logo
Committee approves stopgap biennial budget, adds funding for Medicaid and urgent needs

Committee approves stopgap biennial budget, adds funding for Medicaid and urgent needs

Yahoo15-03-2025

Entrance to the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee room in the Maine State House in Augusta. (Photo by Jim Neuger/Maine Morning Star)
The Democratic majority of the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee approved a biennial budget bill Friday night that largely continues funding for state government at the same level but includes some additional appropriations to address urgent needs, including the MaineCare funding gap.
The committee passed the plan 7-3, with two members absent, around 8:30 p.m. with an emergency clause, meaning if it secures two-thirds support of the full Legislature the funding could take effect immediately. However, Republicans on the committee made it clear Friday that's unlikely to happen.
This threshold was the downfall of the supplemental budget bill the Legislature had considered to address the current $118 million funding shortfall for the state's Medicaid program. It will again pose problems for the biennial budget that now includes that same time-sensitive measure and others, such as $2 million to treat a growing outbreak of spruce budworm, a destructive insect that threatens Maine's northern forests, which has a narrow treatment window this spring.
Without two-thirds support of the full Legislature, the allocations won't be immediately available. Short of that, a majority of both chambers would have to approve the bill by the end of March in order for the funding to be available by the start of the next fiscal year, July 1.
The final blow to the supplemental budget came on Thursday when Senate Republicans maintained their opposition to the plan after it was amended to include some of the minority party's demands: cost-of-living adjustments for certain essential support workers that are currently being withheld by Gov. Janet Mills' administration and limits to General Assistance, as well as annual training requirements for the program that Republicans hadn't requested.
Medicaid funding fix fails final votes in Senate with Republicans maintaining opposition
Another addition had been a review of MaineCare for fraud, waste and abuse, but Senate Republicans said it had to include structural reform of the program in order to get their vote.
The new biennial plan includes the funding for MaineCare, to treat spruce budworm and other initiatives the committee had initially had in the supplemental plan, as well as some aspects of the amendment — though not Republicans' key asks.
The committee voted to include the annual training requirements for General Assistance but not the limits to the program. The biennial plan includes cost-of-living adjustments, but it does not include the review of MaineCare.
An item to address a concern raised by the Maine Community College System, University of Maine and Maine Maritime Academy during public hearings for the supplemental and biennial budgets is also included: funding to help cover the costs for state-supported positions related to the new Paid Family and Medical Leave Program, which took effect on Jan. 1.
The biennial budget plan doesn't add any new state spending to provide this support but rather would use the remaining balance from the state's fund for the program.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Addressing some of these time-sensitive issues in the two-year budget presents clear timing complications.
Many providers that rely on MaineCare are already looking at backpayments since the state started to withhold some funds this week and they could be looking at longer delays depending on when budget allocations become available.
In a statement shared with Maine Morning Star ahead of Friday's meeting, House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham (R-Winter Harbor) said, 'I think it's extremely juvenile to send the supplemental budget, a bill we had invested so much time on, to the dead file and then immediately move on to a Democrat only majority budget when they know this will delay funding.'
Peggy Rotundo (D-Androscoggin), who co-chairs the budget committee, said if they didn't vote today, the Legislature's nonpartisan offices wouldn't have had enough time to draft the legislation to get it to the floor for consideration by the end of March.
However, she added that she hopes the budget bill could gain enough support to be enacted as an emergency to avoid any delay. That seems unlikely at this point as Republican members of the committee voted 'Ought Not to Pass,' recommending that the full Legislature reject the bill.
Before casting votes, members of the committee voiced opposing perspectives of the politics that led to this point, both this year and in past sessions.
Republicans also critiqued Democrats' decision to pursue a budget that doesn't require their buy-in, reminiscent of the majority party's approach last session. Meanwhile, Democrats argued a two-part budget is necessary to keep the lights on, now more than ever.
'We all have a different story to tell about this and I don't think we're going to resolve all that historical knowledge that we all have as individuals,' said committee co-chair Rep. Drew Gattine (D-Westbrook). However, Gattine said that given the current volatility outside the Legislature's control, it's important to shore up the state government commitments they can.
'We have uncertainty coming out of the federal government,' Gattine said. 'We have uncertainty coming about our own local economy, about our state economy, about our national economy. And I think what we can do as legislators here today is take some of that uncertainty away.'
Federal funding uncertainty came up in deliberations about specific initiatives, too.
For example, the majority of the committee backed Mills' proposal to transfer $45 million from the education stabilization fund to the general fund, though Republicans argued against using it to fill the state's budget gap.
Rep. Mark Blier (R-Buxton) raised concern about this move in light of the ongoing investigations by President Donald Trump's administration into Maine's Department of Education.
'It's really not very prudent for us to move these funds out of a lot of our education system,' Blier said.
An audit of the state budget to assess whether current, baseline funding levels are adequate has been a consistent call from Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart (R-Aroostook).
Republicans on the appropriations committee raised concern on Friday about the biennial proposal continuing state spending at current levels without such introspection.
The human and environmental costs at stake in Maine's Medicaid funding battle
'When you're voting in this baseline budget, you're really voting in baseline budgets that have been, in my opinion, majority Democrat baseline budgets,' said Rep. Ken Fredette (R-Newport), referring to Democrats' past use of majority budgets.
Republican budget lead Rep. Jack Ducharme of Madison said, 'The people of Maine cannot afford for us to just do continuing services.'
While appropriations committee member Sen. Sue Bernard (R-Aroostook) was absent for voting Friday, in a statement she reiterated concerns about the sustainability of the MaineCare program as it currently stands.
'The problems that existed in the supplemental budget continue to be completely unaddressed,' Bernard said. 'MaineCare is on the verge of collapse and won't be available for those who truly need it.'
Rotundo argued that baseline budgets have also grown under Republican leadership in the past. She added that the committee may have to revisit baseline numbers in a separate budget that Democrats are planning to introduce next to address policy changes.
The biennial budget plan approved by the appropriations committee Friday night prioritizes continuing services to maintain state government functions and doesn't include program cuts or tax increases.
But those are coming.
In order to address the $450 million deficit, Mills initially proposed a biennial budget plan that included a number of new taxes on tobacco, cannabis, streaming services, pensions, ambulances and pharmacies, which Republicans have said they will not support.
Mills' proposal also includes targeted program cuts that have faced pushback from progressives, including reversing the state's recent investments in child care, limiting low-income food assistance for asylum seekers and removing funding appropriated last year for some crisis receiving centers in the wake of the Lewiston mass shooting.
Before the appropriations committee considers part two of the biennial budget, read up about the policy proposals here, here and here.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can the President Activate a State's National Guard?
Can the President Activate a State's National Guard?

