Trump's Scotland visit is 'distraction' from Epstein association, says professor
Fabian Hilfrich, a senior lecturer at the University of Edinburgh, said the visit is 'in Trump's interest' because it will take him away from the United States, where he said the US President's involvement in the Epstein case 'doesn't seem to be going away'.
Less than 24 hours ahead of the US President's visit, the White House downplayed reports that Trump's name appears in Justice Department files about the convicted sex trafficker.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi told the President that his name appeared in documents related to the Epstein case in May. Getty Images
The White House denies this, saying it is another example of 'fake news stories'.
Trump had previously been friends with Epstein, who was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges.
Epstein killed himself in his cell in New York City while awaiting trial.
His former girlfriend, the British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, was later convicted at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison for sex trafficking, conspiracy and transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity.
President Trump filed a lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch a day after the newspaper published a story reporting on ties to wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein.
The newspaper described a sexually suggestive letter that it said bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday.
On Thursday, a subcommittee in the US House of Representatives voted to subpoena the Department of Justice for the files relating to the Epstein investigation.
Dr Hilfrich said the question is whether or not the Justice Department will release the files and what they might contain.
He called Trump 'the ultimate Teflon president' – a convicted felon and who has had many cases run against him that have all been dismissed by his base.
However, Dr Hilfrich said the Epstein case feeds into far-right conspiracy theories about historic child abuse rings propagated by some of the President's closest allies.
'Now that there is potential that their own hero is involved or implicated with cases having to do with historic child abuse, it is, for some of them, a bridge too far,' Dr Hilfrich said.
Dr Hilfrich said Trump will spin his Scottish visit as a 'slightly nostalgic, romantic, and certainly business-related trip' to open his newest golf course in Aberdeenshire.
'I think quite broadly, this [visit] is very much at the moment in Trump's interest because it will certainly be nice for him to be away from the US where his involvement in the Epstein case doesn't seem to be going away,' Dr Hilfrich said.
'If he can find any way of distracting from it at the moment, he'll be glad to do so.
'I don't think we can expect any big policy pronouncements or anything like that. Although Trump being Trump, he's always good for a surprise. So we'll have to wait and see.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says US to hit India with 25% tariff starting August 1
WASHINGTON/NEW DELHI, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday imposed a 25% tariff on goods imported from India starting August 1, as well as an unspecified penalty for buying Russian arms and oil - moves that could strain relations with the world's most populous democracy. The U.S. decision singles out India more severely than other major trading partners, and threatens to unravel months of talks between the two countries, undermining a key strategic partner of Washington's and a counterbalance to China. "While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. "They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD!" In response, the Indian government said in a statement that it was studying the implications of Trump's announcements and remained dedicated to securing a fair trade deal with the U.S. "India and the U.S. have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective," it said. The White House had previously warned India about its high average applied tariffs - nearly 39% on agricultural products - with rates climbing to 45% on vegetable oils and around 50% on apples and corn. Russia continued to be the top oil supplier to India during the first six months of 2025, making up 35% of overall supplies. The United States, the world's largest economy, currently has a $45.7 billion trade deficit with India, the fifth largest. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said Trump has been frustrated with the progress of trade talks with India and believed the 25% tariff announcement would help the situation. Hassett said more information on the additional penalty would be made "shortly." The new U.S. tax on imports from India would be higher than many other countries that struck a deal with the Trump administration recently. Vietnam's tariff is set at 20% and Indonesia's at 19%, while the levy for Japan and the European Union is 15%. "This is a major setback for Indian exporters, especially in sectors like textiles, footwear and furniture, as the 25% tariff will render them uncompetitive against rivals from Vietnam and China," said S.C. Ralhan, president of the Federation of Indian Export Organisation. The news pushed the Indian rupee down 0.4% to around 87.80 against the U.S. dollar in the non-deliverable forwards market, from its close at 87.42 during market hours. Gift Nifty futures were trading at 24,692 points, down 0.6%. U.S. and Indian negotiators have held multiple rounds of discussions to resolve contentious issues, particularly over market access into India for U.S. agricultural and dairy products. In its latest statement, India said it attached the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of its farmers, entrepreneurs and small businesses. "The government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements," it said. The setback comes despite earlier commitments by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump to conclude the first phase of a trade deal by autumn 2025 and expand bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030, from $191 billion in 2024. Since India's short but deadly conflict with arch South Asian rival Pakistan, New Delhi has been unhappy about Trump's closeness with Islamabad and has protested, which cast a shadow over trade talks. "Politically the relationship is in its toughest spot since the mid-1990s," said Ashok Malik, partner at advisory firm The Asia Group. "Trust has diminished. President Trump's messaging has damaged many years of careful, bipartisan nurturing of the U.S.-India partnership in both capitals." Besides farm products access, the U.S. had flagged concerns over India's increasingly burdensome import-quality requirements, among its many non-tariff barriers to foreign trade, in a report released in March. The new tariffs will impact Indian goods exports to the U.S., estimated at around $87 billion in 2024, including labour-intensive products such as garments, pharmaceuticals, gems and jewelry, and petrochemicals.
