logo
How one American inventor unknowingly unleashed two of the planet's greatest environmental disasters

How one American inventor unknowingly unleashed two of the planet's greatest environmental disasters

Time of India10-05-2025

In the annals of invention, few names echo with such tragic irony as that of
Thomas Midgley Jr.
Hailed in his lifetime as a chemical wizard who solved the mechanical ailments of a rapidly modernizing world, Midgley's innovations were initially celebrated as miraculous breakthroughs. Yet in the cold clarity of hindsight, his inventions are seen as environmental catastrophes of epic scale — twin disasters that humanity is still struggling to undo.
#Operation Sindoor
India-Pakistan Clash Live Updates| Pak moving troops to border areas? All that's happening
Why India chose to abstain instead of 'No Vote' against IMF billion-dollar funding to Pakistan
How Pak's jihadi general Munir became trapped in his own vice
One soot-blackened, gasping century after he stood before journalists in 1924, grinning as he poured a lethal chemical over his hands and inhaled its toxic fumes to prove a point, the damage is still unfolding.
Midgley didn't just change the world — he unintentionally poisoned it.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
The Deadly Promise of Progress
It was a time of boundless belief in science. The United States was roaring through the 1920s, driven by the promise of machines, speed, and petroleum. In this high-octane climate, Midgley — a chemical engineer working for
General Motors
— was tasked with fixing a problem that threatened the future of automobiles: engine knock.
After testing thousands of substances, Midgley struck upon tetraethyl lead, a compound that silenced the problem and gave birth to 'Ethyl' gasoline. At a press event, he theatrically doused his hands in the compound and inhaled its fumes to allay public fears. But soon after, he himself would fall ill. The irony? He was already poisoned, and so was the world.
You Might Also Like:
How a Nobel-nominated scientist was cancelled for exposing the invisible danger we face every day
Despite the already known dangers of lead, which can severely impair cognitive development — particularly in children — the product was a commercial success. It powered cars and economies. It also contaminated soil, poisoned air, and irreparably harmed generations. The World Health Organization still estimates that a million people die each year from
lead poisoning
, long after the compound's use was banned in most countries.
— rossiadam (@rossiadam)
Cooling the World, Burning the Sky
Having seemingly solved one global dilemma, Midgley turned to another: how to replace the toxic and flammable gases then used in refrigeration and air conditioning. Again, he succeeded — and again, the consequences would prove catastrophic.
In 1930, Midgley introduced Freon, the first chlorofluorocarbon (CFC). Marketed as safe and efficient, Freon transformed daily life. Air conditioning became accessible. Spray cans became ubiquitous. But the molecule's stability — once its greatest virtue — was its deadliest flaw. CFCs rose into the stratosphere, where they began to eat away at the ozone layer, Earth's natural sunscreen.
It wasn't until the 1970s, decades after Midgley's death, that scientists realized what had happened. A hole in the ozone layer had opened above Antarctica, threatening all life with heightened UV exposure. The global response was swift — by 1987, the
Montreal Protocol
aimed to phase out CFCs. Even so, scientists estimate it will take another 40 to 50 years before the ozone layer fully recovers.
You Might Also Like:
How India's first female sociologist-anthropologist, named after a river, carved her own course defying Nazis, caste and conventions
A Heavy Toll, Still Unfolding
Leaded gasoline, despite its known risks, was not fully phased out globally until 2021. Its final holdout, Algeria, continued sales into the 21st century. And even now, aviation fuels still contain lead additives. A 2022 study found that half of all Americans alive today may have been exposed to dangerous levels of lead as children — a staggering public health legacy tied back to Midgley's 'miracle fuel.'
In both cases — Ethyl and Freon — Midgley was hailed as a savior, awarded medals, lauded in scientific journals, and immortalized by institutions. But his tale did not have a heroic end.
Entangled in Irony
Stricken by polio in 1940, Midgley became severely disabled. Ever the inventor, he designed a contraption of pulleys and ropes to help him move independently between his bed and a wheelchair. But on November 2, 1944, he became fatally entangled in his own device. Officially ruled a suicide by some, his death has long been shrouded in tragic symbolism — a man strangled by his own creation.
According to some historians, including Radford University's Bill Kovarik, Midgley may have been haunted by guilt in his final years. 'He had a tremendous sense of guilt,' said Kovarik. 'The lead poisoning could have contributed to his psychosis.'
Caught in the Cogs of Progress
Today, it's tempting to paint Midgley as the villain — the man who, more than anyone else, broke the sky and poisoned the air. But historians warn against such simplification. He was, they argue, a cog in the great industrial machinery of the 20th century — a man responding to the demands of corporate giants like GM and DuPont, within a society intoxicated by progress.
'Had it not been Midgley, I'm sure it would have been somebody else,' said historian Gerald Markowitz according to a report from
CNN
. 'He was just an employee.'
Indeed, his story is not just about one man's fatal brilliance. It is a cautionary tale about the blind pursuit of innovation, the arrogance of unchecked industry, and the long shadow of scientific oversight. It is about how the very notion of 'progress' was once considered an unquestioned good — even when it poisoned the Earth in the process.
Redemption in Recovery?
Today, as we stand beneath a slowly healing ozone layer and breathe in a world still contaminated by lead, Midgley's story remains both a haunting warning and a call to humility. Science can illuminate, but it can also blind. Invention can uplift, but it can also entangle.
Midgley didn't live to see the damage unfold. But his tale is far from over. It lingers in the air we breathe, in the soil beneath our cities, and in the sky above our heads — a legacy both invisible and inescapable.
And perhaps, just perhaps, in remembering him, we can remember the cost of forgetting caution.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foreign minister Jaishankar asked if India can trust US President Donald Trump. His reply: ‘Meaning what?'
Foreign minister Jaishankar asked if India can trust US President Donald Trump. His reply: ‘Meaning what?'

