
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch gets financial boost as video game tycoon donates £2million to Conservative Party
The money from Jeremy Elliott, who is better known as Jez San, will give a huge boost to Kemi Badenoch 's leadership, just days before challenging local elections.
I can disclose that Mr San, who founded Argonaut Software in his bedroom as a teenager during the early 1980s computer boom, gave £1million in February.
He then gave a second surprise £1million earlier this month. He is the biggest donor to Tory funds since Mrs Badenoch became party leader in November.
Mr San used to be a Labour supporter, but turned against Keir Starmer after the record £40billion tax-raising Autumn Budget.
His Argonaut company produced the Harry Potter, Alien Resurrection and Star Fox hit console games. It was also instrumental in developing early 3D graphics technologies, including the SuperFX chip used by Nintendo.
Mr San, 59, and his wife Natasha had dinner with Mrs Badenoch and her husband Hamish, who works in the City. They bonded over the Tory leader's pledge to cut regulation, taxes and to try to ensure Britain develops maximum potential from AI.
Computer games have been kind to Mr San. In 2022 he bought Palazzo di Vista, a £40million mansion in Los Angeles where his neighbours include Jennifer Aniston, Beyonce and Elon Musk. He's also a major donor to Great Ormond Street children's hospital.
Like most of his competitors, Mr San was an early computer user. He was 12 when his father brought back from the US a TRS-80, a forerunner of today's PCs. But his parents and teachers were far from encouraging. In a rare interview, he said: 'Everyone thought it was a terrible influence. I was staying up all night, every night.
'It's a while since I've seen the sunrise after working all night, but at school it happened all the time. I was hacking before it was made illegal, but never since.' He was only 16 when the money started to roll in. 'Some friends and I wrote a game called Skyline Attack,' he says. 'My share of the profits bought a second-hand Volkswagen Scirocco GTi. Computers have given me a great new car about every 18 months since.'
Starting from a Saturday job at a computer shop in Edgware, north-west London, less than a mile from Argonaut's offices, he now employs hundreds globally.
Mrs Badenoch told me: 'I was delighted to meet Jez San, who is one of our great entrepreneurs and innovators. His donations are an important statement of support in the Conservative Party to lead Britain out of the current economic malaise.' A source close to Mr San told me: 'Jez does not believe you can tax your way to growth. He has huge concerns over Labour's tax-heavy approach, which is driving top talent and investors abroad.
'He will offer policy advice to the Tories to help champion high-growth sectors and reward homegrown innovation. He believes you have to reward risk takers.'
The revelation of the donations comes at the end of a strong week for Mrs Badenoch who had her best performance at the despatch box at Prime Minister's Questions this week when she mocked Sir Keir's U-turn on the definition of woman in the aftermath of the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
a minute ago
- Scotsman
Rising UK State Pension age may push retirement to 70
A new government review could reshape when you can claim your pension 🕰️ Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Labour is reviewing the possibility of raising the UK State Pension age to 70 The review may tie future increases to life expectancy, following models used in countries like Denmark Experts warn automatic increases could create uncertainty and disrupt retirement planning Over-60s may need to plan for a longer working life and consider personal savings But immediate changes are limited: currently, the pension age rises to 67 next year and 68 by 2044-46 If you're approaching retirement, a new government review could directly affect when you get your State Pension, and how long you might have to wait. Labour is exploring the possibility of raising the State Pension age to 70, with the latest review examining whether future increases should be tied automatically to life expectancy, reports The Telegraph. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The review is being led by Suzy Morrissey, an expert commissioned by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, who is exploring the 'merits' of automatic adjustments. Countries such as Denmark, Finland, Italy, and the Netherlands already link retirement age to life expectancy, and Denmark recently raised its pension age to 70. Morrissey will be studying these models to see what lessons the UK could take from them. But what does it mean for UK pensioners and their money? How likely is it that such a radical change could be brought in? Here is everything you need to know about it. Liz Kendall MP, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, leaves Downing Street after a weekly cabinet meeting on January 21, 2025 (Photo:) | Getty Images Why might changes be made? Life expectancy is a key factor in the debate. UK life expectancy at age 66 has continued to rise, although improvements have slowed compared with previous forecasts, partly due to pandemic-related reversals. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Current projections suggest a 66-year-old in 2050 might live until 87, compared with 90 under older 2014-based forecasts. As mentioned above, Denmark's approach offers one potential model. The Danish system effectively caps the amount of time anyone can spend claiming state support, legislating that the average retirement period should be 14.5 years. By contrast, the UK aims for future generations to spend 'up to a third' of adult life in retirement, a target that could mean later pensions if life expectancy continues to rise. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The review is also taking place amid long-term pressures on public finances. State Pension spending has risen 19% over the past decade and 70% over 20 years in real terms. Politicians have previously tried to accelerate increases to reduce costs, including former Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, who attempted to bring forward the rise to 68 in the late 2030s. Declining life expectancy made the plan politically unworkable. What does it mean for pensioners? For pensioners in the UK, the immediate picture is less drastic. The State Pension age is set to rise to 67 from next year and is scheduled to reach 68 between 2044 and 2046. Any increases beyond that, including the controversial age of 70, are likely at least a decade away. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But the review signals that retirement planning in the UK could become more unpredictable, particularly if automatic formulas are adopted. How likely is a change? Experts warn that tying State Pension age strictly to life expectancy could create 'chaos' in retirement planning. Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, says that different population projections could swing the retirement age by up to eight years. 'Every time the population projections are updated, this could move the dates for pension age changes by up to a decade, making it very difficult for people to plan their finances,' he adds. Catherine Foot, director of the Standard Life Centre for the Future of Retirement, is already warning that working to the current pension age isn't realistic for everyone. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'People aged 60-65 are experiencing the fastest-growing rate of poverty for any working-age group,' she says, citing ill health, caring responsibilities, and ageism as barriers. Using average life expectancy to set pension age could push retirement further away for those already struggling. For now, the review is in the evidence-gathering stage, with recommendations expected in several years' time, but for over-60s and those planning retirement, it's a reminder that pension timelines are not set in stone. Those approaching retirement may need to plan for a longer working life, consider personal savings, and stay informed about potential policy shifts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad


BreakingNews.ie
2 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Helen Mirren: I am such a feminist, but James Bond has to be a guy
Helen Mirren has said that while she is a feminist the next James Bond 'has to be a guy'. It comes after Amazon MGM Studios, which has taken creative control over the 007 character, revealed last month that Peaky Blinders creator Steven Knight would be writing the script for the next film. Advertisement The Oscar-winning actress told Saga Magazine: 'I'm such a feminist, but James Bond has to be a guy. You can't have a woman. It just doesn't work. 'James Bond has to be James Bond, otherwise it becomes something else.' Helen Mirren stars in the new Thursday Murder Club film (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Mirren, 80, stars alongside former 007 actor Pierce Brosnan in the new Thursday Murder Club film, a cosy crime drama adapted from the best-selling book by game show host Richard Osman. Brosnan, 72, agreed with the actress about the next portrayal of Bond and told the magazine: 'Oh, I think it has to be a man.' Advertisement He added: 'I wish (Amazon) them well. I'm so excited to see the next man come on the stage and to see a whole new exuberance and life for this character. 'I adore the world of James Bond. It's been very good to me. It's the gift that keeps giving. 'And I'm just a member of the audience now, sitting back, saying: 'Show us what you're going to do'.' Mirren previously told the Standard that 'the whole concept of James Bond is drenched and born out of profound sexism' and added: 'Women have always been a major and incredibly important part of the Secret Service, they always have been.' Advertisement In the forthcoming Thursday Murder Club film, the veteran actress plays a retired spy, who is also the founder and leader of the club. Speaking about her character Elizabeth, she told Saga: 'So many women have worked in that world. She's a manifestation of a reality, that's for sure.' Pierce Brosnan and Helen Mirren on the cover of Saga Magazine (Saga Magazine/Giles Keyte/Netflix/PA) Asked if she is a better portrayal of a spy than Bond, Mirren said: 'More realistic. But not so much fun as Bond!' She added: 'The great thing about a movie like this is that it reminds everyone, as an older person I have a brain, I have agency, energy, commitment, passion and intellect. It doesn't all stop when you're 40.' Advertisement Brosnan said the movie, directed by Harry Potter director Chris Columbus, would also appeal to anyone who likes the film series about wizardry and added: 'This is like a Harry Potter retirement home.' The film, which lands on Netflix on August 28th, follows a crime-busting group of retirees, played by Oscar-winning actress Mirren, Mamma Mia! star Brosnan, Calendar Girls actress Celia Imrie and Gandhi star Sir Ben Kingsley. You can read the full interview in Saga Magazine's September issue.


