logo
HC upholds order for Haryana to consider Arjuna awardee shooters for state civil services posts

HC upholds order for Haryana to consider Arjuna awardee shooters for state civil services posts

Time of India4 days ago
Chandigarh: In a scathing ruling, the Punjab and Haryana high court has upheld an earlier decision directing the Haryana govt to consider international shooters and Arjuna Awardees Ankur Mittal and Abhishek Verma for appointments to the Haryana Civil Services (HCS) or Haryana Police Services (HPS), slamming the state and imposing a ₹50,000 penalty for "scuttling a genuine claim".
The division bench, led by chief justice Sheel Nagu and justice Sanjiv Berry, rejected the state's appeal against the April 18, 2022 order issued by justice Arun Monga, saying the case was rooted in "sound and time-tested principles of service jurisprudence" and should never have gone to court.
Policy Changed After Applications
Mittal and Verma had applied for HCS/HPS posts under the 2018 sports policy, which entitled top-performing athletes to state govt jobs.
However, the Haryana govt amended the policy on March 9, 2019, and applied it retrospectively from Sept 5, 2018, disqualifying the two shooters effectively. Calling the move deliberate and mala fide, the court ruled that such retrospective changes cannot dilute the fundamental right of the petitioners to be considered under the rules in force at the time they had applied.
Penalised for Events Not in Oly
The Haryana govt's defence centred on the fact that the shooting events in which Mittal and Verma competed were not part of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.
Mittal had won gold in the double trap men's event at the 52nd ISSF Championship in Korea in 2018, while Verma was part of the 10m air pistol men's team. However, the court held that their exclusion based on Olympic inclusion violated the principles of fairness and legitimate expectation, particularly when they had applied in good faith under the unamended 2018 policy.
The bench imposed ₹50,000 in costs on the Haryana govt for pursuing what it termed avoidable litigation. Of this, ₹10,000 each is to be paid to Mittal and Verma, while ₹30,000 will be deposited with the high court's bar association. "This litigation ought not to have arisen in the very first place had the state of Haryana and its functionaries obtained proper legal advice," the court observed, criticising the govt's handling of the matter.
The ruling is seen as a major win for elite Indian athletes who seek recognition and public employment for their international achievements.
MSID:: 122763654 413 |
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mohammad Hidayatullah: The only Indian vice-president who also officiated as President and CJI
Mohammad Hidayatullah: The only Indian vice-president who also officiated as President and CJI

First Post

time25 minutes ago

  • First Post

Mohammad Hidayatullah: The only Indian vice-president who also officiated as President and CJI

