logo
Bira beer maker raises  ₹85 cr in rights issue, cuts workforce to rein in costs

Bira beer maker raises ₹85 cr in rights issue, cuts workforce to rein in costs

Mint10 hours ago

New Delhi/Mumbai: B9 Beverages has already raised ₹85 crore by selling fresh shares to existing investors at a massive discount, as the maker of Bira beer shrinks its workforce and restructures its operations to focus on fewer markets to cut costs, people close to the development said.
The company, founded by Ankur Jain in 2015, is raising a total ₹100 crore in a rights issue for working capital requirements, and the remainder ₹15 crore is expected to be raised by the middle of July, the people cited earlier said on the condition of anonymity.
These shares are being sold at ₹325 apiece, a substantial discount of 55% from a previous round when Japanese beer maker Kirin came in at over ₹700 per share. B9 currently has about 6,500 private investors, and a large family office is also likely to now come in as a first-time investor. The people cited earlier also said B9 has now reworked its arrangements with four breweries, which will no longer manufacture exclusively for them. This is being done to control costs.
Read more: India's liquor stocks are on a high—what's fuelling the rally, and what could derail it
It is also in the midst of raising an ₹800 crore round through which some of its early backers may look to cash out.
A rights issue is a mechanism to raise funds, in which a company offers its existing shareholders the chance to buy more shares typically at a discounted price, in proportion to their holdings.
Workforce shrink
"A huge amount of shares have come up for sale in the last two years largely because of an exodus of employees in the last two years who sold their employee stock options (Esops). The company has also pruned its employee base from 975-odd employees to 500 or so, some of these corporate employees had stock options. Interestingly the number of shareholders is more than what restaurant aggregator Zomato had itself before its IPO," said a company official, who is close to the development.
Beer production is a capital-intensive industry, with states claiming nearly two-thirds of its revenues. It also has high freight costs, which reduces profitability. As per B9 Beverages' most recent filings with the ministry of corporate affairs, its operating revenue slumped to ₹638.5 crore in FY24 from ₹824.3 crore in FY23. Losses also widened significantly, rising to ₹748.8 crore in FY24 compared to ₹445.4 crore in FY23.
The company, which had earlier planned to go public in 2026, has now put it off to 2028.
Mint has also learnt that the company has multiple share classes, with equity holders owning only a small portion of the shares as of 16 June, when part of the rights issue closed.
Other passive shareholders will also participate and the window will close by the middle of next month. So far, it has already received commitments for about 85% of the right's issue amount and the aggregate number of investors participating so far is over 300, which includes the large family office, which is expected to come for the first time.
"It's definitely a big discount from the last time when the Japanese beer maker came in at ₹718 per share. From that, this is a 55% discount, that's why a lot of employees have participated. It's a good price. While my investment could go either way, most investors and myself believe this could go up because it's strengthening its position in many markets again, one of which is Delhi," the official cited earlier added.
Shifting focus
The company, according to its latest investor relations report accessed by Mint, has now reduced its focus from 25-30 big markets to just the bigger metros and four tier-II cities.
Queries sent to Ankur Jain, the company's founder, remained unanswered till press time.
Read more: India is the world's fastest-growing alcohol market when global demand cools
In FY23, Japan's Kirin Global (the makers of Kirin Ichiban beer) invested $70 million to become the largest shareholder in B9 Beverages. In FY24, Tokyo-based Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group invested $10 million in the company, which subsequently secured an additional $50 million in external commercial borrowing from Kirin and Tiger Pacific Capital.
In February, Mint also reported that B9 was facing troubles with tax authorities in various states with huge pending liabilities not just to states but also to employees who had not been receiving salaries on time. However, a bulk of its employee dues from the last financial year have now been settled, said two company insiders.
It has also worked on changing its sales and supply chain models in an attempt to turn the company around. It is now largely focusing on distributing its beer instead of manufacturing it, much like what other brands in the FMCG sector do, easing up its requirements for fixed and working capital.
It has now reworked its business model with four breweries to move to contract manufacturing. Just two breweries—in Gwalior and Nagpur—will continue to exclusively produce for them.
The beer company, in its investor deck, added that it was streamlining operations to focus on Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, and Maharashtra—which now account for 55% of its revenue. It said it cut its manufacturing footprint by 40%, reducing capacity from 25 million to 15 million cases to improve utilisation to 58% by FY26 and slash factory overheads by nearly 50%.
A shift to contract manufacturing at four breweries will save it as much as ₹600 crore annually, it added. With this, its margins could rise to 66% in FY26 from 63% in FY24. Fixed costs, too, it said, had dropped by ₹2,000 crore versus FY24, driven by a 40% reduction in headcount and tighter control over marketing, with spends now focused on in-store promotions.
Read more: India's liquor makers are having a party. And it's not going to end soon
According to industry body Brewers Association of India, 400 million beer cases were sold in FY23 and about 430 million in FY25. Three large brands command an 86% share of the overall market, including Kingfisher, Carlsberg and Budweiser maker Ab InBev (in no particular order).
According to Bira's investor deck for May 2025, it is the country's fourth-largest beer company with a manufacturing capacity of 2.1 million hectolitres or 25 million cases per annum.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro banned in Japan, Pixel 8 and 9 at risk: Here's why
Google Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro banned in Japan, Pixel 8 and 9 at risk: Here's why

