Tamil Nadu Assembly introduces Bill to amend Goondas Act
The Tamil Nadu government on Saturday (April 26, 2025) introduced a Bill in the Assembly to amend the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber Law Offenders, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Slum-Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982.
Though the Bill bore the name of Electricity, Prohibition and Excise Minister V. Senthilbalaji, who was present in the House, Law Minister S. Regupathy introduced it in the Assembly.
Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, in 2024-25, announced in the Assembly that the Act (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982) would be amended suitably to control the activities of persons committing economic offences.
Biomedical waste rules
Explaining the need to amend the Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, 2016, under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, the Bill also recalled the observation of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court that it was time to book the violators of the Rules.
The Bill also pointed out the grave risks posed by biomedical waste to public health and environment, and complaints about the dumping of such waste in Tamil Nadu from neighbouring States.
The Bill said certain consequential amendments were required since the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Central Act XLV of 1860) and the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Central Act 2 of 1974) were repealed and re-enacted as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Central Act 45 of 2023) and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Central Act 46 of 2023), respectively.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
17 minutes ago
- NDTV
Gangster Goldy Brar Was Asked Why He Killed Sidhu Moose Wala. His Response
New Delhi: On a late May afternoon in 2022, Sidhu Moose Wala, the popular Punjabi musician, was driving his black Mahindra Thar SUV near his native village in Punjab's Mansa district when two vehicles began to tail him. Within minutes, one of the vehicles cut sharply across the road and blocked Mr Moose Wala's path. Moments later, gunfire erupted. His SUV was peppered with over 100 bullets. More than two years after the murder, the main accused in the killing, Satinderjit Singh or Goldy Brar as he is better known, in an exclusive interview with the BBC, spoke about why he and his associates killed Mr Moose Wala. "In his arrogance, he [Moose Wala] made some mistakes that could not be forgiven," Brar told the BBC. "We had no option but to kill him. He had to face the consequences of his actions. It was either him or us. As simple as that." Goldy Brar, a native of Punjab's Sri Muktsar Sahib, is a close aide of jailed gangster Lawrence Bishnoi. Operating from Canada, Brar is officially designated a terrorist under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Interpol has issued a Red Corner Notice against him and there is an outstanding non-bailable warrant for his arrest. The Home Ministry in a notification had said that Brar is part of a network involved in the smuggling of high-grade weapons and explosives across the India-Pakistan border via drones. The ministry stated Brar's association with the banned group Babbar Khalsa International and accuses him of conspiring to disrupt peace and law and order in Punjab through targeted killings, recruitment of terror modules, and other anti-national activities. Brar continues to operate his criminal enterprise from North America, "Lawrence [Bishnoi] was in touch with Sidhu [Moose Wala]. I don't know who introduced them, and I never asked. But they did speak," Brar told the BBC. "Sidhu used to send 'good morning' and 'good night' messages in an effort to flatter Lawrence." Brar claimed that the tension began over a kabaddi tournament in Punjab. "That's a village our rivals come from. He was promoting our rivals. That's when Lawrence and others were upset with him. They threatened Sidhu and said they wouldn't spare him," Brar claimed. According to the BBC report, tensions were defused through the intervention of Vicky Middukhera, an associate of Bishnoi's and an intermediary. But Middukhera was gunned down in Mohali in August 2021. "Everyone knew Sidhu's role, the police investigating knew, even the journalists who were investigating knew," Brar said. "Sidhu mixed with politicians and people in power. He was using political power, money, and his resources to help our rivals. We wanted him to face punishment for what he'd done. He should have been booked. He should have been jailed. But nobody listened to our plea. So we took it upon ourselves. When decency falls on deaf ears, it's the gunshot that gets heard." When pressed Brar on whether this constituted justice or vigilantism, he was dismissive of India's legal system. "Law. Justice. There's no such thing," Brar told the BBC. "Only the powerful can... [obtain] justice, not ordinary people like us. I did what I had to do for my brother. I have no remorse whatsoever."
