'No way' Australia will deploy combat troops in Iran
Australia is considering its next steps after one of its closest allies joined with Israel to bomb Iran, exacerbating volatility in the Middle East.
After days of growing escalation, the US unleashed strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday (AEST) as President Donald Trump declared "there will be peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran".
The Australian government has urged all parties to prioritise diplomacy and dialogue since Israel first launched strikes in mid June.
Though some have raised questions over whether Australia should do more to support its ally, former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said the government was unlikely to get involved in combat.
"There's no way we would put troops on the ground," he told AAP.
"I don't think the government or the political establishment here are suggesting that we just follow whatever the US is going to do.
"I'd be very surprised if there's anybody saying that we, automatically as a result of what the US has done, are now part of that conflict."
Australia has previously provided some resources around shipping lanes but during the recent outbreak of violence, the government has refused to even entertain the possibility of military involvement.
When Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed the government would deploy defence assets to assist evacuation efforts, she repeatedly emphasised that they were not there for combat purposes.
And in the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, a government spokesperson said they "note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace" while continuing to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.
While the coalition has insisted it does not want war, acting foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said the opposition supported the US bombings and claimed it was a "necessary action to take".
However, the American strikes have also been labelled as a "terrifying and catastrophic escalation" with the Greens warning further violence from Israel or the US would impact ordinary Iranian civilians.
Former Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said Australia's respond to the bombings would be defining."Australia should welcome US bombing of Iran's nuclear program," Mr Downer said on X.
"We've been a US ally since 1951 as well as a consistent supporter of nuclear non-proliferation."
About 2600 Australians in Iran are seeking assisted departures from the region, alongside about 1200 in Israel as the government urges travellers not to venture to either nation.
Staff from the Department of Foreign Affairs have been evacuated from the Tehran embassy and are helping Australians leave through the border in Azerbaijan.
Mr Sinodinos warned the future of Iran was uncertain as strikes could lead to the collapse of the country's regime.
Australia is considering its next steps after one of its closest allies joined with Israel to bomb Iran, exacerbating volatility in the Middle East.
After days of growing escalation, the US unleashed strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday (AEST) as President Donald Trump declared "there will be peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran".
The Australian government has urged all parties to prioritise diplomacy and dialogue since Israel first launched strikes in mid June.
Though some have raised questions over whether Australia should do more to support its ally, former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said the government was unlikely to get involved in combat.
"There's no way we would put troops on the ground," he told AAP.
"I don't think the government or the political establishment here are suggesting that we just follow whatever the US is going to do.
"I'd be very surprised if there's anybody saying that we, automatically as a result of what the US has done, are now part of that conflict."
Australia has previously provided some resources around shipping lanes but during the recent outbreak of violence, the government has refused to even entertain the possibility of military involvement.
When Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed the government would deploy defence assets to assist evacuation efforts, she repeatedly emphasised that they were not there for combat purposes.
And in the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, a government spokesperson said they "note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace" while continuing to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.
While the coalition has insisted it does not want war, acting foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said the opposition supported the US bombings and claimed it was a "necessary action to take".
However, the American strikes have also been labelled as a "terrifying and catastrophic escalation" with the Greens warning further violence from Israel or the US would impact ordinary Iranian civilians.
Former Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said Australia's respond to the bombings would be defining."Australia should welcome US bombing of Iran's nuclear program," Mr Downer said on X.
"We've been a US ally since 1951 as well as a consistent supporter of nuclear non-proliferation."
About 2600 Australians in Iran are seeking assisted departures from the region, alongside about 1200 in Israel as the government urges travellers not to venture to either nation.
Staff from the Department of Foreign Affairs have been evacuated from the Tehran embassy and are helping Australians leave through the border in Azerbaijan.
Mr Sinodinos warned the future of Iran was uncertain as strikes could lead to the collapse of the country's regime.
Australia is considering its next steps after one of its closest allies joined with Israel to bomb Iran, exacerbating volatility in the Middle East.
After days of growing escalation, the US unleashed strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday (AEST) as President Donald Trump declared "there will be peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran".
