Hidden cost: how tighter payment rules could hurt Kiwis
This article was prepared by Anthony Watson for Visa and is being published by the New Zealand Herald as advertorial.
By Anthony Watson, Country Manager, Visa New Zealand & Pacific Islands
Just over two years have passed since the Commerce Commission introduced interchange regulation intended to bring down the cost of payments to consumers and businesses in New Zealand. Now, it's proposing to tighten that even further.
On the surface, the regulator's rationale seems simple: in its view, further capping interchange payments would help businesses lower their costs and therefore lead to cost savings for consumers. But there's a critical piece of analysis missing – if the regulation introduced in 2022 didn't deliver the savings promised, why will this round be any different?
Before trying the same again, let's look at what's actually happening
Interchange balances the risks and benefits for all parties to deliver secure, seamless payments. Many of the features New Zealanders now take for granted, such as contactless (PayWave), ecommerce and advanced fraud capabilities, are the result of sustained investment and global collaboration.
Before reaching for more regulation, we need to understand what impact the current regulation has achieved. To date there is no clear, data-driven evidence to show that the 2022 caps delivered their intended benefits, nor is there a detailed cost-benefit analysis of the further regulation proposed.
And that's important because, in some areas, there have been outcomes that run counter to the original intentions of the regulation. Take surcharging, for example. Despite guidance to encourage businesses to pass on lower costs, surcharging has become more prevalent - not less. This raises serious questions about whether further fee reductions would be passed on to consumers at all.
A comprehensive assessment of what's already occurred is needed before introducing deeper regulatory intervention. Otherwise, how can decision makers be confident that this next step will deliver the intended outcomes?
Regulation should be a response to proven problems
Interchange encourages innovation and competition while contributing to the protection of New Zealand consumers and businesses from card-related fraud.
In countries where card schemes operate under artificially low or compressed interchange, there has been evidence of a lag in terms of development and the introduction of new payments technology. We have a widely-acknowledged local example in Eftpos which, despite its initial success, does not offer contactless payments in New Zealand. This is largely due to Eftpos' zero-cost model which did not generate sufficient returns to re-invest in new technology. Singapore's Competition Commission, by comparison, concluded in 2013 that regulating interchange would create barriers to entry and since then has gone on to develop one of the most advanced digital payment ecosystems in the world.
This is why any changes to how interchange fees are regulated should be grounded in robust analysis - not assumptions or generalisations. Regulation is an important part of a well-functioning market, but it should be balanced and used as a safeguard, not a sledgehammer.
Without a clear demonstration that the current caps have failed, surely pushing ahead with further restrictions is premature, and uncertain. First, we must look at the other levers and elements in the picture.
The risks of getting it wrong
Let's be clear: slashing interchange further, without understanding the ripple effects, risks unintended consequences. We're talking about restricted access to affordable credit – especially for small businesses, and a slowing of New Zealand's economy with impacts on tourism, commerce and foreign direct investment.
Let's focus on commercial cards. Used by many small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) to manage cash flow, commercial cards could become unviable if further interchange caps are applied. A Retail NZ poll found that 92% of its member businesses used a credit card for purchasing business items. With SMBs representing 97% of New Zealand's businesses overall [1], introducing a cap could disproportionately affect their access to commercial credit products to manage their working capital requirements.
When it comes to other methods of payment, all forms from cash to Eftpos, four-party debit and credit card models like Visa, or more expensive credit options like Buy-Now-Pay-Later (BNPL) come at a cost and provide different levels of additional value, convenience and security. While lower interchange may sound appealing, it would reduce the viability to deliver secure and convenient payment experiences.
Our evidence shows that taking action on interchange in one, undifferentiated swoop is likely to have the opposite effect than the Commission intends. It will push consumers and businesses to other credit options, like charge cards or BNPL, which generally have a higher cost for consumers and businesses, immediately negating the benefits of any initial cost saving (and increasing surcharges if nothing else). It will likely result in lower authorisations for everyday payments (which means fewer sales for businesses and more frustration for consumers). And it will limit innovation and restrict choice, essentially shutting the door to new fintech competition entering the New Zealand market in future.
