logo
20 Tips To Navigate Sudden Funding Losses

20 Tips To Navigate Sudden Funding Losses

Forbes09-05-2025

getty
Whether due to shifting market conditions, funding freezes or a simple change in priorities, a sudden loss of funding can disrupt even the best-planned business development or research initiatives. While this can feel like a major setback, it doesn't have to signal the end of progress.
In moments like these, taking strategic action to reassess and move forward can turn a funding loss into a pivot point for innovation. If you find yourself facing a sudden funding loss, follow this advice from the members of Forbes Business Development Council to regain momentum and move forward.
One should avoid a knee-jerk reaction and first assess the facts. Is the funding truly lost, or could minor tweaks help requalify it? Don't assume the decision is final. The first step is to diagnose the root cause and explore if there's a salvage opportunity. Once the "why" is clear, determine next steps—this may include repositioning, adjusting scope or seeking alternative funding sources. - Janesh Janardhanan, Frost & Sullivan
It's important to understand why funding was cut and how the project aligns with current strategic priorities. In my experience, funding should never be taken for granted—always have a plan B. In this case, it's worthwhile to reassess the value and cost and to explore scrappier, more cost-effective ways to achieve similar outcomes. I've often seen roadblocks spark innovation in unexpected ways. - Jani Hirvonen, Google
Some first steps to take include reforecasting the roadmap based on available funding, adjusting the burn rate and transparently communicating the situation to stakeholders, such as your team, investors or partners. Also, explore alternative funding sources like grants, partnerships or bridge funding—and consider repackaging key initiatives to attract new investment or sponsor support. - Vinit Mojes, EY
When you lose significant funding, it's time to reassess your current financial situation, priorities and processes. This involves evaluating what resources you still have and identifying which aspects of the project are most critical to maintain. Communicating transparently with your team and stakeholders is essential. Then, refocus, reimagine and take your first steps toward success. - Scotty Elliott, AmeriLife
Reach out early and often. Whether it's mentors, advisors, industry peers or your team, don't try to course-correct alone. Collaboration costs nothing but can be worth everything. A quick brainstorming session or honest conversation might uncover resources, workarounds or support you hadn't considered. You never know who's willing to help until you ask—and wants to be part of a solution. - Bryce Welker, The CPA Exam Guy
Forbes Business Development Council is an invitation-only community for sales and biz dev executives. Do I qualify?
The first step is to assess the impact of the funding loss: Identify affected activities, quantify the financial gap and evaluate consequences on timelines and goals. Then, reprioritize the project and seek alternative funding sources, while maintaining clear communication with the team and stakeholders. - Umberto Cavallaro, AscoService
Constraints often lead to innovation, and this is where leadership has to be decisive, resourceful and transparent. Figure out what's a must-have versus a nice-to-have. Engage key stakeholders, cross-functional teams, partners or even customers to explore alternative funding sources. Also, explore creative partnerships that could fill the gap. It's about shifting from a scarcity mindset to an opportunity mindset. - Olga Lykova, monday.com
When your funding gets cut, competitive intelligence is a budget pivot pro move. There are no hard costs required to collect the websites, LinkedIn page posts and ad creative that other brands are running. You can view this information on the ad libraries of Meta, Google and LinkedIn. Compare how you and your competitors talk about your brands and your solutions. Differentiation opportunities will present themselves. - Barry Reicherter, Finn Partners
When funding cuts hit, start by evaluating your cash flow and securing critical operations to keep your project afloat. Then, seek bridge funding or streamline efforts to preserve progress toward your goals. - Vivek Vishal, Honeywell
Take a pulse on the marketplace and customer impact. Review the impact of the budget cut on major deliverables and assess customer plans. Before reaching out to internal and external stakeholders, it's helpful to first outline alternative scenarios, for example, descoping features to focus only on the top-priority, high-impact ones, or planning a staggered release approach with fewer resources. - Srinivas Vadhri, Skydo
When funding drops, the first move is to reassess priorities through the lens of strategic alignment. Focus on what still supports your core goals with the resources you have. Tighten the scope, engage your team and get creative. A clear sense of purpose can turn constraints into momentum. - Michael Fritsch, Smarter Operations
Review your priorities at hand and then figure out a way to self-fund the most critical ones through the existing business. Once you reduce your priorities, you have an option to reduce expenses associated with those shelved projects. - Ruchir Nath, Dell Technologies
Identify which parts of the project matter most. If you figure out which pieces are directly tied to the main goals, you can shift your time and resources to those first. You can also look into changing the timeline to fit the current situation better. It's a practical way to keep moving forward and allows time to rethink the overall strategy if needed. - Max Avery, Digital Ascension Group
Accept that tomorrow is never guaranteed, especially in business development. When funding disappears, don't just react—reframe. The real cost isn't always in the dollars lost, but in the opportunity left on the table. Rally your allies, sharpen the business case and make it clear what's at stake. In business development, conviction is often the bridge between a setback and a comeback. - Alexander Masters, MBA, BIDA, Siemens
Do a team-wide debriefing to clarify what led to the loss of funding, and if the possibility still exists to go back and revive the conversation. If it does, then find out how to approach this conversation. Who needs to be involved? What do you need to present or showcase to get back in the ring? If these questions are not possible, are there other funding avenues that you can explore? - Mustansir Paliwala, Zomara Group
The first step is to revisit and prioritize objectives based on available resources. Conduct a review of the project's core goals and identify the most critical activities that align with the business's strategic vision. By focusing on high-impact and low-resource initiatives, you can maintain momentum, preserve value and position your business to adapt while seeking alternative funding sources. - Salice Thomas, Wipro Limited
The first step is to reassess the project's key parts tied to your goals. Use "first principles thinking" to find cost-effective, creative solutions that keep things moving forward, even if they're less scalable. Communicate with your team, explain the new direction and keep everyone motivated. With budget cuts, focus on progress, not perfection—sometimes good enough is enough to keep advancing. - Jayant Walia, Gainbridge
Review project goals through an impact analysis to understand how the funding gap affects objectives, timelines and deliverables. Identify essential components and determine what can be scaled down, postponed or adapted—without losing core value. Explore alternatives—such as partnerships, grants or budget reallocations—to complete the project or research. - Ali Faizan Rizvi, Mint Gateway
Reassess and prioritize initiatives that align with strategic goals and offer high ROI. Explore alternative funding—partnerships, grants or internal shifts. Communicate transparently with stakeholders and use the challenge as a catalyst for innovation and focus. - Rahul Saluja, Cognizant
If funding takes a hit, start by stepping back to reassess. Focus on what's still possible with the resources you have. Are there leaner, more creative approaches you can take to reach your goals? Funding loss doesn't have to mean giving up; it can be an opportunity to test new strategies and refocus efforts to efficiently win new business or conduct research. - Raviraj Hegde, Donorbox