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Is the US abandoning Ukraine? Aid cuts loom in 2026 budget, Europe pressed to counter Russia
The United States plans to decrease military assistance to Ukraine in the 2026 budget. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth says this is a strategic shift. The Trump administration aims to de-escalate the conflict through diplomacy. Washington wants NATO allies to take more responsibility for Europe's defence. Concerns grow over the cost of aid to Ukraine. The US will cut military aid to Ukraine in 2026, focusing on diplomacy instead, as NATO allies are expected to handle Europe's defence against Russia. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is the US cutting aid to Ukraine? On the ground in Ukraine Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Is the US deserting the Ukrainians? The United States has confirmed that it will reduce military aid to Ukraine in the proposed 2026 defense budget. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated before a congressional subcommittee that the decision is a strategic reorientation, with the Trump administration trying to de-escalate the Ukraine conflict through diplomatic efforts rather than prolonged military engagement. Hegseth also said that Washington's NATO allies should take primary responsibility for Europe's conventional defense and deterrence of comes when growing concerns within Washington over the sustainability of the multi-billion-dollar aid packages sent to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February the past two years, the US has committed more than $66 billion to Ukraine, supplying it with advanced weaponry, ammunition, air defense systems, and logistical with global tensions rising elsewhere, from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East, and domestic calls for fiscal restraint growing louder, the administration is trying to push its NATO allies to spend more in supporting at a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on June 10, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that funding for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) will be scaled back. 'It is a reduction in this budget,' he told lawmakers, pointing out a viewpoint different from the Biden administration.'This administration takes a very different view of that conflict. We believe that a negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests, especially with all the competing interests around the globe.'The USAI is a key mechanism for delivering US military aid to Ukraine. While Hegseth did not disclose precise figures, he noted that the Pentagon is reassessing specific systems used in the war, saying they are 'not survivable on the modern battlefield,' hinting at a deeper review of weapons strategy beyond view is that the US doesn't want to only focus on the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but a much larger potential economic threat, China. Hegseth hinted that American defense resources must be strategically distributed to counter global threats, particularly in the Indo-Pacific the same time, he called on NATO allies to step up, asserting, 'Europe should take primary responsibility for conventional defense and deterrence of Russia.'This messaging mirrors previous calls from Washington for the European Union and NATO to bear a greater share of the financial and logistical burden in supporting Ukraine continues to face relentless Russian aerial assaults. Missile and drone strikes recently targeted Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, intensifying pressure on Ukrainian forces and urgently requests additional air defense systems, including US-supplied Patriot batteries, to shield its cities and energy grid. However, the US has now reallocated some of these resources, reportedly including 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally designated for Ukraine, to American military operations in the Middle officials have not yet formally commented on the proposed aid cuts. Still, analysts warn that any significant drop in Western support could devastate the Ukrainian army and put pressure on Western European NATO the US administration's stance is complex to untangle, the US is not deserting Ukraine either. On multiple occasions, President Trump has remained committed to Ukraine's aid cut may signal a growing prioritization of diplomatic pathways over sustained military funding. The Pentagon is expected to submit its full 2026 budget proposal in the coming move will likely spark debate in Congress, where bipartisan support for Ukraine has shown signs of Social Security Fairness Act, passed in January, is another example of budgetary recalibration: it offers domestic spending increases while potentially diverting resources from overseas believe that the United States is no longer prepared to underwrite an open-ended war in Eastern Europe without a clear endgame and that future support for Ukraine may be shaped more by diplomacy than defence.
