Las Vegas residents sue state over ‘arbitrary decision' to put a $200M housing project in their neighborhood
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
In 2023, Nevada lawmakers approved $100 million in funding for Campus for Hope, a $200 million housing project meant to address homelessness in the city. The rest of the money is being provided by a nonprofit backed by the gaming industry.
The proposed site is the 6100 block of West Charleston Boulevard near Jones Boulevard, and two property owners who live about three blocks away have decided to fight it by filing a lawsuit. They say their quality of life, safety, and home values will be affected by the 'arbitrary decision' to place the facility in the current location.
As 8 News Now reports, the suit, which was filed in Clark County District Court, alleges that state officials violated Nevada's Open Meeting Law by greenlighting the project without giving residents proper notice or allowing members of the public to comment on it.
Last month, the governor even signed a bill to speed up construction of the project, says News 3.
"Why are they trying to push this $200 million project so secretly into the neighborhood?' said homeowner Matthew Wambolt, one of the plaintiffs in the case, to 8 News Now.
The plaintiffs argue the project creates an 'incurable defect' in the location and seek to halt it until independent studies are conducted on the potential impact of the facility.
The plan is for Campus for Hope to be a 900-bed, 26-acre transitional housing facility. According to Nevada Current, the project will take up space on the Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services campus and there are fears that it will displace existing mental and behavioral health services.
According to the lawsuit, the facility raises safety concerns since it is less than a mile from the Linda Smith and Christopher Smith Family Campus, which serves children and adults with intellectual disabilities, and within a 2-mile radius of over 20 schools serving K-12 students.
'This project will dramatically alter the fundamental character of our neighborhood, transforming our quiet residential area into one marked by significantly increased congestion, activity, and potential crime,' it says. 'Ultimately, we believe this project will substantially lower property values and negatively impact the quality of life for local residents."
It also says that the approval process for Campus for Hope was not transparent enough.
'Given the secretive nature of project approvals, the deliberate avoidance of community engagement, and the removal of normal oversight mechanisms … there is a distinct appearance of impropriety in the actions and backroom collaboration of certain state legislators and their large donors within the gaming industry are at play here,' says the lawsuit.
Read more: No millions? No problem. With as little as $10, here's of diversified assets usually only available to major players
"I have a question for the governor. The Strip, the casinos are giving hundreds of millions of dollars for this project. You're going to move these people off the Strip to this area?' said homeowner Gail Johnson to 8 News Now.
Campus for Hope said it has 'met all the state and local requirements for the construction of the facility,' in a statement to 8 News Now.
Boyd Katz, who works for a security company in the area, told the news station that it's not that residents don't want to help the homeless, they simply believe the project needs proper oversight.
"If we add a facility with that many beds here just like that it's going to severely affect that area … not just the commercial area, but the residential neighborhood nearby," he said.
Another issue is who's paying for the project.
'Local municipal authorities claim alternative locations were considered but have repeatedly refused to disclose any addresses, evaluation criteria, or comparative assessments that justify selecting our community as the ideal site," James Root, one of the plaintiffs in the suit, wrote in an affidavit. "Our city alone bears the responsibility for an estimated annual $15 million in operating expenses."
The Nevada Current reports once construction is complete, Campus for Hope will run on taxpayer dollars almost entirely, split between local governments and the state. It will be overseen by a board of directors that does not include state or municipal representatives.
With a total estimated $30 million a year in operational costs, this project could also result in a hefty tax burden on residents.
This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Money doesn't have to be complicated — sign up for the free Moneywise newsletter for actionable finance tips and news you can use.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
A teenaged driver rammed my parked car — now his dad wants to pay for it and bypass insurance. Is this even allowed?
It's a situation many of us might face: You get back to your car after an outing, only to find a dented bumper or scratched panel. But this time, there's a note on the windshield with a name, number and insurance details. You call the number and speak with the father of the person who hit your car. He explains that his son, a new driver, caused the damage and suggests paying for the repairs himself, rather than filing an insurance claim. He's worried about the hit to his son's premiums. It seems honest and you want to be fair to a young driver. But is it smart? Before you agree to skip the insurance claim, here's what you should know. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now The risks of settling privately To begin, if you or anyone else was in the car at the time of the accident, it's safest to go through insurance. Injuries can take days to surface and if there's any chance you were hurt, your eventual medical bills can pile up. You'll want the legal and financial protection that comes with an insurance claim. However, if the damage was to your parked car with no one inside, you may consider settling privately, without filing a claim, though you would still likely be required to report the incident to your insurer. And just know that not filing a claim still carries risk. The pros of handling it privately include: Faster resolution: You won't have to wait on insurance adjusters, paperwork, or any delays in receiving your check. No increase to your premium: Car insurance companies often increase your rates following a claim, even if the accident wasn't your fault. A favor to the other driver: They avoid penalties such as points on their license or insurance rate increases. The cons of filing privately include: No guarantees: The other party may not pay in a timely manner. If they ghost you or never pay, you have limited recourse. Risk of hidden damage: You may be on the hook for additional repair bills if the other driver refuses to pay for damage that wasn't apparent at the time of the accident. This can include issues that crop up months later. Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. How to skip insurance — safely If you're considering accepting private payment rather than filing an insurance claim, there are steps you must take to protect yourself. Get everything in writing Make sure to get the driver's full name, contact information, license plate and driver's license number. Write up an agreement detailing the time and date of the accident, the damage, estimated costs and their commitment to pay by a certain due date. Document the damage Take photos and videos of the damage to your vehicle, as well as any damage to the other vehicle. Make sure to get every angle and include images of the surrounding area as well. Get an estimate before you accept payment Don't guess what the repairs will cost. Take your vehicle to a trusted mechanic or auto body repair shop before agreeing to payment. If the damages turn out to be more extensive than expected, consider filing an insurance claim. Set a firm payment deadline If the other party wants to pay in full, agree on a firm deadline for payment. If they want to pay in installments, write up a payment schedule and keep records of all the payments received. If you have any doubt about their ability or willingness to pay, ask for payment in full or file an insurance claim. Know your insurance's rules on reporting an accident Some insurance companies (and states) require you to report an accident or damage within a specific number of days with your local DMV or law enforcement agency as well as to your insurance, even if you don't plan to file a claim. Make sure to follow the rules, or you may risk losing your policy. This means that you might have a short window of time (as little as 24 hours) to decide and confirm the other side is truly going to hold up their end of the bargain. Settling up privately can work, but only if you're cautious, thorough and realistic. If you're uncertain about the damage, liability, or the other party's ability to follow through, insurance may still be your safest bet. What to read next Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Solve the daily Crossword


CNBC
8 hours ago
- CNBC
Firefly Aerospace prices shares at $45, above the expected range
Firefly Aerospace priced shares in its IPO at $45 on Wednesday, above its expected range. The Texas-based rocket maker will debut on the Nasdaq Thursday under the ticker symbol "FLY." The offering raised $868 million and values the company at about $6.3 billion. Firefly filed its initial prospectus in July and upped its IPO range this week to $41 to $43 a share, from an initial range of $35 to $39. The space technology sector has seen rising investor interest over the last few years as billionaire investors such as Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos put their money behind SpaceX and Blue Origin, respectively. So far this year, space technology companies Voyager Technology and Karman Holdings have gone public. The broader IPO landscape has also seen major public debuts this year from Figma, CoreWeave and Circle as the market for public offerings reopens following a prolonged drought. Firefly creates lunar landers, rockets and space technology, and won a $177 million contract with NASA last month. Earlier this year, the company successfully landed its lunar lander known as Blue Ghost on the moon. The company has worked with key defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin and L3Harris. Northrop Grumman invested $50 million in Firefly earlier this year. For the quarter that ended in March, Firefly reported a net loss of about $60.1 million, widening from $52.8 million in the year-ago period. Revenue jumped sixfold to $55.9 million from $8.3 million. Its backlogged totaled about $1.1 billion.


Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
Founder Poaching: 3 Major Impacts On Entrepreneurs & Venture Capital
What would have happened if Gates, Bezos, and Zuckerberg had been poached mid-journey by IBM, Borders, and MySpace? These founder moves could have shaken the foundation of venture capital's most profitable model. Two billion-dollar founders have made moves that may redefine how Silicon Valley and venture capital operate. They walked away from their ventures, where they were the CEOs, in the middle of the journey. These aren't CEOs cashing out after an IPO or a strategic sale. They're visionary entrepreneurs in their prime who are leaving mid-journey to join the very tech giants they set out to disrupt. One online commentator called it 'a break in Silicon Valley's social contract.' For venture capitalists, it's more than that. It's a threat to the model that drives their returns and a sign that the old rules may be changing. Why Unicorn Founders Matter Venture capital is powered by extreme outliers. Out of 100,000 startups, only about 100 get VC funding. Of those, about 80 ventures fail, 19 are successes, and one becomes a unicorn, delivering the outsized returns that justify an entire VC fund. And that unicorn almost always hinges on the founder. In my study of 87 billion-dollar entrepreneurs, 94% succeeded because of the founder's vision and leadership, not a professional CEO hired later. Leaders like Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg attracted top-tier VCs because they'd already proven their ability to dominate emerging markets. Without these rare 'Unicorn-Entrepreneurs,' the VC model weakens. The best-performing 20–30 firms, which generate roughly 95% of U.S. VC profits, depend on just a handful of unicorns each. ( and on the founders. Do the odds change when the founders leave before a very high-valuation exit? The Major Impacts of Founder Poaching Currently, VCs replace the founder in nearly 4 out of 5 ventures, especially when the venture seeks multiple rounds of financing ( But that is under the control of the VCs and based on their analysis of the venture's needs. Now, it's the proven founders, not the VCs, who are walking away mid-journey. What would the VCs have to do to offset this new risk, especially when the VCs often invest because of the proven strategic skills and leadership potential of the Unicorn-Entrepreneur? Here are 3 likely impacts if the pattern continues: #1. Valuations Will Adjust. VCs pay a premium for founder-led unicorns because the founder's continued leadership is a key part of the growth story. If poaching becomes a trend, investors may discount valuations to account for the risk of losing that edge. #2. Deal Terms Will Tighten. Expect to see more contractual protections, designed to lock in founders, from extended vesting schedules to 'golden handcuffs' tied to milestones and profitable exits. #3. Startups Will Need New Retention Strategies Equity alone may no longer be enough. Startups may have to offer greater strategic and operational freedom, board influence, or mission-driven commitments to keep visionary founders from leaving. MY TAKE: Founder poaching isn't just a talent war story; it's a systemic risk. If leaders like Wang and Mohan can be lured away before a profitable exit, venture capital faces higher uncertainty. In Silicon Valley, ideas are plentiful. The ability to execute to build unicorns is rare. Lose those unicorn-founders, and you risk losing the ecosystem's edge.