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

On a Search for an Old E.V., Jay Leno's Car Obsession Came Up Clutch
On a Search for an Old E.V., Jay Leno's Car Obsession Came Up Clutch

New York Times

time26 minutes ago

  • New York Times

On a Search for an Old E.V., Jay Leno's Car Obsession Came Up Clutch

Times Insider explains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. As an energy reporter on the Business desk of The New York Times, I often cover the transition to electrify the world around us, including automobiles and heating and cooling systems. But until I spoke with the historian at the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angeles, I did not know that electric cars rattled down city streets as far back as the mid-1890s. A century ago, roughly a third of taxi drivers in New York City shuttled passengers around in electric cars. I set out to write an article about these cars, and a time before lawmakers gave deference to the oil industry by offering numerous tax breaks, paving the way for gasoline-powered vehicles. But finding an original E.V. that I could ride in proved difficult. Most of them sit in museums and personal collections. Enter the comedian — and car collector — Jay Leno. My editor suggested I reach out to Mr. Leno after learning about his 1909 Baker Electric, housed in his famous garage. Mr. Leno's team gave an enthusiastic 'Yes' in reply. When I arrived at his warehouse garage in Burbank, Calif., in April, Mr. Leno had his Baker Electric charged and ready to hit the streets. The 116-year-old car, which had been refurbished, looked like it had just rolled off the showroom floor. Still, the wooden high-top body, 36-inch rubber wheels and Victorian-style upholstery whispered the car's age. It was basically a carriage with batteries, enabling drivers to free horses from their bits and harnesses. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Artificial Intelligence Collaboration and Indirect Regulatory Lag
Artificial Intelligence Collaboration and Indirect Regulatory Lag

Forbes

time27 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Artificial Intelligence Collaboration and Indirect Regulatory Lag

