logo
As Gaza Starves, A Look At Historic Use Of Famine As Weapon of War

As Gaza Starves, A Look At Historic Use Of Famine As Weapon of War

NDTV2 days ago
There is increasing evidence that "widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease" are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths" in Gaza, a group of United Nations and aid organizations have repeatedly warned.
A July 29, 2025, alert by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a global initiative for improving food security and nutrition, reported that the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip," as access to food and other essential items is dropping to an "unprecedented level."
More than 500,000 Palestinians, one-fourth of Gaza's population, are experiencing famine, the U.N. stated. And all 320,000 children under age 5 are "at risk of acute malnutrition, with serious lifelong physical and mental health consequences."
U.N. experts have accused Israel of using starvation "as a savage weapon of war and constitutes crime under international law."
They are calling on Israel to urgently "restore the UN humanitarian system in Gaza."
Israel is not the only government in history to cut off access to food and water as a tool of war. As an Indigenous scholar who studies Indigenous history, I know that countries - including the United States and Canada - have used starvation to conquer Indigenous peoples and acquire their land. As a descendant of ancestors who endured forced starvation by the U.S. government, I also know of its enduring consequences.
Dismantling Indigenous food systems
From the founding of the U.S. and Canada through the 20th century, settler colonizers often tried to destroy Indigenous communities' access to food, whether it was their farms and livestock or their ability to access land with wild animals - with the ultimate aim of forcing them off the land.
In 1791, President George Washington ordered Secretary of War Henry Knox to destroy farms and livestock of the Wea Tribe that lived along the Ohio River valley - a fertile area with a long history of growing corn, beans, squash and other fruits and vegetables.
Knox burned down their "corn fields, uprooted vegetable gardens, chopped down apple orchards, reduced every house to ash, [and] killed the Indians who attempted to escape," historian Susan Sleeper-Smith noted in her 2018 book, "Indigenous Prosperity and American Conquest." Women and children were taken hostage. The goal was to destroy villages and farms so that Indigenous people would leave and not return.
Seventy-two years later, General Kit Carson conducted a scorched-earth campaign to remove the Navajo from what is now Arizona and New Mexico. Similar to Knox, he destroyed their villages, crops and water supply, killed their livestock and chopped down over 4,000 peach trees. The U.S. military forced over 10,000 Navajo to leave their homeland.
Indigenous famine
By the late 19th century, numerous famines struck Indigenous communities in both the U.S. and Canada due to the "targeted, swift, wholesale destruction" of bison by settlers, according to historian Dan Flores; this, too, was done in an effort to acquire more Indigenous land. One U.S. military colonel stated at the time: "Kill every buffalo you can! Every buffalo dead is an Indian gone."
There were an estimated 60 million bison before U.S. and Canadian settlement; by the 1890s, there were fewer than 1,000. Indigenous communities on the northern Great Plains in both the U.S. and Canada, who believed bison were a sacred animal and who relied on them for food, clothing and other daily needs, now had nothing to eat.
Historian James Daschuk revealed in his 2013 book, "Clearing the Plains: Disease, Politics of Starvation, and the Loss of Aboriginal Life," that between 1878 to 1880, Canadian Prime Minister Sir John A. Macdonald did little to stop a multiyear famine on the Canadian Plains, in what is now Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta. Macdonald did not hide his intentions. He and his government, he said, were "doing all we can, by refusing food until the Indians are on the verge of starvation."
Indigenous peoples on the Canadian Plains were forced to eat their dogs, horses, the carcasses of poisoned wolves and even their own moccasins. All the Indigenous peoples in the region - an estimated 26,500 people - suffered from the famine. Hundreds died from starvation and disease.
Malcolm C. Cameron, a House of Commons member at the time, accused his government of using "a policy of submission shaped by a policy of starvation" against Indigenous peoples. His denunciation did little to change their policy.
What my great-grandparents experienced
Many Indigenous peoples' families in the U.S. and Canada have stories of surviving forced starvation by the government. Mine does, too.
In the winter of 1883-1884, my grandmother and grandfather's parents experienced what is remembered as the "starvation winter" on the Blackfeet reservation in what is now Montana.
Similar to what happened in Canada, the near extinction of bison by American settlers led to a famine on the Blackfeet reservation. In an effort to slow the famine, Blackfeet leaders purchased food with their own money, but the U.S. government supply system delayed its arrival, creating a dire situation. Blackfeet leaders documented 600 deaths by starvation that one winter, while the U.S. government documented half that amount.
As historian John Ewers noted, the nearby "well-fed settlers" did nothing and did not offer "any effective aid to the Blackfeet."
My family survived because a few men and women within our family were able to travel far off the reservation by horseback to hunt and harvest Native foods. I was told the story of the "starvation winter" my entire life, as were most Blackfeet. And I now share these stories with my own children.
Weapon of war
Thousands of children in Gaza are malnourished and dying of hunger-related causes.
Due to mounting international pressure, Israel is pausing its attacks in some parts of Gaza for a few hours each day to allow for some aid, but experts have noted it is not enough.
"We're talking about 2 million people. It's not 100 trucks or a pausing or a few hours of calm that is going to meet the needs of a population that has been starved for months," Oxfam official Bushra Khalidi told The New York Times.
"This is no longer a looming hunger crisis - this is starvation, pure and simple," Ramesh Rajasingham, director of the U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, said on Aug. 10, 2025.
Many might assume that the use of starvation as a weapon of war happened only in the past. Yet, in places like Gaza, it is happening now.
The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. The Conversation is wholly responsible for the content.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ahead of Alaska summit, what US, Russia and Ukraine want
Ahead of Alaska summit, what US, Russia and Ukraine want

Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Ahead of Alaska summit, what US, Russia and Ukraine want

United States President Donald Trump will meet Russia's President Vladimir Putin on Friday in an attempt to find a way to end the war in Ukraine. At a time when Europe perceives an existential threat from Russia and the continent's ties with the US are being tested, and when Ukraine's future is at stake, neither the Europeans nor the Ukrainians will be present. In that sense, the Trump-Putin summit in Anchorage, Alaska, is reminiscent of Yalta 1945, when the leaders of the US, UK, and the Soviet Union met to decide the future of post-War Europe without Charles de Gaulle of France at the table. This will be the first in-person meeting between the leaders of the US and Russia since June 2021, when Putin met then President Joe Biden in Geneva. The meeting did not go well, and Russia invaded Ukraine eight months later. Putin will be the first Russian leader to visit Alaska, which was sold to the US in 1867 for $7.2 million. He last visited the US in 2015 to attend events at the United Nations. The meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson will be Putin's first with Trump after he returned to the White House this January. The two leaders met in person on six occasions during Trump's first term (2017-21), the last meeting being the one on June 28, 2019 at the G20 leaders' summit in Osaka, Japan. Trump had famously promised to end the war in 24 hours. Within a month of his inauguration, the President spoke with Putin — with whom he had claimed to have a good relationship for years — over the phone for 90 minutes. On February 18, senior American and Russian officials met in Riyadh — the first in-person contact between Washington DC and Moscow since the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Ten days later, Trump and Vice President J D Vance berated Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in front of press cameras at the White House. At this time, Putin was seen to have a clear advantage. But in April, following negotiations led by Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and France's President Emmanuel Macron, Trump had a 'very productive' meeting with Zelenskyy at the Vatican. He then posted on social media that 'there was no reason for Putin to be shooting missiles into civilian areas'. In July, Trump told the BBC in an interview that he was 'disappointed in' Putin, even though he was not yet 'done with him'. Hours earlier, Trump had announced plans to send weapons to Ukraine, and had warned of strong tariffs action against Russia if there was no ceasefire deal in 50 days. The President subsequently moved up this timeline to 10 days, citing his disappointment with Putin. He complained that his 'nice' and 'respectful' conversations were followed by Russian missile attacks on civilians. On August 7, the day before the deadline, Trump said the ball was in Putin's court — 'It's gonna be up to him…Very disappointed.' This week, Trump sought to downplay expectations from the Alaska summit. 'This is really a feel-out meeting,' he said, predicting he would know 'probably in the first two minutes' whether a deal would be possible. But on Wednesday, after a virtual conference with Zelenskyy and European leaders which he rated at 'a 10' and 'very friendly', Trump threatened 'severe consequences' if Putin did not agree to a deal. Trump, with his fascination with stopping wars and conflicts, wants to show the world that he has delivered in Ukraine. He aspires for the Nobel Peace Prize, and likely suspects that he is being played by Putin. That frustrates him. For Putin, the meeting will be a victory from the moment he lands in Alaska. He has been declared an outcast by the West, and he will be on American soil at a time he has charges of war crimes against him. Recognition from the leader of the world's most powerful country is proof that efforts to isolate him have failed. Putin has aimed high — asking for not just all the Ukrainian territories that Russia currently occupies and a ban on Ukraine's entry into NATO, but also the removal of Zelenskyy. He will also be looking at an easing of the sanctions on Russia, which have affected its technology and defence industries. Russia's budget deficit is increasing, and its income from oil and gas exports is under pressure. Zelenskyy's immediate objective is a ceasefire, a stop to the attacks on Ukrainian cities and the killings of Ukrainians. But Kyiv has also stressed that for any talks to be even remotely substantive, the next stage must be about a durable peace that both sides will honour. 'We support what President Trump wanted — a ceasefire, and then sit down at the negotiating table and talk about everything else,' Zelenskyy told reporters this week. The other goal is NATO membership, and Russia, Zelenskyy has said, 'cannot have any right of veto on this matter'. Ukraine wants continued Western military assistance to strengthen and modernise its armed forces. Ukraine has also insisted that it will not give up any regions that are currently occupied by Russian forces. As Trump seeks to pile pressure on Russia, he has squeezed India with a 25% 'penalty' for buying Russian oil, in addition to 25% tariffs on Indian exports to the US. For Trump, India is the easiest target — the US has limited leverage with China, which buys the most energy from Russia. NATO chief Mark Rutte had earlier warned India, China, and Brazil that they could face severe economic penalties if they continued to do business with Russia. India and Brazil face 50% US tariffs, the highest in the world. India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval met with Putin in the Kremlin last week, and the next day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke with the Russian President. Three days later, Modi called up Zelenskyy. The outcome of the Alaska summit is of much consequence for India. New Delhi hopes that if Trump comes out feeling good with a 'win' in his mind, it could lead to a rethink of the 25% penalty. Hours after Trump announced the meeting with Putin, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said, 'India welcomes the understanding reached between the United States and the Russian Federation'. 'This meeting holds the promise of bringing to an end the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and opening up the prospects for peace. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said on several occasions, 'this is not an era of war',' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. Besides hoping for the removal of the penalty for buying Russian oil, India would be keen to participate in the rebuilding of Ukraine, as the post-conflict future emerges. India will also be looking at how Beijing moves on the peace negotiations, and whether the US — after bringing the Ukraine war to an end — is able to refocus on the Indo-Pacific strategy to counter China.

