Rep. Mike Flood booed at Nebraska town hall after defending Trump policies
Congressman Mike Flood said he wanted to talk about President Donald Trump's signature legislation and declared there was "a lot of misinformation" surrounding it.
That's when the shouting started, continuing for more than an hour as the Republican lawmaker faced a rowdy town hall crowd in Lincoln, Nebraska, on Aug. 4, full of people irate about Trump's new bill and other policies coming from his administration.
Audience members in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Kimball Recital Hall pressed Flood on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, accused Trump of "fascism," and raised concerns about cuts to government programs. They yelled and booed continuously as Flood spoke.
Trump carried Nebraska by 20 percentage points in 2024, and Flood won his district, which includes Lincoln and other communities in the eastern part of the state, by the same margin in 2024. But the town hall reflected an energized opposition to the new administration.
Trump's top legislative priority, a package that includes sweeping tax cuts and deep reductions to spending on programs such as Medicaid, was a frequent target.
One woman called the measure a "monstrosity."
The president signed the new law on July 4. With the House in recess until September, lawmakers are now home in their districts, hearing directly from voters about the legislation.
Polls indicate the measure is unpopular. Trump and the GOP have been gearing up to sell voters on it ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The town hall highlighted the challenges they face.
The crowd unloaded on Flood, who tried to preempt some of the criticism by opening the event with a defense of the law, lauding the tax reductions and focusing on Medicaid work requirements and a fund to help rural hospitals.
"More than anything, I truly believe this bill protects Medicaid for the future," Flood said.
The crowd booed, and the criticism kept coming.
The law is projected to cut $1 trillion mostly from Medicaid and Affordable Care Act insurance plans and eliminate insurance coverage for 11.8 million people over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
A person raised concerns about thousands of Nebraskans losing health insurance coverage. Other constituents focused on the CBO projection that the law will increase the national debt by $3.4 trillion over a decade.
With the Trump administration embroiled in a controversy over releasing government records about Epstein, a wealthy financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges, one question posed to Flood: "Why are you covering up the Epstein files?"
Flood said he favors releasing the records.
The congressman was also pressed about how to ensure the accuracy of the nation's economic data after Trump decided to fire Erika McEntarfer, the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, following the agency's release of a report showing weak job creation.
Flood said he didn't know the details, but that "if all that person did was get the data out there… and I don't know that's the case, but if that's all they did, I would not have fired her."
"But I don't know because things are complicated," Flood added.
Contributing: Ken Alltucker
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariffs and the tax bill are splitting the stock market. Here's the playbook for investors, according to Morgan Stanley.
Trump's policies are splitting the stock market, Morgan Stanley says. The bank said it believes Trump's tariffs and tax bill are splitting parts of the market in half. It says there are a handful of things for investors to look for when deciding where to put their money. President Donald Trump's policies are splitting the market into distinct camps, Morgan Stanley says. Lisa Shalett, the chief investment officer of the bank's wealth management arm, pointed to the effects of Trump's tax bill and his sweeping tariffs in a recent podcast. "Now, as the impacts of the tax reform bill and global tariff implementation begin to roll through the economy, we sense that yet another series of great divides are opening up," Shalett said. Here are the splits that are emerging: 1. Consumer-facing businesses vs. B2B businesses Businesses that sell directly to consumers are more impacted by any potential weakening fo household balance sheets, a risk that business-to-business firms are less worried about. Market pros believe that tariffs could weaken consumers' spending power, as companie can pass along the cost of import duties by raising prices. Shalett added that those pressures are coming at an already critical time for consumers, pointing out that more Americans are falling behind on credit card and auto loan payments. The job market is also flashing signs of weakness, with payrolls in May and June seeing a large downward revision, while job growth for the month of July was below expectations. A weaker labor market often leads to a pullback in consumer spending. 2. Multinational exporters vs. importers Multinational exporters outside of the consumer space are facing "fewer external barriers" to sending products abroad, Shalett said, suggesting they were more shielded from the trade war. Those firms are also benefitting from a weaker US dollar, which is making their products more attractive to foreign customers, Shalett added. Multinational firms are also typically more capital- and research & development-intensive, she said. That also positions them to benefit more from the tax benefits outlined in the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which creates favorable tax treatment for domestic R&D costs. "So, with this new structural division emerging, global stock selection is more important now than ever," Shalett said. Here are some characteristics of the companies investors should be leaning toward, in Shalett's view: Multinational non-consumer exporters. Tailwinds for these companies should continue, Shalett said. Select tech, financials, industrials, energy, and healthcare stocks. Stocks in these areas could benefit from some of the policies included in Trump's tax bill, which could lead to upside surprises in earnings and cash flow. Stocks that aren't "overhyped." International stocks, commodities, and energy infrastructure. Companies in these areas could help an investor diversify their portfolio, she added. Sentiment has shifted slightly more bearish in the last week, with Trump doubling down on tariff threats and markets digesting weaker-than-expected economic data. Goldman Sachs, Evercore ISI, Stifel, Pimco, and HSBC are among the firms that have recently flagged the risk of a stock correction or advised investors to rethink their portfolio allocations. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
