The carbon cost of real estate
Traditionally shaped by policy reforms, consumer sentiment, and macroeconomic trends, it now faces a new market force: the cost of carbon. With India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) launching in pilot form and commercial real estate entering PAT Cycle VI under the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), carbon management has shifted from voluntary green building efforts to mandatory financial discipline.
This is more than an environmental compliance issue — it is an economic recalibration. According to the World Bank, nearly 24% of global emissions are now covered by carbon pricing instruments. Indian buildings, which account for approximately 25% of national emissions today, are poised to become regulated emitters with financial liabilities attached. Developers, investors, and occupiers must now answer a new question: not just 'what is the ROI?' but 'what is the carbon cost?' Carbon pricing is not a policy experiment — it's a new operating reality.
The CCTS, enabled by the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act 2022, will soon introduce emissions accountability for high-consumption sectors, including real estate. The scheme operates on a rate-based Emissions Trading System (ETS), meaning that entities will be assigned intensity benchmarks — like kilograms of CO₂ per square metre — and must meet or beat them or purchase credits to bridge the gap.
Unlike the earlier PAT Scheme, which focused on industrial energy efficiency, CCTS will monetise carbon, creating market-driven consequences for poor energy performance. The Bureau of Energy Efficiency has already notified energy-use intensity norms for large buildings, and the upcoming National Carbon Registry will link energy audit outcomes to carbon credit eligibility.
Pricing trajectory
The pricing trajectory is already being tested. Internal calculations at BEE suggest that carbon credits may trade in the ₹800–₹2,000/tonne range during the pilot phase. For a five-lakh sq.ft. commercial asset emitting 3,000 tonnes annually, this could mean a ₹24 lakh–₹60 lakh recurring liability if corrective measures aren't taken.
If the asset overperforms, it could generate surplus credits of equivalent financial value. This dual-edge market mechanism makes carbon performance an active profit-and-loss consideration for developers and asset owners. India's real estate is entering the regulatory lens traditionally reserved for industries like cement, steel, or thermal power. The reason is simple: real estate is responsible for 38% of global energy-related emissions, and in India, commercial buildings alone consume over 180-220 kWh/sq.m./year. When scaled nationally, this amount is more than the total power usage of Bangladesh or Sri Lanka.
As CCTS evolves, so will the scrutiny around operational performance. Asset valuations will shift accordingly. A JLL India study from 2024 indicated that Grade-A office assets with IGBC or LEED Gold certifications command 8%–11% higher rental yields than their non-compliant peers.
Additionally, buildings with smart meters, rooftop solar, or BMS systems enjoy average energy cost savings of 25%–30%, improving long-term NOI.
Institutional capital is already adapting. Blackstone, Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), and GIC have begun stress-testing Indian real estate assets for ESG compliance. Green premiums are no longer abstract—they show up in deal valuations, especially in REITs. Embassy REIT, for instance, cited its portfolio's 87% green-certified area as a strategic differentiator in its FY24 investor presentation.
Conscious occupiers
Carbon pricing will not only shape asset ownership economics — it will reshape tenant behaviour. Occupiers, particularly global tech, finance, and consulting firms, are setting internal net-zero targets that require emissions tracking across leased spaces. In 2023, over 45% of Fortune 500 companies operating in India required sustainability disclosures from their landlords as part of lease negotiations.
For example, in Bengaluru, a major US-headquartered technology company declined to renew its lease in a premium but non-certified commercial complex, opting instead for a nearby IGBC Platinum-rated building with a 17% higher lease rate. The reason? The new facility allowed for tenant-level emissions monitoring and reporting — a key requirement for their ESG reporting.
This tenant shift is now influencing developers' leasing strategies. Green leases, which include shared responsibility for retrofits and energy savings, are gaining popularity. Landlords who can validate energy consumption in real time and participate in decarbonisation efforts are enjoying higher renewal rates and longer lease tenures. A 2024 survey by Colliers India revealed that 72% of tenants would pay more for spaces aligned with sustainability goals. In the era of carbon pricing, building performance is no longer just an engineering parameter — it's a leasing currency.
