Apple overcomes trade war and slow start in AI to deliver strong quarter
The April-June results released on Thursday came against a backdrop of adversity that has been raising worries about the trajectory of a longtime tech kingpin that expects to absorb a setback of nearly two billion dollars (£1.5 billion) from the tariffs that President Donald Trump has already imposed and others in the pipeline.
Despite the doubts, Apple remains a moneymaking machine.
The company earned 23.4 billion dollars (£17.8 billion) during its fiscal third quarter, a 9% increase from the same time last year.
Revenue climbed 10% from a year ago to 94 billion dollars (£71 billion). The company's iPhone sales surged 13% from a year ago to 44.6 billion dollars (£33.8 billion).
In another positive development, Apple's business in China showed signs of snapping out of a prolonged malaise with a 4% bump in revenue from the same time last year.
All those numbers were well above the analyst projections that steer investors, helping to boost Apple's recently slumping stock price by about 3% in extended trading.
But the unexpectedly solid performance does not necessarily mean it is smooth sailing ahead for Apple.
Mr Trump's trade war targeting foreign-made products such as the iPhone and Apple's stumbling start in the pivotal transition to AI is causing investors to question if the company will remain at the tech forefront as the industry moves into a new era.
Before Thursday's report came out, Apple's stock price had plunged by 17% so far this year to wipe out more than 600 billion dollars (£455 billion) in shareholder wealth and knock the company off its perch as the world's most valuable company.
Meanwhile, the shares of AI chipmaker Nvidia have surged 32% this year and the shares of AI pacesetter Microsoft have gained 27%, propelling the market value to four trillion dollars (£3 trillion).
Even though Apple remains highly profitable, the tariffs that Mr Trump has already imposed on China and other countries cost the company 800 million dollars (£600 million) during the past quarter, and CEO Tim Cook told analysts during a conference call that the fees would exact an additional toll of 1.1 billion dollars (£830 million) during the July-September period.
The company also predicted its revenue for July-September period would increase at a slightly slower pace than the past quarter.
Mr Cook indicated the financial damage from the tariffs could have been much higher, telling analysts most of the components in iPhones and other Apple products are still shielded by temporary exemptions that the Trump administration granted most electronics in mid-April.
Apple softened the blow of Mr Trump's tariffs on products made outside the US during the past quarter by shifting its production of iPhones from China to India.
But the administration intends to impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, a move that could intensify the pressure on Apple to raise the prices on the next generation of iPhones expected to be released in September.
Mr Cook was not asked about the possibility of an iPhone increase during his Thursday remarks to analysts.
Consumer fears about the tariffs driving up iPhone prices spurred an unusual buying spree of iPhones and Mac computers in the US during early April, according to Mr Cook.
Apple estimated that spike accounted for roughly one percentage point of its 10% revenue increase in the past quarter, which translates into about 82 million dollars (£62 million) in sales.
Mr Cook also credited an uptick in consumers upgrading to the latest model for helping Apple sell its three billionth iPhone since the device's 2007 debut.
Mr Trump has been pressuring Apple to make all its iPhones in the US, a move that analysts believe would take years to pull off and ultimately double or triple the average price of the device.
But Mr Cook told analysts Thursday that the company is pushing to increase its computer chip production in the US as one way of avoiding tariffs.
'We ultimately will do more in the United States,' he said.
Meanwhile, Apple is still trying to fulfil the AI promises it made last year when it unveiled an array of new iPhone features built on the revolutionary technology, raising expectations that the shift would spur millions of people to upgrade their old devices.
But Apple still has not delivered on an AI upgrade that was supposed to smarten up its often-bumbling virtual assistant Siri, one of the main reasons underlying the lacklustre growth of iPhone sales.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Who are the biggest buyers of Russian oil?