Chicago Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
HUD drops housing discrimination complaint related to aldermanic prerogative and Chicago zoning
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is dropping its investigation into whether or not aldermanic prerogative, which typically gives Chicago aldermen the final word on zoning decisions in their ward, resulted in housing discrimination. In a letter HUD sent Wednesday to the complaining parties, which was obtained by the Tribune, the agency said it was closing the case to instead focus on 'real concerns regarding fair housing.' 'It is the Department's policy to focus on the original understanding and enforcement of the law and therefore rightfully return such decisions on zoning, home building, and more, to local leaders who are directly responsible for those matters,' the letter says. 'HUD enforcement will continue to prioritize investigations of specific allegations of actual discrimination, rather than dictate or influence land use policy.' ProPublica reported last month HUD was planning to drop the case. What dropping the investigation means for Chicago remains unclear. Advocates hope to negotiate a deal with Mayor Brandon Johnson that will prevent aldermen from discriminating against affordable housing projects and developments. But it's unclear what action Johnson will take, given that he is preparing for a difficult reelection campaign and budget fight. Johnson's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday, nor did HUD officials. A 2018 complaint filed by the Shriver Center on Poverty Law on behalf of community organizations alleged that aldermanic prerogative promotes housing discrimination by keeping racial minorities from moving into affluent white neighborhoods. After an investigation, HUD under Democratic President Joe Biden found in 2023 the allegations to be true. The agency found that Chicago had limited the building of income-restricted affordable housing in majority-white neighborhoods by giving aldermen complete veto power. It also found that Chicago had disproportionately harmed Black and Hispanic residents, perpetuated racial segregation and effectuated opposition to affordable housing 'based on racial animus.' HUD offered the parties an opportunity to work with the federal agency on informal settlement negotiations. But the Tribune reported last month that Johnson's administration delayed signing an agreement to resolve the federal complaint. A group of organizations behind the complaint met July 9 with senior mayoral aides Kennedy Bartley and Jason Lee to discuss alternative arrangements that would address the issue while leaving HUD out of the equation and forgoing any action items that would require City Council approval. But the political willpower to approve changes that would address the issue is in danger without HUD's backing. Representatives from organizations behind the complaint said last week they believed HUD will no longer pursue fair housing complaints under Republican President Donald Trump's administration. The affordable and fair housing community locally and nationally have been taking repeated hits from the Trump administration, which has sought to hinder fair housing enforcement and obstruct certain affordable housing developments. Asked last month how the complaining organizations will take on aldermanic prerogative without HUD's backing and the City Council's support, Rod Wilson, executive director of the Lugenia Burns Hope Center, said he thinks there are other routes that don't need City Council approval but declined to share specifics because of the ongoing negotiations with the mayor's team.
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rubio suggests Russia, Ukraine not ready for Trump meeting
Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested Wednesday that Russia and Ukraine are not ready for a meeting with President Trump as the war between the two countries rages on. 'I think what we have is a better understanding of the conditions under which Russia would be prepared to end the war,' Rubio told Fox Business Network's Larry Kudlow on his show. 'We now have to compare that to what the Ukrainians and our European allies, but the Ukrainians primarily, of course, are willing to accept and what you try to see is, how far can you get these two positions closer? How can you get these two positions closer to each other?' 'If we can get what the Ukrainians will accept and what the Russians will accept close enough, then I think there's the opportunity for the president to have a meeting that includes both Putin and Zelensky to try to close this thing out,' he added. 'So, we've got to get closer in that regard.' Trump has recently weighed a meeting in upcoming weeks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky amid an effort to end the war between the two countries. The president brought up the idea of meeting with the two leaders in a Wednesday call with European leaders, a source confirmed to The Hill. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said Russia had shown interest in a Trump meeting. 'As President Trump said earlier today on TRUTH Social, great progress was made during Special Envoy Witkoff's meeting with President Putin,' Leavitt said in a statement. 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with President Trump, and the President is open to meeting with both President Putin and President Zelensky. President Trump wants this brutal war to end,' she added.
