logo
Rabo: Even If Iran Does Not Close Hormuz

Rabo: Even If Iran Does Not Close Hormuz

Gulf Insider19 hours ago

The world didn't have to wait long for Donald Trump to make up his mind over bombing Iran's nuclear facilities. Trump last week suggested that he would make a decision 'within the next two weeks', but that appears to have been a case of misdirection with a mission already in train to strike Fordo, Natanz and Esfahan.
Seven B-2 Spirit bombers deployed from Missouri dropped fourteen 30,000lb bunker buster bombs (the world's most powerful non-nuclear weapons) on Fordo and Natanz, while a guided missile submarine hit the Esfahan facility with dozens of Tomahawk missiles. Trump, Hegseth and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs have said that the strikes were an overwhelming success, 'obliterating' the Iran's nuclear program.
Markets are, predictably, in risk-off mode this morning as traders contemplate what comes next, but given the gravity of the event the moves are perhaps surprisingly small.
Brent crude rallied up as far as $81.40/bbl in early trade, but has fallen back below the $80/bbl level at time of writing. The Dollar is again burnishing its credentials as a safe-haven asset with the DXY index up 0.32% to 99.05, equity futures are pointing negative, Bitcoin is lower, sovereign curves are steepening and European gasoil futures are up a little more than 4.5% as markets again judge that Europe stands to be a loser on the energy front.
Interestingly, spot gold has reversed earlier gains to be down $14/oz at time of writing following news that Iran has been liquidating reserves in a dash for liquidity. Keep an eye on the SOFR fix.
Global Strategist Michael Every, writes
'While the U.S. may now prefer to reopen negotiations with Iran, the latter is in no mood to do so.
Iran's parliament has voted to close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for the U.S. strike on its nuclear programme, with the final decision resting with their national security council.
This would be unprecedented; economically ruinous for them; and for the world; almost impossible for them to do, as is; would ensure almost everyone who can would confront them to reopen the Strait; but… it's likely to see war insurance risk soar, and therefore push oil & LNG prices far higher.
All the usual 'rational' market voices are saying Iran won't do it when they are a regime that in the past specialised in suicide bombings and are here threatening an economic suicide bomb.
And as U.S. Secretary of State Rubio said: 'I would urge the Chinese government in Beijing to pick up the phone and talk to them. China relies heavily on oil that passes through the Strait of Hormuz. If Iran takes that step, it would be a serious mistake and a massive escalation,' who could last out a 30-day (for example) de facto closure of Hormuz better? Those with strategic reserves, like China, or those with much less, like Europe?
Russia is also threatening 'some countries' could send Iran nuclear weapons. It's a short short-list, and Russia and Iran will meet today – will this be on the agenda? Again, it seems unlikely as it would be unprecedented and could potentially even take us to the edge of a new Cuban Missile Crisis – but fat tail risks are evident.
So, how this all ends is still very much in the balance: regional peace — as Israel says 90% of Iran's enriched uranium was destroyed, it could stand down if Iran does, and the door has been opened to more Abraham Accords deals — or a wider war
Ridiculously, ahead of this week's key NATO summit, Spain claims it's secured an opt-out from spending 5% of GDP on defence. How? Who else will claim the same because shifting spending priorities or borrowing or trading more 'is unreasonable'? And this is just as Spain is shown as vulnerable to a closure of Hormuz as anyone else – and yet won't be able to contribute much to either this or any future geopolitical crisis if it doesn't spend more. What will the political ramifications then be?
This is also just after the FT ran an op-ed from an Eurocrat arguing Europe now has the chance to build itself in its own image thanks to Trump's hardball politics. Yes, all Europe has to do is build: a true single market; a capital market; a military; energy independence with no energy; its own tech firms; and globalise the Euro and get its own markets off the dollar – in a contested world where others would rather Europe fail than succeed; as
The Telegraph talks of how the 'naive' U.K. government thinks its domestic levers of power still work, but don't, let alone the international ones.''
With so many moving parts and the sense of more shoes to drop in central Asia, it's likely to be a volatile week ahead. All eyes will be trained on the Middle East for signs of Iranian strikes on US regional bases, or any attempts to impede energy flows through Hormuz.
Also read: Widespread GPS Jamming Across Strait Of Hormuz; Six Supertankers Perform Abrupt U-Turns

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran attacks US airbase in Qatar; missiles successfully intercepted
Iran attacks US airbase in Qatar; missiles successfully intercepted

Daily Tribune

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Tribune

Iran attacks US airbase in Qatar; missiles successfully intercepted

AFP | Doha said yesterday the security situation was 'stable' following an Iranian missile attack that targeted a US airbase on its territory in retaliation for American attacks on Iran key nuclear sites. 'The Ministry of Interior confirms... that the security situation in the country is stable, and there is no cause for concern,' the government said in a statement. This came moments after Iran launched missiles yesterday evening at a major US airbase in Qatar — Al Udeid Air Base — with explosions ringing out in Doha and projectiles seen streaking overhead. Qatar, which is home to the largest US military facility in the Middle East, said its 'air defences successfully intercepted a missile attack targeting Al Udeid Air Base'. US President Donald Trump shrugged off the response as 'very weak' and said it was now time to make peace. He said Iran gave warning of the missile salvo, indicating that it wanted to avoid casualties. Right to respond Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari said his country 'reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportional to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression'. Condemnation Regional neighbours strongly condemned Tehran's attack 'in the strongest terms', which constitutes a flagrant violation of Qatari sovereignty and a clear breach of international law and the United Nations Charter. They offered 'all their capabilities to support the sisterly State of Qatar in any measures it takes'. Diplomacy UN chief Antonio Guterres condemned Iran's attack and urged again for diplomacy to end the conflict between Iran and Israel, his spokesman said. 'From the outset of the crisis, the Secretary-General has repeatedly condemned any military escalation in this conflict, including today's attack by Iran on the territory of Qatar,' spokesman Stephane Dujarric said in a statement. Guterres 'further reiterates his call on all parties to stop fighting,' he added. GCC Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Secretary-General Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi, described the act as a serious violation of Qatari sovereignty and a threat to the collective security of the Gulf region. He emphasised that any attack on a GCC member state is an attack on the entire Council, reiterating the bloc's unified stance in standing with Qatar against any threat to its territorial integrity and national security. The Arab Parliament called it a clear and unacceptable violation of Qatari sovereignty and international law. It also urged against further escalation and the spread of conflict in the region.