Indian Express

time24 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Foreign minister Jaishankar asked if India can trust US President Donald Trump. His reply: ‘Meaning what?'

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar weighed in on India's foreign policy priorities and ties with major global players — including the United States under Donald Trump during his visit to Brussels this week. In a conversation with European media network Euractiv, he was asked whether India could trust Trump. Jaishankar replied: 'Meaning what?'. The interviewer then expanded on the question, asking, 'Is he (Trump) as good as his word? Is he a partner India is willing to deepen ties with?' 'I take the world as I find it,' was Jaishankar's reply. 'Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests — and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' Jaishankar's frank comments come as New Delhi and Washington have differed over US role in the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. The US President has often reiterated his claim of mediating peace between New Delhi and Islamabad, while India has asserted that the decision was made strictly bilaterally. Speaking at a campaign event on May 31, Trump once again said he 'got India and Pakistan to stop fighting' by linking trade talks to de-escalation. 'We talk trade, and we say we can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons… They understood and they agreed, and that all stopped,' he said. Earlier, on May 10, when the two nuclear-armed countries agreed to stop firing and military action, the United States claimed credit for brokering the ceasefire with Trump saying the two countries agreed on a full and immediate ceasefire 'after a long night of talks mediated by the United States'. New Delhi has dismissed such remarks in the past and maintains that the ceasefire following Operation Sindoor was the outcome of direct bilateral engagement with Pakistan. Indian officials have underlined that no foreign government, including the United States, was involved — and that trade negotiations with Washington were unrelated to any security decisions made in the region. Jaishankar, who is in Brussels to meet European Union (EU) leaders, also spoke about India's foreign policy priorities from counterterrorism and trade to multipolarity and global trust. On the recent clash with Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack, Jaishankar urged the West to see India's response under Operation Sindoor as an anti-terror operation—not a border spat. 'This isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism,' he said, adding: 'Let me remind you—Osama bin Laden lived in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point. That very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.' He also criticised the international media coverage for reducing the situation to 'tit-for-tat between two nuclear-armed neighbours.' Noting Europe's search for 'strategic autonomy,' Jaishankar said multipolarity is already here. 'Europe must now make decisions based on its own capabilities and interests… I hear terms like 'strategic autonomy' being used—these were once part of our vocabulary,' he remarked. Calling the EU a 'major pole' in the global order, Jaishankar said: 'That is precisely why I'm here: to deepen our relationship in this multipolar world.'

