I drove this Chinese EV and it's just another example of the trouble Tesla is in
The MG4 is one of the most popular EVs in the UK.
The Chinese-made car is stylish, well-appointed, and keenly priced making it a danger to Tesla.
The XPower version I tested is extremely fast and has some nice touches, but failed to excite.
One of Britain's most quintessential sports car brands has been Chinese-owned for many years — and after driving one of its best-selling cars, I could see the kind of innovation combined with competitive pricing that has Western automakers so worried.
MG was founded in Oxford in 1924 and its cars have appeared in countless films and TV shows, driven by stars from Elvis to Audrey Hepburn.
MGs were sold in the US until 1980, but their then-owner withdrew from the market amid financial difficulties. Things never really improved, and in 2005, MG Rover was bought by China's SAIC, although production continued in the UK until 2016.
The MG badge never disappeared from British showrooms and the Chinese-made cars have become increasingly popular there. The brand notched up record sales of just over 81,000 vehicles last year, putting MG in 10th place for registrations, with a market share of almost 4.2%. About one in four MGs sold were electric.
The MG4 hatchback was the fourth best-selling EV in the UK last year and was the second most popular model with private (as opposed to fleet) buyers.
Part of the appeal is probably down to the prices, which range from £27,000 (just under $35,000) — about £13,000 less than the cheapest Tesla in the UK and about the same as a BYD Dolphin — through to £36,500 (about $47,000.)
So what's the MG4 like to drive? I had the most expensive XPower version, which promises 0 to 62 miles an hour in 3.8 seconds from the 64kWh battery — half the time the long-range model takes. (A test by What Car? got the Xpower to 60mph in just 3.6 seconds — faster, they say, than a Porsche Taycan 4S.)
It also boasts all-wheel drive, enhanced brakes, launch control ,and has a claimed maximum driving range of between 239 miles on the WLTP measure, and 328 miles in the city.
I rather liked the shade of matte green, although the styling may not win any design awards. As far as Chinese EVs go, it could be much worse. The flashy alloy wheels with orange brake calipers are a nice touch.
Inside, the seven-inch screen behind the (leather-clad) steering wheel is complemented by a larger, wider central screen with entertainment and navigation options.
I was pleased to find a row of good, old-fashioned physical buttons for volume, fan, and hazard lights. However, connecting my iPhone to the sound system was a fiddlier experience than it needed to be.
I took the MG4 south of London one gloomy Sunday to a scenic spot called Box Hill. Unlike other cars I've driven for BI, it did not scold me the moment I exceeded the speed limit by even 1 mile an hour — a blessed relief given many roads have a 20 mph limit. More bonus brownie points. It's a breeze to drive, and as I suggested above it goes like the clappers when required (on the freeway, of course.)
Other than delivering boy-racer levels of acceleration, that's about the only relation to the MGs of yesteryear and this "hot hatch" is hard to get too excited about. Given that it's almost certain to never go on sale in the US, you probably won't have to grapple with that dilemma.
If I was in the market for an EV this size, I'm not convinced the XPower would make my shortlist (and that was before I learned the MG4 performed very poorly in What Car?'s annual reliability survey.)
No matter what I think, the MG is likely to attract some buyers who might previously have considered a Tesla Model Y, which is almost £18k more.
The MG4 has very respectable range, a decent amount of trunk space — and you could fit three adults in the back as long as they really like each other.