As India's second-highest office falls vacant with the resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar, history recalls the only man to have held the top three read more In an unprecedented development in India's constitutional history, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar tendered his resignation, citing health-related reasons. His exit from the second-highest constitutional office marks the first time a sitting vice president has voluntarily stepped down before completing the term. The resignation has created a temporary vacancy in the Rajya Sabha chair and prompted fresh discourse on constitutional succession. The Ministry of Home Affairs confirmed the resignation under Article 67A of the Indian Constitution, with immediate effect. Following the announcement in the Rajya Sabha by BJP MP Ghanshyam Tiwari, Deputy Chairman Harivansh Narayan Singh assumed responsibility for chairing proceedings. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This development brings to mind a moment from 1969, when India faced a similar constitutional gap and a remarkable figure—Mohammad Hidayatullah—rose to fill it. A stalwart of the Indian judiciary and polity, Hidayatullah remains the only individual in Indian history to have held the offices of Chief Justice of India (CJI), Acting President, and Vice President. A star in the Indian judiciary Hidayatullah was elevated to the position of Chief Justice of India in February 1968, under Article 124 of the Constitution. He was the first Muslim to hold the post and earned respect for his sharp constitutional insights and erudition. Assuming the presidency in a time of crisis The summer of 1969 brought a constitutional conundrum. President Zakir Husain passed away in office and Vice-President VV Giri stepped in as acting president. However, when Giri resigned to contest the presidential election, both the top posts stood vacant. Under the provisions of Article 65 and the President (Discharge of Functions) Act, 1969, Chief Justice Hidayatullah was called upon to act as the President of India from July 20 to August 24, 1969. This was a moment of historical significance. It was the first and only time the chief justice had to act as the president due to vacancies in both the president and vice-president's offices. The Constitution, in its foresight, allowed for such an eventuality, highlighting the depth and resilience of India's legal framework. Vice-presidential tenure After retiring from the judiciary, Hidayatullah remained an influential figure in public life. In 1979, he was elected unopposed as the sixth Vice President of India, serving until 1984. His election was guided by Articles 63 to 68 of the Constitution, which regulate the post. During his tenure, he again briefly served as 'Acting President' in 1982 when President Zail Singh was abroad, reiterating his unique role in India's constitutional machinery. Landmark judgments and legal philosophy Hidayatullah's legacy as a jurist is rich with landmark cases and scholarly judgments. In the Golaknath vs State of Punjab case, he opposed Parliament's unrestrained power to amend the Constitution, especially concerning Fundamental Rights. His judgment in Ranjit D Udeshi vs State of Maharashtra also set important boundaries around freedom of expression and obscenity laws. His opinions combined legal precision with literary elegance, reflecting his vast intellectual horizon. Beyond the courtroom Hidayatullah remains a towering figure whose constitutional journey is unmatched. His ability to serve in the judiciary's highest post, temporarily hold the presidency and later serve as vice president highlights the flexibility of India's constitutional provisions and the depth of leadership they can foster. At a moment when India's vice-president's office stands vacant, reflecting on Hidayatullah's legacy provides both historical perspective and institutional reassurance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

India, US BTA not signed yet, 5 rounds of talks held: Govt to Parliament
India, US BTA not signed yet, 5 rounds of talks held: Govt to Parliament

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India, US BTA not signed yet, 5 rounds of talks held: Govt to Parliament

The Monsoon Session of the Parliament begins on Monday marking the first sitting since Operation Sindoor, India's precision airstrikes on terror camps in Pakistan. India and the US are currently engaged in negotiations for a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), with five rounds of talks completed as of now. Simultaneously, India's Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the UK, finalized in May, aims for deeper economic integration and tariff concessions, benefiting various sectors including textiles, IT, and agriculture. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: India and US are negotiating a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) which has not been signed as yet and five rounds of negotiations have been held till now, the government informed Parliament on BTA negotiations were launched in March 2025.'India and the US are negotiating a Bilateral Trade Agreement which has not been signed as yet,' minister of state, commerce and industry ministry, told Lok Sabha in a written a separate reply, he also said that the last round of talks was held from July 14-18 in minister also said that India's free trade agreement (FTA) with the UK is a modern, comprehensive and landmark agreement which seeks to achieve deepeconomic integration along with trade liberalisation and tariff concessions.'The FTA ensures comprehensive market access for goods, across all sectors, covering all of India's export interests. The FTA seeks to promote good regulatory practices and enhance transparency that are in sync with India's own focus on domestic reforms to enhance the ease of doing business,' he that the government takes care of all the sensitivities associated with the FTA and ensures that India's interests are protected, he said: 'Every FTA is unique and is based on specific dynamics of trade and is aimed at maximizing benefits for both nations.'More than 99% of Indian exports are expected to benefit from tariff liberalization under the FTA including improved export opportunities in labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, leather, gems and jewellery, engineering goods, auto parts, and FTA will also support services exports due to commitments across trade in services such as IT/ITeS, financial services, professional services, other businessservices and educational agreement will benefit Indian farmers, fishermen, workers, MSMEs, startups and innovators,' he the India-UK FTA negotiations concluded in May, the talks with the EU are ongoing. Twelve rounds of negotiations have been held till recently, the last being from July 7-11 at Brussels.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store