News18
40 minutes ago
- News18
Disbanding Awami League Could Lead To Identity Crisis For Bangladesh
Last Updated: Awami League led a long political struggle for Bangladesh's emancipation. By rejecting this legacy, Bangladesh might end up shooting itself in the foot On May 10, 2025, the interim government in Bangladesh further amended the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973 through ordinance no. 20, 2025. It thus authorised the tribunal to suspend and prohibit the activities of any political party (including its front organisations), cancel its registration and confiscate its property if found guilty of aiding, inciting or conspiring in any crimes mentioned in the statute. The Yunus administration, however, was unwilling to wait for the tribunal's verdict. On the same day, it hastily announced a ban on all activities of Awami League, pending the disposal of cases against it. On May 8, the Yunus administration had created a second three-member tribunal with former High Court judge Nazrul Islam Chowdhury as its chairman. The existing three-member tribunal under Justice Mohammed Ghulam Murtaza Mazumdar has been re-designated as International Crimes Tribunal-I (ICT-I). The interim government has redefined the objective of the tribunal, established on March 25, 2010. Its original purpose was to prosecute and punish those guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity during the Bangladesh Liberation War, 1971. A second tribunal was created on March 22, 2012 to expedite pending trials, but the two were merged on September 15, 2015, after the caseload decreased significantly. The tribunal was essentially created by Sheikh Hasina's administration (though its conception dates back to her father Mujibur Rahman's government). Ironically, she now finds herself subject to its scrutiny. There was initial disagreement on whether approximately 1,400 lives lost in police firing during anti-quota protests (15 July to 5 August 2024) constituted genocide. The father of a student belonging to Students Against Discrimination filed a complaint with the ICT against nine people, including deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Professor Asif Nazrul, Advisor on Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs in the interim government, opined that the July killings qualified for trial by the tribunal. The tribunal had previously ruled that crimes against humanity need not be specific to war. Banning political parties is not new in Bangladesh. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman initiated this practice. Not content with Awami League's overwhelming majority (307 out of 315 seats) in Bangladesh's first general election (March 7, 1973), Mujib amended the 1972 Constitution on January 25, 1975, changing the government from parliamentary to presidential. Mujib, as Marcus Franda (1982) states, 'was vested with all executive power and authorized to declare Bangladesh as a one-party state. In subsequent months he abolished all political parties, stripped the supreme court of its powers to enforce fundamental rights, created special courts and tribunals directly answerable to him, and closed down all but four daily newspapers (two in English, and two in Bengali). All four of the newspapers that were allowed to exist were either government or party owned". (Bangladesh: The First Decade, p. 55). On June 6, 1975, 40 days before his assassination in a coup, Mujib formally ended multiparty democracy in Bangladesh by establishing one-party rule under Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League (BKSAL). Bangladesh subsequently fell under the rule of military dictators General Ziaur Rahman and General H.M. Ershad, who governed for 15 years combined. In the last 50 years, Bangladesh has experienced coups, military dictatorships, controversial elections, political violence, and attempts to create an Islamist state. Even the two-party democracy in place since 1991 devolved into confrontational politics, often dubbed the 'battle of the Begums". In 2007, under the caretaker government of President Iajuddin Ahmed, a controversial 'minus two" formula was devised to restore democracy by excluding both Sheikh Hasina and Begum Khaleda Zia from politics. Both leaders were arrested. This unpopular formula faced backlash and was abandoned. It resurfaced recently when BNP General Secretary Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir mentioned it disapprovingly. III Both Sheikh Mujib and Sheikh Hasina exhibited authoritarian tendencies, seeking to eliminate political opponents. Their personalities often overshadowed the party itself. However, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has demonstrated similar tendencies. When in power (e.g., 1991-96 and 2001-06), the BNP attempted to manipulate elections, leading to the introduction of caretaker governments, demonstrating the immaturity of Bangladeshi democracy. Yet, banning Awami League is different. It threatens Bangladesh's identity. Ahmed Sofa (1943-2001), the late Bangladeshi essayist, poet and public intellectual, suggested that while Awami League's triumph