It may start at about £56,000 and only has two seats, but I think the real star of MG's European model range may be the stunning Cyberster roadster.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

24 minutes ago
Critical minerals give China an edge in trade negotiations
GANZHOU, China -- China's dominance over critical minerals in global supply chains was a powerful bargaining chip in trade talks between Beijing and Washington that concluded with both sides saying they have a framework to pursue a deal. China has spent decades building the world's main industrial chain for mining and processing such materials, which are used in many industries such as electronics, advanced manufacturing, defense and health care. Mines and factories in and around Ganzhou, a key production hub for rare earths, underpin China's control over the minerals. Many residents grew up collecting rocks containing the valuable minerals from the forested hills surrounding the southern city and today make a living from mining, trading or processing them. Responding to ever higher tariffs and other controls on advanced technology, China told exporters of certain key rare earths and other critical minerals to obtain licenses for every shipment abroad. Approvals can take weeks, leading to supply chain disruptions in the U.S. and other countries. President Donald Trump said Wednesday that China would make it easier for American industry to obtain much-needed needed magnets and rare earth minerals, clearing the way for talks to continue between the world's two biggest economies. In return, Trump said, the U.S. will stop efforts to revoke the visas of Chinese nationals on U.S. college campuses. But details remain scarce. Beijing has not confirmed what the negotiators agreed to, and Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump himself have yet to sign off on it. The Chinese Commerce Ministry said Saturday it had approved a 'certain number' of export licenses for rare earth products, apparently acknowledging Trump's personal request to Xi during a phone call last week. And on Wednesday, the Ganzhou-based rare-earth conglomerate JL MAG Rare-Earth Co. confirmed it had obtained some export licenses for shipments to destinations including the U.S., Europe and Southeast Asia. Experts say, however, Beijing is unlikely to do away with the permit system enabling it to control access to those valuable resources. The only scenario in which China might deregulate its critical minerals export is if the U.S. first fully removes tariffs imposed on Chinese goods as part of the trade war, said Wang Yiwei, a professor of international affairs at Renmin University, echoing the Chinese government's earlier stance. 'Without that,' he said, 'it will be difficult to blame China for continuing to strengthen its export controls.' In 1992, Deng Xiaoping, the leader who launched China's ascent as the world's biggest manufacturing power, famously said 'the Middle East has oil, China has rare earths,' signaling a desire to leverage access to the key minerals. Several generations later, Beijing has made its rich reserves of rare earths, a group of 17 minerals that are abundant in the earth's crust but hard, expensive and environmentally polluting to process, a key element of China's economic security. In 2019, during a visit to a rare earth processing plant in Ganzhou, Xi described rare earths as a 'vital strategic resource.' China today has an essential monopoly over 'heavy rare earths,' used for making powerful, heat-resistance magnets used in industries such as defense and electric vehicles. The country also produces around 80% of the world's tungsten, gallium and antimony, and 60% of the world's germanium -– all minerals used in the making of semiconductors, among other advanced technologies. The risks of dependency on Chinese suppliers first came into focus in 2010, when Beijing suspended rare earths exports to Japan due to a territorial dispute. The ban was lifted after about two months, but as a precaution, Japan invested in rare earths processing plants in other countries and began stockpiling the materials. Beijing's across-the-board requirement for export licenses for some critical minerals has put pressure on world electronics manufacturers and automakers. Some auto parts makers in Europe have shut down production lines due to delays in supply deliveries, according to the European Association of Automotive Suppliers. In the U.S., Tesla CEO Elon Musk said a shortage of rare earths is affecting his company's work on humanoid robots. In the drab industrial hub of Ganzhou, cradled by the scenic Dayu Mountains, the U.S.-China trade war is still a distant stressor. Miners and small mineral traders interviewed by The Associated Press said they are more concerned about depleting the mountains' once-abundant resources. Zhong, a tungsten factory manager in Ganzhou who would only give his last name, worked his way up to manager from a miner, but he's unsure there is a future for him and others in the industry. 'I find growing difficulties to source tungsten these days,' he said, adding that smaller mines and trading companies are slowly disappearing as the resources are dwindling. Tungsten is an ultra-hard metal used in armor-piercing ammunition, nuclear reactors and semiconductors. At least five tungsten mines have closed in the area in recent years, according to state media. Remaining reserves are deeper and harder to extract and process after decades of exploitation, said Li Shangkui, chairman of the Ganzhou-based Jiangxi Yuean Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. Processing factories in Ganzhou now routinely source materials from other provinces or other countries. Zhong's plant imports some raw materials from places like Africa and Cambodia. Major state-owned and private companies in Ganzhou are also ramping up investments abroad. Tungsten producer Ganzhou Haisheng, for instance, announced last year a $25 million investment in a new tungsten plant in Thailand. Whatever the challenges in