Kyiv, not Kiev — Kyiv Independent community helps rename street in Oregon
Photos shared with the Kyiv Independent show the newly installed blue-and-yellow street sign, reflecting both the correct Ukrainian transliteration and the national colors of Ukraine.
The change comes amid a broader effort by Ukraine and its allies worldwide to move away from Russian-derived place names and honor Ukraine's linguistic and political independence.
"We're very proud of our city (Springfield, OR, U.S.) for supporting our efforts to make this happen," one community member told the Kyiv Independent.
The spelling "Kiev," pronounced "kee-yev," is the Russian version of Ukraine's capital. "Kyiv" (pronounced "keev") is the correct Ukrainian form, based on the native pronunciation and Latin transliteration.
For decades, global usage favored Russian-based spellings, a legacy of the Soviet Union's dominance and the widespread misconception that Ukrainian cities and culture were merely extensions of Russia. Even after Ukraine declared independence in 1991, much of the international community continued using names like Kiev, Lvov, and Odessa — all Russified versions.
That began to change after Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea and its war in eastern Ukraine. The full-scale invasion in 2022 accelerated the shift, prompting governments, media outlets, and advocacy groups to adopt Ukrainian transliterations such as Kyiv, Lviv, and Odesa.
Ukraine's Foreign Ministry has promoted the change through campaigns like #KyivNotKiev, arguing that the use of correct names respects Ukraine's sovereignty and resists Russian imperial narratives.
Russian leaders, including President Vladimir Putin, have long emphasized historical ties to Kyiv in their justification for expansionist policies. Renaming streets and using correct spellings is one way communities abroad are pushing back.
Read also: Kyiv, not Kiev — How Ukrainians reclaimed their capital's name
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump shares Melania Trump's letter to Putin
President Donald Trump shared on social media the "peace letter" from first lady Melania Trump that was hand delivered to Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska on Friday. The first lady writes "it is time" to protect children and future generations worldwide. "Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger," Melania Trump's letter begins. MORE: Hunter Biden escalates rift with Melania Trump over Jeffrey Epstein allegation The first lady states that all children are born innocent, regardless of their nationality, political views or beliefs. "A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity -- an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology," she said. "In today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them -- a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future," she continued. The first lady tells the Russian president that protecting children "will do more than serve Russia alone" and "will serve humanity itself." "Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today," she concludes. "It is time," she signs off. The physical letter was first obtained by Fox News Digital.
New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Maximum pressure on Putin is the only way to win a fair deal in Ukraine
Judging by his body language — and by the goals he had initially set for the summit — President Donald Trump could not be satisfied with the outcome of his meeting with Russia's leader, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska. 'I won't be happy if I walk away without some form of a cease-fire,' he told Fox News' Bret Baier hours before arriving in Anchorage. 'There will be very severe consequences,' the president warned days before the summit. Much as he likes to be unpredictable, the US president would do well to the predictable thing and stand by his earlier threats. On Aug. 1, after a major aerial attack on Kyiv, killing 31, he called Russia's actions 'disgusting' and promised fresh sanctions. The summit with Putin, on American soil no less, was a major pivot. Going into the meeting, it was possible to give President Trump the benefit of the doubt. If Putin had agreed to a ceasefire, the gambit would have been worth it. Yet the US president did not get what he asked for. Instead, he was offered flattery, vague promises of future business deals — and likely a delusional lecture on Russian and Ukrainian history, featuring a collection of old maps that Putin had brought with him. Alas, President Trump, just like his envoy Steve Witkoff earlier, seems to have fallen for the Russian bag of tricks, damaging US credibility not unlike the former President Obama's empty rhetoric about 'red lines' in Syria did. 'We don't have to think about [sanctions] right now,' President Trump said after the meeting, which he rated a '10 out of 10.' Worse yet, his shift from demanding ceasefire to seeking a peace agreement echoes the Russian rhetoric about the need to address the conflict's 'root causes.' And if the reporting about President Trump's support for the plan to urge Kyiv to cede unoccupied Ukrainian territory in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in exchange for peace is correct, the administration is about to commit a major blunder, giving Putin for free what he could not take militarily for over a decade. A 'deal' on Russian terms will not bring lasting peace. Because Ukraine matters to the security of Eastern Europe at large, such a deal risks destroying the transatlantic alliance — and also jeopardizing President Trump's minerals deal with Ukraine, which is predicated on Ukraine's control of its own territory. The 'root cause' of the conflict, after all, is not Russia's need for more land, in Donetsk, Luhansk or elsewhere. The root cause is Putin's demented view of his own place in history as the successor to Peter the Great and Stalin: a rebuilder of the Russian empire. Until Putin is disabused of that notion, Ukraine will be in danger. The 'hot' war may temporarily stop but a humiliated, partitioned Ukraine, abandoned by