Let's take a measured, evidence-first approach
Visa supports a competitive, innovative, and secure payments environment in New Zealand that delivers great outcomes for consumers, businesses and the economy. And we support regulation that is backed by clear data and designed to deliver long-term value.
At this point, we encourage the Commission to pause, step back, and conduct a full regulatory impact assessment. Without that, we risk undermining the very outcomes we're all trying to achieve.
Because, when it comes to a system that is important in driving economic growth and tourism in New Zealand, we can't afford to get it wrong.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
A slice of Italy in Dunedin's St Clair
By Tess Brunton of RNZ A Dunedin seaside suburb is becoming a haven for Italian expats and foodies alike. It all started with a desire to bring authentic woodfired pizzas to the shores of St Clair more than a decade ago. When Katrina Toovey took over The Esplanade back in 2012, she wanted to embrace the history but thought it was time for a new identity. Less a Kiwi pizza restaurant and more an authentic slice of Italy. But she had no idea the business would help to create a thriving, Italian community. "Almost has been a happy accident and kind of an organic growth so when I did take over, I decided that I wanted to do woodfired pizza and I thought who better to do that than an Italian," she said. Since then, she has helped to bring about 40 or so Italians to Dunedin, saying there was also a stream of people who floated through on working holiday visas as well as a strong foundation of people in the community. This year, she opened two more businesses - Piccolo Bar and Sorella Gelato - both a short stroll away from The Esplanade and St Clair beach. "Sometimes I do look at it and I think 'how did this happen?' There's a whole community of people here including now children who've bubbled up through this business and through finding something that they like in the city and work they enjoy and a supportive environment," Toovey said. Restaurant manager Luca Capece moved over when his best friend, who's a pizza chef, got a job at The Esplanade in 2013. It changed his life. He met his partner there and they now have two kids. "I'm feeling at home here and ... we have a small community, Italian, but what I really enjoy and I was shocked how the Kiwi community treat us. They see us like a family," he said. Capece said it had been a joy being able to speak Italian with other staff and get a taste of home - with a recent staff dinner featuring a traditional polenta dish from his hometown. "When you eat polenta, it brings up all the memories from when your mum was cooking it and you were enjoying it. I come from a big family, we are 10 of us so I remember this big table and then we have some cheese, we have some polenta. It's beautiful," he said. When Esplanade maître d' Vanessa Sanna moved to Dunedin with her Kiwi husband, she knew no one. She started scouting for good Italian food and came across the restaurant. "That was amazing the day that I step in for the first time, where I heard Italians talking to each other so I said 'oh my gosh, this is my place' ... I really missed the little Italian community and being so far away from home," she said. She applied for a job there and has been working there for nearly 10 years. She loved how they shared food after closing, saying it helped to make Italy feel a little closer. There were now about 30 people in their Italian community and they met up to eat and catch up, Sanna said. "This Italian community is growing, many people come see us because they really enjoy this little Italian corner," she said. "It feels like we are in a little Italian coast and you can have your Italian drinks, your Italian food and your Italian gelato, like that's just the cherry on the cake." Gelato maker Marco Adinolfi moved to Dunedin to bring his creations to Sorella Gelato. He wanted to leave Italy for a different lifestyle and was surprised to find an Italian community here. He hoped his wife and two daughters would join him in a few months time, and said there were plans for a feast to welcome them to the southern city. "Every Italian conversation with friends and family, it's about food. All the time my mum or my dad call me 'what did you eat?' It's the first thing so Italian connection with food is very important," he said. He has been trying to combine his knowledge and love for Italian gelato with some New Zealand flavours including a popular scoop inspired by pumpkin pie. "Every flavour I make it's very seasonal. I don't like to use flavouring, chemical flavouring so everything is made by me," he said. He loves clams and discovered he could find wild clams on local beaches. "I go almost every week with my shovel to dig clams," he said. He usually cooked spaghetti with clams for his lunch or dinner most weeks. Katrina Toovey was grateful for the Italians who had uprooted their lives to move to Dunedin and shared their cuisine and culture with the city. "The flavours, the smells, it's all like home and it's all familiar so ... it's like an anchor in a new community and they gravitate towards it," she said. "It makes perfect sense to me, it's kind of what I might do myself when I travel - want the new experiences and then just want the familiar."