procuring raw materials, China likely will seek to maintain its dominance in critical minerals, said Fabian Villalobos, an engineer and critical minerals expert at the RAND think tank. Between 2020 and 2023, the U.S. imported at least 70% of the rare earth compounds it used from China, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. It has diversified its sources in recent years, but still mainly relies on China. Since beginning his second term in office, Trump has made improving access to critical minerals a matter of national security. But the U.S. has an incredibly long way to go to catch up with China, experts say. The sole operational U.S. rare earths mine, in Mountain Pass, California, is unable to separate heavy rare earths. It sends its ore to China for processing. The U.S. Defense Department has provided funding to the mine's owner, MP Materials, to build new separation facilities. It will take months to build and still only produce a fraction of what is needed. Friction over the issue has opened the way for government-backed financing that was unavailable before, said Mark Smith, who ran the Mountain Pass mine in the early 2010s and now leads NioCorp. It's seeking about $780 million in financing through the U.S. Export-Import Bank to build a processing facility in Nebraska for critical minerals including rare earths. The Defense Department has committed $439 million to building domestic rare earth supply chains, but building a complete mining and processing industrial chain like China's could take decades. 'There are going to be some real issues here unless we can figure out how to get along with China for a period of time while we're developing our own resources and our mainstream processing,' Smith said. The spotlight on critical minerals also provides opportunities for smaller miners to invest in extracting and processing some critical minerals, such as tungsten, considered 'niche' because they are needed in relatively small amounts in key industries, said Milo McBride, an expert on sustainability and geopolitics at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'For many of these companies, the business strategy hedges on a scenario where the U.S. and China become more confrontational and where trade relations become more uncomfortable,' McBride said. 'And all of a sudden, what was once an uneconomic project somewhere outside of China starts to make more sense.'


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Reacts to Trump Review of Nuclear Submarine Deal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China reiterated its opposition to the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal after the Trump Administration said it is reviewing the defense agreement to ensure it fits with its "America First" agenda. AUKUS is a partnership between the U.S., U.K., and Australia centered on developing nuclear-powered attack submarines that will expand patrols of the Pacific by Western allies. The deal, agreed in 2021, is worth $240 billion and is now under scrutiny by the Pentagon, led by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. "China has made clear more than once its position on the so-called trilateral security partnership between the U.S., U.K., and Australia, designed to advance cooperation on nuclear submarines and other cutting-edge military technologies," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a briefing on Thursday. "We oppose manufacturing bloc confrontations and anything that amplifies the risk of nuclear proliferation and exacerbates the arms race." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sterling ticks lower ahead of closely watched UK spending review
By Lucy Raitano (Reuters) -Sterling fell against a firmer dollar on Wednesday, as markets geared up for a multi-year UK spending review due later in the day from British finance minister Rachel Reeves, who is set to reveal how public spending will be divided up. The pound was last down 0.2% versus the dollar at $1.3472, and was weaker against the euro, which rose 0.1% to 84.68 pence. The dollar edged up against a range of currencies after U.S. and Chinese trade representatives wrapped up two days of talks in London where they agreed on a framework to bring their tariff truce back on track. Reeves will set out the allocation of around 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public spending, with plans for allocations for research and development, public transport, a new nuclear power station, nuclear submarines and prisons already announced. "When it comes to day-to-day spending, there's still probably not enough cash to go around, so more money would need to be found in the autumn budget," said Francesco Pesole, FX strategist at ING. "The take-away for markets today will simply be confirmation that there is very little fiscal headroom." The only risk for sterling would come from changes in the gilt market, which can be more sensitive to anything related to UK budgets, Pesole said. Sterling has soared almost 8% in 2025 and is not far off a three-year high of $1.3593 hit on May 26 with trade jitters and wariness over the global economic outlook underpinning dollar weakness. Meanwhile, the fact that Britain is the only country to strike a trade agreement with the U.S. has lent support to the pound. But the outlook for the British economy remains murky. Jobs data on Tuesday showed pay growth slowed sharply and unemployment rose to its highest level in nearly four years in the three months to April. The Bank of England is still expected to keep rates on hold at next week's meeting, with markets placing a 90% likelihood on that outcome. Commerzbank analysts said in a note the jobs data showed the UK's real economy is not as stable as suggested by stronger than expected first-quarter growth figures published last month. Also complicating the picture was a hotter-than-expected inflation print for April, which at the time dampened the prospect of a delay to cuts from the BoE. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data