MEPs reject call to halt funding for environmental NGOs
ADVERTISEMENT
The European People's Party (EPP) group's campaign to block EU financial support for non-profit environmental groups has taken a blow after a trio of conservative lawmakers broke ranks and voted down a motion to censure the European Commission over its use of public funds.
The motion was jointly tabled by Dutch lawmaker Sander Smit of the Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB), who sits with the EPP in the European Parliament, and the eurosceptic ECR group member Pietro Fiocchi, of Italian premier Giorgia Meloni's populist Fratelli d'Italia party.
It asserted that the EU executive 'failed to provide adequate safeguards to uphold the institutional balance in the Union by allowing the targeted lobbying of Members of the European Parliament on instruction of the Commission'.
The environment committee rejected the objection by 41 votes to 40 on Monday evening (31 March) after three EPP lawmakers – Radan Kanev, Ingeborg Ter Laak and Dimitris Tsiodras – broke ranks and voted against the motion. Another two group members abstained.
Otherwise, the vote was split along clear party lines, with the EPP/ECR motion enjoying the unanimous support of far-right and nationalist lawmakers, while the Socialists & Democrats, liberal Renew, Greens and The Left voted against.
The committee subsequently rejected by a wider margin a substantively similar motion tabled by French nationalist Mathilde Androuët, a member of Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally party who sits in the ranks of the Patriots for Europe Group.
There were half a dozen EPP lawmakers, including Smit, among the 30 lawmakers who supported Androuët's motion.
'
Vaudeville'
In another twist, Smit blamed the EU executive for the debacle, accusing it of reneging on an agreement to read out at the committee meeting a statement admitting misuse of LIFE Programme environmental funds in exchange for the EPP dropping its objection.
'We had a deal in which the European Commission would finally admit abuses surrounding the green lobby scandal...and rule them out for the future, but DG Environment refused to read the entire statement,' the Dutch lawmaker said on social media after the vote.
'Now the fight for EU NGO transparency really begins,' Smit said.
The rejection of the two proposals may come as a relief to the European Commission.
It is not legally bound to follow the outcome of such votes - in the case of genetically modified crop authorisations, it routinely ignores them - but it may have had to decide whether or not to abide by the wishes of the parliament over a high-profile and controversial issue.
The European Environmental Bureau – among the 34 non-profit groups that were awarded LIFE funding last year, and one of eight that received the maximum €700,000 – was scathing, describing the committee meeting as 'low-level vaudeville' that was 'as absurd as the objection it debated'.
'The Commission needs to clearly stand up against this disinformation campaign and the fabricated scandal behind it,' the group's policy director Faustine Bas-Defossez said, having earlier described the EPP's campaign as a 'political attempt to silence civil society and dismantle democratic oversight'.
The EPP's contention is that the European Commission had used the LIFE programme to pay NGOs to lobby MEPs on its behalf – a claim for which it has published no convincing evidence, although it did succeed in pressuring the EU executive to review guidelines on the use of funds.
ADVERTISEMENT
Related
Use of EU funds to lobby MEPs was 'inappropriate', commissioner says
In an ironic twist, it became apparent earlier thisyear that one of the key figures behind the push to disallow EU support for civil society groups, Monika Hohlmeier (Germany/EPP), had a lucrative side job in a private company that received €6.5 million from the LIFE Programme in 2022, well in excess of the €700,000 cap on operating grants to individual NGOs.
Opponents see efforts of the EPP and it's right-wing allies as a populist campaign to silence a source of consistent and vocal criticism of their lawmakers' stance on environmental issues.
Tiemo Wölken, the Socialists & Democrats environment policy coordinator said the vote was just the latest move in a 'reckless political campaign by the EPP and their far right allies to gag civil society'.