Newsroom
11 hours ago
- Newsroom
Supermarkets impervious to bad headlines and court fines
Opinion: If you have the impression the big supermarket chains have been facing a lot of court cases over allegations of abusing competition, heavying suppliers or exploiting customers, then you're not wrong. The Commerce Commission reveals it will be filing civil proceedings against Foodstuffs North Island and its wholesale arm, Gilmours, for alleged cartel conduct. Essentially, it alleges they pressured a big food producer to cancel a deal to supply direct to a hospitality customer, and instead transact via the Foodstuffs firms. We've been hearing these sorts of allegations for more than 10 years now. In 2014, Shane Jones (who was then a Labour MP) sparked an inquiry by claiming in Parliament that New Zealand suppliers were being 'blackmailed' into making payments to the Australian-owned chain Countdown, to ensure their products continued to be stocked. He called it a 'shakedown' and an example of the ruthless 'dingo culture' of Australian corporations. Back then, I remember talking to big Kiwi food suppliers. Really big companies. Companies whose brands are household names. One senior manager at a food multinational told me the supermarket brought in top Australian managers to its south Auckland HQ, to review suppliers' terms. 'Suddenly you get invited into a windowless room at Favona Rd and you get ambushed.' But they were too scared to speak out publicly – 'people are nervous about getting that phone call inviting them to that windowless room' – and that's only slowly starting to change. Today, the focus is on both Woolworths (as Countdown is now branded) and perhaps more so, the New Zealand cooperatives that make up Foodstuffs. It started with the Commerce Commission market study of grocery competition. And from July 2021, one after another, Kiwi suppliers mustered the courage to speak publicly to Newsroom. First Sarah Hedger, the founder of a the small Yum Granola breakfast cereal maker in Nelson. Then Orchard Gold, Bloomsberry Chocolate and even the big fishing company Sealord. Yet just last week, the commission issued a warning to Foodstuffs North Island for its treatment of another supplier, arbitrarily obstructing and delaying the business from raising its wholesale prices. The commission is already prosecuting Woolworths for allegedly misleading consumers about the price they'd pay for groceries, and fake 'specials'. The owners of Foodstuff's Pak'nSave supermarkets in Mill St and Silverdale have pleaded guilty to similar charges. Earlier, Pak'nSave Mangere was fined $78,000 for promotional price discrepancies. The commission has taken action against both supermarket chains over restrictive land covenants. Last year, the High Court penalised Foodstuffs $3.25m for lodging anti-competitive land covenants with the purpose of blocking competitors. There are more ongoing Commerce Commission investigations, that may yet result in criminal charges or civil proceedings. And it's not just the commission that has unscrupulous supermarket behaviour in its crosshairs. Newsroom revealed in 2023 that police had won a judicial order forcing grocery giants Foodstuffs and Woolworths to change the way they do business. It was the result of a test case against Silverstream New World for illegal discounting of alcohol. That was followed last year by the Alcohol Regulation and Licensing Authority ordering more than 30 New World supermarkets' off-licences to be suspended, after a wider police case of illegal discounting. The question has to be, are these bad corporate citizens? Certainly, senior politicians in both National and Labour seem to have drawn that conclusion. Finance Minister Nicola Willis, like her Labour predecessors, has spoken loudly and firmly about her determination to crack down on supermarkets in order to rein in rising food prices. Foodstuffs managing director Chris Quin says his cooperatives are very focused on managing down prices. He claims a basket of food from Pak'nSave compares favourably in price with a basket from Aldi in Australia. He claims Foodstuffs has surveyed New Zealanders and most of them understand that rising prices are driving the continuing food inflation. 'Facts do matter a little bit. I know they can appear pretty complicated, but keeping it simple like that matters,' he told broadcaster Mike Hosking a month ago. 'But none of that makes it easier in terms of households meeting budget.' In response to the latest court case, spokesperson Stefan Herrick says Foodstuffs North Island and its stores are committed to complying with all their regulatory obligations, and cooperated fully with the Commerce Commission throughout its investigation. 'We strongly deny any unlawful conduct,' he says. 'As this matter will be before the court in due course, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.' Jon Duffy, the Consumer NZ chief executive, welcomes the Commerce Commission cases, which he says are difficult for regulators to detect. 