VS Achuthanandan, Former Chief Minister Of Kerala, Dies At 101
Veteran CPM leader and former Kerala Chief Minister VS Achuthanandan died on Monday, after a long hospitalization. The 101-year-old was admitted to a private hospital in Thiruvananthapuram on June 23 after he suffered a suspected cardiac arrest at home. He had been in the intensive care unit on ventilator support.
Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and CPM state secretary MV Govindan have rushed to the hospital to meet the family and speak to the attending doctors. A steady stream of political leaders are already making a beeline for the hospital to pay their respects.
The veteran leader had been staying alternately with his son or daughter in Thiruvananthapuram since he quit as the Chairman of the Administrative Reforms Committee in January 2021.
A towering figure in Kerala's political landscape, Achutanandan's populist stance and uncompromising image won him admiration across party lines.
Achuthanandan had been the Leader of the Opposition from 2001 to 2006, when he had spearheaded the attack on the UDF government led by AK Antony. In 2006, he had led the CPM-led Left Democratic Front to victory and served as Chief Minister from 2006 to 2011.
In 2011, he crafted the LDF campaign and leading from the front, came close to securing a second term, but the Oommen Chandy-led UDF managed a narrow win, securing 72 seats in the 140-member Assembly.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Soon, Haryana's Saini govt to recruit for 24,800 junior-level posts
After recruiting nearly 24,000 youths for government jobs during the oath ceremony in October 2024, the Nayab Singh Saini-led government is now set to offer an additional 24,800 junior-level posts in the coming months. To shortlist candidates for Group-C positions, one round of the Common Eligibility Test (CET) has already been conducted, while preparations are underway for the next exam. Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini's media secretary Praveen Attrey told The Indian Express on Thursday that 'as many as 24,800 posts for Group C and Group D would be filled after another round of Common Eligibility Test (CET)'. The CET, organised by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission (HSSC), serves as a preliminary written examination to screen candidates for government roles. The Group C posts include various roles such as junior engineers, clerks, excise and taxation inspectors, auditors, assistant managers, patwaris, and male and female police constables, while Group D roles in Haryana include various entry-level positions in government departments, including peon, animal attendant, helper, gardener, cook and water carrier. The CET for Group-C posts, held on July 26 and 27, saw participation from nearly 12.22 lakh eligible candidates. Conducted over the weekend at 1,350 centres across the state, the exam registered an exceptional 92% turnout. HSSC chairman Himmat Singh described this level of attendance as 'a possible national record', noting that it was 'far beyond the usual 55–60% seen in competitive exams'. In the next phase, the main examination for Group-C recruitment will be conducted, with participation open to a candidate pool 10 times the number of available positions. The CET for Group-D posts is expected to be held in September, with officials anticipating participation from nearly 17 lakh candidates. The scale of this exercise will require extensive logistical coordination. So far, appointments to Group-D posts have been made solely based on performance in the Common Eligibility Test (CET). The schedule for the second exam of Group-C posts is not yet clear, but it will likely be held this year only, the officials said. Excited over the successful execution of the recent CET, Himmat Singh said: 'We have received calls from some commissions that also execute competitive exams for government jobs. They are keen to know how we executed such an exam involving lakhs of candidates successfully.' He added: 'Officials from some of the commissions have even planned to visit Haryana to see the system and pattern adopted for successful execution of the exam.' To support candidates logistically, Haryana transport authorities had operated more than 30,000 bus rounds, providing free transportation. In partnership with social organisations, the government also arranged overnight lodging for candidates travelling from distant areas. 'Through AI-based monitoring and CCTV, incidents like cheating and paper leaks were completely prevented. We kept a close watch on all centres, and now the CCTV footage will be reviewed to prepare the final report. This technological approach not only enhances transparency but also instils trust in fairness among candidates,' Singh remarked. CM Saini inspected arrangements in Panchkula, issuing directions to officials to ensure every possible assistance was extended to candidates. Saini said: 'Our goal is that every youth receives their rightful due, and we will make every possible effort to achieve this.' Sukhbir Siwach's extensive and in-depth coverage of farmer agitation against three farm laws during 2020-21 drew widespread attention. ... Read More
NDTV
14 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Weaponising Economy To "Dictate Its Will" To Iran, India: Tehran