might signify the victory of a few leaders, its defeat represents a loss for all of Bangladesh (Bangali Musalmaner Mon, p. 17). This is due to the party's historical roots in the struggle of the people of East Bengal. Sofa acknowledged Awami League's shortcomings, including its superficial secularism, which he considered a political tool incapable of addressing obscurantism and dogmatism within Muslim society, hindering Bangladesh's social progress. Nevertheless, Awami League spearheaded nation-building in East Pakistan, culminating in Bangladesh's independence. Founded as Awami Muslim League Party on 23 June 1949 under Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani (1880-1976), its initial leadership comprised dissidents from the Pakistan Muslim League (formerly All India Muslim League). Before partition, the All India Muslim League prioritised the creation of Pakistan, neglecting governance issues that later plagued the new state. The party became an exclusive clique, restricting membership, which fuelled discord. The East Pakistan Awami Muslim League (estd. 1949) was among several dissident parties emerging from the Muslim League. By the end of 1949, according to Shyamali Ghosh (1990), around 20 opposition parties existed in Pakistan, including 13 in Punjab, eight formed by dissident Muslim Leaguers (The Awami League 1949-1971, p. 2). The Awami Muslim League's influence grew. In the 1954 provincial elections, its alliance with the Krishak Sramik Party, led by A.K. Fazlul Huq, and other smaller parties, campaigning on a 21-point demand (commemorating the Bengali language martyrs of 21 February 1952), decisively defeated the Muslim League, which secured only nine seats compared to the United Front's 229. The United Front's manifesto, essentially Awami Muslim League's charter of demands, was condensed from 42 to 21 points by journalist and lawyer Abul Mansur Ahmad. 'Neither in the manifesto of Awami League nor in that of Krishak Sramik Party", notes Justice Muhammad Munir (1979), 'was there any reference to Islam or the Quran and Sunnah" (From Jinnah to Zia, p. xvii). At its Dacca session from October 21-23, 1955, Awami Muslim League dropped 'Muslim" from its name. The Awami League (1956) advocated for abolishing separate electorates, a colonial legacy. Prime Minister H.S. Suhrawardy, leading a coalition of Awami League and the Republican Party, piloted the Joint Electorate Bill on 10 October 1956. Joint electorates were introduced in East Pakistan, but separate electorates remained in the west, highlighting Pakistan's internal divisions. 'In spite of economic backwardness", comments Badruddin Umar, 'East Bengal was an advanced region in respect of social, cultural and political developments. Owing to its cultural and political backwardness and predominantly feudal composition of leadership in West Pakistan they cling to old prejudices" (The Emergence of Bangladesh Vol-1, p. 329). On 3 April 1957, the East Pakistan Legislative Assembly adopted a resolution on regional autonomy, moved by Mohiuddin Ahmad of Awami League and addressed by his party colleague and United Front minister Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Mujib described regional autonomy as crucial for East Bengal. The resolution demanded full autonomy for East Pakistan except for currency, foreign affairs, and defence, which would remain with the Centre. Mujib elaborated on regional autonomy and democracy in his booklet 'Six-Point Formula — Our Right to Live" (March 1966), published during Field Marshal Ayub Khan's military dictatorship (1958-69) after the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War. This Six-Point Formula became Awami League's programme. Ayub Khan attempted to implicate Mujib in the Agartala Conspiracy Case (1968), alleging collusion with India to divide Pakistan. However, he withdrew the case under pressure from public agitation in East Pakistan, compounded by his precarious position in West Pakistan. The 1969 agitations in East Bengal foreshadowed the 1971 uprising. Awami League thus prepared the ground for Bangladesh's independence. It won 167 of 169 East Bengal seats in the 1970 National Assembly elections (total strength 313). Whether Bangladesh would have emerged if Yahya Khan had allowed Mujib to become Prime Minister is debatable. However, the March 1971 uprising demonstrated East Bengal's determination to achieve sovereignty, with or without Mujib, who was imprisoned in Mianwali jail in West Pakistan. top videos View all Awami League's governance has been authoritarian at times, but so has that of the BNP and General Ershad. In a democracy, parties naturally cycle in and out of power. However, banning Awami League creates an identity crisis for Bangladesh. Denying its historical heritage could lead the nation in unpredictable directions. The writer is the author of 'The Microphone Men: How Orators Created a Modern India' (2019) and an independent researcher based in New Delhi. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 11, 2025, 14:32 IST News opinion Opinion | Disbanding Awami League Could Lead To Identity Crisis For Bangladesh
