Back the Blue? Lawmakers remain divided on bill regarding anonymous complaints about law enforcement
A proposal that would lift the anonymity of people filing complaints against a law enforcement officers advanced in a Florida House committee on Thursday, even though key players in Florida law enforcement are divided about whether the legislation is truly 'Backing the Blue.'
The proposal sponsored by Miami-Dade Republican Tom Fabricio (HB 317) would require a person who initially files an anonymous complaint about a law or corrections officer in the state to have to give up his or her anonymity before any interrogation of that officer can commence.
Both the Florida Sheriffs Association and the Florida Police Chiefs Association oppose the bill.
'It will not increase accountability,' said Tampa International Airport Police Department Chief Charlie Vasquez, who is serving as president of the Florida Police Chiefs Association. 'It will make it more difficult to hold officers accountable when they have serious misconduct.'
But other parts of the law enforcement community do support the measure, such as the Florida Fraternal Order of Police.
A member of that organization, Miami Police officer Felix Del Rosario, said the proposal is about fairness, integrity, 'and the protection of those who dedicate their lives to public service.'
Del Rosario added that, for too long, police officers in Florida have been subjected to 'prolonged and ambiguous investigations.'
'This legislation helps address those inequities,' he said, 'by ensuring that officers have timely access to their complete investigative file, providing safeguards against unfounded and malicious allegations that can have long lasting affects on an officers' reputation, career, and upholding the principals of.due process and equal treatment under the law.'
Orange County Democratic Rep. LaVon Bracy Davis noted how the Legislature last year effectively eliminated civilian review boards designed to oversee certain local law enforcement, which was supported by the sheriffs and police chiefs, so why wouldn't they support those agencies on this piece of legislation?
'I feel like I'm in an alternate universe right now because I hear from this chamber, from this committee, often times that we need to 'Back the Blue.' And the Blue just spoke. What I wrote down from the police chief is that this bill will make it more difficult to hold officers accountable when they participate in misconduct,' she said.
And Bracy Davis, who is Black, said she was speaking as a representative of a minority-majority district with constituents who in some cases 'have apprehension when it comes to dealing with police officers.'
'So, not only do I 'Back the Blue', but I also back the Black, and I back the Brown.'
Rep. Bruce Antone, who also is Black, said he opposed the bill which, ultimately would repeal anonymity for a complainant once law enforcement begins interrogating the accused officer. Antone listed three separate occasions when he was harassed by law enforcement.
South Florida Democratic Rep. Mike Gottlieb said he disagreed with the notion that if he opposed the bill he somehow was not 'Backing the Blue.'
'We have many masters, and in a bill like this we have the administration, we have the rank and file, the law enforcement officers who are on the street fighting day and day out to protect the society, and we have the citizens, and each one of us represents approximately 175,000 individuals,' he said. 'And to come here and tell us that if we vote no on this product we don't 'Back the Blue?' That's just not true.'
But Republicans on the committee said that while the administrators and lobbyists for Florida's top law enforcement agencies oppose the bill, actual cops on the street support it, and that should be good enough.
'All we're saying is, if you have a complaint against someone, just like if you're going to accuse someone in a court of law, put your face on it,' said Hillsborough County GOP Rep. Danny Alvarez, whose job outside of the Legislature is general counsel for the Tampa Police Benevolent Association. 'And if you can't put your face and name on it, then it's not worthy of going forward and smearing this person for the rest of their career.'
Alvarez added that the bill was 'for the cop, not the sergeant, not the captain, and not the chief.'
Last week, when the bill was heard in the House Government Operations Subcommittee, Jennifer 'Cookie' Pritt, executive director of Florida Police Chiefs Association, gave highly personal testimony regarding an incident involving a herself and a high-ranking command officer as a real life example of why she opposed the bill. She chose not to comment publicly on the measure on Thursday.
Ultimately, the House Judiciary Committee voted 16-4 to advance the bill, and it now moves to the full House for consideration. But it may not end up becoming law this year, as its Senate companion (SB 516) has yet to be heard in any committee in that chamber.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
NYC pol rips Jewish activist over photo op with anti-Israel mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani: ‘Don't even bother calling' for funding
A NYC councilwoman warned nonprofits to look elsewhere for funding if they support socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani or others 'Hamas sympathizers.' Brooklyn Republican and staunch Zionist Inna Vernikov made the vow Tuesday regarding her share of council members' annual discretionary funds – which this fiscal year total $810,000 – in response to video posted on X of Jewish activist Mark Meyer Appel shaking hands with the pro-Palestine Mamdani. 'I know it may not be much, but just a small PSA [Public Service Announcement] for the orgs who will be seeking discretionary funding from me for the next four years: In my discretion, I will NOT fund organizations whose leadership supports Hamas sympathizers and October 7th apologists,' Vernikov said on X. 4 NYC Councilwoman Inna Vernikov issued a stern declaration to nonprofits who support socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani or anyone else she believes is 'sympathetic' to Hamas terrorists – no political pork for you. Stephen Yang 'So if you want to be like @MarkMeyerAppel, and support or do photo ops with @Zohran Mamdani, don't even bother calling,' she added, accusing Appel of 'commie/jihadi a– kissing.' And she doubled down Friday, telling The Post 'If someone allows themselves to be in a photo with Mamdani, they're either supporting him or pandering to him.' 'Either way, I will defund them,' she said. 4 Vernikov's post on X ripped Jewish activist Mark Meyer Appel (left) for shaking hands with NYC mayoral candidate and staunch Israel critic Zohran Mamdani on Tuesday during a Brooklyn event. Inna Vernikov/ X Some Democratic Council sources contended Vernikov's remarks were over the top. 'How can you make a blanket statement that you're not giving a group money but because someone appears in a photo op?' a source said. Council Minority Leader Joann Ariola (R-Queens) wouldn't comment on Vernikov's rhetoric but said nonprofits should be apolitical. 'They should be focused on their goals of helping New York, not on illegal performative activism,' she said. 4 Vernikov doubled down on her remarks Friday, telling The Post, 'If someone allows themselves to be in a photo with Mamdani, they're either supporting him or pandering to him. Either way, I will defund them.' Stephen Yang 4 Mamdani (pictured, shaking the hand of a supporter) went to the Flatbush Gardens Community Center Tuesday to talk about ways he'll look to boost affordable housing if he's elected NYC mayor. Gregory P. Mango Appel's Flatbush-based group, The Bridge Multicultural and Advocacy Project, scored $60,000 in political pork from the Council in this fiscal year's budget, but none from Vernikov, records show. Messages left with Appel were not returned.


