Trump says talks with E.U. are 'going nowhere,' threatens 50% tariff in June
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote that he was "recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025." That rate would be higher than the 39% Trump promised to hit the bloc with on April 2's so-called Liberation Day.
Just minutes earlier, Trump had also threatened Apple with a 25% tariff if it does not start producing iPhones in the United States — an outcome industry experts broadly see as a nonstarter. "The concept of Apple producing iPhones in the U.S. is a fairy tale," prominent tech analyst Dan Ives said in response to Trump's threat Friday.
The early morning posts risked reigniting the trade war Trump started in April that had cooled down in recent weeks. His administration had been speaking positively about ongoing trade talks, even though it has so far secured few concrete economic wins. The president has backed down from some of his most severe tariffs, sparking a comeback for U.S. and global markets.
That rebound looked poised to reverse after Trump's posts, with stock indexes in Germany, France and Italy each dropping nearly 3%. The Stoxx 600, which tracks hundreds of stocks across Europe, plunged more than 2%. Shares in the United Kingdom dropped more than 1%, even though it is not a member of the E.U.
U.S. stocks opened sharply lower, with the S&P tumbling 1.3%, the Dow falling about 500 points, and the Nasdaq Composite plunging 1.7%.
A number of companies with major U.S. and E.U. operations also saw their shares fall. Deutsche Bank shares plunged 4%, carmakers BMW and Stellantis, the maker of Jeep trucks, dropped 3.5%, and tech giant SAP fell 2%. Cosmetics firm L'Oreal also dropped more than 2%, and luxury goods conglomerate LVMH dropped 3%.
Trump has repeatedly assailed the European Union, calling it 'in many ways, nastier than China." On tariff rates and what the U.S. calls "non-tariff barriers," Trump has said, "They'll come down a lot. You watch." But the bloc has refused to alter its value-added tax, a frequent point of contention for Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and other U.S. officials.
Speaking on CNBC shortly after Trump's social media posts, Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee noted, "10% was going to be the highest tariff rate that we had on the world in 90 years. To go to 50% is a completely different order of magnitude."
Goolsbee added that it would be "really scary for the supply chain" if businesses in his Midwest district, which includes auto hub Detroit, would see tariff rates as high as 50%.
The E.U. bloc is America's second-biggest trading partner behind China. The United States exported more than $350 billion of goods to the 27-nation bloc in recent years and imported $550 billion worth of goods.
Maros Šefčovič, the European Commission's trade chief, is set to speak by phone with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on Friday morning, just hours after Trump's post.
The E.U. has been bracing itself for months for the possibility that trade talks with the U.S. would fail. In early May, Šefčovič said the bloc preferred negotiations, "but not at any cost. We therefore continue to prepare for every scenario." The following day, the E.U. announced more than $100 billion worth of possible retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods.
"With the exception of the E.U., most [countries] are negotiating in very good faith," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Friday morning on Fox News. "I would hope that this would light a fire under the E.U."
In 2024, pharmaceutical products were the E.U.'s top export to the U.S., with more than $90 billion crossing the Atlantic, followed by more than $45 billion of vehicles and automotive products. The U.S. also imported more than $300 billion of E.U. services. Telecom, information technology and scientific services were the top imports.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Block Is Joining the S&P 500 Index. Should You Buy XYZ Stock Now?
Block (XYZ) shares rallied as much as 8% on Monday following news the financial technology company will join the S&P 500 Index ($SPX) on July 23. Founded by Jack Dorsey in 2009, the New York Stock Exchange-listed firm will replace Hess in the benchmark index after Chevron (CVX) completed its $53 billion acquisition of the global independent energy firm on July 18. More News from Barchart It's Never 'Happened in the History of Tech to Any Company Before': OpenAI's Sam Altman Says ChatGPT is Growing at an Unprecedented Rate This Penny Stock Wants to Become the MicroStrategy of Dogecoin Option Volatility And Earnings Report For July 21 - 25 Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! Including today's gain, Block stock is up roughly 75% versus its year-to-date low set in early May. Significance of S&P 500 Inclusion for Block Stock Investors are cheering the announcement as index inclusion reinforces XYZ's status as one of the most influential U.S. companies. Joining the S&P 500 will boost both demand and liquidity for Block shares as funds, including ETFs, that track the benchmark index must now invest in them. According to experts, indexers may need to buy millions of XYZ shares, a powerful tailwind that could drive sustained momentum in the fintech stock. Simply put, becoming a part of the benchmark S&P 500 Index increases Block's visibility among institutional investors and validates its central role in reshaping digital finance. Baird Says XYZ Stock Has More Room to the Upside Index inclusion news made Baird analysts reiterate their 'Outperform' rating on XYZ shares as well. On Monday, the investment firm raised its price target on Block stock to $84, indicating potential upside of about 15% from its previous close. Analysts believe that Block stands to benefit from continued momentum in cryptocurrencies as well, given it currently has more than 8,500 Bitcoin (BTCUSD) on its balance sheet. Block has also built a robust ecosystem around crypto, including its Bitkey self-custody wallet and integration of the Lightning Network for faster, low-cost Bitcoin payments, which may help drive its share price up in the second half of 2025. Other Wall Street Firms Disagree with Baird on Block While index inclusion evidently is a majorly positive development for Block shares, other Wall Street analysts believe much of the related upside is already priced into XYZ stock. According to Barchart, the consensus rating on Block remains at 'Moderate Buy' but the mean target of about $68 indicates potential downside of more than 10% from current levels. On the date of publication, Wajeeh Khan did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Verizon Surges as Trump Tax Breaks, Fiber Gains, and EPS Beat Shock Wall Street