'The objections tabled today by the EPP and the far right in the ENVI committee clearly show their willingness to follow Donald Trump's dangerous footsteps in undermining democracy by weakening civil society,' Wölken said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Of the LIFE Programme's €771m annual budget, approximately €15m is allocated to NGOs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
32 minutes ago
- Fashion Network
China says it is working with France on trade differnces, no sign yet of a cognac deal
China and France have agreed to resolve their trade disputes through dialogue, China's foreign ministry said on Friday, though there was no indication that agreement had been reached in talks on lifting Chinese levies on European brandy. Talks to resolve the cognac dispute accelerated this week with China's commerce minister Wang Wentao meeting his French counterpart in Paris on the sidelines of an OECD conference, and technical talks on the matter taking place in Beijing. The latest round of negotiations have raised hopes of a settlement, two industry sources with knowledge of the discussions said. "The two sides have reached consensus on resolving economic and trade issues through dialogue and consultation", the Chinese foreign ministry said after a call between the Chinese and French foreign ministers. Chinese anti-dumping measures that applied duties of up to 39% on imports of European brandy - with French cognac bearing the brunt - have strained relations between Paris and Beijing. The brandy duties were enforced days after the European Union took action against Chinese-made electric vehicle imports to shield its local industry, prompting France's President Emmanuel Macron to accuse Beijing of "pure retaliation". The Chinese duties have dented sales of brands including LVMH 's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard 's Martell and Remy Cointreau. Beijing was initially meant to make a final decision on the duties by January, but extended the deadline to April and then again to July 5. China is seeking to strengthen trade ties with the 27-member bloc as relations with the United States have soured in the escalating trade war. "France will not compromise on ... the protection of its industries, such as cognac," French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said after talks with Wang on Wednesday. Chinese officials, meanwhile, signalled to industry officials during three rounds of technical meetings in Beijing this week they wanted to settle the matter, one of the sources said, but added some sticking points remained. With annual imports of around $1.7 billion last year, China is the French brandy industry's most important measured by value and the second-largest by volume after the United States.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Blue Economy Forum: Macron rebukes climate change deniers
Hosted by Prince Albert of Monaco, the final day of the Blue Economy and Finance Forum (BEFF) closed with leaders pledging their support and calling for global responsibility to protect the oceans. William, Prince of Wales, said the challenge of protecting the world's oceans was "like none that we have faced before" and that the clock is ticking: "I believe that urgency and optimism have the power to bring about the action needed to change the course of history. I'm an optimist because as the founder of the Earthshot Prize, I see the incredible examples of the ideas, innovations and technologies that are harnessing the power of the ocean whilst protecting its vitality." "Watching human activity reduce beautiful sea forests to barren deserts, the base of our oceans is simply heart-breaking for many. It is an urgent wake-up call to just what is going on in our oceans, but it can no longer be a matter of out of sight, out of mind. The need to act to protect our ocean is now in full view, as ever," Prince William added. Meanwhile, in his closing speech, French President Emmanuel Macron criticised countries that deny climate change and cut budgets on this matter. 'We've been hearing that, basically, climate change, the threat to biodiversity, the issue of the oceans, all of that, is a matter of opinion," Macron said. He continued: "I'm going to tell you: no, we don't have the right to do that because it's not an opinion, but it's scientifically established." The French president also hinted at potential developments in the near future: "We have a duty to mobilise because the science is clear and the facts are there. There is no inevitability. And so, with a few governments, we will in the coming days make strong decisions and mobilise the international community." A major focus of the weeklong summit was the push to ratify the High Seas Treaty, which would enable conservation in international waters. The forum is the precursor to the United Nations Oceans Conference (UNOC) in Nice, where more than 50 world leaders are expected to attend. The US administration will not send representatives. On Sunday 8 and Monday 9 June, citizens are called to the polls to vote on five abrogative or repeal referenda - they are so called because they decide whether to retain or repeal a law or decree that is part of the legislature and already implemented. They coincide with local elections in several Italian regions and municipalities. The referenda, proposed by trade unions and civic organisations, touch on issues that have generated political debate in recent years, in particular the labour market reform, mainly of the 2016 Jobs Act, and migrant reception and integration policies. The first four issues are related to the job topic and concern