Daily Mirror
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Moment two Brit children found drowned with 'exhausted' dad in holiday tragedy
Spanish authorities confirmed a British brother and sister, aged 11 and 13, died while they were swimming off the coast of Tarragona in north-east Spain as their dad attempted to save them A British brother and sister tragically drowned in front of their dad while swimming off a beach in Spain. The boy aged 11 and girl aged 13 had been swimming off Llarga beach in Salou, Tarragona, on Tuesday night, according to the Civil Protection force. Their dad reportedly entered the water after seeing them in trouble and tried to save them. He was rescued alive, but tragically his children could not be saved. Police said sea conditions were rough and the beach had a yellow flag throughout the day - meaning swimming is allowed but caution is advised. The Civil Protection spokesman said lifeguards had already left the beach for the day less than an hour earlier. A hotel worker had tried to help the stricken family and police who arrived at the scene also jumped in to try and save them all. Seven medical units attended the scene along with police and fire services. But both youngsters were in cardiac arrest by the time emergency help arrived and efforts to save them proved unsuccessful. Inspector Jose Luis Gargallo, head of Salou's local police force, said the initial call received pointed to three people drowning off the resort's Llarga beach. He said: 'Local police rushed to the scene and saw that there were indeed three people who were really struggling to get out of the water. It was a father with his son and his daughter, all British. When the youngsters, the boy and girl aged 11 and 13, were brought out of the water they had no vital signs and all the resuscitation efforts to save them proved unsuccessful. 'The father could be saved. He had swallowed a lot of water and he was exhausted but could be saved thanks to the intervention of the emergency medical responders and police. We're talking about a family with five children and the mum was in the nearby hotel where they were staying with the other three children. The father was with the two children that died. 'All day a yellow flag had been out at that beach so there was a danger of a stormy sea which is why the yellow flag was out. When the tragedy happened the sea was the same as two or three hours before so it was a stormy sea,' he said. 'That's why you have to be careful with the sea. "This is a beach that offers ideal swimming conditions 99% of the year, but yesterday this was not the case…it's a very calm sea normally... Just a few hours earlier another person had died in very similar conditions.' He added: 'The lifeguards are on duty at the beach where these British youngsters died until 8pm. They start work at 9.30am. 'Unfortunately this alert came in at 8.48pm so 48 minutes after the lifeguard service had finished. This has been an accident but as always with these sorts of accidents, a thorough investigation will take place to see if there are things that can be improved and if they can there will be improvements.' He also said local police officers jumped into the sea to try to save the children. One of the officers, identified only by his first name and the initial of his surname as Younes A, said: 'A hotel worker was trying to get one of the three out of the sea when we arrived. 'We were told when we helped get that person out that another two people were in the sea who could be minors. We tried to locate them, saw bits of clothes and seconds later were able to locate and get a young girl out of the water and began resuscitation and another police force was the one responsible for getting the other child out of the sea. 'When the emergency services arrived they took over the efforts to save them until they said they couldn't do anything more. We don't know the circumstances leading up to them getting into difficulties. 'I leapt into the water with two other colleagues to get the father to safety first before going back to rescue one of the children.' He added: 'There were waves and wind. It was dangerous. There was a lot of swell.' Footage published locally yesterday showed a helicopter flying above the beach where a white tent had been erected on the sand to shield the bodies of the two children. Emergency services were still at the scene after nightfall before court workers authorised the removal of their bodies so they could be taken to a nearby morgue for post-mortems to take place. Authorities sent a team of psychologists to support the family who are understood to have been staying at a nearby four-star Hotel Best Negresco. A source at the hotel confirmed: 'The hotel is doing all it can at the moment to assist the family. 'The children's father is here at the moment and is not in hospital. The hotel found out yesterday what had happened. Everyone at the hotel is distraught.' Salou Town Hall organised a minute's silence on Wednesday around noon local time. The deaths bring the number of fatalities on Catalan beaches to 16 since the summer season began on June 15th - five more than the same period last year, officials added. A spokesperson for the UK Foreign Office said: "We are supporting the family of two British children who have died in Spain and are in contact with the local authorities." The civil protection force urged "the importance of taking extreme precautions on beaches, swimming pools and inland waters this summer". Five hours before this tragedy a 54 year old German tourist also drowned at Cambrils beach in southern Catalonia. He was rescued alive around 4.30pm but died soon after he reached the shoreline. Cambrils' mayor Oliver Klein said afterwards: 'We profoundly regret the loss of a human life on our coast. 'It's a tragic incident which has left us deeply moved. I want to express my most sincere condolences to the family and friends of the person affected.' The deaths of the two youngsters, follows a number of other British deaths in Spain this summer. Two British men, aged 19 and 26, died in separate incidents at a hotel and music venue in Ibiza earlier this month. The Mossos regional police force declined to comment and a spokesman said: 'We are not making any official comment as this is not a criminal matter and according to protocol it's Civil Protection that would make any statement. 'We've drafted a report on the incident which has been passed on to an investigating court.'