Verizon (NYSE:VZ) is finally showing signs of life. The telecom giant just posted Q2 revenue of $34.5 billionup 5.2% year over year and ahead of the Street's $33.7 billion estimatewhile also raising full-year guidance on several fronts. Adjusted EPS came in at $1.22, beating the $1.19 consensus. Management pointed to stronger phone upgrade activity, higher monthly rates, and a $1.5$2 billion tailwind from President Donald Trump's newly enacted tax bill. The legislation allows immediate depreciation of capital investments, which could free up additional cash this year. Shares jumped as much as 4.7%, their best day since January. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with VZ. But it wasn't all clean. Verizon lost 51,000 monthly wireless phone subscribers, missing expectations for a net gain. The company blamed that on an earlier pullback in holiday promos, but said it has since pivoted. New three-year price locks, satellite texting, and free device upgrades have been rolled out to entice users. CFO Tony Skiadas also emphasized upcoming AI tools aimed at reducing churn by offering smarter, more personalized customer service. While the competitive pressure remains intense, Verizon seems to be playing a more calculated gameonly countering rival promos when there's a clear ROI. One bright spot: broadband. Verizon added 293,000 new internet customerswell ahead of the 209,000 forecastas it keeps chipping away at cable's market share using bundled fiber and 5G home internet. The firm also just cleared a major regulatory hurdle to acquire Frontier Communications Parent Inc., which could meaningfully expand its fiber reach when the deal closes in early 2026. CEO Hans Vestberg said the company now sees a clear path forward, and investors are watching closely as the U.S. prepares to auction off new wireless spectrum licensesessential for the 6G future. Full-year EBITDA is now expected to grow 2.5%3.5%, with free cash flow landing between $19.5 billion and $20.5 billion. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Washington Commanders threat: Can president actually block team's planned move to D.C.?
President Donald Trump posted on social media Sunday that he wants the Washington Commanders to switch back to their old "Washington Redskins" team name — and he threatened to block the Commanders' impending move back to D.C. and their new stadium unless they do. A Commanders spokesperson declined comment on the issue to the Washington Post on Sunday. Back in February, team owner Josh Harris committed to sticking with the new name, saying it's "embraced by our team." A poll conducted in May by the Post suggested it's embraced by the public too, with 50 percent of local people and 62 percent of Commanders fans saying they either "like" or "love" the name. But Trump appears insistent, so the next logical question is: Can Trump actually block a move? As with anything in politics, it's a tangled, complicated answer. We know this: The Commanders have submitted a proposal to move into a new stadium within D.C. limits built on the site of the old Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium, which was the team's home from 1961 to 1996. But there are avenues the president could take, as laid out by Front Office Sports. These are the paths of least resistance, though each would still require Trump to steel himself for a political fight: Lobbying D.C. Council members This would perhaps be the most conventional path to take, though it presents numerous challenges. The District of Columbia is negotiating directly with the Commanders on the $3.7 billion stadium proposal through the D.C. Council, which is the 13-member legislative branch of the District's government. Trump could attempt to get them to vote no through various channels. The main problem? Eleven of the council members are Democrats, including chairman Phil Mendelson, who sounded confused by the president's threat. "I don't know what the restriction would be," he told the Post. Withhold funding since Congress controls D.C.'s budget Under the Home Rule Act of 1973, Washington D.C. residents can elect local officials, but the district's budget is subject to Congressional oversight. Right now, both the Senate and House of Representatives are controlled by Trump's Republican party, and would likely approve the blocking of funds for the Commanders' new stadium. From there, untangling the stadium money from government bureaucracy could prove difficult, though there's one potential countermove for the Commanders and D.C. Council, as noted by Front Office Sports: delay public disbursements for the stadium project until after the 2026 midterms, in which Democrats are projected to regain control of the House of Representatives. That would conceivably give the council some reinforcements in the battle for stadium money. Rescind control of the RFK Stadium property Former president Joe Biden signed a bill in January that transferred control of the RFK Stadium site from the federal government to Washington D.C. Section J of the bill, however, outlines grounds for a reversion of control to the federal government and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, a Trump appointee. If Burgum wants to exercise it, however, he would be required to provide written notice to the D.C. Council and give them 90 days to correct the non-compliance. So there appear to be options for Trump to follow through on his threat to prevent the Commanders from building their new stadium. It remains to be seen which one, if any, he'll take.