The Australian government has urged all parties to prioritise diplomacy and dialogue since Israel first launched strikes in mid June.
Though some have raised questions over whether Australia should do more to support its ally, former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said the government was unlikely to get involved in combat.
"There's no way we would put troops on the ground," he told AAP.
"I don't think the government or the political establishment here are suggesting that we just follow whatever the US is going to do.
"I'd be very surprised if there's anybody saying that we, automatically as a result of what the US has done, are now part of that conflict."
Australia has previously provided some resources around shipping lanes but during the recent outbreak of violence, the government has refused to even entertain the possibility of military involvement.
When Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed the government would deploy defence assets to assist evacuation efforts, she repeatedly emphasised that they were not there for combat purposes.
And in the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, a government spokesperson said they "note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace" while continuing to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.
While the coalition has insisted it does not want war, acting foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said the opposition supported the US bombings and claimed it was a "necessary action to take".
However, the American strikes have also been labelled as a "terrifying and catastrophic escalation" with the Greens warning further violence from Israel or the US would impact ordinary Iranian civilians.
Former Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said Australia's respond to the bombings would be defining."Australia should welcome US bombing of Iran's nuclear program," Mr Downer said on X.
"We've been a US ally since 1951 as well as a consistent supporter of nuclear non-proliferation."
About 2600 Australians in Iran are seeking assisted departures from the region, alongside about 1200 in Israel as the government urges travellers not to venture to either nation.
Staff from the Department of Foreign Affairs have been evacuated from the Tehran embassy and are helping Australians leave through the border in Azerbaijan.
Mr Sinodinos warned the future of Iran was uncertain as strikes could lead to the collapse of the country's regime.
Australia is considering its next steps after one of its closest allies joined with Israel to bomb Iran, exacerbating volatility in the Middle East.
After days of growing escalation, the US unleashed strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities on Sunday (AEST) as President Donald Trump declared "there will be peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran".
The Australian government has urged all parties to prioritise diplomacy and dialogue since Israel first launched strikes in mid June.
Though some have raised questions over whether Australia should do more to support its ally, former ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said the government was unlikely to get involved in combat.
"There's no way we would put troops on the ground," he told AAP.
"I don't think the government or the political establishment here are suggesting that we just follow whatever the US is going to do.
"I'd be very surprised if there's anybody saying that we, automatically as a result of what the US has done, are now part of that conflict."
Australia has previously provided some resources around shipping lanes but during the recent outbreak of violence, the government has refused to even entertain the possibility of military involvement.
When Foreign Minister Penny Wong revealed the government would deploy defence assets to assist evacuation efforts, she repeatedly emphasised that they were not there for combat purposes.
And in the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, a government spokesperson said they "note the US president's statement that now is the time for peace" while continuing to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.
While the coalition has insisted it does not want war, acting foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said the opposition supported the US bombings and claimed it was a "necessary action to take".
However, the American strikes have also been labelled as a "terrifying and catastrophic escalation" with the Greens warning further violence from Israel or the US would impact ordinary Iranian civilians.
Former Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said Australia's respond to the bombings would be defining."Australia should welcome US bombing of Iran's nuclear program," Mr Downer said on X.
"We've been a US ally since 1951 as well as a consistent supporter of nuclear non-proliferation."
About 2600 Australians in Iran are seeking assisted departures from the region, alongside about 1200 in Israel as the government urges travellers not to venture to either nation.
Staff from the Department of Foreign Affairs have been evacuated from the Tehran embassy and are helping Australians leave through the border in Azerbaijan.
