Bill cutting foreign aid and public broadcasting passes US House
Republicans have said the rescissions package, a political tool to cut funding already approved by Congress, is likely to be the first of many."This isn't the end, it's the beginning," House Speaker Mike Johnson said after the bill was passed.The victory for Republicans and President Trump is the latest development in their ongoing effort to shrink government spending."Nine billion dollars is a good start," House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said.The approved funding cuts include large reductions to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which includes PBS and NPR.It also includes cuts to the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the largest US global humanitarian programme. The spending cuts, however, were slightly smaller than Trump had originally proposed. In the Senate version of the bill, lawmakers voted to keep $400m in the budget for Pepfar, a global Aids prevention programme, bringing the proposed cuts from $9.4bn to $9bn.The bill faced a bit of a rocky path on its way through the House and Senate, with lawmakers on both sides of the isle wary of cuts to foreign aid and public broadcasting.On the day the Senate passed its version of the bill, people in Alaska were told to tune into their local radio station that includes NPR programming after an earthquake that struck off the coast prompted tsunami warnings."Public radio is a lifeline, connecting rural communities to the rest of the nation, and providing life-saving emergency broadcasting and weather alerts. It cannot be replaced," NPR President Katherine Maher said after the Senate passed the bill.According to US media, this rescissions package was the first to succeed in over 30 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Lawmakers want US tech CEOs to address concerns about submarine cables
WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - Three Republican House lawmakers on Monday asked the CEOs of Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, Facebook-parent Meta (META.O), opens new tab, (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab if the tech firms have adopted adequate safeguards to address growing concerns about China and Russia on submarine communications cables. Washington has been raising alarm about the network of more than 400 subsea cables that handle 99% of international internet traffic. The letter signed by Representative John Moolenaar, who chairs a House panel on China and two other Republicans, raised concerns that entities affiliated with China "such as SBSS, Huawei Marine, China Telecom, and China Unicom, have continued to provide maintenance or servicing to cable systems in which your companies maintain direct or indirect operational involvement or ownership."
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Redskins and Indians and Obama (Oh, my): How Trump is deflecting from his Epstein Files bungle using MAGA greatest hits
Donald Trump's efforts to shift his base's focus away from the so-called Epstein Files fallout continued over the weekend as the president dove headfirst back into the culture war and leaned into his own favorite topic: the supposed Deep State's efforts to persecute him. Ahead of a trip to Scotland this week, Trump is desperate to move the news cycle off of accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and a declaration by the Justice Department that a list of the convicted pedophile's co-conspirators did not exist within the files of the DOJ's investigation — despite his dutiful Attorney General Pam Bondi having said she had such files 'sitting on my desk.' What happened next was a wildfire that engulfed the president's online MAGA base and even spread into the broader podcasting 'manosphere.' As explanations from his supporters ranged from confusion to outright accusations of a cover-up, the president fumed privately and in a since-deleted Truth Social post that his 'PAST' supporters refused to move on from the issue. Epstein was known to cultivate relationships with powerful men and institutions, and speculation has swirled online for years around whether any of those men (including Trump, former President Bill Clinton and Britain's Prince Andrew) knew of his crimes or participated themselves during excursions to his private island or other properties. No public evidence exists definitively linking anyone besides Epstein and his society-girl lover Ghislaine Maxwell to the crimes, though evidence of his close friendships with Trump and others is extensive. Epstein's death was ruled a suicide after he was found in a New York City jail cell on Aug. 10, 2019, sparking further cries in MAGA circles of a mass conspiracy. On Thursday, the picture of that relationship between the president and a man who would later be found hanged in his jail cell awaiting trial for sex trafficking of minors and women changed considerably. The Wall Street Journal, a Rupert Murdoch-owned publication, published an article revealing the stomach-churning contents of a supposed 50th birthday card Maxwell curated for her boyfriend in 2003. The card included messages from friends of Epstein including, according to the WSJ, Donald Trump. The paper reports that Maxwell 'collected' a letter from Trump for the card, which alluded to a hidden 'secret' shared by the two men, concluding with Trump allegedly wishing Epstein a happy birthday — all done on top of a marker-drawn bawdy image of a naked woman. The White House and the president directly denied all parts of the Journal's report, including the authenticity of the note. But the president also redoubled his efforts at misdirection, and launched a slew of new efforts to that aim. First came the lawsuit against Murdoch and the Journal — as well as other independent reporters who circulated the story. This was unquestionably where the