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 16: Samuel Altman, CEO of OpenAI, testifies before the Senate Judiciary ... More Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law May 16, 2023 in Washington, DC. The committee held an oversight hearing to examine A.I., focusing on rules for artificial intelligence. (Photo by) Steve Jobs often downplayed his accomplishments by saying that 'creativity is just connecting things.' Regardless of whether this affects the way you understand his legacy, it is beyond the range of doubt that most innovation comes from interdisciplinary efforts. Everyone agrees that if AI is to exponentially increase collaboration across disciplines, the laws must not lag too far behind technology. The following explores how a less obvious interpretation of this phrase will help us do what Jobs explained was the logic behind his genius The Regulatory Lag What most people mean when they say that legislation and regulation have difficulty keeping pace with the rate of innovation because the innovation and its consequences are not well known until well after the product hits the market. While that is true, it only tells half of the story. Technological innovations also put more attenuated branches of the law under pressure to adjust. These are second-order, more indirect legal effects, where whole sets of laws—originally unrelated to the new technology—have to adapt to enable society to maximize the full potential of the innovation. One classic example comes from the time right after the Internet became mainstream. After digital communication and connectivity became widespread and expedited international communication and commercial relations, nations discovered that barriers to cross-border trade and investment were getting in the way. Barriers such as tariffs and outdated investment FDI partnership requirements—had to be lowered or eliminated if the Internet was to be an effective catalyst to global economic growth. Neoliberal Reforms When the internet emerged in the 1990s, much attention went to laws that directly regulated it—such as data privacy, digital speech, and cybersecurity. But some of the most important legal changes were not about the internet itself. They were about removing indirect legal barriers that stood in the way of its broader economic and social potential. Cross-border trade and investment rules, for instance, had to evolve. Tariffs on goods, restrictions on foreign ownership, and outdated service regulations had little to do with the internet as a technology, but everything to do with whether global e-commerce, remote work, and digital entrepreneurship could flourish. These indirect legal constraints were largely overlooked in early internet governance debates, yet their reform was essential to unleashing the internet's full power. Artificial Intelligence and Indirect Barriers A comparable story is starting to unfold with artificial intelligence. While much of the focus when talking about law and AI has been given to algorithmic accountability and data privacy, there is also an opportunity for a larger societal return from AI in its ability to reduce barriers between disciplines. AI is increasing the viability of interdisciplinary work because it can synthesize, translate, and apply knowledge across domains in ways that make cross-field collaboration more essential. Already we are seeing marriages of law and computer science, medicine and machine learning, environmental modeling, and language processing. AI is a general-purpose technology that rewards those who are capable of marrying insights across disciplines. In that sense, the AI era is also the era of interdisciplinary boundary-blurring opportunities triggered by AI are up against legal barriers to entry across disciplines and professions. In many professions, it requires learning a patchwork of licensure regimes and intractable definitions of domain knowledge to gain the right to practice or contribute constructively. While some of these regulations are generally intended to protect public interests, they can also hinder innovation and prevent new interdisciplinary practices from gaining traction. To achieve the full potential of AI-enabled collaboration, many of these legal barriers need to be eliminated—or at least reimagined. We are starting to see some positive movements. For example, a few states are starting to grant nurse practitioners and physician assistants greater autonomy in clinical decision-making, and that's a step toward cross-disciplinary collaboration of healthcare and AI diagnostics. For now, this is a move in the right direction. However, In some other fields, the professional rules of engagement support silos. This must change if we're going to be serious about enabling AI to help us crack complex, interdependent problems. Legislators and regulators cannot focus exclusively on the bark that protects the tree of change, they must also focus on the hidden network of roots that that quietly nourish and sustain it.

Why the ‘TACO' Trade Is Tempting Investors Amid US-China Talks
Why the ‘TACO' Trade Is Tempting Investors Amid US-China Talks

Bloomberg

time27 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Why the ‘TACO' Trade Is Tempting Investors Amid US-China Talks

On May 30, US President Donald Trump accused his Chinese counterpart, President Xi Jinping, of breaking a trade truce that brought down tariffs from extreme highs in early May. Investors saw the writing on the wall: tariffs would spike again, hurting the economy. Stocks fell more than 1%. But later the same day, Trump said he'd have a conversation with Xi, and optimism – and stock prices – were restored. When the call finally happened on June 5, the S&P 500 Index again briefly surged. The early months of Trump's second term have been marked by this pattern: The president threatens to impose sky-high tariffs and stocks tumble, then he relents and markets recover. Wall Street has learned to capitalize on this by buying into the S&P 500 when it first drops, anticipating the president will backtrack on tariffs and send markets higher.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store