MEPs reject call to halt funding for environmental NGOs
The European People's Party (EPP) group's campaign to block EU financial support for non-profit environmental groups has taken a blow after a trio of conservative lawmakers broke ranks and voted down a motion to censure the European Commission over its use of public funds.
The motion was jointly tabled by Dutch lawmaker Sander Smit of the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), who sits with the EPP in the European Parliament, and the eurosceptic ECR group member Pietro Fiocchi, of Italian premier Giorgia Meloni's populist Fratelli d'Italia party.
It asserted that the EU executive 'failed to provide adequate safeguards to uphold the institutional balance in the Union by allowing the targeted lobbying of Members of the European Parliament on instruction of the Commission'.
The environment committee rejected the objection by 41 votes to 40 on Monday evening (31 March) after three EPP lawmakers – Radan Kanev, Ingeborg Ter Laak and Dimitris Tsiodras – broke ranks and voted against the motion. Another two group members abstained.
Otherwise, the vote was split along clear party lines, with the EPP/ECR motion enjoying the unanimous support of far-right and nationalist lawmakers, while the Socialists & Democrats, liberal Renew, Greens and The Left voted against.
The committee subsequently rejected by a wider margin a substantively similar motion tabled by French nationalist Mathilde Androuët, a member of Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally party who sits in the ranks of the Patriots for Europe Group.
There were half a dozen EPP lawmakers, including Smit, among the 30 lawmakers who supported Androuët's motion.
'
Vaudeville'
In another twist, Smit blamed the EU executive for the debacle, accusing it of reneging on an agreement to read out at the committee meeting a statement admitting misuse of LIFE Programme environmental funds in exchange for the EPP dropping its objection.
'We had a deal in which the European Commission would finally admit abuses surrounding the green lobby scandal...and rule them out for the future, but DG Environment refused to read the entire statement,' the Dutch lawmaker said on social media after the vote.
'Now the fight for EU NGO transparency really begins,' Smit said.
The rejection of the two proposals may come as a relief to the European Commission.
It is not legally bound to follow the outcome of such votes - in the case of genetically modified crop authorisations, it routinely ignores them - but it may have had to decide whether or not to abide by the wishes of the parliament over a high-profile and controversial issue.
The European Environmental Bureau – among the 34 non-profit groups that were awarded LIFE funding last year, and one of eight that received the maximum €700,000 – was scathing, describing the committee meeting as 'low-level vaudeville' that was 'as absurd as the objection it debated'.
'The Commission needs to clearly stand up against this disinformation campaign and the fabricated scandal behind it,' the group's policy director Faustine Bas-Defossez said, having earlier described the EPP's campaign as a 'political attempt to silence civil society and dismantle democratic oversight'.
The EPP's contention is that the European Commission had used the LIFE programme to pay NGOs to lobby MEPs on its behalf – a claim for which it has published no convincing evidence, although it did succeed in pressuring the EU executive to review guidelines on the use of funds.
ADVERTISEMENT
Related
Use of EU funds to lobby MEPs was 'inappropriate', commissioner says
In an ironic twist, it became apparent earlier thisyear that one of the key figures behind the push to disallow EU support for civil society groups, Monika Hohlmeier (Germany/EPP), had a lucrative side job in a private company that received €6.5 million from the LIFE Programme in 2022, well in excess of the €700,000 cap on operating grants to individual NGOs.
Opponents see efforts of the EPP and it's right-wing allies as a populist campaign to silence a source of consistent and vocal criticism of their lawmakers' stance on environmental issues.
Tiemo Wölken, the Socialists & Democrats environment policy coordinator said the vote was just the latest move in a 'reckless political campaign by the EPP and their far right allies to gag civil society'.
'The objections tabled today by the EPP and the far right in the ENVI committee clearly show their willingness to follow Donald Trump's dangerous footsteps in undermining democracy by weakening civil society,' Wölken said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Of the LIFE Programme's €771m annual budget, approximately €15m is allocated to NGOs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
'Smartphone sales to under-15s should be banned'
Has Europe finally found the key to protecting its youngest citizens from the harmful effects of digital technology? On July 14, the European Commission unveiled a technical system for age verification and published its first guidelines for enforcing the child protection measures of the Digital Services Act (DSA). The next day, in France, the Conseil d'Etat (France's top administrative court) reinstated the requirement for age checks on pornographic websites, a measure that had been suspended a month earlier under pressure from the platforms. Both were strong signals – steps that could mark a promising turning point. Yet, there remains a long and obstacle-strewn path between these announcements and reality. Since 2019, the need to bring order to the legal chaos of Europe's digital landscape has been on the table. Thierry Breton, then newly appointed as European commissioner for the internal market, put it simply and aptly: "What is illegal offline must also be illegal online." The DSA, passed at the end of 2022, is rooted in this principle: It imposes on major digital platforms a responsibility to identify their own risks, to correct them and to meet their protection obligations – or face enormous fines. Unlike other pieces of legislation, the DSA does not mandate a specific method, but it does demand a result. The new guidelines published in July clarify what is expected: private accounts by default, loyalty mechanisms disabled, targeted advertising banned, reports from minors processed within 48 hours and algorithms adapted to prevent exposure to inappropriate content. However, all of this hinges on a single requirement: namely, reliably knowing the age of users. That is why this age verification prototype is so important; it is meant to ensure accurate age assessment without collecting excessive personal data. On paper, the protective measures appear promising. In practice, however, the rollout of the DSA has revealed just how slowly the system is moving. Although it has been legally in force since February 2024, the DSA will not deliver its first independent audits of platform risk assessments until 2026. Meanwhile, the statistics speak for themselves: 90% of 12-year-olds own a smartphone, according to the Born Social 2024 study; by age 12, half of boys visit a pornographic website at least once a month, according to a 2023 study by ARCOM (France's audiovisual and digital communications regulator); one in five adolescents in Europe experiences mental health disorders, which are often worsened by social media, according to the World Health Organization.
LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
Britain, France and Germany threaten to reimpose sanctions on Iran as nuclear program deadline nears
The top diplomats of Britain, France and Germany threatened to reimpose sanctions on Iran as an end-of-the-month deadline nears for the country to resume negotiations with the West over its nuclear program and cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog . The three countries − known as the E3 − wrote in a letter to the United Nations dated Friday, August 8, that they were willing to trigger a process known as the "snapback" mechanism − which allows one of the Western parties to reimpose UN sanctions − if Tehran doesn't comply with its requirements. French Foreign Minister Jean-Nöel Barrot posted the letter on Wednesday to X. He co-signed it along with top diplomats from Germany and the United Kingdom. "E3 have always committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon," the letter said. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism." The Iranian government didn't immediately respond to the development, but parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki − who was Iran's top diplomat for five years in the 2000s − warned of a swift reaction to any move to trigger the snapback mechanism. He said the Iranian parliament has a "finger on the trigger" for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, or NPT, the international treaty aimed at halting the spread of nuclear weapons. "We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal," if the E3 raises the issue at the UN Security Council, Mottaki said. The letter from the E3 comes following a period of apparent diplomatic deadlock after a 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June, where Israeli and American jets struck some key nuclear-related facilities in the Islamic Republic. The countries met with Iranian officials last month in Turkey at Iran's consulate building in Istanbul on the possibility of reimposing international sanctions, lifted in 2015 in exchange for Tehran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said at the time that he hoped that the meeting would see the E3 nations reassess their "previous unconstructive attitude." Since the war, talks with Washington for a new nuclear deal haven't resumed, and Iran has since suspended ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog , following the attacks. The IAEA's first visit to Iran since the war didn't entail any visits to nuclear facilities Monday, and cooperation wasn't officially restored. One of the three countries opting to trigger the snapback mechanism would renew sanctions on Iran, but Tehran renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and addressing concerns about its highly-enriched uranium stockpile would delay it. Iran has had limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West and it is unclear how soon talks between Tehran and Washington for a deal over its nuclear program will resume. German Foreign Ministry spokesperson Josef Hinterseher on Wednesday said that the letter "once again underlines that the legal preconditions for snapback have long existed." "Our position and our appeal is, very clearly, that Iran still has the choice of deciding to return to diplomacy (…) and full cooperation with the IAEA," he told reporters at a regular news conference in Berlin. US intelligence agencies and the IAEA had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% − a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
France 24
7 hours ago
- France 24
At least 26 migrants dead in two shipwrecks off Italy
Around 60 people were rescued after the sinkings in the central Mediterranean, a stretch between North Africa and Italy described by the UN as the world's most dangerous sea crossing for migrants. The two boats had left Tripoli, Libya, earlier in the day, according to the Italian coastguard. It said one of the boats started taking on water, causing people to climb onto the other boat, which itself then capsized. "Currently 60 people have been rescued and disembarked in Lampedusa, and (there are) at least 26 victims. The toll is still provisional and being updated," the coastguard said in a statement. Italy's Red Cross, which manages Lampedusa's migrant reception centre, said the survivors included 56 men and four women, updating a previous toll of 22 dead. Flavio Di Giacomo, spokesman for the UN's migration agency (IOM), said around 95 people had been on the two boats. Given how many had been saved, "approximately 35 victims are feared dead or missing", he wrote on social media. 'Inhumane' traffickers Among the first to be transported to the Lampedusa mortuary were the bodies of a newborn, three children, two men and two women, according to Italy's ANSA news agency. Lampedusa, just 90 miles (145 kilometres) off the coast of Tunisia, is often the first port of call for people trying to reach Europe in leaky or overcrowded boats. In recent years, Italian authorities have sought to intercept the boats at sea before they arrive. It was a helicopter from Italy's financial police that spotted a capsized boat and several bodies in the water on Wednesday, about 14 nautical miles off Lampedusa, the coastguard said. Five vessels were searching for survivors, including one from the EU's Frontex border agency, alongside a helicopter and two aircraft, it said. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni offered her "deepest condolences" to the victims and vowed to step up efforts to tackle migrant traffickers. Her hard-right government took office in October 2022 vowing to cut the number of migrants crossing the Mediterranean to Europe. As part of this, it has cut deals with North African countries from which migrants embark, providing funding and training in exchange for help in stemming departures. "When a tragedy like today's occurs, with the deaths of dozens of people in the waters of the Mediterranean, a strong sense of dismay and compassion arises in all of us," Meloni said in a statement. "And we find ourselves contemplating the inhumane cynicism with which human traffickers organise these sinister journeys." She said stepping up rescue efforts was not enough to tackle the scourge of trafficking, saying this could be done only by "preventing irregular departures and managing migration flows". The UNHCR refugee agency said Wednesday that there had been 675 migrant deaths on the central Mediterranean route so far this year. As of Wednesday, 38,263 migrants have arrived on Italy's shores this year, according to the interior ministry. A similar number was recorded at the same time last year, but the figure is significantly less than in 2023, when almost 100,000 people had arrived by mid-August.
