'Our thoughts remain with them': Kingman students, staff hospitalized after I-10 crash
Two students and two staff members remained hospitalized and will stay in Tucson for treatment, according to the school district.
A Kingman Unified School District bus was heading east on I-10 in Marana when an SUV driver merged into the bus, causing the bus to hit a median barrier and roll onto its side. The crash left four people seriously injured, according to the Arizona Department of Public Safety.
"Our thoughts remain with them and their families during this time," the school district said in an update on its website.
The driver of the Volvo SUV was identified as 31-year-old Nicolas Rodriguez. He was taken into custody and accused of three counts of aggravated assault and serious physical injury, Class 3 felonies, according to the Pima County Attorney's Office. His bond was set at $100,000.
Authorities closed the eastbound lanes of the interstate in response to the crash. The lanes reopened around 6 a.m. April 2, according to the Arizona Department of Transportation.
Students from Kingman High School and Lee Williams High School were heading to Tucson for a Future Business Leaders of America conference when the crash occurred.
"We would like to express our heartfelt appreciation to the Tucson and Marana hospitals, first aid responders, and their community for their exceptional support and assistance provided to our students and staff. Your help truly means the world to us!" the district wrote in a Facebook post.
The Kingman Unified School District asked for gift cards, blankets, water and snacks to create get-well baskets for those involved in the crash.
"Your donation not only helps with recovery but also serves as a reminder of the incredible strength and compassion in our community," the district said in the Facebook post.
Donations will be accepted until 3 p.m. on April 3 at the Kingman Unified District Office.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: SUV driver faces felony charges after causing bus crash near Tucson
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Tested: Is the 2025 Volvo EX30 the Tesla alternative we were promised?
Tesla's influence shows up everywhere in the 2025 Volvo EX30. You see it in the speedometer relegated to a corner of the infotainment touchscreen. You see it in the gear selector stalk that doubles as the cruise control switchgear. And you see it in the credit-card-style key that's meant to be a backup to using your phone for unlocking and starting the vehicle. All of this is cost-saving minimalism cleverly passed off as modernism, an art that Tesla — and now Volvo — has nearly perfected in its pursuit of making attainable (and profitable) EVs. Of all the parallels between the EX30 and a Tesla, the strongest similarity is one that no automaker should imitate: the mile-wide gap between what the automaker originally promised and the car it eventually delivered. Just two years ago, Volvo introduced the EX30 as the cheap and cheerful cure for too-expensive EVs with a $36,245 starting price and 275 miles of range. Yet the only EX30 you can buy in the U.S. right now and for the foreseeable future costs nearly $10,000 more than that and landed well short of 200 miles in MotorTrend's Road-Trip Range test. Volvo set out to build the $35K EV that Tesla has long teased and appears to have come to the same conclusion: It can't be done. (Chevy has proven otherwise.) Revisiting vintage automakers: What if AMC Motors had survived? How it could've changed the auto industry Trading value for performance It's a shame that the launch turned into a bait and switch because the $46,195 Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is awesome in its own right. Imagine an electric Volkswagen GTI with 422 hp and 400 lb-ft of torque, and you'll have a pretty good idea of what it's like to drive. Presented with a gap in traffic or an empty roundabout, the EX30 rockets through with an exuberance that matches its Moss Yellow paint. It is not, however, a rowdy little hooligan of a hatchback as the specs suggest. Exercising characteristic restraint, Volvo delivers all that oomph as a shove rather than a gut punch. The EX30 launches with the faintest scrape of spinning tires, and power builds linearly over the first 20 or so mph. Hitting 60 mph in 3.2 seconds has never felt so civilized. When the EX30 zips past the quarter-mile mark in 11.8 seconds, it does so up against the 112-mph speed limiter that Volvo rolled out across its lineup five years ago in the name of safety. Similarly, the EX30 steers and turns and tackles bumps capably without ever feeling overtly aggressive. Its 110-foot stop from 60 mph and 0.87 g of cornering grip are decent for a 4,190-pound vehicle on all-season tires but hardly the makings of a four-door sports car. For a Volvo, that's perfect. The EX30 Twin Motor Performance is fun to hustle and pleasant to commute in, making it a great daily driver. How to make a cheap car feel expensive The danger of buying the expensive version of a cheap car is that so much of a car is designed and engineered for the lowest-priced model. That's the story of the Ford Maverick. At $33,000, it feels like a value. In a $43,000 model, you can't ignore the flashing and exposed edges on many of the injection-molded plastic parts. Like the Maverick, the EX30 uses texture and color to turn cheap interior materials into eye candy. Unlike Ford, Volvo has engineered the fit and finish so that those materials also look and — where it matters — feel expensive. The sense of quality is furthered by the cabin's thoughtful and innovative design. The glove