
PIL on 'detention' of Bengali-speaking migrant workers: SC seeks replies of Centre, states
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, however, refused to pass any interim order with regard to the detention, saying any order will have consequences especially with respect to people, who genuinely came from across the borders.
"States where these migrant workers are working have the right to inquire from their state of origin about their bonafide but the problem is in the interregnum. If we pass any interim orders, then it will have consequences, especially those who have illegally come from across the border and need to be deported under the law. If someone enters illegally, detaining may be necessary; otherwise they could disappear before verification,' the bench said.
It asked advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for petitioner West Bengal Migrant Welfare Board, to wait till the Centre and nine states – Odisha, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Delhi, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Haryana and West Bengal filed their responses.
Bhushan alleged harassment of people by the states only because they were Bengali speaking and possessed documents in the language on the basis of a circular issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs .
"They are being detained while an inquiry is being held about their bonafide and in some cases, they are even tortured. Kindly pass some interim order that no detention will be held. I have no problem with enquiries but there should not be any detention," Bhushan submitted.
Bhushan said some deported persons were brought back after verification but he flagged the arbitrary enforcement of the MHA order.
The bench said some mechanism was required to be developed to ensure genuine citizens were not harassed.
Justice Kant suggested the presence of a nodal agency to coordinate between home and work states and help in establishing the bonafide of the migrant workers.
Justice Bagchi said the scale of migration from eastern states to the northern and southern states was "too much" and a nodal agency could help in managing the verification process.
The PIL raised alleged systemic and arbitrary detention of migrant workers and labourers specially from West Bengal by various other states.
"Instant petition challenges the legality of such detentions of migrant workers, particularly in light of the Ministry of Home Affairs'. Letter dated May 2, 2025, which authorises inter-state verification and detention of suspected illegal immigrants," it said.
The plea said migrant workers from West Bengal, predominantly employed in low-income and informal sectors in various states, are facing systemic social exclusion based on linguistic basis, economic insecurity, and precarious living conditions in detainer states.
"Despite their lawful citizenship, a section of individuals are subjected to discriminatory action/detention practices solely on the basis of their regional origin, linguistic identity, or socioeconomic status," it said.
The plea said such discrimination violates Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution, which guarantee equality before law and prohibit discrimination on grounds including place of birth.
"The detention policies reinforce harmful stereotypes and unfounded suspicion against inter-State Bengali migrants, undermining constitutional principles of equality and fraternity," it said.
Arguing that the detentions are conducted without lawful procedures, the plea said this mass and arbitrary detention of Bengali migrants on the ground of using Bangladeshi language directly infringes on their right to personal liberty under Article 21.
"The authorities in the detainer states have repeatedly failed to follow due process for identification of citizenship. There is a serious lack of proper verification of identity or citizenship, coordination with police or families in West Bengal, and institutional framework for verification before they are detained," it said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Minister, too, worried over delayed college admission
Kolkata: State education minister Bratya Basu has expressed concern over the impasse related to the undergraduate admission due to legal ambiguity. On Thursday, Basu said: "We are also concerned over the publication of the Joint Entrance results. There is overactivity aimed at halting the admission process, despite the Supreme Court directive. " A huge number of students who want to enrol in undergraduate courses and engineering colleges are still uncertain about the start of the admission process. The West Bengal Joint Entrance Board was preparing to publish the results, but the high court ordered a stay on it. The entire matter is pending before the court. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata | Gold Rates Today in Kolkata | Silver Rates Today in Kolkata The HS results were published on May 7. Since then, three months have passed, but undergraduate admissions have not started yet due to the unresolved reservation matters. Around 3.5 lakh candidates applied through the centralized admission portal, while over 1 lakh candidates appeared for the WBJEE test to get admission to BTech courses. An official from the higher education department said, "This year, quite a good number of students from other states applied through the centralized portal, but we don't know how many of them will actually take admission. " Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
TMC MP Samirul Islam moves SC over alleged harassment of Bengali-speaking migrant workers in BJP-ruled states
Kolkata: Trinamool Rajya Sabha MP Samirul Islam on Thursday filed a PIL in the Supreme Court over the alleged 'unlawful detention, torture, harassment, and atrocities against thousands of Bengali-speaking migrant workers in multiple BJP-ruled states'. Independence Day 2025 Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji gave India its own currency Swadeshi 2.0: India is no longer just a market, it's a maker The division bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, heard the PIL on Thursday. The Supreme Court has directed all the states and the Union government to file an affidavit in response to the allegations mentioned in the PIL. The next date of hearing has been scheduled for August 25. The MP said he filed the PIL on behalf of the West Bengal Migrant Workers ' Welfare Board, of which he is chairman. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas Prices In Dubai Might Be More Affordable Than You Think Villas In Dubai | Search Ads Get Quote Undo 'There are many who were illegally sent to Bangladesh despite being Bengali-speaking Indian citizens. In the PIL, I have named the Union government and the state authorities of Odisha, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Delhi, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Haryana as respondents,' he posted on X. 'I approached the apex court seeking justice for those poor people who built the nation through their precious will continue the legal fight for justice for Bengali-speaking people till our last breath. Under the leadership of chief minister Mamata Banerjee , we will continue protesting against the Bangla Birodhis and ensure their defeat. This country belongs to all of us,' Islam said. Live Events The board has been fighting the cause of migrant labourers for quite long. Calling the detention of Bengali-speaking migrant workers in BJP-ruled states as 'illegal' and "more dangerous than emergency', Banerjee dared to keep her in a detention camp. There were many instances of Bengali-speaking migrants workers' detainment in various parts of the country, including in Odisha, Rajasthan, Delhi and Maharashtra, in the recent past. Banerjee has said there were 22 lakh migrant workers from Bengal work in different states.


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pahalgam-like incident can't be ignored: SC on J&K statehood
The apex court on Thursday remarked that the "ground situation" in Jammu and Kashmir must be factored in before restoring its statehood. A bench headed by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai verbally observed that "incidents like Pahalgam cannot be ignored". The bench also sought a response from the Centre on the matter. Independence Day 2025 Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji gave India its own currency Swadeshi 2.0: India is no longer just a market, it's a maker The bench, at the request of solicitor general Tushar Mehta , granted the Centre eight weeks to furnish its response. Mehta said the Centre had assured statehood after elections. "There is a peculiar position in this part of our country. I don't know why this issue is being agitated now. This particular state is not the correct state to muddy the water," he added. Representing petitioners, senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan contended that the court in its 2023 judgment, while upholding the abrogation of Article 370 , had trusted the word of the Centre that statehood will be granted to J&K. Hence, that bench had refrained from deciding the issue. "It has been 21 months since that judgment," he added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo The plea by college teacher Zahoor Ahmed Bhat and activist Khurshid Ahmad Malik contends that failure to restore statehood is gravely affecting the rights of people. The miscellaneous application argues that since the assembly elections were conducted peacefully, there would be no security concerns in case SC passed a direction to restore statehood.