PVMA seeks removal of Section 8B of Sales Tax Act in budget
KARACHI: Sheikh Umar Rehan, Chairman of the Pakistan Vanaspati Manufacturers Association (PVMA) has urged the federal government, Finance Minister Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb, and the Chairman of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to abolish Section 8B of the Sales Tax Act for the edible oil and ghee industry in the upcoming federal budget.
Currently, Section 8B mandates the advance withholding of 10% of input costs, which Sheikh Rehan described as an unfair burden on an industry that deals with essential food products.
'This clause should not apply to the edible oil and ghee sector, which is already under immense financial pressure due to multiple layers of taxation,' he said.
He emphasized that the industry is grappling with rising production costs, which it can no longer sustain. One of the key challenges, he noted, is the delay in the release of billions of rupees in sales tax refunds, currently held up by the FBR.
'Timely disbursement of these refunds is essential to ensure manufacturers have the working capital they need,' Rehan added.
He explained that if refunds are paid on time, the industry would not need to rely on expensive bank loans, which would significantly lower production costs. 'Ultimately, this would lead to a reduction in the prices of ghee and cooking oil — benefiting consumers directly.'
Sheikh Umar Rehan stressed that if the government aims to curb inflation, it must adopt industry-friendly policies. He highlighted the removal of Section 8B and the prompt payment of sales tax refunds as critical steps toward stabilizing the edible oil sector and providing economic relief to the public.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan debt stock reaches all-time high of Rs75trn
KARACHI: The federal government's total debt stock surged by over Rs 6 trillion during the first ten months of this fiscal year (FY25) due to massive borrowing to finance the budget deficit. According to a statistic released by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) on Wednesday, the central government's total debt, comprising domestic and external liabilities, rose by 9 percent during July-April of FY25. Overall, the stock reached an all-time high level of Rs 74.936 trillion by the end of April 2025 compared to Rs 68.914 trillion as of June 2024, depicting an increase of Rs 6.022 trillion. The major growth in debt stocks was attributed to domestic borrowings, which rose by 11.37 percent or Rs 5.363 trillion to reach Rs 52.523 trillion in April 2025 up from Rs 47.16 trillion in June 2024. The domestic debt comprised long-term loans worth Rs 44.132 trillion and short-term borrowings amounting to Rs 8.328 trillion. Pakistan govt's debt stock soars to Rs73.6trn by March-end External debt, in rupee terms, saw an increase of Rs 659 billion during the first ten months of FY25, reaching Rs 22.413 trillion by the end of April 2025 compared to Rs 21.754 trillion in June 2024. The SBP reported that the Weighted Average Customer Exchange Rate of the US dollar was Rs 278.3668 in June 2024 and Rs 280.9739 in April 2025. The federal government's debt showed a notable increase of Rs 1.248 trillion in April 2025 due to massive borrowing to finance the budget deficit. On a month-on-month (MoM) basis, the federal government's debt stock rose by 2 percent from Rs 73.688 trillion in March 2025 to Rs 74.936 trillion in April 2025. Analysts noted that the tax collection by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) is 26 percent higher during the first eleven (July-May) months of this fiscal year compared to previous year; however, cumulatively FBR has failed to achieve the target. The shortfall in revenue collection has compelled the federal government to borrow from domestic and external resources. FBR had missed its revenue collection target by some one trillion rupees in the first eleven months of this fiscal year due to lower imports and slowing economic growth. The FBR has collected some Rs10.233 trillion between July-May of FY25 as against the budgetary target of Rs11.241 trillion for the same period. The SBP has already emphasised the need for a sharp acceleration in tax revenue growth to meet the annual targets. Achieving the primary balance target remains a significant challenge for the government. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Cashless economy at crossroads
Listen to article As Pakistan's informal economy swells to $140 billion, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif faces a choice between incentivising people by offering lower taxes to encourage digital payments or imposing higher costs on cash transactions for government payments and utility bills. An expert committee on the cashless economy, made up of public and private sector representatives, recently submitted recommendations to the PM. Their approach centres around a "carrot and stick" policy. If the PM chooses incentives, he will have to lower sales tax and petroleum levies. But if he opts for penalties, people will pay more when making payments to the government or buying fuel and other utilities. Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb is set to announce the new budget on June 10. It will be clarified whether the government will focus on incentivising digital payments or punishing cash use. Previous punishment policies targeting non-filers with higher taxes have failed to deliver results. "It is up to the government whether to incentivise digital payments or punish cash users," said a committee member in background talks. The committee offered four key recommendations, presenting both options to the government. The first calls for mandating acceptance of digital payments by empowering district authorities to enforce the use of the RAAST QR code — an instant payment method — at all retail outlets. Local authorities should ensure the presence of RAAST QR codes and penalise merchants for inactivity. The committee expects that within a year, one million active RAAST QR codes could be operational if enforced effectively. "The solution lies with QR codes, not credit cards," said a committee member. "There are only 2 million credit cards and 50,000 card readers, but Pakistan has five million retail outlets." Merchants charge 1.5% fees on credit card payments, but only 1% on RAAST payments, the member added. The committee estimated that the informal economy makes up 35% of the economy, translating to $140 billion today. The government must choose to incentivise or punish, but past experience shows punishments don't work. One major recommendation is to reduce the sales tax on digital payments from 18% to 5%, along with a three-year tax audit break for digital transactions. The committee also proposed eliminating customs duties on digital payment-related equipment. They believe these incentives could double digital transactions within six months. When the committee approached the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) about tax cuts, the FBR said the International Monetary Fund (IMF) would oppose it. However, the IMF told the committee it had no objection and threw the ball back in FBR's court. On the punishment side, the committee suggested making cash payments more expensive. They recommended imposing a surcharge on over-the-counter government payments, capping cash-on-delivery payments, and removing sales tax incentives on cash-on-delivery. One punitive proposal is to increase petrol prices by 1% or Rs3 per litre for cash payments. With 12,000 petrol stations nationwide and 70% of customers on motorcycles, this could be a significant deterrent. The committee believes the punishment policy could cut cash circulation by 2% of GDP, about Rs2.6 trillion. It also suggested that all government paymentssuch as those to Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) beneficiaries or contractorsshould be made digitally. This would require mandatory installation of RAAST QR codes at all government payment points within six months and creating digital wallets for every government disbursement, starting with BISP. If successful, this could add 20 million new bank accounts within 18 months, the committee said. The government introduced the non-filer category in 2013 to broaden the tax base. However, over 12 years, it has become a tool to extract higher taxes rather than expand the base. Utility bills are also being used to collect taxes, hurting sectors like telecommunications. The telecom industry demands exemption from withholding tax deductions, similar to the banking sector. Telecom companies face deductions on thousands of transactions, such as electricity bills for cell towers. This raises compliance costs and administrative burdens. Verifying tax claims on these bills is also difficult for authorities, adding to the operational load. The industry argues withholding tax on telecom services should not be treated as a minimum tax, which applies even during loss-making years. Current harsh recovery measures disrupt business and undermine taxpayer confidence. CMOs pay advance or withholding tax on hundreds of thousands of transactions, including electricity bills and imports. Maintaining documents and handling audits demand significant effort and cause verification issues. They want the 4% withholding tax on telecom services to be adjustable rather than a minimum tax. The shift from adjustable income tax to minimum tax has effectively turned income tax from direct to indirect, the industry said. The sector also demands removal of the 10% advance income tax on auctions or renewals of telecom licenses. This advance tax raises business costs and capital expenses, hindering 4G/5G expansion and rural coverage. Further, the telecom sector wants the 75% advance tax on non-filers abolished, along with measures like SIM blocking, which have not produced meaningful results. Operators would need costly and time-consuming billing system upgrades to manage two tax rates. Since telecom services are essential, SIM blocking could deprive people of basic access. In April 2024, mobile operators were ordered to block SIM cards of over 500,000 non-filers. The Finance Act 2024 increased the advance income tax rate for non-filers to 75%. Additionally, non-compliance carries penalties of Rs50 million for the first offence and Rs100 million for subsequent violations. These punishments have failed, with the FBR shifting responsibility onto others. The withholding tax under Section 236 rose from 10% to 15% in the 2021 supplementary Finance Act. It applies only to tax filers, yet most telecom consumers are non-filers. The industry wants this rate reduced to 12.5% in the next budget.