Carbon performance is rapidly becoming a differentiator in capital access. Financial institutions in India and globally are integrating climate risk into their underwriting criteria.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in its latest discussion paper, encouraged banks to link risk weights to energy-efficiency performance. For developers, this means that greener buildings will receive more favourable financing terms—and potentially more patient capital.
Indian commercial real estate has already seen green bonds grow from ₹3,500 crore in 2020 to over ₹11,000 crore in 2024. These bonds are increasingly used to fund green-certified projects with demonstrable carbon reductions. Axis Bank, SBI, and HDFC Ltd. now offer green home loan variants with 10-25 bps rate discounts for IGBC/ GRIHA properties.
Moreover, the CCTS introduces the prospect of performance-linked lending. In the EU, banks offer carbon-linked loans where interest rates drop based on verified emissions cuts. This is likely to arrive in India within the next three years. Insurance is also adapting.
No longer theoretical
Delay will prove expensive as carbon costs are no longer theoretical — they're operational. The smartest developers are now stress-testing their entire pipeline for carbon risk. From conceptual stage to post-occupancy, every decision—from facade material to HVAC selection — impacts emissions exposure.
At present, retrofitting a 5-lakh sq.ft. commercial building with solar, VFD pumps, and BMS can cost ₹4 crore–₹6 crore. But with energy savings of 25%-35% and potential carbon credits of 1,500–2,000 tonnes/year, the payback period often falls below five years. In contrast, inaction will soon invite penalties and carbon liabilities exceeding ₹50 lakhs/year for large assets.
Some developers are already adapting. RMZ Corp has integrated whole-life carbon analysis into its project planning. Godrej Properties now includes ESG scoring in site selection and capital allocation. These are no longer niche practices — they are rapidly becoming industry standards. The Bureau of Energy Efficiency has proposed mandatory energy-use disclosures in building sanction processes by 2026. Urban local bodies may soon embed carbon offsets in Floor Area Ratio (FAR) approvals, much like London's boroughs.
In an economy poised to grow and urbanise rapidly, real estate is uniquely positioned to decouple growth from emissions. Those who embrace this transition will access cheaper capital, retain premium tenants, and build portfolios that are future-ready. The carbon clock is ticking — and the smartest in the industry are already ahead of it.
The writer is CEM, CEA, CMVP, EIT, LEED Green Associate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
20 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
When sambar met caviar
The Indian diaspora has become a lot more affluent, and they are seeking luxurious experiences, which include dining on exquisitely created and presented food from their home country.
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
GST rationalisation impact on inflation depends on the effect on CPI components: Bank of Baroda Economist
Chennai, Aug 16 (UNI) The impact of the proposed rationalisation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on inflation would depend on the effect on the consumer price index (CPI) components, said a top economist at Bank of Baroda. He also said the impact on investment will be driven by the final effect on consumption. If consumption increases, it can spur more investment in specific products. The Indian government has announced the idea of having two major GST slabs viz., 5% (merit) and 18% (standard). 'The highest slab of 28% would be abolished and all goods and services in this bracket moved to the 18% rate. 99% of goods in the 12% rate will move to 5%. The balance 1% would go to 18%. The existing 40% rate would hold for tobacco and other sin goods. The exempted and special rates of 0.25% and 3% rate goods would remain unchanged,' Madan Sabnavis, Chief Economist said. 'The impact on inflation would depend on how various components of the CPI index are impacted by the new rates. While it has been projected as lowering the tax burden there can be a tendency for inflation to come down. But the extent will depend on the individual tax rates,' Sabnavis said. However, at the micro level, any reduction in GST as it is expected for goods like hair oil, toothbrush, pencils and others may not exactly increase consumption but will release resources of households that can be spent on other products and services. 