The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Blumenthal says Putin spent summit ‘delaying' Trump peace negotiations, reups call for sanctions
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said he thinks President Trump was manipulated at the Friday Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'Putin doesn't want a deal. He doesn't want peace. And the only way to convince him to stop this diplomatic rope-a-dope, playing the President, delaying any kind of ceasefire, is through strength,' Blumenthal said during a Friday appearance on CNN's 'AC360.' 'Providing [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelensky and Ukraine the kind of military arms they need, the interceptors for their patriot systems and more of them, the missiles they need, the long-range artillery, and scorching sanctions in the Graham-Blumenthal bill now on the floor,' he added, referencing his sanctions bill with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) Trump said Friday's bilateral meeting was 'productive' but said before any agreement is determined, peace points must be sorted out. Zelensky is also slated to visit the White House on Monday. Still, both Russia and Ukraine have pressed ahead with fatal strikes. On Thursday, Ukraine launched a drone attack on southern portions of Russia while the Kremlin overtook front lines in the eastern Donetsk region earlier this week. Blumenthal, who met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in May, said his 'stomach turned' when Trump referred to Putin as a friend on Friday. 'Nothing came out of this summit. It was a nothing burger. It was a shrug of the shoulders. But I will tell you, Anderson, my stomach turned when I heard the president of the United States characterize Vladimir Putin as his fabulously good friend,' Blumenthal told anchor Anderson Cooper. 'Vladimir Putin is a war criminal. He has directed soldiers to kill women and children and bury them in mass graves. He's kidnapping children as we speak,' the Connecticut Democrat said. Blumenthal introduced a bipartisan measure with Graham to punish Russia's trading partners, including China, Brazil and India for purchasing oil from Putin. The president has held off on financial rebukes on Russia, but did increase tariffs on India amid the turmoil in Eastern Europe. Meanwhile, Graham on Friday predicted that the war will end before Christmas if Trump and Putin meet with Zelensky. 'If in fact there is a trilateral meeting between President Trump, President Zelensky and Putin, then I am cautiously optimistic that this war will end well before Christmas,' the South Carolina Republican said.


NBC News
5 minutes ago
- NBC News
Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff probes river-raising for JD Vance's birthday kayak trip
A recent family outing Vice President JD Vance took for his 41st birthday is coming under renewed scrutiny as Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff launches a new probe into a federal request to raise the level of a river to accommodate his kayak trip. In a letter first shared with NBC News, Schiff, of California, requests information about the move, which he calls 'unjustified and frivolous.' 'I write to you to express serious concerns regarding the potential abuse of power exercised by Vice President Vance and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) on August 2, in which the Secret Service directed USACE to change the outflow of Ohio's Caesar Creek Lake for a recreational boat outing for the Vice President's birthday,' Schiff wrote. The letter, which is addressed to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth; Adam Telle, the assistant secretary of the Army for civil works; and Secret Service Director Sean Curran, requests answers to over a half-dozen questions by Sept. 5. The Associated Press and other news outlets reported this month that the Army Corps of Engineers increased outflows from Caesar Creek Lake to the Little Miami River, where the Vances were kayaking, 'to support safe navigation of U.S. Secret Service personnel." A spokesperson for Vance, Taylor Van Kirk, told the AP that Vance was unaware of the decision to raise the river. Van Kirk said at the time: 'The Secret Service often employs protective measures without the knowledge of the Vice President or his staff, as was the case last weekend.' The Secret Service, in a statement Friday, agreed that Vance's office was not involved in its decision to raise water levels. 'It was operationally necessary to adjust water levels to accommodate the motorized watercraft used by the Secret Service, local law enforcement, and emergency responders," the Secret Service said. "These decisions were made solely by the agents during our standard advance planning process and did not involve the Office of the Vice President.' In the letter, Schiff asks for confirmation that Vance's office was informed of the decision and, then, why he was "not informed of this planned manipulation of public resources for his personal benefit." Schiff also cites the Trump administration's decision during the Los Angeles fires to release billions of gallons of water from two California reservoirs that were not positioned to help put out the wildfires. 'With the most recent act at Caesar Creek Lake, the Trump administration is providing further evidence of its willingness to exploit public resources for the personal and political benefit of administration officials,' Schiff wrote. 'I hope that the public scrutiny of the Caesar Creek Lake water release will refocus the Army Corps on its mission to deliver vital engineering solutions that secure the country, energize the economy, and reduce risk from disasters.' Schiff is being investigated himself by the Trump administration. The Justice Department last week appointed a "special attorney" to investigate allegations of mortgage fraud, which Schiff has denied, suggesting the investigation is political. President Donald Trump was consistently a target of Schiff's investigations during his first term, with Schiff playing key parts in both of his impeachments.