president saw the most success in the immediate term: turning the issue into a Trump vs. the media fight provides a unifying bogeyman for the right. Supporters including Steve Bannon dialed back their calls for Trump to provide transparency as the reaction to the Journal's reporting clarified that Democrats and Trump's critics see the issue as a political opportunity. Second was the resumption of Trump's war with Barack Obama, who more than any other Democrat has long held the president's political focus. His entrance into national politics during the Obama era began with a racist campaign aimed at questioning the birthplace of the nation's first Black president, and after his first election victory in 2016 Trump accused his predecessor of directing the FBI to spy on his campaign. Trump reignited those accusations this week, with the aid of Tulsi Gabbard, his director of national intelligence. Gabbard published a memo accusing the Obama administration of changing intelligence assessments to support political conclusions, but the crux of her own declaration was centered around a false conflation of the intelligence community's (IC) conclusion that Russia had not attempted to hack directly into voting systems with what the IC actually did conclude: that Russia used bot farms and other means including materials stolen during the verified hack of the Democratic National Committee's servers to influence public opinion. Not satisfied with picking one old fight, Trump picked two others. On Sunday, the president declared on Truth Social that he may attempt to gum up the approval process for the Washington Commanders stadium in the nation's capital if the team did not return to its old name, abandoned for its racist connotations about Native Americans in 2020. He likely does not have any power to actually carry out that threat, given that federal funding isn't involved in the stadium deal. The same could be said about his resumption of hostilities with another nemesis: comedian Rosie O'Donnell. Trump threatened in a separate Truth Social post to strip her citizenship, something the president legally cannot do. All of this is to say: Trump is throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks in a very obvious manner. On Monday, there were signs that many on the right were still unconvinced by the bluster. 'So…the Democrats left all the files implicating themselves in Russia Gate but destroyed all the Epstein Files?' one conservative influencer, Kelly McCarty, snidely asked on X. A number of Democrats have rallied behind a resolution with bipartisan support aimed at forcing the release of the DOJ's entire investigation into Epstein. Those members were undeterred on Friday when Attorney General Pam Bondi moved to ask a court to unseal grand jury testimony regarding Maxwell and Epstein, which they note is just a small part of the evidence collected by federal law enforcement. It also remains the case that much of the uproar was fueled by the Trump White House itself. MAGA supporters and others in the chorus of voices calling for evidence including the 'client list' to be released point to how right-wing influencers were summoned to the White House to receive 'phase 1' of 'The Epstein Files' in February. Vice President JD Vance, before that, fueled the speculation in repeated appearances on Theo Von's podcast, including during the 2024 election. Months later, no one else has faced accountability for associations with Epstein and the extent of his crimes remains unknown to the public.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Laura Loomer hits the ‘trifecta' in Trump's loyalty test and that's why he keeps her around, biographer says
The seamlessness with which far-right activist Laura Loomer fits in with President Donald Trump 's inner circle has made her an easy ally to keep around, a former Trump biographer says. Loomer, 32, has created controversy with her Islamophobic claims but her abiding devotion to the president has led to her having an apparent sway in the firing of some senior officials. It's been widely reported that many of Trump's closest officials are not fans of Loomer, who they see as unpredictable, and aides have attempted to keep Loomer at arms-length from the president. But Michael Wolff, the author of four books about Trump's presidency, says Loomer has the 'trifecta' of what the president wants in an ally. 'She's, what, 30 years old? She looks the part. She's on television often for Donald Trump,' Wolff said on the Daily Beast Podcast this week. 'That's the trifecta. I mean, what's not to like from Donald Trump's point of view?' Loomer, who has the polished, conservative look of other women in Trump's orbit, has shown an unwavering devotion to the president despite having no official role in the administration. That combination serves as a 'comfort blanket system' for Trump, Wolff said. 'He sees that she's very television,' he continued. 'I think she just comes in and she just amuses him.' Loomer appears to be aware of that, too. Speaking to the New York Times earlier this month, Loomer asserted that she maintains a slim figure and always looks her best for the president. That includes purchasing a new outfit anytime she's meeting him. That means she fits right in with the crowd of women that Trump likes to surround himself with, conventionally attractive young women, while also going to bat for him any chance she gets. She's a fierce defender of Trump, using her X platform to call out any person in the administration she believes is not completely loyal to the president. Last week, she went as far as to blame Attorney General Pam Bondi for the Epstein Files debacle and called for Trump to fire her. Her influence with the president has even led to some changes in staffing. In April, Loomer reportedly gave Trump a list of disloyal National Security Council staffers who were subsequently fired.