Time​ Magazine

time6 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Can the President Activate a State's National Guard?

President Donald Trump's mobilization of the National Guard to quell immigration-related protests in Los Angeles marks a rare— and controversial —exercise of presidential power. Trump's decision to make the deployment against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom is especially unusual. The move marks the first time in 60 years that a President has called up National Guard troops to a state without a request from its governor. Newsom confirmed he didn't ask for the mobilization, saying in a post on X on Sunday that he had formally requested that the Trump Administration rescind what he called an 'unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command.' The Democratic governor called the move 'a serious breach of state sovereignty,' and told MSNBC that he plans to file a lawsuit against the Administration. The decision to activate the National Guard came as thousands of demonstrators across Los Angeles county over the weekend protested Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids that targeted undocumented immigrants. While the protests had been largely peaceful, some of the demonstrations escalated: Rocks and Molotov cocktails were thrown, cars were vandalized, and law enforcement officials deployed crowd control agents including tear gas, 'flash bang' grenades, and rubber bullets. Though National Guard troops are typically controlled by state governors, the President does have the authority to deploy them in certain circumstances, including in response to civil unrest. It's a power that has existed in some form almost as long as the country itself, dating back to 1792, though it has been used only sparingly in the centuries since. The deployment of the National Guard in those instances has usually come at the request of state officials—thought not always. The last time a President mobilized the troops without the governor's consent was in 1965, when then-President Lyndon B. Johnson deployed National Guard troops to Alabama, without a request from the state's governor, in order to protect civil rights activists who were marching from Selma to Montgomery, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. Alabama's governor at the time, Democrat George Wallace, didn't want to use state funds to protect the demonstrators. Johnson invoked the Insurrection Act, which authorizes the President to deploy military forces domestically to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or in certain other situations. The Insurrection Act 'is the primary exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, under which federal military forces are generally barred from participating in civilian law enforcement activities,' according to the Brennan Center for Justice. The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was in 1992, when then-President George H.W. Bush called up National Guard troops to quell riots in Los Angeles that were sparked by the acquittal of the four white police officers charged in the beating of Rodney King, an unarmed Black man. Then-California Gov. Pete Wilson had requested the federal aid. Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, but he didn't rule out the possibility of doing so in the future. 'Depends on whether or not there's an insurrection,' Trump said, responding to a reporter's question about whether he was prepared to invoke the law. 'We're not going to let them get away with it.' To mobilize the National Guard troops this weekend, he instead invoked Title 10, Section 12406 of the U.S. Code, which allows for the federal deployment of National Guard forces in limited circumstances, including if 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.' The provision states that the President may call the troops 'in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws.' But it also states, 'Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.' The Trump Administration's move sparked controversy, with many Democratic politicians and advocacy organizations blasting the decision. Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts said in a post on X that deploying National Guard troops 'over the objection of California leaders is an abuse of power and a dangerous escalation.' 'It's what you would see in authoritarian states and it must stop,' she continued. Legal experts also expressed concern over the Trump Administration's actions. 'For the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling,' Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the law school at the University of California, Berkeley, told the New York Times. Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown University Law Center professor specializing in military justice and national security law, called the move 'alarming' in a post on his website, saying there is a possibility that putting federal authorities on the ground 'will only raise the risk of escalating violence' and that the National Guard's mobilization could be intended as a 'precursor' to justify a more aggressive deployment in the future if it fails. 'The law may well allow President Trump to do what he did Saturday night,' Vladeck wrote. 'But just because something is legal does not mean that it is wise—for the present or future of our Republic.'

