logo
Sutskever to lead Safe Superintelligence after Meta poaches CEO Gross in AI talent war

Sutskever to lead Safe Superintelligence after Meta poaches CEO Gross in AI talent war

Economic Times6 hours ago
Ilya Sutskever has taken over the reins of Safe Superintelligence (SSI), the artificial intelligence startup he launched last year, after losing CEO Daniel Gross to an intensifying talent war in the industry.
Gross has joined Meta Platforms to lead its AI products division, sources told Reuters.
The development comes as tech giants such as Meta Platforms aggressively chase high-profile acquisitions and offer multi-million-dollar pay packages to attract top talent in the race to lead the next wave of artificial intelligence. Meta had also attempted to recruit Ilya Sutskever and acquire SSI, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. "You might have heard rumors of companies looking to acquire us. We are flattered by their attention but are focused on seeing our work through," Sutskever said in a post on X. SSI raised $1 billion in cash last year to build advanced AI systems designed to safely exceed human intelligence. Gross did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has launched a new division, Meta Superintelligence Labs, to unify the company's AI efforts, following setbacks with its Llama 4 model and key staff departures.
The unit will be led by former Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang and ex-GitHub chief Nat Friedman, after Meta invested $14.3 billion in Scale and ramped up efforts to recruit top AI talent. Gross and Friedman are known to be close, having cofounded the venture capital firm NFDG - named after their initials. The firm has backed high-profile startups including Safe Superintelligence, Perplexity and Figma. Apple acquired Gross's startup, Cue, in 2013 for its predictive search and AI technology, after which Gross joined the iPhone maker as a director, overseeing machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Quiet Chinese game disrupts iPhone production in India
Quiet Chinese game disrupts iPhone production in India

Hans India

time37 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Quiet Chinese game disrupts iPhone production in India

Apple's iPhone production in India faces disruption as Foxconn experiences a significant withdrawal of Chinese engineers from its Indian facilities, impacting the ramp-up for iPhone 17 manufacturing. This exodus, influenced by China's efforts to restrict technology transfer and skilled labour exports, threatens Apple's ambitious goals to shift iPhone production to India amidst rising geopolitical tensions and supply chain diversification efforts. Apple's largest iPhone manufacturer has recently recalled over 300 Chinese engineers and technicians from its Indian production facilities. The mass withdrawal, which began two months ago, leaves only Taiwanese support staff at Foxconn's southern India plants. The exodus comes as a major disruption to Apple's India expansion strategy, particularly as Foxconn constructs a new iPhone assembly facility in the region. While product quality may remain unaffected, assembly line efficiency could suffer during the critical ramp-up period for next-generation iPhone production. Beijing officials have quietly pressured regulatory agencies and local governments to restrict technology transfers and skilled labour exports to India and Southeast Asia, Bloomberg reported. This coordinated effort aims to prevent Chinese companies from relocating manufacturing capabilities to competing nations amid escalating US-China trade tensions. The strategy extends beyond personnel, encompassing specialized equipment and technical know-how essential for high-tech manufacturing. China's actions come as countries like India and Vietnam aggressively court global technology companies seeking to diversify their supply chains away from Chinese dependence. Apple CEO Tim Cook has consistently emphasized the irreplaceable expertise of Chinese assembly workers, describing their skills as fundamental to maintaining production standards beyond mere cost considerations. India currently produces one-fifth of global iPhone output, a remarkable achievement considering large-scale assembly began just four years ago. Apple had targeted manufacturing most US-bound iPhones in India by late 2026, a timeline now facing potential delays due to the technical expertise shortage. The development highlights the complex challenges facing multinational corporations navigating geopolitical rivalries while attempting supply chain diversification.

Have you hired software developer Soham Parekh yet?
Have you hired software developer Soham Parekh yet?

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Have you hired software developer Soham Parekh yet?