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

Google Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro banned in Japan, Pixel 8 and 9 at risk: Here's why

Google has had a major setback in Japan, where a court has banned the sale of its Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro smartphones due to patent infringement. This ruling could soon affect the upcoming Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 models, which threaten Google's growing presence in the Japanese smartphone market. Google Pixel 7 and Pro smartphone sales have been banned in Japan due to patent infringement.(HT) The dispute centres on a technical part of 4G network communication involving the transmission of an 'acknowledgement signal' or ACK between devices and base stations. This technique is protected by Japanese patent law. Although Pantech, the patent holder, no longer makes smartphones, its remaining patents continue to hold legal weight. The Tokyo District Court ruled that Google's use of this technology violated those patents. Also read: Gemini's dramatic apologies: Why Google's chatbot sometimes says it should 'switch itself off' after failing tasks Furthermore, the judge criticised Google for what was described as an "insincere attitude" during the case. This criticism contributed to the court's decision to impose a full sales ban instead of a lesser penalty or settlement. Pixel Ban's Impact on Market Presence This ruling challenges Google's growing presence in Japan, where the Pixel brand recently became the second most popular smartphone line after Apple's iPhone. The success of the Google Pixel 7 series and the Pixel 7a helped boost the brand's market share. Also read: Could non-Nintendo chargers shorten your Switch 2's life? Here's what a user's experiment found The situation may escalate as the companies behind the patent, IdeaHub and Pantech, are pushing to extend the ban to the upcoming Google Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 models. No official ruling has been made on these devices yet, but the potential for a wider ban adds pressure on Google to resolve the legal issues quickly. Japan stands out as a strong market for Google Pixel phones outside the United States. A broader sales ban could disrupt Google's growth in the region and might also affect customer trust. Also read: Big tech's tariff troubles: Why US trade policy has Silicon Valley on edge Moreover, Google has not yet provided a detailed response to the court's decision. The company now faces choices including appealing the ruling, negotiating licensing rights, or redesigning future phones to avoid patent conflicts. Each option carries risks, especially with the Google Pixel 9 launch expected later this year. Currently, only the Google Pixel 7 and 7 Pro are banned. However, the case signals a growing trend in the tech industry, where older patents are increasingly enforced by entities that do not produce consumer products, which are creating new legal challenges for tech giants. Mobile finder: Google Pixel 8 Pro LATEST price, specs and all details

Taiwan's Innolux unit buys former Japanese TV major Pioneer for $1.1 billion
Taiwan's Innolux unit buys former Japanese TV major Pioneer for $1.1 billion

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Taiwan's Innolux unit buys former Japanese TV major Pioneer for $1.1 billion

