Gun carry law advances in House Committee
The author of the bill, Senator Blake Miquez (R-New Iberia), said it's meant to bring consistency to all the various gun laws in the state.
Opponents call it unnecessary and even add to the confusion. Gun-carrying laws have changed over the past couple of years in the state. Louisiana has become more friendly to gun carriers and Second Amendment Rights advocates.
During the 2024 Second Extraordinary Legislative Session, a proposed bill written by Miguez was passed and signed into law. It allows law-abiding citizens ages 18 and older to carry their weapons without having a permit.
As a result, there is a patchwork of laws dealing with three tiers of carriers: The constitutional carrier, the permit carrier, and the out-of-state carrier. Miguez authored Senate Bill 101 and said one area in which the bill offers consistency is with the 1,000-foot rule around schools. Current law prohibits the carrying of a firearm within that range, SB 101 would change that.
'The 1,000-foot zone around a school is the major part. There are some urban areas where there's a 1,000-foot zone, and it's on public property, you could walk your dog by your mailbox and be in it. We need to make sure you can defend yourself if you're a law-abiding citizen,' said Miguez.
The bill does not allow the carrying of a firearm on school property, and those who are not legally allowed to carry a firearm would still be subject to prosecution for carrying a firearm near a school. The bill passed the committee, but not before opponents argued it was unnecessary and would put more guns closer to schools, creating more dangerous situations for kids.
Senate Bill 101 heads to the full House for debate.
Fifth inmate captured following Orleans Justice Center escapes
Speaker Mike Johnson backs tax cut bill; advocates warn of Medicaid impact
Gun carry law advances in House Committee
Southern University students win HBCU Emmy for sports documentary
Johnson, SALT Republicans zero in on critical agreement
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
14 minutes ago
- USA Today
California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says
Newsom has called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. WASHINGTON ― California Gov. Gavin Newsom's redistricting proposal aimed at creating five new Democratic congressional seats begins with overwhelming support ahead of a planned November referendum when voters would decide its fate, according to a survey conducted by his longtime pollster. The proposal is backed by 57% of California voters and opposed by 35%, the poll taken by Democratic pollster David Binder found, according to a report by Axios. Another 8% of voters in the heavily Democratic state said they were undecided. Newsom has portrayed his mid-term redistricting push as necessary to offset Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's pursuit to create five new Republican congressional districts in Texas. President Donald Trump has publicly lobbied for the gerrymandering in Texas to boost Republican chances in the 2026 midterm elections. Newsom last week called for a Nov. 4 special election on the new maps. The California state legislature, where Democrats have a supermajority, would first need to vote to put the measure before the voters. The poll found 84% of California's Democratic voters support the redistricting plan while 79% of the state's Republicans oppose it. The 57% in overall support for the redistricting plan is a jump from the 51% who said they backed redrawing California's congressional maps in a July poll. California currently has 43 congressional seats held by Democrats and nine by Republicans. The creation of five new Democratic-friendly districts could sway California's delegation to a 48-5 advantage for Democrats. Yet the move comes with risk for Democrats because it might create several competitive seats that Republicans could target. "I know they say, 'Don't mess with Texas,'" Newsom, widely considered a potential presidential candidate in 2028, quipped at a Democratic rally kicking off the redistricting campaign last week. "Well, don't mess with the great Golden State." California has an independent redistricting commission that is designed to limit partisan influence on the map-drawing process, but Newsom said the measure would allow a new process to draw maps that would go into effect for House elections in 2026, 2028, and 2030, before ceding power back to the commission to draw maps ahead of 2032. Redistricting in all states is required by federal law every 10 years following the release of new U.S. Census Bureau figures; however, Trump pushed Texas Republicans to jumpstart the process in the middle of the decade, setting off a cross-country redistricting fight. Redistricting efforts are also ongoing in Florida and Ohio that could benefit Republicans, while Republican-controlled Indiana and Missouri are also discussing redrawing their maps. Control of the U.S. House of Representatives at stake, with Republicans currently holding a 219-212 majority. Contributing: Erin Mansfield of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hoosier elections must remain free and fair
Will Indiana follow Texas' lead in redistricting mid-decade? (Getty Images) Vice President J.D. Vance recently visited Indiana to meet with Gov. Mike Braun and Republican leaders. They discussed a plan to redraw the state's congressional districts this year, mid-decade, in order to gain one or both of the seats currently held by Indiana Democrats and rig the 2026 mid-terms so Republicans can preserve their very slim House majority. We are scholars and teachers of U.S. law and politics. And we are deeply troubled by the Trump administration's attempt to rewrite the electoral rules mid-stream to maximize its power, and by Indiana Republicans' failure to immediately reject such a transparently partisan move, which would corrupt the fairness of our elections. Whatever our party affiliation, all Hoosiers should care about fairness. We would never support changing the rules in the middle of a basketball game so that our team would gain unfair advantage. We want winners to win fair and square. In sports, and in politics. Such corruption is possible because the process whereby Congressional districts are created is localized and susceptible to being rigged by those bent on gaining an unfair partisan advantage. According to the U.S. Constitution, Congress allocates seats in the House of Representatives to states based on population. A census must be taken within every ten years to determine how population shifts may change the number of Congressional districts allocated to each state — a process called reapportionment. The actual shape of Congressional districts in each state is determined by state legislation. Indiana's House GOP congressional contingent lines up behind redistricting effort In 1964, the Supreme Court ruled that Congressional districts must be of roughly equal population and honor the