A few days ago, Soham Parekh was just another full-stack developer. Then his name began surfacing across founder circles: Hacker News threads, Slack channels, Twitter jokes, Reddit threads. One YC-backed startup after another realized they'd hired him. Not in sequence—at the same time. Some found out after a few weeks. One team said he worked with them for nearly a year. The stories converge on the same arc: stellar interviews, fast onboarding, some early output. Then missed meetings. Odd excuses. Gaps in availability. In one case, Soham turned up for a trial in person, then left halfway through the day, saying he had to meet a lawyer. He didn't disappear. He just kept showing up somewhere else. The question isn't how he got away with it. The question is why it was so easy. Soham Parekh is not the first engineer to work multiple jobs in parallel. In November 2022, Vanity Fair published a piece titled 'Overemployed in Silicon Valley: How Scores of Tech Workers Are Secretly Juggling Multiple Jobs." It told of engineers quietly holding down two, three, even four full-time roles. Some used mouse-jigglers to fake activity. Others ran multiple laptops. One admitted to outsourcing work to Fiverr. A few worked in coordinated Discord communities, sharing tactics. 'I'm not sure if they even know I'm here anymore," one engineer told the reporter. 'All my paychecks are still coming in." At the time, it read like a side effect of the remote-work boom. A strange consequence of too many laptops and not enough oversight. Soham didn't need any of that infrastructure. He used his real name. Real resume. Showed up on video calls. Wrote code. Left a trail. He just moved through the system cleanly. What his story shows is how little it takes to get hired—and stay hired. One startup said he 'crushed the interviews." Another called him 'top 0.1%." Founders praised his GitHub, his side projects, his email follow-ups. They only saw the red flags once the real work began. That gap—between performance in a vetting process and actual engagement—isn't incidental. It's structural. Startups, especially ones chasing growth, have narrowed hiring into structured calls and take-home tasks. Processes are recycled across founder networks. Culture fit becomes a checkbox. Most of the time, it comes down to gut feel. Which is just another way of saying: we don't really know. In that kind of system, someone who interviews well and ships enough can coast for months. If that person is also working three other jobs, the signs fade gradually. By the time someone notices, it's already awkward to ask. There's another wrinkle. Soham may not have been doing anything that couldn't be done today by an AI agent. More than one founder joked—what if he was a bot? That question no longer lands as satire. Agents today can write code, answer support tickets, even joke in Slack. At some point, you stop noticing the difference. And if you can't tell whether you're working with a disengaged employee or a competent script—what exactly are you hiring? We've seen this fragility before. In 2022, Wipro fired 300 employees for 'moonlighting." Chairman Rishad Premji called it 'cheating—plain and simple." The company said some were working for competitors. The backlash was swift. Critics pointed out that many executives sit on multiple boards. Others questioned the demand for loyalty from a system that rarely offers the same in return. That episode surfaced a buried truth: the rules of work have changed. Expectations haven't. Soham Parekh is a consequence of that mismatch. He's not a rogue actor. He's the product of a hiring culture that values performance over presence, delivery over connection. A culture that claims to build teams but rarely asks who's actually part of them. So what happens when the next Soham is indistinguishable from an AI agent? Srikanth Nadhamuni, the former CTO of Aadhaar, believes we'll need to rethink identity itself. In a recent paper, he proposed Personhood Credentials—a cryptographic and biometric framework to prove that a person behind a digital interaction is real, unique, and singular. The concept sounds abstract, even dystopian. But Nadhamuni argues that in a world of deepfakes and synthetic voice agents, systems like Aadhaar—originally built for public verification—could help anchor digital interactions to actual humans. He describes it as a privacy-preserving firewall against the collapse of trust online. It raises real questions. About privacy, about exclusion, about the kind of infrastructure we're willing to accept in the name of certainty. But it also names the thing most companies pretend not to see: if you don't know who's on the other side of the screen, you're not hiring a person. You're hiring a pattern. And if Soham Parekh passed every test and still wasn't who we thought he was—what happens when the next Soham isn't even human? Pankaj Mishra is a journalist and co-founder of FactorDaily.

India Methodically Building Own Electronics Capabilities
India Methodically Building Own Electronics Capabilities

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

India Methodically Building Own Electronics Capabilities

India is developing 'its own capabilities' in electronics manufacturing in a 'very methodical and sustained way' and is poised to achieve its value-addition target of 38% within the next five years, said Ashwini Vaishnaw , union minister for electronics and IT, railways and information and broadcasting. Currently, China's value addition stands at about 38%. The minister was responding to queries on reports of Apple's key supplier Foxconn repatriating about 300 Chinese engineers from its factories in India. 'De-risking is learning the skills and making it here and developing our own supply chain, which is what we are doing,' he said at an ET Roundtable in New Delhi on Thursday. Support is coming to the electronics manufacturing ecosystem from countries such as Taiwan, the US and South Korea along with the country's own engineers, he said, downplaying dependence on China and its technical personnel. Vaishnaw said countries are moving toward making social media more responsible for content, responding to whether regulation is needed to rein in misinformation. India is trying to build a political consensus on the issue and will be open to changing its legal framework if required, he said. India has significantly expanded its mobile manufacturing ecosystem and is now building its semiconductor capabilities through the ₹76,000 crore India Semiconductor Mission and the ₹23,000 crore components incentive programme announced earlier this year. India's electronics manufacturing is worth about $145 billion and that's increasing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20%, he said. 'We know that there will be challenges in every growth path, but we have the confidence that we will be able to sustain our growth,' the minister said. As per a Bloomberg report, Foxconn has recalled over 300 Chinese engineers and technicians from its Indian iPhone production facilities, reportedly due to Chinese government directives aimed at curbing technology and talent outflow. This is expected to create operational hurdles for Foxconn, potentially impacting the efficiency of assembly lines and delaying the training of local Indian workers as Apple scales its iPhone production in India. While the report said that the talent gap is being offset by Taiwanese staff, the move underscores the challenges Foxconn faces in diversifying its supply chain amid current geopolitical tensions. The highest value addition in any one country (China) is 38% and India has already crossed 20% within a time frame of six to seven years. 'We are on a clear path to crossing 30% in the coming two to three years, and reaching 38% within the next five years is a very reasonable target,' he said. The Tata Electronics chip assembly plant in Assam will service telecom manufacturers globally, Micron unit in Gujarat will be supplying memory chips, while power electronics will come from the CG plant, also in Gujarat, he said. India has to be self-reliant in every domain to safeguard itself from geopolitical upheaval. 'We have to get into every machine, every component,' he said. 'We must go into every part of it and start manufacturing them.' Almost all the complex things in the world are designed in our country. This is a very big strength which very few countries have. So we should build upon that.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store