TAIPEI: CarUX, a smart cockpit solutions provider and a subsidiary of Taiwan's display maker Innolux Corp, said on Thursday it will acquire Japan's Pioneer Corporation in a deal valued at 163.6 billion yen (around $1.1 billion). Pioneer was once a major Japanese player in consumer electronics, whose decline presaged the broader industry shake-up to come as Japanese manufacturers were unable to keep with larger, more efficient producers like South Korea's Samsung Electronics. CarUX said it has signed a definitive agreement with EQT, a global investment firm, to acquire a 100% stake in the Japanese electronics company. The deal is expected to increase CarUX's presence in the Asia-Pacific region and broaden its global product portfolio by combining its display and touch technology expertise with Pioneer's strengths in automotive sound system and Human Machine Interface (HMI) software development, the company said in a statement. "This acquisition brings strategic synergies for both CarUX and Pioneer," Innolux and CarUX Chairman Jim Hung said in a statement. CarUX said in March that it is planning a listing in the United States. Pioneer has long-standing partnerships with major Japanese and global automakers, including Toyota. Its president and CEO, Shiro Yahara, said it looks forward to collaborating with CarUX to "create the future of mobility experiences". Hung added at a press conference that Pioneer generated revenue of 240 billion yen in the fiscal year ending March 2024 and maintains a healthy financial structure, which is one of the key factors enabling the deal. Pioneer launched the world's first plasma TV in 1997 and briefly found success in the high-end segment. Pioneer was acquired in 2018 by Baring Private Equity Asia in a deal for $900 million, leading to its delisting from the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Baring was later acquired by Sweden-based EQT AB in 2022.

Japan Halts Google Pixel 7 Sales Over LTE Patent Dispute
Japan Halts Google Pixel 7 Sales Over LTE Patent Dispute

Hans India

time2 hours ago

  • Hans India

Japan Halts Google Pixel 7 Sales Over LTE Patent Dispute

In a significant legal setback for Google, a Japanese court has ordered a halt to the sales of its Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro smartphones in the country. The Tokyo District Court ruled in favour of a patent infringement claim, stating that Google had used patented LTE technology without proper authorization. The core of the issue lies in a particular method used in 4G communication, especially the transmission of the "acknowledgement signal" (ACK) between mobile devices and base stations. While it may seem like a technical detail, this mechanism is fundamental to the functioning of modern networks and is protected under Japanese patent law. The lawsuit was reportedly initiated by Pantech, a company that has long exited the smartphone business but still holds valuable intellectual property. The court concluded that Google violated these rights in the Pixel 7 series, triggering a ban that covers not only sales but also imports, advertising, and even product displays across Japan. What has made the situation worse for Google is the court's sharp criticism of its behavior during the proceedings. The judge described the company's stance as showing an "insincere attitude," a remark that played a role in the court opting for a sweeping sales ban rather than a negotiated settlement or partial restriction. The decision comes at a time when Google had been gaining considerable traction in Japan. The Pixel line recently became the second-most popular smartphone brand in the country, trailing only Apple. Much of this rise was driven by the Pixel 7 and the more affordable Pixel 7a. Now, the legal trouble might not stop at just these models. The complainants—IdeaHub and Pantech—are seeking to expand the ban to newer models, including the Pixel 8 and the yet-to-be-released Pixel 9 series. While no verdict has been issued yet regarding these newer devices, the pressure on Google is mounting. Analysts warn that a broader ban could damage Google's market presence in Japan—a rare international stronghold for Pixel phones outside the U.S. Any interruption in product availability or consumer trust could unravel years of brand-building efforts. Google has yet to release a detailed response but will soon have to choose between three difficult paths: appealing the court's ruling, negotiating a licensing deal, or redesigning future devices to avoid further legal exposure. Each option comes with its own set of risks, especially as anticipation builds for the upcoming Pixel 9 launch later this year. The case also highlights a growing trend in the tech industry—dormant patents and intellectual property portfolios are increasingly being used in legal battles, sometimes by companies that are no longer active in product development. As this legal saga continues, Google faces a critical test in maintaining its momentum in Japan while navigating a complex IP challenge that could affect its global smartphone strategy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store