U.S. President Donald Trump is pushing China and India to stop buying oil from Russia and helping fund the Kremlin 's war against Ukraine. Trump is raising the issue as he seeks to press Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. But cheap Russian oil benefits refiners in those countries as well as meeting their needs for energy, and they're not showing any inclination to halt the practice. Three countries are big buyers of Russian oil China, India and Turkey are the biggest recipients of oil that used to go to the European Union. The EU's decision to boycott most Russian seaborne oil from January 2023 led to a massive shift in crude flows from Europe to Asia. Since then, China has been the No. 1 overall purchaser of Russian energy since the EU boycott, with some $219.5 billion worth of Russian oil, gas and coal, followed by India with $133.4 billion and Turkey with $90.3 billion. Before the invasion, India imported relatively little Russian oil. Hungary imports some Russian oil through a pipeline. Hungary is an EU member, but President Viktor Orban has been critical of sanctions against Russia. The lure of cheaper oil One big reason: It's cheap. Since Russian oil trades at a lower price than the international benchmark Brent, refineries can fatten their profit margins when they turn crude into usable products such as diesel fuel. Russia's oil earnings are substantial despite sanctions The Kyiv School of Economics says Russia took in $12.6 billion from oil sales in June. Russia continues to earn substantial sums even as the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations has tried to limit Russia's take by imposing an oil price cap. The cap is to be enforced by requiring shipping and insurance companies to refuse to handle oil shipments above the cap. Russia has, to a great extent, been able to evade the cap by shipping oil on a 'shadow fleet' of old vessels using insurers and trading companies located in countries that are not enforcing sanctions. Russian oil exporters are predicted to take in $153 billion this year, according to the Kyiv institute. Fossil fuels are the single largest source of budget revenue. The imports support Russia's ruble currency and help Russia to buy goods from other countries, including weapons and parts for them.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump's Ukraine peace plan now runs straight through an old friend
After championing Vladimir Putin indefatigably for months, Donald Trump is poised this week to punish Russia's invasion of Ukraine for the first time. But it is India, not Russia, that appears likely to bear the brunt. Facing a self-imposed deadline – shortened from 50 to 12 days – the US president has until Friday to unveil measures aimed at forcing Putin to consider a ceasefire. With bipartisan support in Congress for tough sanctions, Mr Trump has threatened to throttle Russia's war economy by imposing 100 per cent tariffs on any country buying its oil. Such a move would have a significant impact, said Timothy Ash, associate fellow at Chatham House, the international affairs think tank: 'Russia's exports would slow to a trickle. Its fiscal revenues would stop almost completely. We would see major runs on banks and the currency come under severe pressure.' Focus on Moscow's oil exports But, Mr Ash added, while the impact on Moscow would be severe, it would also unleash turmoil on world markets, send oil prices sky-rocketing and chill the global economy. So outlandish did the threat seem that investors initially dismissed it as bluster from a president long open about his warm relations with Putin. But in recent days, he has begun shaping a more modest sanctions package targeting states whose purchases of Russian oil help fund the war. So far his focus has been selective. He has avoided threatening China – Russia's biggest energy customer – and Turkey, the third largest. Instead, he has singled out India, the second-largest buyer. Last week, Mr Trump raised tariffs on Indian goods to 25 per cent, above the rate applied to Asian competitors, and promised an additional penalty for Delhi's oil purchases from Russia. 'They're fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not happy,' he told CNBC on Tuesday, saying he would unveil the new tariff within 24 hours. India's role in sustaining Russia's economy is clear. Before the 2022 invasion, Russian oil accounted for just 0.2 per cent of India's imports; today it is 45 percent – around two million barrels a day – bringing Moscow £41bn in revenue last year, according to Delhi's Global Trade Research Initiative. Even so, China buys more – 47 per cent of Russia's oil, compared with India's 37 per cent. Mr Trump's circumspection as far as Beijing is concerned probably reflects geopolitical caution: Washington and Beijing only recently stabilised relations after a damaging trade war and Mr Trump is hoping to stage a triumphant summit with Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, before the end of the year. That he feels freer to confront India suggests ulterior motives. Despite the president's warm