Iran on Thursday accused the United States of weaponizing the economy and using sanctions as tools to "dictate its will on independent nations" such as Iran and India and impede their growth and development. "The United States continues to weaponize the economy and use sanctions as tools to dictate its will on independent nations such as Iran and India and impede their growth and development. These coercive discriminatory actions violate the principles of international law and national sovereignty, representing a modern form of economic imperialism," the Embassy of Iran in India posted on X. "Resisting such policies is a stand for a more powerful emerging non Western-led multilateral world order and a stronger Global South," it added. The reaction came less than 24 hours after US President Donald Trump announced that he will levy a 25 per cent tariff on India and a penalty for buying Russian oil, starting August 1. Meanwhile, the Iranian Foreign Ministry on Thursday described the new US sanctions against Iran's oil trade as a "malicious act" aimed at damaging the country's economic development and the well-being of its people. Strongly condemning the imposition of new sanctions by the US against a group of Iranian individuals, entities, and vessels related to Iran's oil and energy sector, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baqaei described the "oppressive sanctions" as clear evidence of the hostility of US decision-makers toward the Iranian people. "The Foreign Ministry spokesperson further stressed that Washington's addiction to unilateralist behavior and its reliance on illegal and coercive tools to pursue illegitimate objectives at the international level, as well as its flagrant disregard for the rule of law and human rights, has made a mockery of the fundamental principles of international law, including respect for state sovereignty and the freedom of interstate trade, putting the world at unprecedented risk," read a statement issued by the Iranian Foreign Ministry. Addressing the media in Tehran, Baqaei said that these unilateral and illegal sanctions are criminal in nature, violate the fundamental principles and norms of international law and human rights, and constitute a crime against humanity.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Judges grill Trump over use of emergency powers for 'reciprocal tariffs'
US appeals court judges sharply questioned on Thursday whether President Donald Trump's tariffs were justified by the president's emergency powers, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., is considering the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of US trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. In hearing arguments in two cases brought by five small US businesses and 12 Democratic-led US states, judges pressed government lawyer Brett Shumate to explain how the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, gave Trump the power to impose tariffs. Trump is the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs. "IEEPA doesn't even say tariffs, doesn't even mention them," one of the judges said. Shumate said that the law allows for "extraordinary" authority in an emergency, including the ability to stop imports completely. He said IEEPA authorizes tariffs because it allows a president to "regulate" imports in a crisis. The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under IEEPA and that the US Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. Neal Katyal, a lawyer for the businesses, said the government's justification for the tariffs amounted to "a breathtaking claim to power that no president has asserted in years." The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all US trading partners - mark the first test before a US appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent US trade imbalances and declining US manufacturing power. He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing US borders. The countries have denied that claim. Shumate cited a 1975 appeals court decision that authorized President Richard Nixon's across-the board surcharge of 10% on imported merchandise to slow inflation. But that decision added that the president did not have authority to impose "whatever tariff rates he deems desirable." Shumate also said that courts cannot review a president's actions under IEEPA or impose additional limits that are not included in the law. Several judges said that the argument would essentially allow one law, IEEPA, to overwrite all other US laws related to tariffs and imports. The case is being heard by a panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the US Supreme Court. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS Tariffs are starting to build into a significant revenue source for the federal government, with customs duties in June quadrupling to about $27 billion, a record, and through June have topped $100 billion for the current fiscal year. That income could be crucial to offset lost revenue from Trump's tax bill passed into law earlier this month. But economists say the duties threaten to raise prices for US consumers and reduce corporate profits. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted US companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the US Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an August 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority.
