progress. Despite its huge potential, the mineral sector currently contributes around 3.2% to the gross domestic product (GDP), with exports accounting for a meagre 0.1% of the world's total. However, with increasing exploration, foreign investment and infrastructure improvement, the mining industry is poised for significant expansion. Pakistan's mineral-rich landscape covers an outcrop area of approximately 600,000 square kilometres. With 92 known minerals, 52 of which are commercially exploited, Pakistan produces an estimated 68.52 million metric tons of minerals annually. The sector supports over 5,000 operational mines and 50,000 small and medium enterprises (SMEs), providing direct employment to 300,000 workers. Some of the country's most notable mineral reserves include the world's second-largest salt mines, the fifth-largest copper and gold deposits and significant coal reserves. Furthermore, Pakistan possesses vast quantities of bauxite, gypsum and precious stones such as ruby, topaz and emerald, which can help gain considerable foothold in overseas markets. The government needs funds, technology and expertise of foreign companies to exploit the minerals. The time is ripe for engaging in meaningful negotiations with China, the US and other countries to extract gold and copper that may change Pakistan's destiny. The writer is a staff correspondent
Business Recorder
5 days ago
- Business Recorder
Ankara, Damascus top diplomats warn Israel over Syria action
ANKARA: Turkiye's foreign minister and his Syrian counterpart on Wednesday warned Israel not to stir up chaos in Syria and demanded an end to all external interventions aimed at destabilising the war-torn country. 'Certain actors are bothered by the positive developments in Syria,' Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said after talks with Syria's Asaad al-Shaibani in Ankara, referring to Israel and Kurdish YPG fighters operational in northeastern Syria. 'Israel is currently one of the biggest actors in this dark picture,' he said of its ongoing military incursions since the overthrow of Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad late last year. 'The emergence of chaos in Syria… appears to have become a priority for Israel's own national security,' he said. Standing next to him, Shaibani also warned against efforts to foster chaos in Syria. Turkey starts supplying Azerbaijani gas to boost Syria's power output 'We're facing new challenges that are no less dangerous than those we encountered during the years of war, foremost among them are repeated Israeli threats… through airstrikes,' he said. Fidan said efforts to destabilise Syria could be clearly seen in the March bloodshed in the coastal Alawite heartland of Latakia and in the recent deadly violence that gripped the southwestern Druze-majority province of Sweida as well as in the Kurdish-dominated northeast. 'The events in Latakia and Sweida and the failure to integrate the YPG (into the Syrian state) are evidence of the challenges and obstacles facing the positive process under way,' he said. Shaibani said foreign actors were exacerbating the unrest within Syria. 'We are also confronting multiple foreign interventions, both direct and indirect… (that) push the country toward sectarian and regional strife,' he said without giving details but warning against 'any reckless attempts to exploit events here'. During the war, Assad's government was backed by Russia, Iran and Hezbollah. Fidan said the YPG – part of the US-backed Kurdish-led SDF but seen by Ankara as an extension of PKK militant group – remained a concern over its refusal to integrate into the Syrian state despite a March agreement to do so. The PKK, which fought a decades-long insurgency against Ankara, is currently in the throes of disbanding as part of a peace agreement with the Turkish government. 'We have not seen any developments that indicate the organisation has eliminated the threat of armed action' nor sent home the foreign fighters in its ranks, he said. 'In an environment where Turkiye's security demands remain unmet, we have no chance of remaining calm,' he warned.