Mr Sinodinos warned the future of Iran was uncertain as strikes could lead to the collapse of the country's regime.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
39 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Iran threatens US with ‘everlasting consequences' after strikes on nuclear sites
The US has attacked three nuclear sites in Iran in what President Trump has described as a spectacular military success. Three sites were targeted, two using the world's most powerful non-nuclear bomb. Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs Abbas says the strikes are a "grave violation" of international law and will have "everlasting consequences". The operation was codenamed Midnight Hammer and involved more than 125 aircraft. At 2:10 am local time, the US dropped the first bunker buster bomb on Fordow, a Uranium enrichment site, hidden in a remote mountainside vital to Iran's nuclear ambitions. The US then hit two other nuclear sites, Natanz, another Uranium enrichment facility, and Isfahan, a significant research base understood to store much of Iran's enriched uranium. Isfahan was struck with Tomahawk missiles launched from a US submarine, rather than B-2 stealth bombers.
Perth Now
39 minutes ago
- Perth Now
How the US struck Iran's nuclear facilities
Fresh details about the US military operation against Iran have emerged, revealing a sophisticated deception tactic involving B-2 stealth bombers. As Operation 'Midnight Hammer' got underway on Saturday, a group of B-2 bombers took off from their base in Missouri and were noticed heading out toward the Pacific island of Guam, in what experts saw as possible pre-positioning for any US decision to strike Iran. But they were a decoy. The real group of seven bat-winged, B-2 stealth bombers flew east undetected for 18 hours, keeping communications to a minimum, refuelling in mid-air, the US military revealed on Sunday. As the bombers neared Iranian airspace, a US submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles. US fighter jets flew as decoys in front of the bombers to sweep for any Iranian fighter jets and missiles. The attack on Iran's three main nuclear sites was the largest operational strike ever by B-2 stealth bombers, and the second-longest B-2 operation ever flown, surpassed only by those following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States by al Qaeda. Washington detailed the resounding tactical success of Operation "Midnight Hammer". (AP PHOTO) Credit: AAP The B-2 bombers dropped 14 bunker-busting GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 13,600 kg. The operation involved over 125 US military aircraft, according to the Pentagon. From the US military's perspective, the operation was a resounding tactical success. The Iranians were unable to get off a single round at the American aircraft and were caught completely flat-footed, General Dan Caine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon on Sunday. 'Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface-to-air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission,' Mr Caine said. 'We retained the element of surprise.' Mr Caine said initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites targeted sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was more confident. 'It was clear we devastated the Iranian nuclear program,' he said, standing alongside Caine in the Pentagon briefing room. Midnight Hammer was highly classified, Mr Caine said, 'with very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature of the plan.' Many senior officials in the United States only learned of it on Saturday night from President Donald Trump's first post on social media. Mr Hegseth said it took months of preparations to ensure the US military would be ready if Mr Trump ordered the strikes. Mr Caine said the mission itself, however, came together in just a matter of weeks. - With AAP
9 News
42 minutes ago
- 9 News
'Obliterated' or 'quite superficial'? What's really happened to Iran's nuclear sites
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Warplanes. Submarines. Cruise missiles. Bombs that weigh more than 13 tons. After initially favouring diplomacy, US President Donald Trump resorted to an extraordinary use of force against Iran on Saturday night, striking three of the regime's key nuclear sites. Trump claimed Iran's nuclear facilities had been "obliterated," but some Iranian officials downplayed the impact of the strikes – just as they did when Israel first struck Iran's facilities on June 13. A file photo from inside the Fordow facility that was released by Iran in 2020. (EPA/AAP) With satellite imagery of the overnight strikes beginning to emerge, here's what we know about the damage the US inflicted on Iran's nuclear program. Fordow is Iran's most important nuclear enrichment facility, buried deep inside a mountain to guard it from attacks. The main halls are believed to be some 80 to 90 metres below ground. Analysts have long said that the US was the only military in the world with the kind of bomb required to burrow that deeply – the enormous, 13-ton GBU-57. The US used six B2 bombers to drop 12 of those "bunker-busting" bombs on the site, a US official told CNN. A CNN analysis of satellite imagery showed that the US strikes left at least six large craters at the Fordow site, pointing to the use of bunker-busting bombs. The images, captured by Maxar, showed six separate impact craters in two nearby locations at Fordow. The craters are visible along a ridge running over the underground complex. Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, told CNN that there had been a "direct kinetic impact" on Fordow, but that it was too soon to judge whether it had caused internal damage to the underground site. "Of course, one cannot exclude (the possibility) that there is significant damage there," he said. A satellite image of Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant in Iran, as it was in 2004. (Maxar Technologies via CNN Newsource) David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), told CNN that the satellite imagery suggested "a considerable amount of damage could have been done to the enrichment hall and adjacent halls that provide support to enrichment." "Total destruction of the underground hall is quite possible," Albright said, while stressing that a full assessment of the damage would take time. NR Jenzen-Jones, a munitions specialist and director of the research company Armament Research Services (ARES), concurred that there were at least six entry points in Fordow following the US strikes. "The larger, central entry holes in the two groupings have irregular shapes and suggest multiple munitions struck the same precise location," Jenzen-Jones told CNN. "This is consistent with the theory of an attack on such a deeply buried target as the Fordow site, which would require multiple precisely delivered, and carefully calibrated, penetrating munitions to essentially 'smash' and blast their way through to the deeper, more protected areas of the site," he added. Satellite imagery also showed significant changes to the color of the mountainside where the facility is housed, indicating a vast area was covered with a layer of grey ash in the aftermath of the strikes. A CNN analysis of imagery collected before the US strikes suggested Iran had taken steps to reinforce the entrances to the tunnels believed to lead into the underground facility, likely in anticipation of a coming strike. That imagery showed dirt piled up in front of at least two of the six entrances. Although Iran's foreign minister said the US had crossed a "very big red line," other Iranian leaders downplayed the strikes' impact. Manan Raeisi, a politician representing the city of Qom, near Fordow, said the damage from the attack was "quite superficial". But Albright, of the ISIS, told CNN that initial reports from Iran "should be dismissed". He said that, during previous rounds of strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Tehran has soft-pedaled their impact, only for satellite imagery to tell a very different story. Natanz is the site of Iran's largest nuclear enrichment centre and was targeted in Israel's initial attack on Iran on June 13. The site has six above-ground buildings and three underground structures, which house centrifuges – a key technology in nuclear enrichment, turning uranium into nuclear fuel. The above-ground facilities were damaged in Israel's initial attack. The IAEA said the strikes damaged electrical infrastructure at the plant. Although it is not clear if Israel's strikes caused direct damage to the underground facilities, the IAEA said the loss of power to the underground cascade hall "may have damaged the centrifuges there." A file image taken in 2007 of an anti-aircraft gun position at Iran's nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz. (AP) The US also targeted Natanz in its Saturday night operation. A US official said a B2 bomber had dropped two bunker-busting bombs on the site. US Navy submarines also fired 30 TLAM cruise missiles at Natanz and Isfahan, the third Iranian site targeted by the US. A CNN analysis of satellite imagery showed two new craters had emerged at the site, likely caused by the bunker-busting bombs. The craters – one with a diameter of around 5.5 metres, the other around 3.2 metres, according to the Maxar images – sit directly above parts of the complex located underground. The extent of the underground damage at the site is unclear at this time. Isfahan, in central Iran, is home to the country's largest nuclear research complex. The facility was built with support from China and opened in 1984, according to the non-profit Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). Some 3000 scientists are employed at Isfahan, NTI says, and the site is "suspected of being the centre" of Iran's nuclear program. Following the US strikes, at least 18 destroyed or partially destroyed structures could be seen in satellite imagery, a CNN analysis found. The site was visibly blackened by the degree of rubble thrown up by the strikes. Albright said initial reports suggested that the US also struck tunnel complexes near the Isfahan site, "where they typically store enriched uranium." If confirmed, Albright said this would show that the US was trying to take out Iran's stocks of uranium that had been enriched to 20 per cent and 60 per cent. Weapons-grade uranium is enriched to 90 per cent. CNN could not independently verify reports that tunnel complexes near the Isfahan site were targeted. At a Pentagon news conference yesterday, General Dan Caine, US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said a US submarine had "launched more than a dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles against key surface infrastructure targets" at the Isfahan site. Israel Iran Conflict World USA Donald Trump nuclear CONTACT US