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Used by foreign missions: No additional duties on resale of locally purchased vehicles: FTO
ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman Secretariat (FTO) on Wednesday conveyed to embassies and foreign missions that vehicles purchased from the local market and subsequently used by Foreign Missions are not subject to further duties upon resale. The Federal Tax Ombudsman Secretariat (FTO) held the second session of the Diplomatic Grievances Redressal Cell (DGRC) at FTO Head office. This session brought together representatives from the embassies of South Africa, Philippines, United States of America, Poland, Ireland, Denmark, Qatar, Romania, and Kuwait. Representatives from the United Nations World Food Programme were also in attendance. This event was chaired by Federal Tax Ombudsman of Pakistan, Dr Asif Mahmood Jah and featured briefings by senior officials of FTO Secretariat including Almas Ali Jovindah (Head of DGRC), Dr Arslan Subuctageen (Advisor Customs), and Khalid Javaid (Registrar). Addressing a query from the representative of US Embassy, Dr Arslan confirmed that vehicles purchased in the local market and used by Foreign Missions are not subject to further duties upon resale, as taxes are already paid at the point of sale. In response to concerns from the Jordanian Embassy about challenges faced by outgoing officers in selling their vehicles, he advised contacting the 'International Customs' section of FBR. If the matter remains unresolved, he assured, the DGRC would assist further. Dr Asif Mahmood Jah placed emphasis on FTO's mandate to provide a cost-free and efficacious forum for addressing tax-related issues, particularly those affecting foreign missions. He remarked that the DGRC was created in response to repeated concerns from the diplomatic community, pertaining to procedural delays and bottlenecks faced with FBR and Customs Authorities. With a 30-day resolution target, DGRC is designed to streamline communication and promote institutional accountability. During his presentation, Almas Jovindah stated that the DGRC was established to formalize a consistent and responsive interface between taxation authorities of Pakistan and the diplomatic corps. Its mandate goes beyond administrative support as it aims to function as a dedicated mechanism to ensure that grievances of the diplomats are addressed with transparency and urgency. Jovindah also shed light on the recent accomplishments of DGRC in which complaints from the embassies of Poland, Kuwait, Türkiye, and Belgium were resolved on a priority basis by FTO after facing considerable inaction. While presenting performance statistics of FTO, Jovindah reported that as of May 2025, the FTO had received over 15,000 complaints, with an average resolution time of 34 days and a 96% implementation rate. In 2024 alone, 13,500 cases were handled, including 1,700 through informal Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). He also remarked that FTO is an autonomous body and works as a watchdog of FBR who intervenes in case of overreach or inaction of their officers. Advisor (Customs), Dr Arslan Subuctageen provided a detailed briefing on the legal framework governing customs privileges for diplomats. Referring to SRO 578(I)/2006 and its amendment S.R.O. 649(I)/2017, he explained the duty-free import of vehicles by diplomatic missions under reciprocity, and the graduated duties applicable upon resale based on the vehicle's age and category. He also clarified that diplomats may shop at the designated duty-free diplomatic warehouse in Islamabad. Dr Subuctageen also elaborated the distinction between diplomatic bags and diplomatic cargo. While diplomatic bags which are certified by the Sending State are exempt from inspection, cargo exceeding 500 kg is subject to scanning and requires documentation from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA). In exceptional cases involving credible risk, inspections may be conducted in the presence of the mission and MOFA representatives. FTO Secretariat's Registrar Khalid Javaid briefed participants on the legal framework governing zero-rated supplies and tax refunds for diplomats under Rules 51, 52, and 52A of the Sales Tax Rules, 2006 and S.R.O. 918(I)/2019. Javaid noted that exemption certificates from MOFA enable both pre-supply and post-supply zero-rating within a 180-day window. Refunds, processed manually via the STARR system under Section 66 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and Rule 38(5), are credited directly to mission accounts. He added that delays beyond one year can now be condoned up to three years per SRO 1444(I)/2024. On Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), refunds are granted under Rule 36 of the Federal Excise Rules, 2005, subject to MOFA certification and original receipts. He stressed the importance of proper documentation and clarified that while diplomats are exempt from certain taxes under Article 34 of the Diplomatic and Consular Privileges Act, 1972, Pakistan extends refunds as a reciprocal goodwill gesture, not as a blanket legal obligation. Towards the end, an interactive Q&A session took place which provided an opportunity for diplomats to raise their concerns. A number of questions focused on procedural challenges, including confusion around the responsibility for verifying tax compliance when making purchases, especially from retailers who fail to deposit taxes with the national exchequer. In response, Khalid Javaid clarified that the obligation lies with the supplier, not the mission, and assured that diplomats retain the right to refunds even if the supplier is non-compliant. He added that FBR is empowered to take action against such retailers independently. A participant from Embassy of Kuwait raised a query regarding delays in refund processing, particularly when documents are lost, rerouted, or caught between MOFA and FBR. Khalid Javaid acknowledged the bureaucratic gaps and clarified that once MOFA issues an exemption certificate, the responsibility to process the refund lies squarely with FBR. He encouraged missions to submit pending summaries directly to his office for coordinated follow-up and escalation. Regarding older claims and refund eligibility, the participant from UN World Food Programme noted that UNWFP had accumulated unpaid refunds since 2016. Javaid explained that while there is a statutory one-year limit under Section 66 of the Sales Tax Act, condonation up to three years is now possible under SRO 1444(I)/2024. He invited missions to submit full case details to explore possible facilitation within legal bounds. Diplomatic representatives expressed their appreciation to Federal Tax Ombudsman HE Dr Asif Mahmood Jah and his team for convening a solution-oriented seminar that directly addressed long-standing operational challenges. They acknowledged the objective of DGRC in providing sustained institutional support to the foreign missions in Pakistan. As a gesture of acknowledgment, certificates of participation were distributed by the Honorable FTO, Dr Asif Mahmood Jah at the end of the seminar. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