Privilege motion against Suvendu Adhikari for remarks against Mamata Banerjee
Privilege motion against Suvendu Adhikari for remarks against Mamata Banerjee

Hindustan Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Privilege motion against Suvendu Adhikari for remarks against Mamata Banerjee

Kolkata: West Bengal assembly speaker Biman Banerjee on Wednesday accepted a privilege motion moved by four Trinamool Congress (TMC) legislators against leader of the opposition Suvendu Adhikari for allegedly making defamatory remarks against chief minister Mamata Banerjee outside the assembly house on Tuesday. The speaker told the media that the motion has been sent to the assembly's privilege committee for review. 'The committee will submit its report by the next session,' he said. The next session is likely to be held in September, according to assembly officials. On Tuesday, Mamata Banerjee targeted the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) alleging that the Pahalgam terror attack had proved the Centre's failure to provide security to Indian citizens. She made the remarks during discussions on a resolution moved by the TMC government condemning the April 22 terror attack and hailing the subsequent action by the Indian armed forces against Pakistan. In the resolution, which was adopted unanimously, the name of the Indian action, Operation Sindoor, was, however, not mentioned. After the proceedings, Adhikari told reporters outside the assembly house that Banerjee batted for Pakistan throughout her speech. 'She batted for Pakistan all the way and also insulted our Prime Minister and Union home minister,' he said. Hours after this, TMC legislators submitted an application at the speaker's office seeking permission to move a privilege motion against Adhikari.

"When is PM Modi going to meet leaders of political parties?": Jairam Ramesh
"When is PM Modi going to meet leaders of political parties?": Jairam Ramesh

India Gazette

time33 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

"When is PM Modi going to meet leaders of political parties?": Jairam Ramesh

New Delhi [India], June 11 (ANI): A day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met the all-party delegation members on India's global outreach on Operation Sindoor, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh on Wednesday launched sharp attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, repeatedly asking him to conduct an all-party meeting and hold a two-day discussion in the upcoming Monsoon Session in the Parliament. Speaking to ANI, Ramesh questioned PM Modi about the potentiality of conducting an all-party meeting, setting up a review committee on Operation Sindoor, a two-day discussion during the Monsoon Session and about the efforts made to nab the terrorists of the Pahalgam attack. The Congress MP stated, 'It was natural that the Prime Minister meet all the 50 MPs who were members of these seven delegations that went to 32 countries. That was not a surprise as far as we were concerned. But we have only four simple questions. We would like the Prime Minister to answer these questions. Question number one - When will the Prime Minister chair an all-party meeting and meet the leaders? Leaders and not MPs, and take them into confidence on the internal and external security challenges that have emerged after the Pahalgam terror attack.' 'Secondly, our question is that after the Kargil war, we had a Kargil review committee... will there be a similar exercise, especially after the CDS revelations in Singapore? Will there be a review? Will there be an analysis? ... So will there be a report? Will it be tabled in Parliament? The third question is, during the Monsoon session, will the Prime Minister allow a two full-day discussion on internal and external security challenges, on China, on Pakistan, on the new emerging technologies which we have to contend with, with the challenges posed by President Trump's repeated claims...' Ramesh added. He further said, 'Our fourth question is that the Pahalgam terrorists who carried out this brutal attack are still free; they have not been brought to justice. They were responsible for the Poonch attack on December 23. They were responsible for Gagangir on October 24. They were involved in Gulmarg on October 24. These are all reports that have not been denied. So, when will these Pahalgam terrorists be brought to justice?' Speaking about PM Modi's meeting with the delegation members, he said, 'Prime Minister meeting the MPs is fine. That's his prerogative. But when is he going to meet the leaders of political parties? When is he going to announce a two-day discussion in the upcoming Parliament session?...' Earlier today, in a social media post on X, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh asked a series of questions to Prime Minister Narendra Modi over several issues. His remarks came after Prime Minister Modi himself met with the members of the seven Parliamentary delegations that had been sent to multiple key partner countries. The Congress asked PM Modi about the possibility of chairing an all-party meeting about the issues concerning India's security strategy. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store