'Impact on investment will be driven by the final effect on consumption. If consumption increases, it can spur more investment in specific products,' Sabnavis remarked. Having fewer slabs certainly makes the system simpler and leads to better compliance and removal of ambiguity. But it needs to be seen whether or not the final effect is tax neutral. If movement of goods across slabs provides a net gain on the fiscal side, then it would not change much from the consumption point of view, he said. 'On the whole it has been projected to provide support to consumption which is positive for the consumer goods segments. The ultimate impact has to be gauged from the point of view of fiscal impact given that any restructuring has to be a zero-sum game – if the consumer is to gain, there has to be some let off on the budget. This however, can get corrected once the economy grows at a faster rate in the coming years,' Sabnavis said. The GST Council is to meet in Sept-Oct and deliberate on this proposal. The compensation cess is to be phased out and it is possible that goods and services with 40% slab would take in this effect. UNI VJ GNK
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
"No agreements that would go against the farmers": Shivraj Singh Chouhan on US's demand amid tariff talks
Live Events New Delhi: Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Friday firmly stated that India will not enter into any agreements that could harm the interests of its farmers, emphasising the paramount importance of safeguarding their rights amidst ongoing trade talks with the US, especially regarding the tariff issues in the country's agricultural and dairy a gathering of farmers in the national capital, the Union Minister noted that there were global voices that had shown concern about India's rapid progress, especially in the context of trade agreements and acknowledged that while India seeks to maintain friendly relations and create fair trade agreements with countries across the world, the spirit of these agreements must be grounded in fairness and equality."In our country, the right of the farmer is paramount, and the right of the citizen is paramount. You know, there are many people in the world who are jealous of our progress. 'What if India makes great progress? Make an agreement with them.' We do make agreements because we see the world as one family. But the spirit of agreement is based on fairness, on equality," he highlighted the agreement made with the UK, where Indian agricultural products would be allowed to enter the UK without tariffs, benefiting Indian farmers . However, he was cautious about any potential trade deals that could jeopardise Indian agriculture."We made an agreement with the UK on equal terms so that the produce of our farmers can go to England without any tax. Many agricultural products will now reach England without tax. But if someone suggests an agreement that allows another country's goods to flood our markets, we cannot compete with them," he Union Minister pointed out the disparity in the scale of farming between India and many foreign countries, stating, "Their farms are massive--10,000, 15,000, or even 20,000 hectares--while our farmers often have just one or two acres, or maybe up to five acres, which is rare. There is no comparison."He also warned that an agreement that allows foreign agricultural products to flood Indian markets could severely harm domestic farmers, driving down prices and depriving them of fair returns."If such an agreement happens, it would kill Indian farmers. Cheap foreign produce will flood the market. If we sell our produce at lower prices, farmers will not get a fair return," he a strong reaffirmation of India's stance, Chouhan echoed the words of Prime Minister Narendra Modi , asserting that no agreement would be signed at the expense of Indian farmers."But PM Modi said there will be no agreements that would go against the farmers. Their rights will be paramount," he Prime Minister Narendra Modi while addressing the nation on the 79th Independence Day, reaffirmed his support to protect farmers, saying that he is "standing tall like a wall against policies which are against farmer interest.""If any policy is against India's farmers, fishermen, cattle rearers, Modi is standing like a wall," PM Modi about standing his ground in the era of 'economic selfishness,' he added, "I say this with great experience. Kisi doosre ki lakeer chhoti karne ke liye, apni oorja hamein nahi khaphai. Hamein poori oorja ke saath hamari lakeer ko lamba karna hai. If we do that, the world will admit our strength."These remarks come during a time when India is actively involved in the discussions on the Bilateral Trade Agreement with the US, which the two sides could not conclude due to the American demand to get comprehensive access to the Indian agriculture and dairy US is pressuring India to open its agricultural market and subsequently imposing a 25 per cent additional tariff, with Washington calling it a 'penalty' for buying Russian oil. (ANI)