increasing protection of workers, small enterprises and their obligations towards employees, short-term contracts, and the responsibility of clients towards sub-contracting parties and employees' safety. The fifth question concerns the period of time necessary to be eligible for Italian citizenship, proposing to reduce it from 10 to 5 years. Government parties opposed the referenda, with some politicians urging citizens not to go to the polls. Analysts say the vote is a test for Giorgia Meloni's executive. For the referenda to be valid, a quorum must be reached: at least 50% plus one of all eligible voters must participate. According to the advocacy group International Democracy Community, the referenda can be characterised as a citizens' initiative: "The referendum questions were proposed through a bottom-up approach, and did not come from Parliament. Members of the Europa+ party launched the initiative on the citizenship question, whilst the Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGIL) has been the initiator of the Jobs Act ones, with support from the Democratic Party, the Five Star Movement, and the Green & Left Alliance." Voting is taking place from 07:00 to 23:00 on Sunday and from 07:00 to 15:00 on Monday. At 12 noon, with almost all sections verified, turnout stood at just over 7%, raising concerns about a successful outcome. In 2011, the last time the quorum was reached in a referendum, 11.6% had voted by that time.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Italian labour reform and citizenship referendum under way
On Sunday 8 and Monday 9 June, citizens are called to the polls to vote on five abrogative or repeal referenda - they are so called because they decide whether to retain or repeal a law or decree that is part of the legislature and already implemented. They coincide with local elections in several Italian regions and municipalities. The referenda, proposed by trade unions and civic organisations, touch on issues that have generated political debate in recent years, in particular the labour market reform, mainly of the 2016 Jobs Act, and migrant reception and integration policies. The first four issues are related to the job topic and concern increasing protection of workers, small enterprises and their obligations towards employees, short-term contracts, and the responsibility of clients towards sub-contracting parties and employees' safety. The fifth question concerns the period of time necessary to be eligible for Italian citizenship, proposing to reduce it from 10 to 5 years. Government parties opposed the referenda, with some politicians urging citizens not to go to the polls. Analysts say the vote is a test for Giorgia Meloni's executive. For the referenda to be valid, a quorum must be reached: at least 50% plus one of all eligible voters must participate. According to the advocacy group International Democracy Community, the referenda can be characterised as a citizens' initiative: "The referendum questions were proposed through a bottom-up approach, and did not come from Parliament. Members of the Europa+ party launched the initiative on the citizenship question, whilst the Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGIL) has been the initiator of the Jobs Act ones, with support from the Democratic Party, the Five Star Movement, and the Green & Left Alliance." Voting is taking place from 07:00 to 23:00 on Sunday and from 07:00 to 15:00 on Monday. At 12 noon, with almost all sections verified, turnout stood at just over 7%, raising concerns about a successful outcome. In 2011, the last time the quorum was reached in a referendum, 11.6% had voted by that time. Russia's Defence Ministry said on Sunday that its forces had reached the western edge of the Donetsk region, one of the four provinces Russia illegally annexed in 2022, and that troops were 'developing the offensive' in the neighbouring Dnipropetrovsk region. This would be the first time Russian troops had pushed into the region in the more than three-year-old war. Ukraine has denied the claim. Russia's advance would mark a significant setback for Ukraine's already stretched forces as peace talks remain stalled and Russian troops have made incremental gains elsewhere. Putin's forces also appear to be within a few kilometres of the city of Sumy, three years after Ukraine forced them out of the northern region. One person was killed and another seriously wounded in Russian aerial strikes on the eastern Ukrainian Kharkiv region. These strikes came after Russian attacks targeted the regional capital on Saturday. Regional police in Kharkiv said on Sunday that the death toll from Saturday's attacks had increased to six people. More than two dozen others were wounded. Russia fired a total of 49 exploding drones and decoys and three missiles overnight, Ukraine's air force said Sunday. Forty drones were shot down or electronically jammed. Russia's defence ministry said that its forces shot down 61 Ukrainian drones overnight, including near the capital. Five people were wounded Sunday in a Ukrainian drone attack on a parking lot in Russia's Belgorod region, according to regional Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov. Two people were wounded when a Ukrainian drone attack sparked a fire at a chemical plant in the Tula region, local authorities said. Russian authorities said early Sunday that Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports, two international airports serving Moscow, temporarily suspended flights because of a Ukrainian drone attack. Later in the day, Domodedovo halted flights temporarily for a second time, along with Zhukovsky airport.
