UK Navy's dubious first in 500 years, Admiral Ben Key sacked for sex with subordinate
, the former First Sea Lord and head of the
Royal Navy
, has been dismissed from service following a misconduct inquiry into an extramarital affair with a subordinate officer. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed that he has lost his rank but will retain his pension. The sacking marks the first time in 500 years that a First Sea Lord has faced dismissal due to misconduct.
Sir Ben, 59, was suspended in May 2025 after allegations emerged of a relationship with a female subordinate. The complaint reportedly came from the officer's husband and invited a formal investigation.
In a statement, the MoD said, 'Following a full investigation, Admiral Sir
Ben
Key's behaviour has been found to have fallen far short of the values and standards expected of service personnel. This has resulted in the termination of service and his commission.'
A distinguished naval career ends in disgrace
Sir Ben joined the Royal Navy in 1984 as a university cadet. Over the years, he qualified as a helicopter aircrew and a Principal Warfare Officer.
Live Events
He commanded several vessels, including HMS Sandown, HMS Iron Duke, HMS Lancaster, and the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious.
He rose to First Sea Lord in 2021. He led major operations including 'Operation Pitting', the UK's evacuation from Afghanistan, and 'Operation Prosperity Guardian' to protect maritime routes in the Red Sea. In 2016, he was knighted and awarded the KCB (Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath).
Sir Ben was scheduled to retire this summer before the inquiry disrupted his plans. He has been the head of the Royal Navy since 2021.
In recorded history, a similar incident was in December 1917 when Admiral of the Fleet John Jellicoe was dismissed (asked to resign) from his position, though that was as Commander-in-Chief of the Grand Fleet, not First Sea Lord.
Personal statement and apology
In a statement after his dismissal, Sir Ben said: 'Serving as First Sea Lord has been one of the greatest privileges of my life, and I pay tribute to the dedicated and professional officers, sailors, Royal Marines and civil servants who make up the Royal Navy.'
He sincerely regretted his actions from the previous spring, stating that they did not meet the standards he held for himself or for the Royal Navy. Consequently, he fully accepted the decision of the Defence Council.
Apologizing to his close ones, he said, 'I am very sorry to those I have hurt personally, and I apologise to everyone who serves with the Royal Navy. I am very grateful for the support of my wife, family, and friends during a very difficult time.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
a day ago
- Deccan Herald
Afghan data breach: Britain spies, special forces identities leaked
The leak by the Ministry of Defence in early 2022, which surfaced on Facebook a year later, prompted the relocation of more than 16,000 Afghans to Britain as of May this year amid concerns that they would face deadly reprisals from the Taliban.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a day ago
- First Post
After Afghans, over 100 British spies exposed due to 'mistakenly shared' details
The leak came to light after a High Court judge in London lifted a rare and sweeping injunction on Tuesday that had previously barred any reporting on an email inadvertently sent by a Ministry of Defence official in February 2022 read more A data leak has exposed the identities of several British spies linked to the UK's operation in Myanmar Sindoor A data leak that led to thousands of Afghans being resettled in the United Kingdom after assisting Western forces against the Taliban also exposed the identities of British spies and special forces personnel, news outlets reported on Thursday (July 17). British media said the names of more than 100 individuals, including special forces troops, MI6 intelligence officers, and senior military officials, were among the details mistakenly shared. A person familiar with the matter confirmed to The Associated Press that 'a small number of special forces personnel' names were leaked. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The leak came to light after a High Court judge in London lifted a rare and sweeping injunction on Tuesday that had previously barred any reporting on an email inadvertently sent by a Ministry of Defence official in February 2022. The email contained personal data of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to resettle in the UK under a scheme for those at risk of Taliban retaliation. These Afghans, many of whom had worked as interpreters, fixers, or served in the Afghan National Army, applied under a relocation programme due to fears they would face persecution. The British government only became aware of the leak 18 months later, when some of the data appeared on Facebook posted by an individual who threatened to release the full list. A classified effort to urgently relocate affected Afghans to the UK was launched in response. When High Court Judge Martin Chamberlain lifted the 'super injunction'– which had even prohibited reporting on its own existence– he permitted reporting on the Afghan applicants. However, his initial ruling barred the publication of information indicating that British military and intelligence figures were also on the list. News organisations sought to amend that restriction after The Sun tabloid, which was not a party to the legal proceedings and therefore not subject to the injunction, published details that British identities had also been exposed. The blunder has become a political scandal, largely because of the government's efforts to suppress information while quietly relocating thousands of people. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On Tuesday (July 15), Defence Secretary John Healey apologised in Parliament on behalf of the government. He confirmed that 'a small number of names of people who supported the applications, including members of Parliament, senior military officers and government officials,' were on the list. So far, about 4,500 Afghans (900 applicants and 3,600 of their family members) have been relocated under the scheme. The total is expected to reach nearly 6,900 before the programme concludes, at a cost of approximately £850 million ($1.1 billion). Officials said they would close the programme following an independent review, which concluded that the leak likely did not increase the Taliban's awareness of those who had cooperated with Western forces. The review noted that the Taliban had alternative means of identifying such individuals. Nonetheless, critics said the breach endangered the lives of thousands of Afghans who had supported British operations. Sean Humber, a lawyer who has represented affected Afghan clients, described the breach as 'catastrophic' and said it had caused 'anxiety, fear and distress' to those involved. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD British troops were first deployed to Afghanistan in the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. At their peak, nearly 10,000 UK service members were stationed in the country, primarily in Helmand province. Britain ended combat operations in 2014, and its last forces withdrew in 2021 amid the Taliban's rapid return to power. The militant group's takeover prompted a chaotic international evacuation of foreign nationals and Afghan allies. With inputs from AP
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
Who are Syria's Druze, caught in sectarian clashes and Israeli strikes?
Israel has launched air strikes in southern Syria after days of intense clashes between Druze militias and Sunni Bedouin fighters in the province of Suweida, according to several media reports. Fighting broke out on July 13 following the reported abduction of a Druze merchant, triggering violence that has left at least 350 people dead, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). On July 15, Israel said its military stepped in to protect the Druze community and eliminate pro-government forces accused of attacking them. The strikes initially targeted Syrian security forces and military vehicles in Suweida but expanded the following day to include the Ministry of Defence and army headquarters in Damascus. Syrian authorities have condemned the attacks. Who are the Druze, caught between Damascus and militias? The Druze community, who represent about 3 per cent of Syria's population, have historically operated local militias in southern regions, resisting integration into national forces. Since the fall of former president Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, many Druze factions have opposed the new government's attempts to assert authority over Suweida. Syria's current leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, has pledged to safeguard the country's minorities. However, the SOHR has documented incidents of government forces attacking Druze civilians, including reports of summary executions, fuelling mistrust between the community and Damascus, according to a BBC report. The current violence in Suweida is the first major unrest in the Druze-majority region since fighting between Druze militias and Syrian security forces in April and May. Combined with Israeli air strikes, the clashes highlight Syria's fragile security landscape following over a decade of civil conflict and the Islamist-led takeover of Damascus in December 2024. Israeli military escalation in Syria the largest since December 2024 The latest strikes are Israel's most significant military escalation in Syria since December 2024, when it carried out extensive operations across Syrian territory and seized a United Nations buffer zone in the Golan Heights. Israeli officials said their primary goal is to prevent Syrian army deployments near its northern border and establish a demilitarised zone in southern Syria, citing concerns over Islamist fighter presence near the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. In recent months, Israel has attempted to build relations with Syria's minority groups, specifically the Druze, Kurds, and Alawites. Israel's officials have depicted the state as a defender of minorities in the region amid Syria's on-going instability. On the contrary, some Druze leaders in Syria and Lebanon claim that Israel promotes sectarian divisions to achieve its own strategic ends in the region. As Ahmed al-Sharaa's government implements strategies to stabilise the country, sectarian standoffs and foreign involvement pose a threat to reconstruction and state-building. Analysts are of the opinion that Israel will likely have a suspicious view of Syria's new Islamist-aligned leadership and continue military actions against the Syrian government while promoting alliances with marginalised groups in southern Syria.