Bahrain Welcomes Iran-Israel Ceasefire Agreement Announced by Trump
Bahrain Welcomes Iran-Israel Ceasefire Agreement Announced by Trump

Daily Tribune

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Tribune

Bahrain Welcomes Iran-Israel Ceasefire Agreement Announced by Trump

The Kingdom of Bahrain has welcomed the announcement made by U.S. President Donald Trump regarding a full and comprehensive ceasefire agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Israel. In a statement issued on Monday, Bahrain's Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the agreement as a 'positive development' that could help end the ongoing conflict and pave the way toward regional peace and stability. The Ministry reaffirmed Bahrain's firm stance on avoiding escalation and resolving disputes through dialogue and peaceful means. It also stressed the importance of swiftly resuming U.S.–Iran negotiations over the Iranian nuclear file, expressing hope that such steps would enhance regional and global security. Bahrain concluded its statement by expressing optimism that all parties involved will honor and uphold the terms of the agreement.

Where is Iran's uranium? Questions abound after US strikes
Where is Iran's uranium? Questions abound after US strikes

Daily Tribune

time14 hours ago

  • Daily Tribune

Where is Iran's uranium? Questions abound after US strikes

After President Donald Trump bragged US strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear capabilities, officials cautioned it was still too soon to assess the impact on the country's nuclear programme. Many questions remain after Sunday's strikes, especially about the whereabouts of Iran's sensitive stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 percent -- a short step from the 90 percent required for a nuclear weapon. Where is Iran's enriched uranium? The US attacks, carried out by B-2 stealth bombers, targeted three Iranian nuclear sites: Isfahan and Iran's main enrichment plants in Fordo and Natanz. While significant damage has been reported, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has voiced concern about Iran's stockpile of near-weaponsgrade uranium. Tehran has an estimated 408.6 kilogrammes of uranium enriched to 60 percent, according to the UN nuclear watchdog, whose inspectors last saw that stockpile on June 10. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. IAEA head Rafael Grossi on Monday demanded access to Iran's nuclear sites, saying the agency needs to 'account for' t h e u r a n i u m stockpile. C o n c e r n s about the fate of the sensitive stockpile have loomed large. On June 13, the day Israel began its Iran offensive, Ira - n i - a n Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the IAEA, announcing the implementation of 'special measures to protect nuclear equipment and material'. Days before the US attacked, satellite imagery showed vehicles near Fordo's entrance. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had 'interesting intelligence' on the matter, declining to elaborate. Israel announced Monday it had carried out strikes to block access routes to Fordo. 'It will be difficult if not impossible to track down all of Iran's 60 percent enriched uranium, stored in small canisters that are easily transportable by car,' Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association, told AFP. 'They (Iranians) no longer have the capacity to turn that stockpile of highly enriched uranium to weapons-grade uranium, and that was really the goal there,' US Vice President JD Vance told ABC News. He added the Trump administration would deal with the uranium 'in the coming weeks'. Can Iran still make a nuclear bomb? Analysts have been treading carefully when addressing this issue. Before the attacks, Iran had about 22,000 centrifuges -- the machines used to enrich uranium. Many of them were damaged when Natanz was hit, the IAEA head said. Grossi also said 'very significant damage' is expected to have occurred at Fordo, 'given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges'. Experts however say that it is unclear how many centrifuges Iran has, with some of them believed to be stored at unknown locations. With '60 percent enriched uranium and a few hundred advanced centrifuges, Iran still has the capability to weaponise, and now there is more political impetus to dash for a bomb', said Davenport. What are the proliferation risks? Before the conflict, the IAEA said it had 'no indication' of the existence of a 'systematic programme' in Iran to produce a nuclear weapon. But without access to nuclear sites, the agency no longer has oversight. Grossi warned Monday that the 'global non-proliferation regime that has underpinned international security... could crumble and fall', urging parties to return to diplomacy. Iran ratified the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT) in 1970, committing it to declare its nuclear material to the IAEA. But it has recently begun preparing the grounds for a possible withdrawal from the treaty, accusing the agency of acting as a 'partner' in Israel's 'war of aggression'. Reza Najafi, Iran's ambassador to the IAEA, said Monday the 'unlawful act of aggression' by the United States had 'delivered a fundamental and irreparable blow' to the non-proliferation regime. 'I do think there is a major risk that Iran withdraws from the NPT and expels inspectors, or simply does not provide them with access to key sites,' said Eric Brewer of the US research institute Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI). He added that Iran could also 'over time, build (a) covert' programme like North Korea, which withdrew from the NPT in 2003 and went on to become a nucle - ar-armed power.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store