California labor leader charged with impeding officer during immigration crackdown
California labor leader charged with impeding officer during immigration crackdown

Associated Press

time7 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

California labor leader charged with impeding officer during immigration crackdown

LOS ANGELES (AP) — A California union leader has been charged with conspiring to impede an officer during a demonstration over President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, authorities said on Monday. David Huerta, 58, is currently being held in federal custody in downtown Los Angeles and expected to appear in court later on Monday for a bond hearing, federal prosecutors said. Huerta is president of Service Employees International Union California, which represents thousands of janitors, security officers and other workers in the state. The SEIU was holding a rally in downtown Los Angeles on Monday to show support for Huerta and stand up for his right to observe and document law enforcement activity. Demonstrations were also planned in at least a dozen cities from Boston to Denver. The union has been a strong Democratic supporter, and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and California's two Democratic senators wrote a letter to federal officials demanding answers regarding Huerta's arrest. 'It is deeply troubling that a U.S. citizen, union leader, and upstanding member of the Los Angeles community continues to be detained by the federal government for exercising his rights to observe immigration enforcement,' the senators wrote. Protests broke out last week in response to reports of immigration raids in the nation's second-largest city. Since then, tensions have escalated with thousands of protesters taking to the streets after Trump took the extraordinary move of deploying the National Guard. Demonstrators blocked a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire downtown as law enforcement used tear gas and rubber bullets to control the crowd. Huerta was arrested Friday when law enforcement officers were executing a federal search warrant at a Los Angeles business under investigation for allegedly hiring illegal immigrants and falsifying employment papers, a special agent for Homeland Security Investigations, which is part of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, wrote in a court filing. A crowd of people including Huerta gathered outside the business yelling at the officers. Huerta sat down in front of a vehicular gate and encouraged others to walk in circles to try to prevent law enforcement from coming in or out, the agent wrote, adding it was clear 'he and the others had planned in advance of arrival to disrupt the operation.' A law enforcement officer approached Huerta and told him to leave, then put his hands on Huerta to move him out of the way of a vehicle, the agent wrote. Huerta pushed back and the officer pushed Huerta to the ground and arrested him, according to the filing. 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are—if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted,' Bill Essayli, U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles, said in a post on X. 'No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties.' Messages were left for Huerta's attorney, Marilyn Bednarski. The SEIU said in a statement the union condemns the immigration raids and will continue to protect workers' rights. 'We demand David Huerta's immediate release and an end to these abusive workplace raids,' said April Verrett, SEIU's international president. ___ Taxin reported from Santa Ana, Calif.