box drops from the center of the dash to give the front passenger more kneeroom. Instead of a conventional center console, a bin slides out from below the fixed center armrest with a clever, independently sliding top plate that allows you to allocate the space for cupholders or catchall storage. As noted at the beginning of this story, it's not hard to find where Volvo has cut cost from the bill of materials. Look at how simple the climate vents are. The front doors have been stripped of nearly all electronics, with the driver and passenger sharing two window switches in the center console to control all four windows. The front speakers all live in a soundbar running across the top of the dash, which unfortunately takes a toll on the audio system's sound quality. Lamborghini unveils the Temerario GT3: Introducing the successor to Lambo's most decorated race car What would have been easily justified trade-offs in a $36,245 EX30 are tougher to swallow at our test car's $48,395 sticker price, but the cabin is ultimately an industrial design masterpiece. Funky and original, the EX30 feels like the spiritual successor of the quirky 2008–2013 Volvo C30. The EX30's petite size reinforces the connection with that decade-old Volvo. The four-door EX30 measures about an inch shorter than the two-door C30 (and 5 inches shorter than the Toyota Corolla hatchback). As a result, the rear seats are only functional if your kids have the anatomy of a Squishmallow, and emptying a full Costco cart into the EX30's 12.4-cubic-foot cargo hold will test your Tetris skills. Volvo EX30 real-world range and charging The most consequential cost-cutting measure naturally shows up in what's the most expensive part of any EV, the battery. The EX30's lithium-ion pack stores 64.0 kWh of electricity, less than the late (but soon-to-be-resurrected) Chevrolet Bolt EV. Officially, the Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance is rated for a reasonable 253 miles on a full charge. At a steady 70 mph in the real world, though, we achieved an impractical 180 miles. That 29 percent gap between the window sticker and our measurement (which admittedly only looks at 95 percent of a full charge) makes the EX30 one of the worst performers in the MotorTrend Road-Trip Range test. Its fast-charging performance is similarly underwhelming. Power peaks at 153 kW and quickly tapers off, delivering enough juice in 15 minutes to cover just 87 miles at 70 mph. Given the EX30's size, limited range and mediocre charging, there are far better options at this price point — pretty much any EV at this price point — for anyone planning on road-tripping their electric vehicle. Getting techy Tesla's influence is palpable in the nearly button-free dashboard. The EX30 runs nearly all its major controls through a scaled-down version of the Android Automotive–based infotainment system found in the larger EX90. Thankfully the EX30 hasn't been plagued by the litany of software quality complaints owners have logged against Volvo's new flagship EV, and our reviewers took to the user interface quickly. We like that you can download apps such as Spotify and Waze directly to the 12.3-inch touchscreen and that it offers the familiar comfort of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto for those who aren't ready for such newfangled ideas. The EX30 comes in two versions, the standard Plus trim and the $1,700 Ultra upgrade that adds a 360-degree camera system, automated parking, ambient cabin lighting, a cabin air filter, LED headlights and Pilot Assist, Volvo's conservative take on Tesla's Full Self-Driving. It can center the EX30 in its lane, slow or accelerate with traffic, and even guide the vehicle through a lane change, but all of this requires the driver to keep their hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. We appreciate a cautious, safety-first approach, but the value of Pilot Assist seems marginal compared to Ford's BlueCruise or GM's Super Cruise. Given its limited capabilities, we'd be inclined to pass on the Ultra trim to try to keep the price in check. A lesson learned? The Volvo EX30 Twin Motor Performance's straight-line speed, polished driving dynamics, and fetching design tug at our emotions, but it's hard not to feel jilted once you climb out of the driver's seat and look at the vehicle in the larger context. Volvo originally pitched the EX30 as a value play that would get more Americans into EVs. Instead, we got a tiny hot rod of a luxury car for a niche buyer. For now, the work of pushing EVs into the mainstream will have to be carried out by larger, cheaper, longer-range alternatives such as the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Ford Mustang Mach-E and Chevy Equinox EV. Should Volvo someday figure out how to bring the entry, single-motor EX30 to America (specs for which are included on the U.S. media site), we hope it's learned an important lesson: Wait until you're shipping the cars to the U.S. to announce the price. Photos by Jim Fets
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trucking companies sue California, seeking a release from Clean Truck Partnership