its most important Western partner, will provide a fertile ground for a Russian offensive through other means — through propaganda, bribery of elites, and pitting different Ukrainian factions against each other — until the Kremlin is ready to come back for the rest of the country. It is eminently possible for the United States and our allies to ensure Putin fails. If passed, the bipartisan bill introduced by Senators Graham and Blumenthal would impose a de facto trade embargo on countries buying Russian oil, adding significant pressure on Russia's ailing public finances. Likewise, US military assistance — from precision artillery to air defenses — has given Ukraine a substantial edge on the battlefield. Europeans are eager to finance further transfers of US equipment to Ukraine, making them cost-free to US taxpayers. Finally, there is the lowest of all low-hanging fruit: making sure existing sanctions work. Because Russians constantly try to get around the congressionally mandated sanctions, their effective enforcement resembles a game of whack-a-mole. During the Biden administration, the Treasury Department rolled out over a hundred updates to sanctions and export ban lists to keep the pressure on. The constant fine-tuning has been brought to a halt following President Trump's return to office. Again, it might have been worth giving a more lenient approach a try. Continuing to pursue it in face of Putin's intransigence projects American weakness. In a telling moment during the short joint press conference in Anchorage, Putin expressed hope that 'Kyiv and European capitals won't throw a wrench in the works.' If throwing a wrench means ensuring that the United States stands with its European allies and Ukraine, against Russia, then one very much hopes that President Trump's meeting with Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelensky and key European leaders on Monday achieves exactly that — for America's own sake. Dalibor Rohac is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington DC. Twitter: @DaliborRohac.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rubio blasts ‘stupid media narrative' Trump bullying Zelensky into deal
Secretary of State Marco Rubio showed irritation Sunday with suggestions that Europe is worried President Trump will bully Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky into an unfavorable peace deal, calling it a 'stupid media narrative.' Rubio fired back at CBS 'Face the Nation' host Margaret Brennan when she said there was concern from Europeans that 'Zelensky is going to be bullied into signing something away.' 'That's why you have these European leaders coming as back up tomorrow. Can you reassure them?' she said. 'That's not true,' Rubio responded. 'They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelensky form being bullied.' Rubio said the U.S. has held many more meetings with Zelensky and Ukraine than with Putin, and that Trump has been in regular contact with Zelensky's allies in Europe. 'They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied,' he said of the leaders coming to the White House for a meeting with Trump and Zelensky on Monday. 'They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans. We talked to them last week. There were meetings in the UK over the following, the previous weekend.' 'No, no, but you said that they're coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're not coming here tomorrow — this is such a stupid media narrative that they're coming here tomorrow because the- — Trump is going to bully Zelenskyy into a bad deal,' a seemingly frustrated Rubio said. 'We've been working with these people for weeks, for weeks on this stuff. They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow. We invited them to come. We invited them to come. The President invited them to come.' One reason some might be worried about Trump bullying Zelensky is the last meeting the Ukrainian attended at the White House, when he, Trump and Vice President Vance got into a shouting match. At that meeting, Trump and Vance doubled up on Zelensky, who ended up being essentially kicked out of the White House. A lunch the group were to have went unused. Trump also after his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday said whether there was a deal would be up to Zelensky and Ukraine. That appeared to put the onus on Zelensky to make concessions to get a deal. Rubio rejected suggestions that Trump had given too warm a welcome to Russian President Vladimir Putin at their summit meeting in Alaska on Friday. Brennan noted that Trump had suggested there would be severe consequences if a ceasefire wasn't reached at the summit, but then did not follow up with any tough words, let along punishments, of Putin. Rubio said that was the case because the administration felt enough progress was made to move forward and have another meeting. 'Look our goal here is not to stage some production for the world to say, 'Oh how dramatic he walked out.' 'Our goal here is to have a peace agreement to end this war. Okay? And obviously we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress, not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase.' Rubio said he did not think Russia and Ukraine were on the precipice of a peace deal, but that there had been enough progress to do Monday's follow up meeting with Zelensky and European leaders. 'Look, at the end of the day, if peace is not going to be possible here, and this is just going to continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands, the President has that option to then come in and impose new sanctions,' he said. 'But if he did this now, the moment the President puts those additional sanctions, that's the end of the talks. You've basically locked in at least another year to year and a half of war and death and destruction. 'We may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't want to wind up there. We want to wind up with a peace deal that ends this war so Ukraine can go on with the rest of their lives and rebuild their country and be assured that this is never going to happen again.'