Dems walk back pro-cop, law and order rhetoric from J6 era in the face of spiraling immigration riots
Dems walk back pro-cop, law and order rhetoric from J6 era in the face of spiraling immigration riots

Fox News

time8 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Dems walk back pro-cop, law and order rhetoric from J6 era in the face of spiraling immigration riots

Elected Democrats from coast to coast championed law and order and embraced law enforcement in the wake of the Jan. 6 protest at the U.S. Capitol in 2021, but have seemingly walked back such rhetoric in the face of federal law enforcement officials carrying out immigration raids in Los Angeles that have spiraled into riots. Democrats have increasingly condemned the immigration raids that began Friday in Los Angeles, claiming they were "illegal" and revealed alleged evidence of President Donald Trump's "authoritarianism," while attempting to characterize the riots as a result of the administration's alleged overreach. "Inciting and provoking violence; Creating mass chaos; Militarizing cities; Arresting opponents," Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on X Sunday. "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President." "Deploying federalized troops on the heels of these raids is a chaotic escalation," Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass posted to X Sunday. "The fear people are feeling in our city right now is very real – it's felt in our communities and within our families and it puts our neighborhoods at risk. This is the last thing that our city needs, and I urge protesters to remain peaceful. I've been in touch this morning with immigrant rights leaders as well as local law enforcement officials. Los Angeles will always stand with everyone who calls our city home." Federal law enforcement officials converged on the city Friday, with both Newsom and Bass issuing statements shortly thereafter denouncing the raids, which are part of Trump's campaign vow to remove the millions of illegal immigrants who flooded the nation under the Biden administration. Newsom, Bass and other local elected Democrats quickly sounded off that they did not support the raids, while offering words of support to illegal immigrants who reside in Los Angeles. "As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass, for example, said Friday. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. My office is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations. We will not stand for this." Protests against the raids soon devolved into violence over the weekend, as rioters targeted federal officials with rocks and other projectiles, set cars on fire, looted stores and took over 101 Freeway Sunday. Trump said Saturday that he was authorizing the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to Southern California to help quell the violence as it spiraled, bypassing the governor who typically activates the National Guard during state emergencies. The White House has defended calling in the National Guard to restore law and order, after Democrats reportedly failed to control the increasingly violent protests and the LAPD declared an unlawful assembly in the city. Dozens of violent protesters have been arrested since Friday, according to local police. "Gavin Newsom did nothing as violent riots erupted in Los Angeles for days," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted to X Monday. "Federal law enforcement officers were attacked by violent radicals and illegal criminals waving foreign flags because Governor Newsom was too weak to protect the city. The Los Angeles Police Chief has even said the riots were getting out of hand. President Trump has stepped in to maintain law and order and protect federal buildings." As the riots raged, a handful of elected Democrats, as well as Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, have condemned the raids and federal officials cracking down on the protests, which stand in stark contrast to messages they issued in the 2021 era after Trump supporters breached the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 following the 2020 election. Democrats have long argued the Jan. 6 protest was a violent insurrection that trampled on the U.S. Constitution and threatened democracy when an estimated 2,000 people breached the Capitol building that day. "ICE get the f--- out of LA so that order can be restored," Democratic California Rep. Norma Torres posted in a video on TikTok Friday of the raids, which received widespread backlash among conservative critics. But when addressing the Jan. 6 protest, Torres invoked the Constitution, celebrated law enforcement and disavowed the "chaos" seen at the Capitol in 2021. "The American people deserve leaders who will uphold the Constitution and protect our democracy from those who seek to destroy it," Torres said in a statement in January criticizing Trump's pardons of the vast majority of those charged in connection to the protest at the Capitol. "I call on my colleagues, regardless of party affiliation, to condemn this reckless abuse of power and to recommit ourselves to the principles of justice and accountability." "I remember the sound of the mob banging on doors, the bravery of law enforcement officers who risked their lives to protect us, and the sense of betrayal as our sacred democratic institutions were desecrated," she added. When asked about the disparity in comments, Torres said she has "always supported our local law enforcement – whether it be in Los Angeles or Washington, D.C.," adding that the ICE raids is "entirely different.' "LAPD is trained to handle this situation and have the resources to do so," Torres told Fox News Digital on Monday. "What ICE is doing in California is entirely different – we're witnessing ICE ignore federal law, people going missing, families being separated, and even American citizens being mistakenly detained. I do not support violent conduct, but I believe the Los Angeles Police Department can restore calm, and prosecute any violent offenders as needed. Bringing in the National Guard will only escalate tensions by introducing a weaponized military presence into the city." While Sanders joined CNN Sunday and slammed Trump for moving the country toward "authoritarianism" after activating the National Guard as