Major trucking companies have entered the legal war between California and President Donald Trump over vehicle emissions, asking a federal judge to decide whether they must comply with the state's clean-air standards that Trump and congressional Republicans have acted to repeal. Truck manufacturers 'are caught in the crossfire,' four companies said Monday in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Sacramento. While California's Air Resources Board demands that they comply with state emissions standards, 'the United States maintains such laws are illegal and orders (the manufacturers) to disregard them.' The companies asked the court to decide which laws they must follow, and to shield them from enforcement of conflicting laws. They include Daimler, which manufactures about 40% of U.S. trucks, and Volvo, which makes about 15%, along with Paccar and Traton. A related issue is already before the federal courts in San Francisco, where California sued the Trump administration in June after the president signed a law declaring an end to vehicle emissions standards that the state has been allowed to enforce since 1970. That suit seeks to preserve the state's mandate to phase out gasoline-powered cars and, by 2035, limit new-car sales to electric vehicles and hybrids that can run on either electricity or gasoline. The trucking companies' suit targets another California mandate imposing stricter standards on diesel emissions than those enforced nationwide, with a goal of a zero-emission fleet at a later date. The companies agreed to comply with those standards under a 'Clean Truck Partnership' they signed with the California Air Resources Board in 2023. The state enforces its standards under waivers granted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, actions that state officials maintain are still valid despite the new federal law. The waivers allow other states to follow California's standards, and 12 states have done so, while several others have adopted California's rules for truck emissions. In Monday's suit, the trucking companies said the Clean Truck Partnership they signed in 2023 gave them a 'woefully inadequate' period of only two years to comply with the state's emission standards. They said the Air Resources Board also required them to meet those standards regardless of the outcome of any legal challenges. After the recent congressional action, attorney Benjamin Wagner wrote in the lawsuit, the companies must learn 'within a matter of weeks' whether they need Air Resources Board approval to sell their trucks in California and other states following its standards, which together make up about 25% of the national market. The Air Resources Board did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But the suit was criticized by the Sierra Club, a prominent environmental group. 'It is disappointing to see major truck manufacturers attempting to back away from their commitments in response to a hostile federal government,' said Jakob Evans, a policy strategist for the Sierra Club in California. Last week the Sierra Club, other environmental groups and the Electric Vehicle Association issued a letter to truck manufacturers in California urging them to 'reaffirm your commitment to this agreement and to the truck drivers, fleets, and communities who stand to benefit from electrification.'
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
Two NYC food-truck customers, elderly driver killed in tragic caught-on-video horror
Two food-truck customers and an 84-year-old driver were killed when the senior plowed his car into them in a horrific Tuesday morning scene in Queens, according to cops and startling surveillance footage. The elderly motorist was driving his light-colored 2010 Toyota Corolla north on 42nd Street at 19th Avenue in Astoria when he whizzed through the intersection and careened straight into the food truck as the two men, ages 42 and 70, were ordered from it, according to police and the video. After the initial impact, the out-of-control driver also spun around and collided with a Volvo sedan driven by a 42-year-old man, cops said. The Volvo driver was unhurt. 4 An 84-year-old driver struck a food truck at 42nd Street and 19th Avenue in Astoria on Tuesday morning, killing himself and two customers, cops said. James Keivom 'All of a sudden I hear loud screeching from tires and like, a really loud engine roar sounded like it was, like, right on top of me,' shaken food-truck worker Giancarlo Caruso told The Post. 'Someone screamed really loudly, and I just had stepped back, like right up to the sidewalk,' he said, adding he was saved 'by a millimeter or a centimeter' as he stood next to one of the fatal victims and 'felt the wind hit my leg. 'I was parked right off the sidewalk, and as soon as I heard that scream and the screeching, I stepped back, and a vehicle going about 60 miles an hour mauled two of the customers that were with me,' Caruso said. 'They were just laid out and lifeless,' he said of the tragic victims. 'It happened so fast. It just, it was almost like God removed me from the scene.' The younger food-truck patron was pronounced dead at the scene, cops said. 4 The grisly crash wiped out several vehicles. Peter Gerber The older customer as well as the elderly driver were taken to the Elmhurst Hospital Center, where they succumbed to their injuries, cops said. 4 The elderly driver succumbed to his injuries at a local hospital after the crash. Obtained by the NY Post The two fatal victims were not immediately identified, pending family notification. Francisco Neto, owner of a nearby doggie daycare, said he knew one of the victims for his work at a tire shop near the scene. 'Very nice guy,' Neto said. 'He helped us a lot with with the cars here, with the tires. He just replaced all four tires of my car the other day. It's sad. 4 The out-of-control driver spun around after hitting the food truck and collided with a Volvo sedan. Peter Gerber 'This is a busy street for this area, extremely busy,' he added. 'You have the tire shop, the mechanic, the motorcycle place. So it gets busy, but never anything like this.'