principle of 'one person, one vote.' Since then, Congressional redistricting has almost always been done on the ten-year cycle, except when federal courts have required certain states to redraw their maps to bring them into compliance with federal election law. But now Texas Republicans are trying to redraw their Congressional map mid-decade. The reason why: because President Trump has very publicly called upon them to do this, telling CNBC's Squawk Box: 'We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor, and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas . . . and we are entitled to five more seats.' It should be obvious that Trump's vote total in the 2024 presidential election confers no GOP entitlement to extra House seats, which are not allocated based on presidential popularity (indeed, while Trump only received 56% of the 2024 Presidential vote, the Texas GOP controls 66% of the state's House seats). If the party wants five more seats in Texas or two more in Indiana, then the correct way to obtain them is to run strong candidates in districts currently held by Democrats, and win the elections in those districts, fair and square. The administration's push for Texas, Indiana, and other 'red' states to redistrict now has one very clear purpose: to change the electoral map, midstream, so that Trump and his party can retain control of the entire federal government by giving more power to voters they like while taking electoral power away from voters they don't like. And that is simply not fair. Hoosier citizens, and not statehouse Republicans, should choose who they want to represent them in their congressional districts in 2026 and 2028 and 2030. And they can freely choose only if the elections are fair. Any party that tries to try to change district boundaries in advance of an election just so they have a better chance of winning the election is doing something that has a simple name: cheating. Basketball coach John Wooden, a legendary Hoosier, famously taught his players to 'never lie, never cheat, never steal.' Indiana Republicans should heed coach Wooden's famous words, politely refuse to do the bidding of the Trump administration, and stand tall, with their Democratic counterparts, and all patriotic Hoosiers, in defense of the fairness of our elections.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Senate passes all but four bills on special session agenda
(The Center Square) – In just a few days, the Texas Senate passed all but four bills on the special session agenda. The second special session was called on Friday, by Tuesday, 14 bills of 18 on the call had already passed. This is after the Senate passed all of the bills on the call for the first special session while Texas House Democrats absconded and halted all House proceedings. The House passed no bills during the first special session because Democrats blocked a quorum from being reached. Nearly all of the bills the Senate passed in the first special session were read again, voted on again, and passed. On Tuesday, Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick lauded the Senate for their efficiency in passing the bills, many with overwhelming bipartisan support. 'The Senate passed all 18 bills on Gov. Abbott's call in the first special session and is on track to do it again. The Texas Senate once again proved we can deliver real results for the people of Texas,' Patrick said. He also said that since enough House Democrats returned to Austin to reach quorum, he looks forward to receiving legislation from the House to pass the remaining bills. 'Texans expect their elected officials to stay in the state and get the job done, rather than fleeing to other states just because they oppose a particular bill,' he said, referring to a redistricting bill that could give Republicans an additional five seats in Congress in Texas. The Texas Senate passed the following bills: SB 2, Natural Disaster Preparation and Recovery, filed by Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock;SB 3, Flood Emergency Communications and Warning, filed by Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston;SB 5, Relief Funding for Hill Country, filed by Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston;SB 6, Banning THC, filed by Perry;SB 8, Protecting Women's Spaces, by Sen. Mayes Middleton, R-Galveston;SB 10, Cutting Property Taxes, filed by Bettencourt;SB 11, Protecting Human Trafficking Victims, filed by Sen. Tan Parker, R-Flower Mound;SB 12, Attorney General Authority to Prosecute Election Crimes, filed by Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Tyler;SB 13, Banning Taxpayer-Funded Lobbying, filed by Middleton;SB 14, Water Project Incentives, filed by Perry;SB 15, Police Personnel Records, filed by Sen. Phil King, R-Weatherford;SB 16, Stopping Title Theft and Deed Fraud, filed by Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas;SB 18, Maintaining Texas Dams, filed by Sen. Judith Zaffirini, D-Laredo. The only reason the four remaining bills haven't yet passed the Senate is because they must first pass in the House. After the House passes them, they will go to the Senate. These bills are SB 4: Redistricting; SB 7: Protecting Unborn Children; SB 9: Eliminating the STAAR Test; and SB 17: State Judicial Omnibus Package. The Texas House made quorum for the first time on Monday after nearly two weeks. House Speaker Dustin Burrows, R-Lubbock, said he expects all bills to be passed by Labor Day weekend. Notably, the Texas Senate passed a bill to ban THC in Texas for the third time this year, twice in defiance of Gov. Greg Abbott calling to regulate it. During the regular session, the legislature passed with bipartisan support a bill to ban THC. Abbott vetoed it at the last hour of the last day allowed by the state constitution after the regular session ended so his veto could not be overridden. The Senate will not back down on banning THC, Patrick maintains. It's 'a top legislative priority because the Texas Senate refuses to allow bad actors to use loopholes in agriculture law to flood our communities with potent, intoxicating products disguised as harmless treats,' Patrick said. 'These products lure and endanger our children and threaten public safety. That's why every single law enforcement agency in Texas, along with the Texas Medical Association, the Texas Pediatric Society, and countless families, stand behind SB 6.' 'Since 2019, bad actors have taken advantage of a loophole in Texas agriculture law to sell potent, intoxicating forms of THC that have nothing to do with agriculture,' Patrick maintains. 'These shops have rapidly spread throughout Texas, endangering the health and safety of children and families across our state, with no accountability.' The bill would prohibit the retail sale of all intoxicating cannabinoid, including in beverages; doesn't alter the Texas Compassionate Use Program or laws related to hemp farming; and doesn't impact the sale or use of CBD or CBG products. Solve the daily Crossword