rioters targeted federal law enforcement officials. Sanders, however, also took Trump to task in January for allegedly giving a "free pass to rioters who attacked the police" Jan. 6 at the Capitol. "We have a president who is moving this country rapidly into authoritarianism," Sanders said Sunday. "My understanding is that the governor of California, the mayor of the city of Los Angeles did not request the National Guard, but he thinks he has a right to do anything he wants." Sanders repeatedly condemned the Jan. 6 protest in 2021 and in subsequent years, including earlier in 2025 when Trump pardoned the vast majority of Americans charged in the protest. Sanders lauded police officers who were working at the Capitol on the day of the protest, while slamming Trump as trampling democracy. "President Trump: You do not stand for law and order when you give a free pass to rioters who attacked the police," Sanders posted Jan. 21. "In fact, you are signaling that violence is okay and attacking law enforcement is acceptable behavior." "As someone who was on the Hill that day, I'm grateful to the officers who put their lives on the line to defend myself and my colleagues," Sanders continued. "It's outrageous that the President would betray officers who defended our democracy by absolving violent insurrectionists of their crimes." As Newsom rails against the raids and Trump deploying the National Guard to LA, the Democratic governor called for order to be restored following Jan. 6, when he said there was an "outright assault to our democracy and Democratic institutions." "Peaceful protest is an important mechanism of our democracy but what we are witnessing in our nation's Capitol building is reprehensible and an outright assault to our democracy and Democratic institutions," Newsom said in a 2021 statement. "The people of California have spoken, and our congressional delegation should never have to fear for their lives to represent Californians," the statement continued. "We are concerned for the safety of California's congressional delegation and U.S. Capitol staff, and are reaching out to offer support in every way possible. President Trump must call for an end to this escalating situation, acknowledge the will of the people to bring President-elect Biden to the White House and move immediately to a peaceful transition of power." When asked for comment on Newsom's previous remarks on Jan. 6 compared to his commentary on the riots, Newsom's press office directed Fox News Digital to the governor's comment to NBC News on Sunday: "This is about authoritarian tendencies. This about command and control. This is about power. This about ego. This is a consistent pattern... this guy has abandoned the core principles of this great democracy. He's threatening to go after judges he disagrees with, cut off funding to institutions of higher learning, he's rewriting history and censoring historical facts." The office also noted that Trump said in 2020 during a townhall event that he could not mobilize the National Guard "unless we're requested by a governor," and pointed Fox Digital to comment from retired Maj. Gen. Randy Manner, former acting vice chief of National Guard bureau, criticizing Trump's activation of the Guard. "The President's federal deployment of the National Guard over the official wishes of a governor is bad for all Americans concerned about freedom of speech and states rights," Manner said, Fox News' Jennifer Griffin reported, on Sunday. "The governor has the authority and ability to respond to the civil disturbances with law enforcement capabilities within his state, augmented as necessary by requesting law enforcement assistance from other governors. There are over a million badged and trained members of law enforcement in this country for the governor to ask for help if he needs it. While this is presently a legal order, it tramples the governor's rights and obligations to protect his people. This is an inappropriate use of the National Guard and is not warranted." Failed 2024 presidential candidate and former Vice President Kamala Harris posted to X Sunday that the raids were part of Trump's "cruel, calculated agenda to spread panic and division," adding that the activation of the National Guard was "a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos." On the one-year anniversary of the Jan. 6 riots, Harris lauded the heroism of police and the National Guard, while celebrating "the resolve" of elected officials to protect the Constitution and law and order. "The resolve I saw in our elected leaders when I returned to the Senate chamber that night, their resolve not to yield, but to certify the election, their loyalty, not to party or person, but to the Constitution of the United States, that reflects its strength," she said in 2022. "And so of course, does the heroism of the Capitol Police, the DC Metropolitan Police Department, the National Guard and other law enforcement officers who answered the call that day, including those who later succumbed to wounds, both visible and invisible." Federal officials have pinned blame for the Los Angeles violence on Democratic elected officials who have "villainized and demonized" ICE law enforcement, Fox Digital previously reported. "The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, for example, wrote in a Saturday statement. "The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens.… From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end." The White House defended Trump's activation of the National Guard, saying it was in direct response to Democrats who have "completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens" while law enforcement officials are attacked. "In recent days, violent mobs have attacked ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations in Los Angeles, California," Leavitt said in a Saturday statement. "These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens." "That is why President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," Leavitt continued. "The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs. These criminals will be arrested and swiftly brought to justice. The Commander-in-Chief will ensure the laws of the United States are executed fully and completely."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store