‘Deplorable acts': What India said over recent racist attacks in Ireland
‘Deplorable acts': What India said over recent racist attacks in Ireland

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Deplorable acts': What India said over recent racist attacks in Ireland

India has lodged strong protests with Ireland over recent incidents of violence against Indian nationals, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) said on Thursday, noting that top Irish leaders including President Michael D Higgins have publicly condemned the attacks. Randhir Jaiswal noted Irish President Michael D Higgins remarks, who publicly condemned recent attacks on Indian nationals. 'There have been several cases of violence against Indian nationals in Ireland. We have strongly taken up this matter with the Irish authorities in Dublin as well as with the embassy here,' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal as saying at the weekly media briefing, as reported earlier by HT. He added, 'We note that both the president of Ireland as also the deputy prime minister and foreign minister have publicly condemned these deplorable acts of violence.' Jaiswal said the Indian embassy in Dublin is in touch with the victims and community members, extending 'all possible support.' The embassy has further issued an advisory urging Indian nationals to take 'reasonable precautions' for personal safety and to avoid deserted areas, particularly during odd hours. Irish president condemns attacks on Indians Irish President Higgins has 'unequivocally' denounced recent violence against members of the Indian community, describing the incidents as 'despicable' and contrary to Ireland's core values. In a statement issued on Tuesday, Higgins said the assaults followed a spate of violent attacks in Dublin and other cities, which Irish police, the Garda, have said are 'being fully and thoroughly investigated.' 'The recent despicable attacks on members of the Indian community stand in stark contradiction to the values that we as a people hold dear,' Higgins said. 'That any person in Ireland, particularly any young person, should be drawn into such behaviour through manipulation or provocation is to be unequivocally condemned.' He added, 'Whether such provocation stems from ignorance or from malice, it is essential to acknowledge the harm that it is causing. Such acts diminish all of us and obscure the immeasurable benefits the people of India have brought to the life of this country.' Higgins praised the role of Indians in 'medicine, nursing, the caring professions, in cultural life, in business and enterprise, to cite just some.' 'Their presence, their work, their culture, have been a source of enrichment and generosity to our shared life. Ireland's connections with India are neither recent nor superficial,' he stated. The president also recalled his meeting earlier this year with external affairs minister S Jaishankar, during which they discussed shared Indo-Irish histories and paths towards independence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store