personal ties with Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, US relations with the country he leads have soured. Trade negotiations have stalled, frustrating Mr Trump. He was also reportedly incensed when Pakistan, not India, praised his mediation and even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize after the India-Pakistan clashes in May. Mr Modi, by contrast, played down Mr Trump's role and has paid the price for his perceived ingratitude. In June, Mr Trump invited Asim Munir, Pakistan's powerful army chief, to lunch at the White House, pledged to improve relations with India's chief enemy and announced plans to help develop its oil reserves. Scepticism over Mr Trump's sudden concern about Indian oil imports is heightened by his previous reluctance to impose new sanctions on Russia – or even uphold the old ones. Enforcement of existing restrictions has significantly weakened since he returned to the White House, critics say. Not only did he decline to appoint a new head of the State Department's Office of Sanctions Co-ordination, he has also proved reluctant to co-ordinate with the EU on sanctions enforcement, European officials complain. 'He feels played and he's angry' Front companies helping Moscow evade restrictions have proliferated, critics say – a claim the White House denies. Some analysts believe Mr Trump has had a genuine change of heart, after concluding that only meaningful pressure on Putin – who believes he has the battlefield advantage – will bring him to the negotiating table. With some experts warning a Russian victory is no longer unthinkable, the president seems determined to act. Charles Kupchan, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, a prominent US think tank, said: 'I think Trump has come around to the realisation that convincing Putin to back away from his maximalist war aims will take more than nice conversations. 'I think in many respects you're looking at an American president who feels played by Putin, and he's angry. And now that he has pivoted, he does not want to go down in history as the American president who lost Ukraine.' It is doubtful that focusing on India alone will work, particularly as Mr Modi shows no sign of yielding. Mr Trump insists that secondary tariffs could cut Russian oil revenues enough to force Putin to rethink his strategy. The US president said last week: 'If energy goes down enough, Putin is going to stop killing people. If you get energy down, another $10 a barrel, he's going to have no choice because his economy stinks.' But experts warned that tariffs and sanctions alone might not be enough, certainly if they were imposed on India alone. As Mr Kupchan noted: 'Increasing economic pressure is necessary, but it's only one plank of a set of policies. The more important element is getting arms to Ukraine and helping it build its own military-industrial base. 'I don't think we can strangle the Russian economy. Ultimately, Ukraine needs the capability to stop Putin.'
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
India holds rates as expected but flags growth risks from US tariffs
MUMBAI, Aug 6 (Reuters) - The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) kept its key repo rate steady at 5.50% on Wednesday, in line with expectations, as policymakers waited to see the impact of recent rate cuts and assessed risks from higher-than-expected U.S. tariffs. The six-member rate-setting panel held the policy rate in a unanimous vote and decided to continue with a 'neutral' stance. Global trade challenges continue to linger but prospects for the Indian economy remain "bright", Governor Sanjay Malhotra said in his statement. While headline inflation is much lower than expected, it is largely due to volatile food prices, Malhotra said. A large majority of economists, 44 of 57, had forecast a pause in a July 18–24 Reuters poll, following a surprise 50 basis point cut in June. The central bank has cut the policy repo rate by 100 bps so far in 2025 as price pressures eased, but U.S. President Donald Trump is ramping up threats to raise tariffs on imports from India over its Russian oil purchases. The central bank left its economic growth forecast unchanged at 6.5%, though Malhotra acknowledged that prospects for external demand remained cloudy amid tariff uncertainties. The surprise U.S. imposition of a 25% tariff on imports from India from August 1 could shave off up to 40 basis points from that level, while stunting business investment, economists have said. Just weeks ago, Indian officials had hoped to strike a deal that would cap tariffs at 15%. Inflation slowed to a six-year low of 2.10% in June and is expected to fall to record lows when July data is released next week, before picking up again later in the year. The inflation outlook has become "more benign", Malhotra said, cutting the central bank's inflation forecast for the current financial year to 3.1% from 3.7% earlier. India's benchmark 10-year bond yield rose 4 bps to 6.3701%, while the rupee was little changed at 87.7350. The benchmark equity indexes were down around 0.2% each