Daily Mirror
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Large families could get £20,000 a year boost if Rachel Reeves axes benefit rule
It is estimated 71,580 large families on Universal Credit could qualify for enhanced benefit payments under plans being considered by the Chancellor, which would cost 3.5 billion Thousands of families could pocket up to £20,000 a year in extra handouts if the Chancellor bows to pressure to scrap the two-child benefit cap. Official figures reveal that 71,580 large families on Universal Credit would qualify for enhanced benefit payments. In theory, a family with five children could get £10,544 a year extra, while it could be over £20,000 more for those with eight. The cap, brought in by the Conservatives in 2017, bars parents from claiming an extra £292.81 a month for a third or subsequent child. Ministers said it was a vital curb on welfare spending and a way to ensure fairness for working taxpayers. But Labour MPs are demanding Sir Keir Starmer axe the cap, which they brand 'deeply unfair' to children in poverty. The move would cost around £3.5 billion, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves weighing up proposals – backed by Gordon Brown and Neil Kinnock – to raise the cash through higher gambling levies. The policy divide has sparked a major political row. Reform UK's Nigel Farage has also pledged to scrap the cap, leaving the Conservatives to defend it. Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said: 'Without a cap, Labour will end up giving households thousands of pounds in extra benefits - a top-up worth more than a year's full-time pay on the minimum wage. Not only is this unaffordable, it's also unfair. If you're in work you don't get extra pay for another child, so it doesn't make sense for parents on benefits to get more.' She added: 'Working people shouldn't see their taxes go up to fund uncapped payouts to others who've opted out of work but opted in to multiple children.' Critics warn that families with ten or more children could qualify for more than £35,000 a year in child payments alone, dwarfing the wages of many workers. But poverty campaigners say the cap has pushed hundreds of thousands into hardship. Alison Garnham, chief executive of the Child Poverty Action Group, told the Times: 'The evidence shows the two-child limit does not affect parents' decisions about family size. Clearly for these households, money does not drive decisions about family size since the vast majority are only receiving UC support for two children. "The two-child limit is the biggest driver of rising child poverty and scrapping it is the most cost-effective way to reverse the increase.' About 4.5 million children are growing up in relative poverty – a number that rose by 100,000 last year. Campaigners insist lifting the cap could help half a million children escape hardship. A government spokesman said: 'Every child - no matter their background - deserves the best start in life. That's why our child poverty taskforce will publish an ambitious strategy to tackle the structural and root causes of child poverty, and in the meantime we are investing £500 million in children's development and ensuring the poorest children don't go hungry in the holidays through a new £1 billion crisis support package.' At a glance: How much families would gain if the cap is lifted 3 children – £3,514 a year extra 4 children – £7,029 a year extra 5 children – £10,544 a year extra 6 children – £14,059 a year extra 7 children – £17,574 a year extra 8 children – £21,089 a year extra 9 children – £24,604 a year extra 10+ children – more than £28,119 a year, with some families eligible for over £35,000