New Statesman
9 minutes ago
- New Statesman
How do we keep the lid on race-related violence?
A police car set on fire by far-right activists in Sunderland last August. Photo by Ian Forsyth / Getty Images 'Shower upon us abundant rain,' goes a Muslim prayer one learns in childhood, 'swiftly and not delayed.' A prayer for rain that makes sense in the desert. Imagine my surprise on learning the Church of England has one too. Whose idea was it to institute such a prayer in this soggy, inclement land? Its diverse uses have, however, recently become apparent: in the middle of an inconvenient hosepipe ban, to foil defeat in the cricket, or – more seriously – to maintain public order in times so tense that the country is being called a 'tinderbox' at risk of exploding again into nationwide rioting. Last summer, a far-right frenzy gripped towns across Britain. Hotels housing asylum seekers were almost burned down. Now, another such hotel in Epping is subject to anti-migrant demonstrations; these are spreading. Fearing another summer of discord, officials have been appealing to the deus ex machina of the weather. It's well known that hot summers provide the perfect conditions for public unrest to germinate. The London riots in 2011 were a summer affair, as were the 1981 England riots, the worst race-related violence the UK has seen. Tempers flare with temperatures. And rain souses the appetite to indulge in outdoor clashes. A historic heatwave also provides the metaphor for simmering conflict in Do the Right Thing (1989), Spike Lee's classic film about racial tension in a predominantly black Brooklyn neighbourhood. Lee saturates the frame – Gauguin-like – with volcanic hues of red and orange. Our eyes are primed – lava will surely fly – and after a youngster is choked to death by a cop, as George Floyd would be, the community at last erupts into violence. What would be the right thing to do in these circumstances? Lee is a dialectical filmmaker. He ends by quoting from two opposing – though equally compelling – schools of thought about political protest: Martin Luther King Jr's contention that violence is 'both impractical and immoral', and Malcolm X's rejoinder, that when violence is 'in self-defence, I call it intelligence'. The film doesn't say which of these courses of action is, in the end, right. I admire Malcolm X's courage. His insinuation that the bullet may ultimately be more effective than the ballot was born of the chronic failure of American democracy. But rewatching Lee's film, I found myself leaning more towards King. I recoiled during the climactic scene, when the amiable protagonist, Mookie, smashes up the Italian-American pizzeria that provides him with employment, a father-figure and a lively communal space (last year's rioters similarly ransacked their own community centres and amenities). Finally, the rioters threaten the local Asian-run grocery. At this moment, seeing such a familiar character threatened, I fully realised where it was that I stand in this debate. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe For all my sympathy with this community ravaged by the violence of an unjust state, I could not accept this rage against blameless bystanders. I recalled the real-life Bangladeshi family in Minneapolis, whose livelihood – a restaurant – was destroyed in Black Lives Matter protests five years ago. 'Let my building burn,' its immigrant owner, Ruhel Islam, proclaimed, 'justice needs to be served.' The restaurant's name still sticks in the mind: Gandhi Mahal, in homage to the man whose still revolutionary doctrine of non-violence King was an adherent of. By overcoming self-interest and standing with a just cause at personal cost, so clearly was Ruhel Islam. The rioters from Do the Right Thing and from last summer have divergent motives: Mookie and his friends in 1980s New York are crying out for racial justice, while last year's rioters were motivated, I do believe, by racial animus. Nevertheless, in distinct ways, they exemplify anxieties and resentments around race that can stew in any 'melting pot' society. Incidents of police brutality or, as has recently been the trigger in UK unrest, sexual assault, can blow the lid off. When that happens, since time immemorial, immigrant communities like mine are the ones consumed in the fury. How, then, to keep the lid on? This, now, is our challenge. Personally, I'd like to spread the Mahatma's teachings in Epping, but alas, that may fall on deaf ears. Severe sentencing was what the courts opted for – on violent demonstrators, deservedly, but also on inciteful or hateful speech. This, on reflection, seems appropriate. Terror was unleashed by the now jailed Lucy Connolly's call to burn down asylum hotels. But such authoritarianism betrays a political establishment increasingly of the view that the country's diverse ethnic and religious make-up can no longer sustain open discussion of topics sensitive to its respective communities. Note the state's recent activity: a superinjunction to prevent media reporting on Afghan refugee resettlement; an Online Safety Act that is concealing from the public controversial footage; making it a crime even to voice support for Palestine Action; penalising the burning of a Koran. Here, then, is a government that thinks segments of the population are so vexed by migration, or so offended by criticism of Israel, or Islam, that these conversations must be suppressed to keep the peace: ignorance coerced for the sake of bliss. If this is the cost of being tolerated, I don't really feel like paying it. I refuse to believe the country is such a tinderbox. Social cohesion will come, but only by having and withstanding difficult conversations, not by avoiding them. That's how to do the right thing. Failing that, I have my prayer for rain. [See also: One year on, tensions still circle Britain's asylum-seeker hotels] Related