'Complainants reporting this type of conduct often face the risk of retribution. When you are dealing with businesses on the scale of supermarkets, targeted retribution could wipe out a supplier's business.' Consumer NZ, too, reports heading off-the-record comments for years, about how supermarkets conduct their business and treat suppliers. 'We understand there is a significant number of other active cases on the commission's books relating to a range of supermarket conduct under the Commerce Act, the Grocery Industry Competition Act and the Fair Trading Act.' Duffy believes the series of cases, with warnings and guilty pleas, could indicate a culture issue within the Foodstuffs North Island cooperative – a belief it can act without consequence. It's got to the extent that last week, Willis said she planned to meet Fonterra chief executive Miles Hurrell to discuss how to get affordable cheese, milk and butter to New Zealanders. Willis said she was interested in how much of the recent price increases were due to Fonterra's wholesale prices, and how much was about a lack of supermarket competition. It's true that last month, Stats NZ figures showed the price of milk was up 15 percent, cheese was up more than 30 percent, and a 500g block of butter had risen 51 percent – and that's not entirely down to rising global dairy prices. This is an exemplar of populist retail politics – and her own coalition partner David Seymour was quick to differentiate Act's position. At the party conference this weekend, he acknowledged concern at people 'driving across the country just to buy butter at Costco in Auckland', but warned that Willis' proposal to break up the private grocery firms would scare off international investment. Jon Duffy acknowledges the politics involved. 'Yes, politicians have got headlines calling out the behaviour of the supermarkets in respect of consumers and suppliers,' he says, 'but that doesn't mean there isn't a significant issue to be addressed'. 'There is a clear difference in robust dealings between commercial actors and what could amount to anti-competitive behaviour. What's been alleged in the proceedings announced today is reminiscent of the excesses of the robber barons of the early 20th century which led to the establishment of competition law in the first place.' What's clear is that 10 years of increasingly robust Commerce Commission action has thus far failed to solve the problem. Chair Dr John Small says the commission does not tolerate this kind of behaviour and will not hesitate to take court action, where appropriate. What's also clear, after 10 years, is the supermarkets seem able to absorb the bad publicity, convictions and fines without it seriously hurting their businesses. They seem impervious. And that goes to the heart of the problem: no matter what Kiwi suppliers and consumers may think of the supermarkets' behaviour, they have few other choices about where to buy and sell their groceries.
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Employment Relations Amendment Bill Passes First Reading
Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden welcomes the successful first reading of the Employment Relations Amendment Bill, calling it a major milestone in helping businesses employ and contract with confidence. The Employment Relations Amendment Bill will now be considered by the Education and Workforce Select Committee where people can have their say on the proposed changes. 'This Bill reflects the Government's commitment to supporting New Zealand businesses and creating more and better opportunities for workers.' The legislation delivers on key commitments from the ACT–National Coalition Agreement, including: Clarifying the distinction between employment and contracting arrangements, giving greater certainty to both businesses and workers. Simplifying the personal grievance process, including the introduction of an income threshold of $180,000, above which unjustified dismissal claims cannot be pursued. This Bill also proposes removing the 30-day rule, allowing employers and employees to negotiate mutually beneficial terms from the start of employment, reducing compliance burden and increasing flexibility. 'I encourage all interested New Zealanders to have their say on the Bill, and I see the Select Committee process as an important way of strengthening the final Bill and making sure it works for a wide variety of working relationships and situations. 'I am particularly interested in hearing feedback on whether the gateway test criteria are workable and whether the test covers a variety of genuine contracting relationships. I am also interested in hearing feedback on the high-income threshold for personal grievances, both from those who may use it as an employer and those who would be affected as a worker. 'I am looking forward to hearing what New Zealanders have to say about the Bill during the Select Committee process,' says Ms van Velden. Notes:
