Veteran with PTSD fined after abandoning car in Haverfordwest crash
AN ARMY veteran suffering from severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) appeared before magistrates this week after abandoning his car following a collision in Haverfordwest.
Robert Watson, 38, left his Kia Sportage in Clay Lanes on May 18 after it was involved in a crash.
He pleaded guilty at Haverfordwest Magistrates' Court to four offences: failing to stop after an accident, driving without due care and attention, driving without a licence, and driving without third-party insurance.
His solicitor, Fenn Richards, told the court that Watson's actions were heavily influenced by complex mental health issues stemming from his military service in Iraq.
'This is someone with complex needs which are being addressed through counselling, therapy and rehabilitation at the VC Gallery,' she said. 'That night, he was feeling extremely stressed and went out to buy a bottle of wine. He now recognises he should have asked his partner to drive, but he doesn't remember getting home — his PTSD had clearly taken over.'
The court heard that Watson had been homeless for three years after fleeing a violent domestic relationship, but had recently secured permanent accommodation and was now receiving targeted support for his condition.
'He's had to deal with a considerable amount over the last few years, but he is finally receiving help,' added Ms Richards.
Watson, of Spring Gardens, Letterston, was fined £80 and ordered to pay £85 in court costs and a £32 victim surcharge. His licence was endorsed with six penalty points, resulting in an automatic six-month driving disqualification under the totting-up procedure.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Transgender troops face a deadline and a difficult decision: Stay or go?
WASHINGTON — As transgender service members face a deadline to leave the U.S. military, hundreds are taking the financial bonus to depart voluntarily. But others say they will stay and fight. For many, it is a wrenching decision to end a career they love, and leave units they have led or worked with for years. And they are angry they are being forced out by the Trump administration's renewed ban on transgender troops. Active duty service members had until Friday to identify themselves and begin to leave the military voluntarily, while the National Guard and Reserve have until July 7. Then the military will begin involuntary separations. Friday's deadline comes during Pride Month and as the Trump administration targets diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, saying it's aiming to scrub the military of "wokeness" and reestablishing a "warrior ethos." "They're tired of the rollercoaster. They just want to go," said one transgender service member, who plans to retire. "It's exhausting." For others, it's a call to arms. "I'm choosing to stay in and fight," a noncommissioned officer in the Air Force said. "My service is based on merit, and I've earned that merit." The troops, who mainly spoke on condition of anonymity because they fear reprisals, said being forced to decide is frustrating. They say it's a personal choice based on individual and family situations, including whether they would get an infusion of cash or possibly wind up owing the government money. "I'm very disappointed," a transgender Marine said. "I've outperformed, I have a spotless record. I'm at the top of every fitness report. I'm being pushed out while I know others are barely scraping by." Some transgender troops decide to leave based on finances Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said this is President Donald Trump's directive and what America voted for. The Pentagon, he said, is "leaving wokeness & weakness behind" and that includes "no more dudes in dresses." Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, a veteran, and 22 other Democratic senators have written to Hegseth urging him to allow transgender troops to keep serving honorably. Already, more than 1,000 service members have voluntarily identified themselves as transgender and are slated to begin leaving, according to rough Defense Department estimates. Defense officials say there are about 4,240 active duty transgender troops but acknowledge the numbers are fuzzy. For many, the decision is financial. Those who voluntarily leave will get double the amount of separation pay they would normally receive and won't have to return bonuses or tuition costs. Those who refuse to go could be forced to repay reenlistment or other bonuses as high as $50,000. That was the tipping point for Roni Ferrell, an Army specialist at Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Tacoma, Washington. Ferrell, 28, lives on base with her wife and two children and had planned to stay in the Army for at least another decade. But she said she felt "backed into a corner" to sign the voluntary separation agreement, fearing she would have to repay an $18,500 reenlistment bonus. "My commander basically said it was my only option in order to make sure my kids are taken care of," Ferrell said. The Marine, who has served for more than 25 years, said she had planned to stay and fight, but changed her mind. Lawyers, she said, told her an involuntary separation would put a code in her record saying she was forced to leave "in the interests of national security." That designation, she said, could mean those involuntarily separated could lose their security clearances, hurting future job prospects. In a statement Friday, a defense official said the code "is not intended" to trigger clearance revocations and that gender dysphoria is not a security reporting requirement, according to the director of national intelligence. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Cynthia Cheng-Wun Weaver, senior director of litigation for Human Rights Campaign, said it's important for troops to talk with judge advocates general in their services to ensure they understand the different procedures being implemented. Other transgender troops plan to stay despite the ban The Air Force service member and a transgender officer in the Army National Guard both said they plan to stay and fight. Lawsuits over the ban continue and could change or block the policy. For troops involved in the court battles as plaintiffs, leaving voluntarily now would likely hurt their standing in the case. For others, it's simply dedication to their career. "I've really embraced military culture, and it's embraced me," the Air Force member said. "It's not about money. It's the career that I love." The Guard soldier echoed that sentiment, saying he will stay on "because it is important to me to serve. Frankly, I'm good at it, I'm well trained so I want to continue." Others without bonuses to repay or who have been in the military only a short while and won't get much in separation bonus pay may opt to stay and see what happens. National Guard troops face a particular problem National Guard members who are heading to their monthly drill weekend or annual two-week drill in June could be required to go but serve as the gender they were assigned at birth. That means they would have to wear uniforms and haircuts of that gender, use that bathroom and be referred to as "sir" or "ma'am" based on that gender. For many, that could be close to impossible and create uncomfortable situations. "If I were to show up to drill this weekend, I'd be expected to use all female facilities, I would be expected to wear a woman's uniform," said the Army Guard officer, who transitioned to male about five years ago and says others in his unit know him as a man. "I don't look like a woman. I don't feel like a woman. It would be disruptive to good order and discipline for me to show up and to tell my soldiers, you have to call me 'ma'am' now." It's not clear if Guard units are handling it all the same way, and it could be up to individual states or commanders. Some may allow troops to postpone the drill or go on administrative leave. What happens next for transgender troops? The service members interviewed by The Associated Press said they don't know what will happen once the deadline passes to leave voluntarily. Some believe that unit commanders will quickly single people out and start involuntary separations. Others say the process is vague, may involve medical review boards and could take months. The defense official said Friday that as the Pentagon takes these steps, it "will treat our service members with dignity and respect." Under Hegseth's directive, military commanders will be told to identify troops with gender dysphoria — when a person's biological sex does not match their gender identity — and send them to get medical checks to force them out of the service, defense officials have said. The order relies on routine annual health checks — so it could be months before that evaluation is scheduled. "My real big sticking point is that this administration's whole push is to reform this country based around merit, and that gender, race, etc., should have no factor in hiring," the Air Force service member said. "If that's true, I'm solely being removed for my gender, and merit is no longer a factor."
The Independent
18 hours ago
- The Independent
Republican senators question cost of Army's parade spectacle set for Trump's birthday
Several Republican senators have questioned the cost of an upcoming military parade set to take place on President Donald Trump 's birthday. The parade is expected to be held in Washington, D.C., on June 14 to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday, which also happens to fall on Trump's 79th birthday. Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican, voiced his concern about the spectacle after he learned it would cost an estimated $25 million to $40 million, per Politico. According to the publication, Wicker heard about the hefty cost from Army Secretary Dan Driscoll in an Army budget hearing. Driscoll said he could not provide an exact price for the parade because the Army will also need to pay for the road damage that its tanks will do, Politico reported. NBC News reported, citing military officials, that it may cost as much as $16 million to repair the streets of Washington, D.C. after the parade. 'I would have recommended against the parade,' Wicker told Politico on Thursday. Wicker did mention a positive possible outcome of the planned spectacle: 'The secretary feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force, that it will be a recruiting tool.' 'So, we'll see,' he added. The Army has already met its recruiting goals for the 2025 fiscal year. In a press release issued Tuesday, the Army announced it signed contracts with more than 61,000 future soldiers, four months before the end of the fiscal year. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, a Maine Republican, also critiqued the military parade. 'I'm glad that we're honoring the Army. I think that's really important to recognize such a significant anniversary,' she said in a recent interview with Politico. But 'the cost does seem a bit steep,' the Republican added. Senator Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, went a step further to tell Politico, 'If it costs money, I won't go.' The parade will feature roughly 6,600 Army troops who will wear uniforms from every military conflict the U.S. was involved in since the Revolutionary War. It will feature military equipment such as a WWII-vintage B-25 bomber, a P-1 fighter and Huey helicopters used in the Vietnam War, according to Politico. Reuters reported that, according to the Army, there will also be 25 M1 Abrams tanks, 28 Stryker armored vehicles, and four Paladin self-propelled artillery vehicles. In a May 4 interview on Meet the Press with NBC News' Kristen Welker, Trump said the cost of the parade is 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' 'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it,' he said.
STV News
a day ago
- STV News
Calls for increased sentence for Army officer who raped woman in her own home
Scotland's senior law officer has called for an increased prison sentence to be imposed on an Army officer who raped a woman in her home after contacting her through an internet dating app. The Lord Advocate, Dorothy Bain KC, told the criminal appeal court in Edinburgh that the judge who jailed Calum MacGregor for four and a half years had erred. She told the Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Beckett, sitting with Lord Doherty and Lord Armstrong: 'The Crown say that this was a case where the seriousness of the offence simply was not properly understood by the trial judge.' She said: 'In my submission it is a matter of great public importance that this appeal is advanced and considered.' The Lord Advocate said it was appropriate to impose a more severe penalty because of the seriousness of the crime committed and it could provide guidance to sentencers generally. The Lord Advocate told the court: 'This was a forceful, aggressive rape.' She added the woman prepared a victim impact statement in which she said she was unable to work for six months following the crime due to mental health issues. She was diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder and became afraid of the dark. She suffered flashbacks and saw a psychologist. The senior law officer said: 'This had a very serious impact on the wellbeing of this young woman.' Defence solicitor advocate Iain McSporran KC argued that the sentence imposed on MacGregor fell within the range that a judge could consider as reasonably appropriate and was not unduly lenient. He said it met the requirements for punishment and deterrence in a case where the offender has no criminal background and had led a pro-social life. Army captain MacGregor, 30, had denied raping the woman at a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh earlier this year and maintained that sex was consensual and that he had a reasonable belief in consent. But a majority of the jury found MacGregor, whose domicile of citation was given as a parachute engineer regiment in Suffolk, guilty of the crime. He was convicted of pushing the 28-year-old woman onto a bed at an address in Edinburgh, kissing her body, seizing her wrists, restraining her, repeatedly grabbing her breasts, removing her clothing and underwear, carrying out sex acts on her and raping her on December 14 in 2021. During the trial MacGregor told the jury that he believed the woman, who he met through the dating app Hinge, was consenting and said: 'At no point in the evening did she say 'no' or 'stop'.' He said he was 'pretty horrified' and 'shocked' when he later saw pictures of bruising on her breasts and told the court that he did not mean to hurt her. The woman said she told him that she did not want sex to happen but was pushed on to a bed and subjected to the sex assault. MacGregor, a first offender, said he was never in trouble before or since the incident and that he was in the Officer Training Corps at St Andrews University where he studied philosophy before going through the Army officer selection course. The court heard he served his country in the military in the UK and abroad and had an exemplary record. The trial judge told him at a sentencing hearing in February that a prison sentence was the only appropriate disposal given the serious nature of the offence. Judge Alison Stirling said: 'You expect to be discharged from the Army as a result of your conviction.' MacGregor followed the proceedings in the appeal court hearing the Crown appeal against his sentence by a TV link to prison. Lord Beckett said the judges would take time to carefully consider submissions in the case and give a decision at a later date. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
